Advertisement

Predictors of physical activity among employees in Tehran: a cross-sectional study based on the trans-theoretical model

  • Mohtasham Ghaffari
  • Yadollah Mehrabi
  • Sakineh Rakhshanderou
  • Ali Safari-Moradabadi
  • Mohammad Samiei-e-NasrEmail author
Original Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

Aim

The present research aimed to explore the level of physical activity among the employees of Melli Bank in Tehran in the light of the trans-theoretical model in 2018.

Subjects and methods

This cross-sectional study followed a multi-stratified sampling method and selected 612 employees from Melli Bank in Tehran. The data collection instrument was a tripartite questionnaire, the reliability and validity of which was statistically tested and confirmed within this research. SPSS16 was used to statistically analyze the data through independent-samples t-test, one-way ANOVA, correlation coefficient and multiple regressions. The significance level was set at p < .05.

Results

In this study, 532 male and 78 female participants were included. Two hundred and ninety-five participants (48.4%) had inadequate physical activity. From among 610 employees, 111 were at the pre-contemplation stage, 164 in contemplation, 160 in preparation, 65 in action, and 110 in maintenance stage. The foremost predictor of performing physical activity was found to be self-efficacy (r = .682, p < .0001).

Conclusion

As the results showed, self-efficacy played a major role in the rate of physical activity. To promote self-efficacy among employees, senior management of banks and related organizations such as physical education organization and universities need to support employees.

Keywords

Physical activity Self-efficacy Trans-theoretical model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article is an excerpt from the approved thesis of MS degree of Health Education at Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. The authors of the paper express their gratitude to all the staff who participated in this research.

Funding information

This study is sponsored by Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Tehran. The funding agencies had no role in the design of the study, data collection and analysis, or presentation of the results.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

The study on which these data analyses are based was approved by the Ethical Board Committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (Reference number IR.SBMU.PHNS.REC.1396.78). Participants were provided with information about the study and consented by proceeding to take the survey; this implied consent was approved by the Ethical Board Committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.

Informed consent

Participants' consent to participate was indicated by returning the completed questionnaire.

Conflicting interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Aghamolaei T, Farshidi H, Safari-Moradabadi A, Dadipoor S (2017) Effect of interventions based on the theory of planned behavior on promoting physical activity: a systematic review. J Prev Med 3(4):15–11Google Scholar
  2. Aghamollaei T, Tvafian S, Hasani L (2008) Self efficacy, perceived benefits and barriers to physical activity in students of Hormozgan University of Medical Science. J Iran Epidemiol 4(3):4Google Scholar
  3. Al-Otaibi HH (2013) Measuring stages of change, perceived barriers and self efficacy for physical activity in Saudi Arabia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 14(2):1009–1016.  https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.2.1009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Allender S, Foster C, Scarborough P, Rayner M (2007) The burden of physical activity-related ill health in the UK. J Epidemiol Community Health 61(4):344–348.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2006.050807 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Balali Meybodi F, Tabatabaei S, Hasani M (2014) The relationship of self-efficacy with awareness and perceptiveness severity and benefits in regard to adopting AIDS preventive behaviors among students of Kerman University of Medical Sciences in 2011. J Rafsanjan Unif Med Sci 13(3):223–234Google Scholar
  6. Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84(2):191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cho S-H, Choi M, Lee J, Cho H (2015) Relationship between expectations regarding aging and physical activity among middle aged adults in urban areas: based on the Pender’s health promotion model. J Korean Aca Nurs 45(1):14–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dadipoor S,  Fallahi S, Safari-Moradabadi A (2013) Investigation of the epidemiology of hypertension and BMI in the adult population in the province of Hormozgan, during 2011. Life Sci J 10(10s):161–166Google Scholar
  9. Dadipoor S, Shahsavari S, Ghaffari M, Farshidi H, Alavi A, Safari-Moradabadi A (2019) A case–control study on lifestyle-related factors of hypertension in Iran. J Public Health 4:1-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-019-01109-w
  10. Farahani A (2011) International questionnaire of physical activity—Persian version. Asian J Sports Med 18(8):1073–1080.  https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.18.08.754 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garcia-Aymerich J, Félez MA, Escarrabill J, Marrades RM, Morera J, Elosua R, Antó JM (2004) Physical activity and its determinants in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36(10):1667–1673.  https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000142378.98039.58 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Haakstad LAH, Voldner N, Bø K (2013) Stages of change model for participation in physical activity during pregnancy. J Pregnancy 2013:193170. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/193170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hazavehei S, Asadi Z, Hasanzade A, Shekarchizadeh P (2009) A study on the effect of physical education (Π) curriculum based on BASNEF model on female students’ regular physical activity in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. J Zanjan Uni Med Sci 17(69):70–83Google Scholar
  14. Jalilian M, Darabi M, Sharifirad G, Kakaei H (2013) Effectiveness of interventional program based on trans-theoretical model to promote regular physical activity in office workers. Health Sys Res 9(2):188–195Google Scholar
  15. Karimzadeh Shirazi K, Sh N, Heydarnia A (2007) Effects of a TTM-based osteoporosis preventive physical activity education, on increasing muscle. Hakim Res J 10(2):34–42Google Scholar
  16. Keshavarz Mohammadian S, Farmanbar R, Mohtasham-Amiri Z, Atrkar Roushan Z (2015) Factors associated with physical activity based on the stages of change model among health volunteers in Rasht. Iran J Health Educ Health Promot 3(3):253–265Google Scholar
  17. Marashi T, Ramezankhani A, Dadipoor S, Safari-Moradabadi A (2019) Health problem multiple behaviors in Iranian adolescents: a cross-sectional study. Int J Adolesc Youth 24(2):224–233.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2018.1513851 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marcus BH, Selby VC, Niaura RS, Rossi JS (1992) Self-efficacy and the stages of exercise behavior change. Res Q Exerc Sport 63(1):60–66.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1992.10607557 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mazloomi-Mahmoudabad S, Mohammadi M, Morovati Sharifabad M (2010) Exercise and its relation to self efficacy based on stages of change model in employees of Yazd in 2008. J Kerman Uni Med Sci 17(4):346–354Google Scholar
  20. McEachan RR, Lawton RJ, Jackson C, Conner M, Lunt J (2008) Evidence, theory and context: using intervention mapping to develop a worksite physical activity intervention. BMC Public Health 8(1):326.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-326 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Naito M, Nakayama T, Okamura T, Miura K, Yanagita M, Fujieda Y, Kinoshita F, Naito Y, Nakagawa H, Tanaka T (2008) Effect of a 4-year workplace-based physical activity intervention program on the blood lipid profiles of participating employees: the high-risk and population strategy for occupational health promotion (HIPOP-OHP) study. Atherosclerosis 197(2):784–790.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.07.026 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Nigg CR, Geller KS, Motl RW, Horwath CC, Wertin KK, Dishman RK (2011) A research agenda to examine the efficacy and relevance of the transtheoretical model for physical activity behavior. Psychol Sports Exerc 12(1):7–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Norman G, Benisovich S, Nigg C, Rossi J (1998) Examining three exercise staging algorithms in two samples. Ann Behav Med 20(suppl):S211Google Scholar
  24. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC (1994) The transtheoretical approach: crossing traditional boundaries of therapy: Krieger, Malabar FL Google Scholar
  25. Pronk NP, Katz AS, Lowry M, Payfer JR (2012) Peer reviewed: reducing occupational sitting time and improving worker health: the take-a-stand project, 2011. Prev Chronic Dis 9:E154.  https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd9.110323 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Sadeghi ASH, Najarmohyabadi M, Amini L, Haghani H (2017) Assessment level of physical activity and its associated beliefs. J Tolooebehdasht Sci 16:3Google Scholar
  27. Schoenborn CA, Barnes PM (2002) Leisure-time physical activity among adults: United States, 1997–98. Advance data from vital and healthstatistics; no. 325. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MDGoogle Scholar
  28. Skaal L, Pengpid S (2012) The predictive validity and effects of using the transtheoretical model to increase the physical activity of healthcare workers in a public hospital in South Africa. Transl Behav Med 2(4):384–391.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-012-0136-5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Taghipour A, Shahroudi M, Tabesh H, Safari-Moradabadi A, Alipour-Anbarani M (2019) The effect of educational intervention based on the theory of planned behavior and stages of change construct on women’s physical activity. J Edu Health Promotion 8(1):195Google Scholar
  30. Tuomilehto J, Lindström J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hämäläinen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S, Laakso M, Louheranta A, Rastas M (2001) Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 344(18):1343–1350.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200105033441801 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Motlagh Z, Heidarnia A, Kaveh MH, Kajoori J (2018) The relationships between constructs of trans-theoretical model and physical activity in patients with hypertension. J North Khorasan Uni Medl Sci 9(3):466–461Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohtasham Ghaffari
    • 1
  • Yadollah Mehrabi
    • 2
  • Sakineh Rakhshanderou
    • 2
  • Ali Safari-Moradabadi
    • 2
  • Mohammad Samiei-e-Nasr
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Environmental and Occupational Hazards Control Research Center, School of Public Health and SafetyShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  2. 2.School of Public Health and SafetyShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran

Personalised recommendations