Journal of Public Health

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 148–154 | Cite as

Improving palliative care in Germany: summative evaluation from experts’ reports in Lower Saxony and Brandenburg

Original Article

Abstract

The German Health Care System is in substantial change. New structuring of services and processes of care are necessary, particularly to meet the complex requirements of the ever-increasing chronic illness and multimorbidity. The main deficits and strategies of improvement can be pointed out clearly by illustrating the situation of palliative care, which is more and more in the focus of experts and public. However, current statements are only slightly based on scientific data. Therefore, policymakers and self-governing bodies in the federal states of Lower Saxony and Brandenburg have commissioned reports from a multidisciplinary study group of health system research. This article describes the cumulative evaluation of both reports, referring to literature findings, specific empirical surveys and expert discussions. The main findings include a high level of emotion among the involved caregivers and social groups, resulting in difficulties in rational discussions; furthermore, a large multiplicity of viewpoints on the assessment of the current situation and on the appropriate needs for improvement was shown. The current deficits are significantly caused by inadequate structuring of care processes. Therefore, better integration of the large and diverse number of involved services and professions is necessary, including new specialised services. Health policy has created legal conditions, but up to now, fulfilment is low. Other improvement strategies should focus on working conditions of personnel in the basic services, such as family doctors and nurses, because the current conditions seem not to meet the patient or caregiver needs. Furthermore, a debate on principles regarding responsibilities of the health care system is needed: What should be covered by social health insurances, and what should be part of other areas of public welfare?

Keywords

Germany Palliative care Health system research Experts’ report End-of-life care 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors received financial support from the Ministeries of Social Affairs in Brandenburg and Lower Saxony, from the Federal Associations of the Health Insurances and of the Association of CHI Physicians.

References

  1. Addington-Hall J (2002) Research sensitivities to palliative care patients. Eur J Cancer Care 11:220–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amelung V, Schumacher H (2004) Managed Care-Neue Wege im Gesundheitsmanagement. Gabler, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  3. Borasio G, Weltermann B, Voltz R, Reichmann H, Zierz S (2004) Attitudes towards patient care at the end of life. A survey of directors of neurological departments. Nervenarzt 75:1187–1193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Buser K, Amelung VE, Janus K, Brandes I, Schneider N, Schwartz FW (2004) Gutachten zur Palliativversorgung in Niedersachsen. Bestandsaufnahme und Empfehlungen zur Weiterentwicklung.http://www.cdl.niedersachsen.de/blob/images/C8578778_L20.pdf
  5. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Palliativmedizin (2003) Begriffsdefinitionen. Z Palliativmed 4:95–99Google Scholar
  6. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Palliativmedizin (2005) Stellungnahme zum Gutachten “Palliativversorgung in Niedersachsen”. http://www.dgpalliativmedizin.de/
  7. Deutscher Bundestag: Zwischenbericht der Enquete Kommission, Ethik und Recht in der modernen Medizin (2005) Verbesserung der Versorgung Schwerstkranker und Sterbender in Deutschland durch Palliativmedizin und Hospizarbeit. Deutscher Bundestag, Berlin, Drucksache 15/5858Google Scholar
  8. Diemer W, Meiering J, Burchert H (2004) Palliative-Care-Teams vernetzen die palliativmedizinische Versorgung. In Aulbert E, Klaschik E, Schindler T (Eds.). Beiträge zur Palliativmedizin. Palliativmedizin im ambulanten Sektor. Schattauer, Stuttgart, New York pp 80–95Google Scholar
  9. Dunlop R, Hockley J (1998) Hospital-based palliative care teams. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Ensink FBM (2001) Das Projekt SUPPORT-eine Möglichkeit zur Optimierung der palliativmedizinischen Versorgung als ethisch zu präferierende Alternative zur aktiven Sterbehilfe.http://www.user.gwdg.de/~pctgoe/Seiten/Publikation/SUPPORTethics.pdf
  11. Finlay I (2001) UK strategies for palliative care. J R Soc Med 94:437–441PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Franks J, Salisbury C, Bosanquet N, Wilinson E, Kite S, Naysmith A, Higginson I (2000) The level of need for palliative care: A systematic review of the literature. Palliat Med 14:93–104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fust E (1999) Interdisciplinary discussion about the care of the dying—viewpoint of nurses and pastors. Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax 88:1224–1228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Husebo S, Klaschik E (2000) Palliativmedizin. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  15. Jansen-van-der Weide M, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, van der Wal G (2005) Granted, undecided, withdrawn and refused requests for euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Arch Int Med 165:1698–1798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Janus K, Amelung VE (2004) Integrierte Versorgungssysteme in Kalifornien-Erfolgs- und Misserfolgsfaktoren der ersten 10 Jahre und Impulse für Deutschland. Gesundheitswesen 66:649–655CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jaspers B, Schindler T (2005) Stand der Palliativmedizin und Hospizarbeit in Deutschland und im Vergleich zu ausgewählten Staaten. Gutachten im Auftrag der Bundestags-Enquete-Kommission “Ethik und Recht der modernen Medizin”. http://www.bundestag.de/parlament/kommissionen/ethik_med/gutachten/gutachten02_palliativmedizin.pdf
  18. Klaschik E (2001) Palliativmedizin. Ganzheitliche Medizin mit hohem Entwicklungsbedarf. Schmerz 15:311CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kreisel-Liebermann H, Bautz M., Hanekop GG, Schlaudraff U, Ensink FBM (2003) “Lasst mich..., aber lasst mich nicht allein!”. Lutherisches Verlagshaus, HannoverGoogle Scholar
  20. Kruse A, Gaber E, Heuft G, Oster P, Re S, Schulz-Nieswandt F (2002) Gesundheit im Alter. In: Robert Koch-Institut (Ed.). Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes. RKI, Berlin pp 3–23Google Scholar
  21. Lennert K (2003). Palliativmedizin: Eine Alternative zur aktiven Sterbehilfe. Dtsch Arztebl 100:C864Google Scholar
  22. McIllumurray M, Thomas C, Francis B, Morris S, Scoothill K, Al-Hamad A (2001) The psychosocial needs of cancer patients: Findings from an observational study. Eur J Cancer Care 10:261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morita T, Miyashita M, Kimura R, Adachi I.,ShimaY (2004) Emotional burden of nurses in palliative sedation therapy. Palliat Med 6:550–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Müller-Busch HC, Andres I, Jehser T (2001) Wieviele Palliativstationen und Hospize brauchen wir in Deutschland? Z Palliativmed 2:16–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Muller-Busch HC, Oduncu F, Woskanjan S, Klaschik E (2004) Attitudes on euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide and erminal sedation-a survey of members of the German Assosciation for Palliative Medicine. Med Health Care Philos 7:333–339CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2004a). Guidance on Cancer Services: Improving Supportive and Palliative Care for Adults with Cancer. Economic ReviewGoogle Scholar
  27. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2004b). Guidance on Cancer Services: Improving Supportive and Palliative Care for Adults with Cancer. Executive Summary. http://www.nice.org.uk/pdf/csgspexecsummary.pdf
  28. Österreichisches Bundesinstitut für Gesundheitswesen (2004) Abgestufte Hospiz- und Palliativversorgung in Österreich. Bericht im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit und Frauen. Wien:21–31Google Scholar
  29. Sachverständigenrat für die Konzertierte Aktion im Gesundheitswesen (2003) Finanzierung, Nutzerorientierung und Qualität. Wege zur Nutzerorientierung und Partizipation. Gutachten 2003. Nomos, Baden-BadenGoogle Scholar
  30. Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der Entwicklung im Gesundheitswesen (2005) Koordination und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen. Gutachten 2005. Nomos, Baden-BadenGoogle Scholar
  31. Schindler T (2005) Palliativmedizin und Versorgungsforschung im Blickwinkel gesundheitspolitischer Entscheidungsträger. In: Schneider N, Amelung VE, Buser K (Eds.) Neue Wege in der Palliativversorgung. Analyse der gegenwärtigen Situation und Optimierungskonzepte am Beispiel des Landes Brandenburg. Medizinisch-Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, Berlin, pp XII–XXGoogle Scholar
  32. Schneider N, Amelung VE, Buser K (2005a) Neue Wege in der Palliativversorgung. Analyse der gegenwärtigen Situation und Optimierungskonzepte am Beispiel des Landes Brandenburg. Medizinisch-Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  33. Schneider N, Buser K, Janus K, Brandes I, Amelung VE (2005b) Konzepte zur bedarfsgerechten Strukturierung der Palliativversorgung im deutschen Gesundheitswesen: Das Beispiel des Bundeslandes Niedersachsen. Gesundheitswesen 67:755–762CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Tang S, Liu T, Lai M, McCorkle R (2005) Discrepancy in the preferences of place of death between terminally ill cancer patients and their primary family caregivers in Taiwan. Soc Sci Med 61:1560–1566CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Vejlgaard T, Addington-Hall J (2005) Attitudes of Danish doctors and nuses to palliative and terminal care. Pall Med 19:119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vollmann J (2001). Sterbebegleitung. In: Robert Koch-Institut (Ed.). Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes. RKI, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  37. World Health Organization (WHO) (2005). Palliative Care.http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System ResearchHannover Medical SchoolHannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations