Prognosis after lamellar keratoplasty for limbal dermoids using preserved corneas
- 33 Downloads
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of lamellar keratoplasty using preserved donor corneas to treat limbal dermoids.
The clinical records of 19 patients with limbal dermoids, who underwent lamellar keratoplasty using preserved corneas that were observed for more than 6 months at the Keio University School of Medicine between January, 2000 and December, 2017, were retrospectively reviewed. We retrospectively analyzed demographics, surgical outcomes, the occurrence of any surgically induced changes in refraction, and intra and postoperative complications.
Patient age at surgery showed 2 peaks, the first ranged from 0 to 6 years, and the second from 13 to 20 years. All patients except one had good cosmetic results. Preoperative astigmatism was more than 2 diopters in 12 of 16 eyes for which refractive data were recorded. The refractive cylinder in 8 of the 16 eyes differed after surgery by less than 2 diopters. Treatment of amblyopia by occlusion of the fellow eye and spectacle prescription was done either prior to or following surgery, and resulted in improved visual acuity in 7 patients. Intraoperative complications did not occur in any of the patients. Postoperatively, all patients except one showed corneal re-epithelialization within a week.
Lamellar keratoplasty using preserved corneas for limbal dermoid yields good cosmetic results. However, improvements in astigmatism and visual acuity are not guaranteed. Preoperative treatment of amblyopia gives a better prognosis for improved visual acuity postoperatively. Long-term observation including amblyopia treatment is required before and after surgery.
KeywordsLimbal dermoid Lamellar keratoplasty Amblyopia
We thank Dr. Hiroshi Fujishima, Dr. Tetsuya Kawakita, Dr. Yukihiro Matsumoto, Dr. Yusuke Yamamoto, Dr. Yoshiyuki Ichihashi, Dr. Miki Mizuno and Dr. Hiroto Mitamura for assistance of analyzing data. We thank Dr. Emi Inagaki for general support.
Conflicts of interest
K. Yamashita, None; S. Hatou, None; Y. Uchino, None; K. Tsubota, None; S. Shimmura, None.
- 1.Sunderraj PP, Viswanathan RK, Balachander R. Neoplasms of the limbus. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1991;39:168–9.Google Scholar
- 5.Robb RM. Astigmatic refractive errors associated with limbal dermoids. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1996;33:241–3.Google Scholar
- 9.Cha DM, Shin KH, Kim KH, Kwon JW. Simple keratectomy and corneal tattooing for limbal dermoids: results of a 3-year study. Int J Ophthalmol. 2013;6:463–6.Google Scholar
- 11.Spierer O, Gologorsky D, Adler E, Forster RK. Lamellar keratoplasty with corneoscleral graft for limbal dermoids. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;11:512–5.Google Scholar
- 12.Xin M, Gong YR, Jiang SH, Dai CH, Li SX, Shi WY. Preoperative evaluation and outcome of corneal transplantation for limbal dermoids: a 10-year follow-up study. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016;9:1756–60.Google Scholar
- 14.Panton RW, Sugar J. Excision of limbal dermoids. Ophthalmic Surg. 1991;22:85–9.Google Scholar
- 17.Okumura N, Sotozono C, Yokoi N, Kinoshita S. Lamellar keratoplasty for 21 cases of limbal dermoids. Folia Ophthalmol Jpn. 2003;54:425–8.Google Scholar
- 19.Jaffe NS, Clayman HM. The pathophysiology of corneal astigmatism after cataract extraction. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1975;79:615–30.Google Scholar
- 20.Vrabec MP, Jordan JJ, Lawlor PP. Lamellar keratoplasty performed with a corneal scleral button. Ophthalmic Surg. 1994;25:389–91.Google Scholar
- 23.Yatsui K, Hatou S, Yokoi T, Azuma N, Yamada M. Refraction and amblyopia in patients with limbal dermoid. Atarashii Ganka (J Eye). 2010;27:1149–52 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
- 24.Oldenburg JB, Garbus J, McDonnell JM, McDonnell PJ. Conjunctival pterygia. Mech Corneal Topogr Changes Cornea. 1990;9:200–4.Google Scholar