Comorbidity and patient-reported quality of care: an evaluation of the primary care based German disease management program for type 2 diabetes
Previous evaluations of the German disease management program (DMP) for type 2 diabetes show that this approach curbs drug and hospital costs, may reduce mortality and improve quality of diabetes care. Otherwise until now there have been no evaluations which analyse the impact of comorbidity (COMORB) on the effectiveness of German DMP to strengthen patient-reported quality of care. Therefore, the study aimed to assess and compare the impact of comorbidity on patient-reported quality of care for patients participating in DMP and in routine care (RC).
Subject and methods
A questionnaire including the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) was mailed to a random sample of 3,546 patients. We grouped patients according to their participation into DMP and RC. To compare groups, we performed analysis of covariance. We considered all main effects, the interaction of DMP * COMORB and assessed the estimated PACIC scores for each number of other conditions.
1,532 questionnaires were returned (42.2%). Valid data existed for 1,399 patients. The analysis showed that only participation in the DMP (p < 0.0001) and gender (p < 0.001) had an impact on the PACIC. The estimated PACIC score of patients in DMP was higher than in routine care for all numbers of other conditions. Whereas the increasing number of other conditions was associated with lower PACIC scores in DMP, it was associated with increased PACIC scores in RC.
Patients with type 2 diabetes in DMP had higher PACIC scores than patients in RC, irrespective of the number of other conditions. Our study revealed no significant impact of comorbidity on the effect of German DMP on patient-reported quality of care.
KeywordsChronic care model Quality of care Patients view Comorbidity Disease management Diabetes
- Altenhofen L, Blaschy S, Hagen B, Haß W, Kretschmann J (2008) Qualitätsbericht 2008 [Disease Management Programme in Nordrhein]. Nordrheinische Gemeinsame Einrichtung, Düsseldorf, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- Freund T, Wensing M, Mahler C, Gensichen J, Erler A, Beyer M, Gerlach FM, Szecsenyi J, Peters-Klimm F (2010) Development of a primary care-based complex care management intervention for chronically ill patients at high risk for hospitalization: a study protocol. Implement Sci. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-70 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Joos S, Rosemann T, Heiderhoff M, Wensing M, Ludt S, Gensichen J, Kaufmann-Kolle P, Szecsenyi J (2005) ELSID-Diabetes study-evaluation of a large scale implementation of disease management programmes for patients with type 2 diabetes: rationale, design and conduct—a study protocol [ISRCTN08471887]. BMC Pub Health 5:99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miksch A, Hermann K, Roelz A, Joos S, Szecsenyi J, Ose D, Rosemann T (2009) Additional impact of concomitant hypertension and osteoarthritis on quality of life among patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care in Germany—a cross sectional survey. Health Qual Life Outcomes 7:19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miksch A, Laux G, Ose D, Joos S, Campbell S, Riens B, Szecsenyi J (2010) Is there a survival benefit for patients with type 2 diabetes enrolled in the German primary care-based Disease Management Program? Am J Manage Care 16:49–54Google Scholar
- Rothe U, Müller G, Schwarz PE, Seifert M, Kunath H, Koch R, Bergmann S, Julius U, Bornstein SR, Hanefeld M, Schulze J (2008) Evaluation of a diabetes management system based on practice guidelines, integrated care, and continuous quality management in a Federal State of Germany: a population-based approach to health care research. Diabetes Care 31:863–868PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Szecsenyi J, Rosemann T, Joos S, Peters-Klimm F, Miksch A (2008) German diabetes disease management programs are appropriate for restructuring care according to the chronic care model: an evaluation with the patient assessment of chronic illness care instrument. Diabetes Care 31:1150–1154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar