Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology

, Volume 58, Issue 5, pp 429–434 | Cite as

Intraocular pressure alterations after visual field testing

  • Akira SawadaEmail author
  • Hiroki Yamada
  • Yoshikazu Yamamoto
  • Tetsuya Yamamoto
Clinical Investigation



To determine whether intraocular pressure (IOP) is significantly altered after visual field (VF) testing in eyes with open-angle glaucoma (OAG).


A prospective clinical trial of 106 OAG patients who had not had any previous surgical interventions. IOP was measured with a non-contact tonometer and refractive error with an auto refractometer. The measurements were made before and immediately after the VF test of the first eye (OD) and the second eye (OS).


The baseline refractive error (spherical equivalent) was −4.13 ± 3.61 diopters (D) OD and −4.05 ± 3.63 D OS. The average VF testing time was 7.5 ± 1.4 min OU. The average baseline IOP was 12.8 ± 2.9 mmHg OD and 12.6 ± 2.8 mmHg OS. After the VF testing OD, the average IOP decreased significantly to 12.3 ± 2.6 mmHg (P = 0.001), but the IOP (12.5 ± 2.6 mmHg) OS was not significantly unchanged (P = 0.190). Following the VF testing OS, the IOP OD was 12.2 ± 2.6 mmHg (P = 0.252) and OS was 12.4 ± 2.7 mmHg (P = 0.487). An elevation of ≥2 mmHg in the IOP after the VF testing was found in 2.8 % of the right eyes and 0.9 % of the left eyes. The refractive error was not significantly changed after the VF testing. Multivariate analysis showed statistically significant correlations between the IOP decrease after the VF testing and the baseline IOP (P = 0.000) and the central corneal thickness (P = 0.034).


In the majority of eyes with OAG, VF testing did not lead to an increase in the IOP. The amount of IOP reduction after VF testing is significantly correlated with the baseline IOP and central corneal thickness.


Intraocular pressure Visual field testing Pen-angle glaucoma 


Conflicts of interest

A. Sawada, None; H. Yamada, None; Y. Yamamoto, None; T. Yamamoto, None.


  1. 1.
    Armaly MF. On the distribution of applanation pressure. I. Statistical features and the effect of age, sex, and family history of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1965;73:11–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shiose Y. The aging effect on intraocular pressure in an apparently normal population. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102:883–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Katavisto M. The diurnal variations of ocular tension in glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 1964;(Suppl 78):1–130.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kitazawa Y, Horie T. Diurnal variation of intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1975;79:557–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blumenthal M, Blumenthal R, Peritz E, Best M. Seasonal variation in intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol. 1970;69:608–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Armaly MF, Rubin ML. Accommodation and applanation tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol. 1961;65:415–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mauger RR, Likens CP, Applebaum M. Effects of accommodation and repeated applanation tonometry on intraocular pressure. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1984;61:28–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anderson DR, Grant WM. The influence of position on intraocular pressure. Investig Ophthalmol. 1973;12:204–12.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Poley BJ, Lindstrom RL, Samuelson TW, Schulze R Jr. Intraocular pressure reduction after phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in glaucomatous and non glaucomatous eyes: evaluation of a causal relationship between the natural lens and open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:1946–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ki-I Y, Yamashita T, Uemura A, Sakamoto T. Long-term intraocular pressure changes after combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and vitrectomy. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2013;57:57–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Loewen NA, Liu JH, Weinreb RN. Increased 24 hour variation of human intraocular pressure with short axial length. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:933–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Read SA, Collins MJ, Becker H, Cutting J, Ross D, Savill AK, et al. Changes in intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude with accommodation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94:332–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Recupero SM, Contestabile MT, Taverniti L, Villani GM, Recupero V. Open-angle glaucoma: variations in the intraocular pressure after visual field examination. J Glaucoma. 2003;12:114–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ni N, Tsai JC, Shields MB, Loewen NA. Elevation of intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients after automated visual field testing. J Glaucoma. 2012;21:590–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rebolleda G, Rodríguez-Villace C, Anton MV, Muñoz-Negrete FJ. Variations in intraocular pressure after visual field examination. J Glaucoma. 2004;13:178–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cassidy L, Delaney Y, Fitzpatrick P, Blake J. Effect of accommodation on intraocular pressure in glaucomatous eyes. Ir J Med Sci. 1998;167:17–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grignolo FM, Bongioanni C, Carenini BB. Der intraokulare druk bei psychischem stress. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1977;170:562–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Erb C, Brody S, Rau H. Einfluß von mentalem und physischem Streß auf den intraokulären Druck-eine Pilotstudie. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1998;212:270–4 (in German).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mosaed S, Chamberlain WD, Liu JH, Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN. Association of central corneal thickness and 24-hour intraocular pressure fluctuation. J Glaucoma. 2008;17:85–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fogagnolo P, Capizzi F, Orzalesi N, Figus M, Ferreras A, Rossetti L. Can mean central corneal thickness and its 24-hour fluctuation influence fluctuation of intraocular pressure? J Glaucoma. 2010;19:418–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Saccà SC, Rolando M, Marletta A, Macrí A, Cerqueti P, Ciurlo G. Fluctuations of intraocular pressure during the day in open-angle glaucoma, normal-tension glaucoma and normal subjects. Ophthalmologica. 1998;212:115–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ogbuehi KC. Assessment of the accuracy and reliability of the Topcon CT80 non-contact tonometer. Clin Exp Optom. 2006;89:310–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Ophthalmological Society 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akira Sawada
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hiroki Yamada
    • 1
  • Yoshikazu Yamamoto
    • 1
  • Tetsuya Yamamoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyGifu University Graduate School of MedicineGifuJapan

Personalised recommendations