Optimization of hospital stay through length-of-stay-oriented case management: an empirical study
- 162 Downloads
Background and objectives
An important component of efficient and high-quality treatment of patients under DRG conditions is the control of patients’ length of stay in hospitals. Medical processes need to be structured in such a way that unnecessary extensions of the length of stay are avoided, thus achieving an economically and qualitatively optimal result. The study presented here examines the question of whether the introduction of length-of-stay-oriented case management can optimize the duration of patients' hospital stays.
In total, 168 inpatient cases and their matched control cases from the cardiology and urology stations of a maximum care hospital are examined in this study.
The result of the t-test for the difference of means indicates that the average length of stay of the intervention cases (5.79 days) was significantly shorter than the average length of stay of the control cases (7.34 days). With respect to the re-admission rate, a statistically significant dependence could not be determined.
Discussion and conclusion
The operationalization of case management in daily clinical routines was tested by a comprehensive survey. Length-of-stay-oriented case management provides transparency of the entire treatment process and integrates procedures to an optimal extent. However, the doctor's sovereignty over therapy is not affected by the introduction of length-of-stay-oriented case management. Hence, the form of case management presented here serves as a new and innovative control and monitoring system for hospitals, as it makes institutions that implement such a system more competitive through the improvement of economical aspects as well as through the introduction of higher process efficiency.
KeywordsCase management Length of stay Reduction Hospital Process optimization Controlling
- Ethridge P (1991) A nursing HMO: Carondelet St. Mary`s experience. Nurs Manag 22(7):22–27Google Scholar
- Ewers M, Schaeffer D (2000) Case management in Theorie und Praxis. Huber, BernGoogle Scholar
- Fahrmeir L, Künstler R, Pigeot I et al (2001) Statistik—Der Weg zur Datenanalyse, 3rd edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Krusch A, Siegmund T, Huber P, Kircher M, Schumm-Draeger PM (2006) Clinical Pathways und case-Management als DRG-Managementinstrumente. Das Krankenhaus 124-128Google Scholar
- Lehmann U, Köpfer T (2002) DRGs als Rahmen für strukturelle Neuerungen im Krankenhaus–Beispiel: case-manager im Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin. Electromedica 70(2):116–118Google Scholar
- Löcherbach P (2003) Einsatz der methode case management in Deutschland: Übersicht zur Praxis im Sozial- und Gesundheitswesen. In: Porz F, Erhardt H (eds) Neue Wege in der Nachsorge und Palliativversorgung. BetaInstitutsverlag, Augsburg, pp 20–33Google Scholar
- OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2006) OECD Health Data 2006. ParisGoogle Scholar
- Powell SK, Ignatavicius D (2001) Core curriculum for case management. Lippincott, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- Shi L (1996) Patient and hospital characteristics associated with average length of stay. Health Care Manag Rev 21(2):46–61Google Scholar
- Wendt WR (2002) Case management–stand und Positionen in der Bundesrepublik. In: Löcherbach P, Klug W, Remmel-Faßbender R, Wendt WR (eds) Case management - fall- und systemsteuerung in Theorie und Praxis. Luchterhand, Neuwied, pp 13–36Google Scholar
- Wissert M (2006) Clinical pathways–entlassungsmanagement–unterstützungsmanagement, begriffserklärung und Systematisierung ausgewählter case management-strategien. Case Manag 2(1):35–38Google Scholar
- Zander K (2002) Nursing case management in the 21st century: intervening where margin meets mission. Nurs Administration Q 26(5):58–67Google Scholar