Advertisement

Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology

, Volume 58, Issue 2, pp 131–138 | Cite as

Characteristics of corneal topographic and pachymetric patterns in patients with pellucid marginal corneal degeneration

  • Mutsumi Fuchihata
  • Naoyuki MaedaEmail author
  • Ryotaro Toda
  • Shizuka Koh
  • Takashi Fujikado
  • Kohji Nishida
Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the characteristics of the shape of the cornea in patients with pellucid marginal corneal degeneration (PMD) and to compare these characteristics to those of eyes with keratoconus and eyes of normal subjects.

Methods

This was a retrospective, cross-sectional case-series in which 49 eyes of 33 patients with PMD, 51 eyes of 51 patients with keratoconus and 53 eyes of 53 subjects with normal corneas (controls) were examined and compared. For all eyes, we obtained the topographic patterns of the axial power maps, anterior and posterior elevation maps and pachymetric maps using a rotating Scheimpflug camera. The eyes were classified into the respective patterns by visual inspection of these maps.

Results

In eyes with PMD, the most common axial power map pattern was the crab claw pattern (78 %) followed by the inferior steepening pattern (18 %). In eyes with keratoconus, the most common pattern was the inferior steepening pattern (67 %). The most common pattern in the elevation maps for both surfaces was the asymmetric island in eyes with PMD and keratoconus. Although the decentered pattern, including the decentered oval (27 %) and decentered round (20 %) pattern, on pachymetric map was specific to eyes with PMD, the incidence of these patterns was relatively low.

Conclusions

The similarity in the topographic and pachymetric patterns in eyes with PMD and keratoconus suggests that they may be a continuity of the same disorder with different phenotypes.

Keywords

Corneal topography Pellucid marginal corneal degeneration Keratoconus Topographic pattern Scheimpflug camera 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Publication of this article was supported in part by Grant-in-Aid no. 24592669 (to Naoyuki Maeda) for Scientific Research from the Japanese Ministry of the Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Copy editor: Dr. Duco Hamasaki, Professor Emeritus, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Florida.

References

  1. 1.
    Krachmer JH. Pellucid marginal corneal degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978;96:1217–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kayazawa F, Nishimura K, Kodama Y, Tsuji T, Itoi M. Keratoconus with pellucid marginal corneal degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102:895–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rodrigues MM, Newsome DA, Krachmer JH, Eiferman RA. Pellucid marginal corneal degeneration: a clinicopathologic study of two cases. Exp Eye Res. 1981;33:277–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;42:297–319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krachmer JH, Feder RS, Belin MW. Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders. Surv Ophthalmol. 1984;28:293–322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gruenauer-Kloevekorn C, Fischer U, Kloevekorn-Norgall K, Duncker GI. Pellucid marginal corneal degeneration: evaluation of the corneal surface and contact lens fitting. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:318–23.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jinabhai A, Radhakrishnan H, O’Donnell C. Pellucid corneal marginal degeneration: a review. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2011;34:56–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim KH, Choi SH, Ahn K, Chung ES, Chung TY. Comparison of refractive changes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2011;55:93–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sridhar MS, Mahesh S, Bansal AK, Nutheti R, Rao GN. Pellucid marginal corneal degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1102–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Walker RN, Khachikian SS, Belin MW. Scheimpflug photographic diagnosis of pellucid marginal degeneration. Cornea. 2008;27:963–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ambrósio JR, Klyce SD, Smolek MK, Wilson SE. Pellucid marginal corneal degeneration. J Refract Surg. 2002;18:86–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fogla R, Rao SK, Padmanabhan P. Keratectasia in 2 cases with pellucid marginal corneal degeneration after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:788–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ambrósio R Jr, Klyce SD, Wilson SE. Corneal topographic and pachymetric screening of keratorefractive patients. J Refract Surg. 2003;19:24–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Belin MW, Khachikian SS. Keratoconus. It is hard to define, but…. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:500–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Belin MW, Asota IM, Ambrosio R Jr, Khachikian SS. What’s in a name: keratoconus, pellucid marginal degeneration, and related thinning disorders. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152:157–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bogan SJ, Waring GO 3rd, Ibrahim O, Drews C, Curtis L. Classification of normal corneal topography based on computer-assisted video keratography. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108:945–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee BW, Jurkunas UV, Harissi-Dagher M, Poothullil AM, Tobaigy FM, Azar DT. Ectatic disorders associated with a claw-shaped pattern on corneal topography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:154–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maguire LJ, Klyce SD, McDonald MB, Kaufman HE. Corneal topography of pellucid marginal degeneration. Ophthalmology. 1987;94:519–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maeda N, Klyce SD, Tano Y. Detection and classification of mild irregular astigmatism in patients with good visual acuity. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;43:53–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Naufal SC, Hess JS, Friedlander MH, Granet NS. Rasterstereography-based classification of normal corneas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:222–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu Z, Huang AJ, Pflugfelder SC. Evaluation of corneal thickness and topography in normal eyes using the Orbscan corneal topography system. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:774–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Saika M, Maeda N, Hirohara Y, Mihashi T, Fujikado T, Nishida K. Four discriminant models for detecting keratoconus pattern using Zernike coefficients of cornea aberrations. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2013;57:503–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nakagawa T, Maeda N, Higashiura R, Hori Y, Inoue T, Nishida K. Corneal topographic analysis in patients with keratoconus using 3-dimensional anterior segment optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:1871–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Higashiura R, Maeda N, Nakagawa T, Fuchihata M, Koh S, Hori Y, et al. Corneal topographic analysis by 3-dimensional anterior segment optical coherence tomography after endothelial keratoplasty. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:3286–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Ophthalmological Society 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mutsumi Fuchihata
    • 1
  • Naoyuki Maeda
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ryotaro Toda
    • 2
  • Shizuka Koh
    • 1
  • Takashi Fujikado
    • 3
  • Kohji Nishida
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineSuitaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Ophthalmology and Visual ScienceHiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical & Health SciencesHiroshimaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Applied Visual ScienceOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations