EcoHealth

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 255–261 | Cite as

Linking Human and Ecosystem Health: The Benefits of Community Involvement in Conservation Groups

Original Contributions

Abstract

This study explored the health, well-being, and social capital benefits gained by community members who are involved in the management of land for conservation in six rural communities across Victoria. A total of 102 people participated in the study (64 males; 38 females) comprising 51 members of a community-based land management group and 51 controls matched by age and gender. Mixed methods were employed, including the use of an adapted version of Buckner’s (1988) Community Cohesion Scale. The results indicate that involvement in the management of land for conservation may contribute to both the health and well-being of members, and to the social capital of the local community. The members of the land management groups rated their general health higher, reported visiting the doctor less often, felt safer in the local community, and utilized the skills that they have acquired in their lifetime more frequently than the control participants. Male members reported the highest level of general health, and the greatest satisfaction with daily activities. Members also reported a greater sense of belonging to the local community and a greater willingness to work toward improving their community than their control counterparts. Of equal importance is evidence that involvement in voluntary conservation work constitutes a means of building social capital in rural communities which may help reduce some of the negative aspects of rural life.

Key words

conservation community health well-being social capital 

References

  1. Ansari MZ, Henderson T, Ackland M, Sundararajan V (2003) Congestive heart failure: urban and rural perspectives in Victoria. Australian Journal of Rural Health 11:266–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bollman, RD (1998) Human capital and human development: What are the linkages? Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario Google Scholar
  3. Buckner JC (1988) The development of an instrument to measure neighbourhood cohesion. American Journal of Community Psychology 16:771–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burls A, Cann W (2004) Networking. Social exclusion and embracement: a helpful concept. Primary Health Care Research and Development 5:191–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chivian E (2001) Environment and health: 7. Species loss and ecosystem disruption—the implications for human health. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal 164:66–70Google Scholar
  6. Curtis A (2000) Exploring landcare from a voluntary perspective. Rural Society 10:47–61Google Scholar
  7. Department of Human Services: Victoria (2000) The Victorian Burden of Disease Study, Melbourne, Australia: Victorian GovernmentGoogle Scholar
  8. Dobbs L, Moore C (2002) Engaging communities in area-based regeneration: the role of participatory evaluation. Policy Studies 23:157–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Franklin RC (2003) Farm-related injury presenting to an Australian base hospital. Australian Journal of Rural Health 11:292–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gorrell C (2001) Nature’s path to inner peace. Psychology Today 34:62–67Google Scholar
  11. Irvine KN, Warber SL (2002) Greening healthcare: practicing as if the natural environment really mattered. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine 8:76–83Google Scholar
  12. Judd F, Fraser C, Grigg M, Scopelliti J, Hodgins G, Donohue A, et al. (2002) Rural psychiatry: special issues and models of service delivery. Disease Management & Health Outcomes 10:771–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Malcolm H (2002) Primary mental health-care model in rural Tasmania: outcomes for patients. Australian Journal of Rural Health 10:20–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pretty J, Smith D (2003) Social capital in biodiversity conservation and management. Conservation Biology 18:631–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Putnam RD (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon & SchusterGoogle Scholar
  16. Sidoti C (1999) Rural health: a human right. Australian Journal of Rural Health 7:202–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Strong K, Trickett P, Titulaer I, Bhatia K (2002) Health in Rural and Remote Australia, Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and WelfareGoogle Scholar
  18. Townsend M, Marsh R (2004) Exploration of the Health and Well-being Benefits of Membership of Truganina Explosives Reserve Preservation Society, Burwood, Australia: School of Health and Social Development, Deakin UniversityGoogle Scholar
  19. Von Schirning Y (2002) Health and sustainable development: can we rise to the challenge? The Lancet 360:632–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ecohealth Journal Consortium 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Health and Social DevelopmentDeakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations