Journal of Public Health

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 453–459

Musculoskeletal injuries among operating room nurses: results from a multicenter survey in Rome, Italy

  • Umberto Moscato
  • Daniela Trinca
  • Maria Luisa Rega
  • Alice Mannocci
  • Giacomina Chiaradia
  • Giovanni Grieco
  • Walter Ricciardi
  • Giuseppe La Torre
Original Article



Chronic disorders of the musculoskeletal system, particularly low back pain (LBP), are increasing and represent a social and economic problem of growing importance, especially if correlated with working conditions. Health care workers are at higher risk of developing LBP during work shifts in the hospital. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of LBP among operating room nurses and to investigate the risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries in the operating room.


We carried out a cross-sectional study that included operating room nurses from nine hospitals. Information on sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle habits, working activity and psychological attitude of nurses was collected using an anonymous self-administered structured questionnaire. We evaluated the association of frequency, localization and intensity of LBP (FLI) with qualitative variables, making use of univariate analysis, chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the variables that affected the FLI. The covariates included in the model were the variables that had a p < 0.25 in the univariate analysis. The significance level was fixed at p < 0.05.


We studied a total of 185 (60.5% male) operating room nurses with a mean age of 36.08 (SD = 7.08). The chi-square test showed that FLI is associated with age (p = 0.042), physical activity (p = 0.036) and work shift (p = 0.01). The logistic regression indicated that age >35 years vs. age <35 (OR = 2.68; 95% CI = 1.17–6.18) and diurnal work shift vs. diurnal/nocturnal (OR = 4.00; 95% CI = 1.72–9.0) represent risk factors associated with FLI, while physical activity is a protective factor (OR = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.20–1.08).


The data suggest that it is important to promote new programs of prevention based on professional training and physical activity among nurses and to improve the organization of work shifts in the hospital.


Low back pain Nurses Operating theater 


  1. Boos N, Semmer N, Elfering A, Schade V, Gal I, Zanetti M, Kissling R, Buchegger N, Hodler J, Main CJ (2000) Natural history of individuals with asymptomatic disc abnormalities in magnetic resonance imaging: predictors of low back pain-related medical consultation and work incapacity. Spine 25(12):1484–92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bordini L, De Vito G, Molteni G, Boccardi S (1999) The epidemiology of musculoskeletal changes due to biomechanical overload of the spine in the manual lifting of patients. Med Lav 90(2):103–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brini S, Migliori R, Cormons V, Giatti A, Manigrasso V (2005) Il mal di schiena negli operatori sanitari: diffusione del fenomeno, livelli di rischio, prevenzione e trattamento (Low back pain in health personnel: spread of the issue, risk levels, prevention and treatment). Centro Studi Evidence Based Nursing. Available at URL:, 30 September 05.
  4. Capodaglio EM, Facioli M, Bazzini G (2001) Evaluation of the risk related to repetitive work activities: testing of several methods proposed in the literature. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 23(4):467–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Colombini D, Occhipinti E, Molteni G, Grieco A, Pedotti A, Boccardi S, Frigo C, Menoni O (1985) Posture Analysis. Ergonomics 28:275–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cushway BC, Mailer RJ (1929) Routine examination of the spine for industrial employees. JAMA 92:701–5Google Scholar
  7. Damiani G, Federico B, Pinnarelli L, Sammarco A, Ricciardi W (2006) Evaluating the effect of stress management programmes at the work-site on absenteeism reduction: a systematic review. Ital J Public Health 2:38–43Google Scholar
  8. Daraiseh N, Genaidy AM, Karwowski W, Davis LS, Stambough J, Huston RI (2003) Musculoskeletal outcomes in multiple body regions and work effects among nurses: the effects of stressful and stimulating working conditions. Ergonomics 46:1178–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis KG, Marras WS (2000) The effects of motion on trunk biomechanics. Clin Biomech 15:703–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Decreto Legislativo del 9 aprile 2008 , n. 81 “Attuazione dell'articolo 1 della legge 3 agosto 2007, n. 123, in materia di tutela della salute e della sicurezza nei luoghi di lavoro” (Legislative Decree 81/08-Implementation of art. 1, law 3 August, 2005, n. 123, concerning health and safety in the workplaces) Gazzetta Ufficiale-Supplemento Ordinario del 30 aprile 2008 n. 101Google Scholar
  11. Denis S, Shannon HS, Wessel J, Stratford P, Weller I (2007) Association of low back pain, impairment, disability and work limitations in nurses. J Occup Rehabil 17:213–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Engels JA, Van Der Gulden JWJ, Senden TF, van’t Hof B (1996) Work related risk factors for musculoskeletal complaints in the nursing profession: results of a questionnaire survey. Occup Environ Med 53:636–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Heliövara M, Mäkelä M, Knekt P, Impivaara O, Aromaa A (1991) Determinants of sciatica and low-back pain. Spine 16(6):608–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ISPESL (2005) Il reparto operatorio e le linee guida ISPESL (The operating theathre and the ISPESL guidelines). Roma. Available at URL:
  15. Jang R, Karwowski W, Quesadax PM, Rodrick D, Sherehiy B, Cronin SN, Layer JK (2007) Biomechanical evaluation of nursing tasks in a hospital setting. Ergonomics 50(11):1835–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Karahan A, Kav S, Abbasoglu A, Dogan N (2009) Low back pain: prevalence and associated risk factors among hospital staff. J Adv Nurs 65(3):516–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Karwowski W, Ren-liu J, Rodrick D, Quesada PM, Cronin SN (2005) Self-evaluation of biomechanical task demands, work environment and perceived risk of injury by nurses: a field study. Occup Ergonomics 5:13–27Google Scholar
  18. Klein BP, Jenson RC, Sandstrom LM (1984) Assessment of workers’ compensation claims for back strains/sprains. J Occup Med 26:443–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Krause N, Ragland DR, Fischer JM, Syme SL (1998) Volvo award winner in clinical studies, psychosocial job factors, physical workload, and incidence of work-related spinal injury: a 5-year prospective study of urban transit operators. Spine 23(23):2507–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Leboeuf-Yde C (2000) Body weight and low back pain, a systematic literature review of 56 journal articles reporting on 65 epidemiologic studies. Spine 25(2):226–37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee P, Helewa A, Goldsmith CH, Smythe HA, Stitt LW (2001) Low back pain: prevalence and risk factors in an industrial setting. J Rheumatol 28:346–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Linton SJ (2000) A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain. Spine 25(9):1148–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lorusso A, Bruno S, L’Abbate N (2007) A review of low back pain and musculoskeletal disorders among italian nursing personnel. Ind Health 45:637–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mandal AC (1984) The correct height of school furniture. Physiotherapy 70(2):48–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Martinelli S, Artioli G, Vinceti M, Bergomi M, Bussolanti N, Camellini R, Celotti P, Capelli P, Roccato L, Gobba F (2004) Low back pain risk in nurses and its prevention. Prof Inferm 57(4):238–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Miranda H, Viikari-Juntura E, Martikainen R, Takala EP, Riihimäki H (2002) Individual factors, occupational loading, and physical exercise as predictors of sciatic pain. Spine 27(10):1102–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Motta C, Turra A, Farina B (2000) Radioguided surgery of breast cancer: radiation protection survey. Tumori 86(4):372–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. National Institute of Disability Management and Research (2006) Disability management in a global context. Adelaide, September 27, 2006. Available at URL:
  29. NIOSH (1997) Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors. A critical Review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back. US, Department of Health and Human Services Publication no. 97–141 July 1997Google Scholar
  30. O'Sullivan PB, Grahamslaw KM, Kendell M, Lapenskie SC, Möller NE, Richards KV (2002) The effect of different standing and sitting postures on trunk muscle activity in a pain-free population. Spine 27(11):1238–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Proietti L, Duscio D, Rotiroti G, Sandonà PB (2000) Environmental monitoring and health monitoring for personnel exposed to inhalation anesthetics. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 22(2):130–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Schenk P, Läubli T, Hodler J, Klipstein A (2007) Symptomatology of recurrent low back pain in nursing and administrative professions. Eur Spine J 16:1789–98CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sherehiy B, Karwowski W, Marek T (2004) Relationship between risk factors and musculoskeletal disorders in the nursing profession: a systematic review. Occup Ergonomics 4:241–79Google Scholar
  34. Spitzer WO, LeBlanc FE, Dupuis M (1987) Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec task force on spinal disorders. Spine 12(7s):1–59Google Scholar
  35. Troussier B, Davoine P, de Gaudemaris R, Fauconnier J, Phelip X (1994) Back pain in school children. A study among 1,178 pupils. Scand J Rehab Med 26:143–6Google Scholar
  36. Walker BF (2000) The prevalence of low back pain: a systematic review of the literature from 1966 to 1998. J Spinal Disorders 13(3):205–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Umberto Moscato
    • 1
  • Daniela Trinca
    • 2
  • Maria Luisa Rega
    • 1
  • Alice Mannocci
    • 1
  • Giacomina Chiaradia
    • 3
  • Giovanni Grieco
    • 1
  • Walter Ricciardi
    • 1
  • Giuseppe La Torre
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of HygieneCatholic University of Sacred HeartRomeItaly
  2. 2.Hospital Unit “San Giovanni di Dio”RomeItaly
  3. 3.National Institute of Infectious Diseases “L. Spallanzani”RomeItaly
  4. 4.Clinical Medicine and Public Health UnitSapienza University of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations