Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology

, Volume 51, Issue 5, pp 347–352 | Cite as

Changes in Contrast Sensitivity Function and Ocular Higher Order Aberration by Conventional Myopic Photorefractive Keratectomy

  • Norishige Sakata
  • Tadatoshi Tokunaga
  • Kazunori Miyata
  • Tetsuro Oshika
CLINICAL INVESTIGATION

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the relation between induced changes in ocular higher order aberrations and changes in the contrast sensitivity function in patients undergoing excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

Methods

Myopic PRK using excimer laser was performed in 31 patients (56 eyes). The preoperative refractive error was −6.2 ± 2.9 diopters. Before and 1 month after surgery, we measured the ocular higher order aberrations for a 4-mm pupil, and three indices of contrast sensitivity function. From the data collected, the area under the log contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF) was calculated.

Results

PRK significantly reduced AULCSF (P = 0.004), low-contrast visual acuity (P = 0.004), and letter-contrast sensitivity (P = 0.013). Coma-like (P < 0.001) and spherical-like (P < 0.001) aberrations were significantly increased by surgery. The change in AULCSF by surgery significantly correlated with the change in coma-like (r = −0.468, P < 0.001) and spherical-like (r = −0.291, P = 0.033) aberrations. The change in low-contrast visual acuity by PRK significantly correlated with the change in coma-like aberration (r = 0.599, P < 0.007), but not with change in spherical-like aberrations (r = 0.136, P = 0.326). There were significant correlations between changes in letter-contrast sensitivity and changes in coma-like (r = −0.450, P < 0.001) and spherical-like (r = −0.255, P = 0.048) aberrations.

Conclusions

PRK significantly increases ocular higher order aberrations, which compromise contrast sensitivity function after surgery. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2007;51:347–352 © Japanese Ophthalmological Society 2007

Key words

contrast sensitivity function excimer laser higher order aberration photorefractive keratectomy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ficker, LA, Bates, AK, Steele, AD,  et al. 1993Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: 12-month follow-upEye7617624PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ghaith, AA, Daniel, J, Stulting, RD, Thompson, KP, Lynn, M 1998Contrast sensitivity and glare disability after radial keratotomy and photorefractive keratectomyArch Ophthalmol1161218PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tomidokoro, A, Soya, K, Miyata, K,  et al. 2001Corneal irregular astigmatism and contrast sensitivity after photorefractive keratectomyOphthalmology10822092212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tanabe, T, Miyata, K, Samejima, T, Hirohara, Y, Mihashi, T, Oshika, T 2004Influence of wavefront aberration and corneal subepithelial haze on low-contrast visual acuity after photorefractive keratectomyAm J Ophthalmol138620624PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Applegate, RA, Howland, HC, Sharp, RP, Cottingham, AJ, Yee, RW 1998Corneal aberrations and visual performance after radial keratotomyJ Refract Surg14397407PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mutyala, S, McDonald, MB, Scheinblum, KA, Ostrick, MD, Brint, SF, Thompson, H 2000Contrast sensitivity evaluation after laser in situ keratomileusisOphthalmology10718641867PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pérez-Santonja, JJ, Sakla, HF, Alio, JL 1998Contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusisJ Cataract Refract Surg24183189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, Z, Chen, J, Yang, B 1997Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy to correct myopia from −1.25 to −6.00 dioptersJ Refract Surg13528534PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pop, M, Payette, Y 2004Correlation of wavefront data and corneal asphericity with contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopiaJ Refract Surg20S678684PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yamane, N, Miyata, K, Samejima, T,  et al. 2004Ocular higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity after conventional laser in situ keratomileusisInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci4539863989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oshika, T, Klyce, SD, Applegate, RA, Howland, HC, El Danasoury, MA 1999Comparison of corneal wavefront aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusisAm J Ophthalmol12717PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Seiler, T, Kaemmerer, M, Mierdel, P, Krinke, HE 2000Ocular optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia and myopic astigmatismArch Ophthalmol1181721PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hemenger, RP, Tomlinson, A, Caroline, PJ 1989Role of spherical aberration in contrast sensitivity loss with radial keratotomyInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci3019972001PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oshika, T, Miyata, K, Tokunaga, T,  et al. 2002Higher-order wavefront aberrations of cornea and magnitude of refractive correction in laser in situ keratomileusisOphthalmology10911541158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marcos, S, Barbero, S, Llorente, L, Merayo-Lloves, J 2001Optical response to LASIK surgery for myopia from total and corneal aberration measurementsInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci4233493356PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mok, KH, Lee, VW 2005Effect of optical zone ablation diameter on LASIK-induced higher order optical aberrationsJ Refract Surg21141143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Oshika, T, Okamoto, C, Samejima, T, Tokunaga, T, Miyata, K 2006Contrast sensitivity function and ocular higher-order wavefront aberrations in normal human eyesOphthalmology11318071812PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fantes, FE, Hanna, KD, Waring, GO,3rd, Pouliquen, Y, Thompson, KP, Savoldelli, M 1990Wound healing after excimer laser keratomileusis (photorefractive keratectomy) in monkeysArch Ophthalmol108665675PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ishikawa, T, Park, SB, Cox, C, del Cerro, M, Aquavella, JV 1994Corneal sensation following excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy in humansJ Refract Corneal Surg10417422PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kauffmann, T, Bodanowitz, S, Hesse, L, Kroll, P 1996Corneal reinnervation after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis: an in vivo study with a confocal videomicroscopeGer J Ophthalmol5508512PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Linna, T, Tervo, T 1997Real-time confocal microscopic observations on human corneal nerves and wound healing after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomyCurr Eye Res16640649PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Perez-Santonja, JJ, Sakla, HF, Cardona, C, Chipont, E, Alio, JL 1999Corneal sensitivity after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis for low myopiaAm J Ophthalmol127497504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nejima, R, Miyata, K, Tanabe, T,  et al. 2005Corneal barrier function, tear film stability, and corneal sensation after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusisAm J Ophthalmol1396471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee, HK, Lee, KS, Kim, HC, Lee, SH, Kim, EK 2005Nerve growth factor concentration and implications in photorefractive keratectomy vs laser in situ keratomileusisAm J Ophthalmol139965971PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Matta, CS, Piebenga, LW, Deitz, MR, Tauber, J, Garner, LP 1998Five and three year follow-up of photorefractive keratectomy for myopia of −1 to −6 dioptersJ Refract Surg14318324PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Honda, N, Hamada, N, Amano, S, Kaji, Y, Hiraoka, T, Oshika, T 2004Five-year follow-up of photorefractive keratectomy for myopiaJ Refract Surg20116120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Verdon, W, Bullimore, M, Maloney, RK 1996Visual performance after photorefractive keratectomy. A prospective studyArch Ophthalmol11414651472PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    van de Pol, C, Soya, K, Hwang, DG 2001Objective assessment of transient corneal haze and its relation to visual performance after photorefractive keratectomyAm J Ophthalmol132204210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vetrugno, M, Quaranta, GM, Maino, A, Mossa, F, Cardia, L 2000Contrast sensitivity measured by 2 methods after photorefractive keratectomyJ Cataract Refract Surg26847852PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Owsley, C, Sekuler, R, Boldt, C 1981Aging and low-contrast vision: face perceptionInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci21362365PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nameda, N, Kawara, T, Ohzu, H 1989Human visual spatio-temporal frequency performance as a function of ageOptom Vis Sci66760765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nomura, H, Ando, F, Niino, N, Shimokata, H, Miyake, Y 2003Age-related change in contrast sensitivity among Japanese adultsJpn J Ophthalmol47299303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Oshika, T, Klyce, SD, Applegate, RA, Howland, HC 1999Changes in corneal wavefront aberrations with agingInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci4013511355PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    McLellan, JS, Marcos, S, Burns, SA 2001Age-related changes in monochromatic wave aberrations of the human eyeInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci4213901395PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Amano, S, Amano, Y, Yamagami, S,  et al. 2004Age-related changes in corneal and ocular higher-order wavefront aberrationsAm J Ophthalmol137988992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Ophthalmological Society 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norishige Sakata
    • 1
  • Tadatoshi Tokunaga
    • 2
  • Kazunori Miyata
    • 2
  • Tetsuro Oshika
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of TsukubaIbarakiJapan
  2. 2.Meiwakai Medical FoundationMiyata Eye HospitalMiyazakiJapan

Personalised recommendations