EcoHealth

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 164–171

Pharmaceutical Contaminants in Potable Water: Potential Concerns for Pregnant Women and Children

Original Contribution

Abstract

There has been increasing concern of late over measurable levels of pharmaceutical contaminants in drinking water. Because most data on water contaminants pertains to aquatic organisms, we wished to assess the risk of these contaminants to human health at currently reported levels. Unlike most other chemicals, there are large amounts of information for the effects of most pharmaceuticals to humans and the current model uses the clinical dose required to cause biological effects as an endpoint to assess risks for pregnant women, children, and the healthy adult population. Twenty-six drugs have been detected in water systems worldwide: 7 in drinking water, 16 in ground water and post-treatment effluent, and 3 in both. Current water treatment practices, clearly, do not always remove pharmaceutical residues. Although healthy adults are unlikely to be adversely affected at the levels of exposure reported, children were shown to have up to eightfold higher risk and may be exposed to several drugs that are contraindicated or not established for safe use in pediatric medicine. The time taken to ingest a single clinically used dose was 3.4–34,000 years. In addition, pregnant women may be exposed to several drugs that are teratogenic (range of % single doses ingested over 36 weeks was 0.0006–12.6%) and in the post-natal period to drugs that are not recommended during breastfeeding. Albeit at low levels, the exposure of pregnant women and children to contraindicated drugs through drinking water is of concern. Further research in this area should focus on integrated ecological and human health consequences of long-term, low-level exposure to pharmaceutical contaminants, particularly in pregnancy and childhood.

Keywords

Pharmacology environmental toxicology risk-exposure model pediatrics developmental 

References

  1. Aherne G, Briggs R (1989) The relevance of the presence of certain synthetic steroids in the aquatic environment. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 41:735–736Google Scholar
  2. Aherne G, English J, Marks V (1985) The role of immunoassay in the analysis of microcontaminants in river samples. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 9:79–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aherne G, Hardcastle H, Nield A (1990) Cytotoxic drugs and the aquatic environment: estimation of bleomycin in river and water samples. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 42:741–742Google Scholar
  4. Briggs G, Freeman R, Yaffe S (2005) Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & WilkinsGoogle Scholar
  5. Brunton LL, Lazo JS, Parke KL (2006) Goodman and Gilman’s Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, New York: McGraw-Hill ProfessionalGoogle Scholar
  6. Daughton C (2001) Pharmaceuticals in the environment: overarching issues and overview. In: Daughton CG, Jones-Lepp T (editors) Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in the Environment: Scientific and Regulatory Issues, Symposium series 791. Columbus, OH: ACS pp 2–38Google Scholar
  7. Halling-Sorensen B, Nielsen SN, Lanzky P, Ingerslev F, Lutzheft H, Jorgensen S (1998) Occurrence, fate and effects of pharmaceutical substances in the environment: a review. Chemosphere 36:357–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hayes T, Collins A, Lee M, Mendoza M, Noriega N, Stuart A, et al. (2002) Hermaphroditic, demasculinized frogs after exposure to the herbicide atrazine at low ecologically relevant doses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99:5476–5480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heberer T, Stan H (1996) Occurrence of polar organic contaminants in Berlin drinking water [in German; abstract in English]. Vom Wasser 86:19–31Google Scholar
  10. Holm J, Rugge K, Bjerg P, Christensen T (1995) Occurrence and distribution of pharmaceutical organic compounds in the groundwater downgradient of a landfill (Grindsted, Denmark). Environmental Science and Technology 29:1415–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones O, Lester J, Voulvoulis N (2005) Pharmaceuticals: a threat to drinking water? Trends in Biotechnology 23:163–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lam L, Leung D (1988) More on simplified calculation of body-surface area [letter]. New England Journal of Medicine 318:1130Google Scholar
  13. Mahler R, Simmons R, Sorensen F, Miner J (2004) Priority water issues in the Pacific Northwest. Journal of Extension 42Google Scholar
  14. Martindale JEF Reynolds (1996) Martindale’s Extra Pharmacopoeia, London: The Pharmaceutical PressGoogle Scholar
  15. National Center for Health Statistics and CDC (2000a) 2 to 20 Years: Boys Stature-for-Age and Weight-for-Age Percentiles, Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  16. National Center for Health Statistics and CDC (2000b) 2 to 20 Years: Girls Stature-for-Age and Weight-for-Age Percentiles, Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  17. Richardson M, Bowron J (1985) The fate of pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment—a review. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 37:1–12Google Scholar
  18. Stackelberg P, Furlong E, Meyer M, Zaugg S, Henderson A, Reissman D (2004) Persistence of pharmaceutical compounds and other organic wastewater contaminants in a conventional drinking-water-treatment plant. Science of the Total Environment 329:99–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Steger-Hartmann T, Kummerer K, Schecker J (1996) Trace analysis of the antineoplastics ifosfamide and cyclophosphamide in sewage water by two-step solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A 726Google Scholar
  20. Tauber R (2003) Quantitative Analysis of Pharmaceuticals in Drinking Water from Ten Canadian Cities, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: Xeno-test division, Enviro-Test LaboratoriesGoogle Scholar
  21. Ternes T (2001) Pharmaceuticals and metabolites as contaminators of the aquatic environment. In: Daughton CG, Jones-Lepp T (editors) Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in the Environment: Scientific and Regulatory Issues, Symposium series 791. Columbus, OH: ACS, p 39–54Google Scholar
  22. Thomson I (2006) The Physicians Desk Reference, Montvale, NJ: Thomson PDRGoogle Scholar
  23. Villanueva C, Durand G, Coutte M, Chevrier C, Cordier S (2005) Atrazine in municipal drinking water and risk of low birth weight, preterm delivery, and small-for-gestational-age status. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 62:400–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Webb S, Ternes T, Gibert M, Olejniczak K (2003) Indirect human exposure to pharmaceuticals via drinking water. Toxicology Letters 142:157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Westerhoff P, Yoon Y, Snyder S, Wert E (2005) Fate of endocrine disruptor pharmaceutical, and personal care product chemicals during simulated drinking water treatment processes. Environmental Science and Technology 39:6649–6663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zuccato E, Calamari D, Natangelo M, Fanelli R (2000) Presence of therapeutic drugs in the environment. Lancet 355:1789–1790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zuhlke S, Dunnbier U, Heberer T (2004) Detection and identification of phenazone-type drugs and their microbial metabolites in ground and drinking water applying solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection. Journal of Chromatography A 1050:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ecohealth Journal Consortium 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Tropical MedicineMedical Microbiology and Pharmacology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Biosciences 320-3HonoluluUnited States

Personalised recommendations