Advertisement

Measuring fiscal sustainability in the welfare state: fiscal space as fiscal sustainability

  • Hyejin KoEmail author
Original Paper
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

This study measures the fiscal capacity of welfare states to derive parameters for a sustainable welfare state. To secure fiscal soundness, it is critical to maintain affordable welfare spending by ensuring public capacity. Adapting the concept of fiscal space, defined as the difference between the current level of public debt and the debt limit implied by the country’s historical record of fiscal adjustment by Ostry et al. (2010) and Ghosh et al. (2011), this research measures and compares the fiscal sustainability of 17 welfare states. To derive this fiscal space, the debt limit of each country is set, primarily based on the estimating of fiscal reaction function and selecting interest schedule (Ghosh et al. 2011, p. F13). We use a pooled-time-series-cross-sectional model to estimate fiscal reaction function and the vector regression model to set the interest schedule. It is found that Southern European welfare states are unsustainable if they do no immediately change their fiscal policies. Countries outside of Southern Europe are generally financially sustainable. However, the UK, the US, and France have in their recent actions exacerbated their financial sustainability. For their part, the social democratic states remain financially sound, despite high levels of welfare spending. This indicates that welfare spending does not necessarily weaken fiscal soundness, which depends on the type of welfare state.

Keywords

Sustainability Public finance Fiscal space Welfare state 

Notes

References

  1. Afonso A, Jalles JT (2014) A longer-run perspective on fiscal sustainability. Empirica. 41:821–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alesina, A. & Perotti, R.(1995). Fiscal Expansions and Fiscal Adjustments in OECD Countries. NBER working paper no. 5214Google Scholar
  3. Anand R, van Winbegen S (1987) Inflacton and the financing of government expenditure in Turkey and empirical analysis. World BankGoogle Scholar
  4. Augustine TJ, Maasry A, Sobo D, Wang D (2011) Sovereign fiscal responsibility index 2011: accompanying exhibits to executive summary. Stanford University and the Comeback America Initiative (CAI)Google Scholar
  5. Bajo-Rubio O, Carmen D, Vicente E (2006) Is the budget deficit sustainable when fiscal policy is nonlinear?. The case of Spain. J Macroecon 28:596–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bajo-Rubio O, Carmen D, Vicente E (2009) Deficit sustainability and inflation in EMU: an analysis from the fiscal theory of the Price level. Eur J Polit Econ 25:525–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumol WJ (1967) Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: the anatomy of urban crisis. American Economic Association 57(3):415–426Google Scholar
  8. Beck N (2001) Time-series-cross-section data: what have we learned in the past few years? Annu Rev Polit Sci 4:271–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beck N, Katz JN (1995) What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. Am Polit Sci Rev 89(3):634–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beck N, Katz JN (2011) Modeling dynamics in time-series-cross-section political economy data. Annu Rev Polit Sci 14:331–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berenger V, Llorca M (2007) Political determinants of the fiscal sustainability: evidence from six developed individual countries. Working Paper presented at the AFSE Conference in Paris, September 21:2007Google Scholar
  12. Besley T, Case A (1995a) Incumbent behavior: vote-seeking, tax-setting, and yardstick competition. Am Econ Rev 85:25–45Google Scholar
  13. Besley T, Case A (1995b) Does electoral accountability affect economic policy choice? Evidence from gubernatorial term limits. Q J Econ 110:769–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blanchard O (1990) Suggestions for a New Set of Fiscal Indicators. OECD economics department working papers, p 79Google Scholar
  15. Block, F. & Evans. P.(2005). The State and the Economy. pp. 505–526 in Handbook of Economic Sociology (second edition), edited by Richard Swedberg and Neil Smelser. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  16. Bohn H (1995) The sustainability of budget deficits in a stochastic economy. J Money Credit Bank 27(1):257–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bohn H (1998) The behavior of U.S. public debt and deficits. Q J Econ 13:949–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bohn H (2007) Are stationarity and cointegration restrictions really necessary for the intertemporal budget constraint? J Monet Econ 54:1837–1847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Buhen A, Schneider F (2012) Size and development of tax evasion in 38 OECD countries: what do we (not) know? CESifo Working Papers 4004Google Scholar
  20. Buiter WG (1985) A guide to public seec to debt and deficit. Econ Policy 1(1):13–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Buiter WG, Patel UR (1992) Debt, deficits, and inflation: an application to the public finance of India. J Public Econ 47:45–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Byrne JP, Fiess N, MacDonald R (2011) The global dimension to fiscal sustainability. J Macroecon 33:137–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Campbell JL (1993) The state and fiscal sociology. Annu Rev Sociol 19:163–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Carey JM, Niemi RG, Powell LW (1998) The effects of term limits on state legislatures. Legis Stud Q 23(2):271–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Carey JM, Niemi RG, Powell LW (2000) The effects of term limits on state legislatures: a new survey of the 50 states. Legis Stud Q 31(1):105–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chen, X., Lin, S. & W. Reed, R. (2010). A Monte Carlo evaluation of the efficiency of the PCSE estimator. Applied Economics Letters, 17, 7–10Google Scholar
  27. Ciżkowicz, P., Rzońca, A. & Trzeciakowski, R. (2015). Membership in the Euro area and fiscal sustainability - Analysis through panel fiscal reaction functions. Working papers series 1501, Italian Association for the Study of economic asymmetries, Rome (Italy)Google Scholar
  28. Coeure B, Pisani-Ferry J (2005) Fiscal policy in EMU: towards a sustainability and growth pact? Oxf Rev Econ Policy 21:598–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Corbacho A, Vicente FC, Lora E (2013) More than revenue : taxation as a development tool. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cottarelli, C. (2009). The State of Public Finances Cross-Country Fiscal Monitor. November 2009 IMF STAFF POSITION NOTEGoogle Scholar
  31. Croce E, Hugo Juan-Ramon V (2003) Assessing fiscal sustainability : a cross country comparison. International Monetary FundGoogle Scholar
  32. Daniel BC, Shiamptanis C (2013) Pushing the limit? Fiscal policy in the European Monetary Union. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 37:2307–2321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. D’Erasmo, P., Mendoza, E. G., & Zhang, J. (2015). What is a sustainable public debt?. NBER Working Paper, No. 21574Google Scholar
  34. Doherty L, Yeaman L (2008) Fiscal space in the G-20. Economic Roundup 3:79–87Google Scholar
  35. Doi T, Hoshi T, Okimoto T (2011) Japanese government debt and sustainability of fiscal policy. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 25:414–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Drelichman M, Voth H-J (2008) Debt sustainability in historical perspective: the role of fiscal repression. J Eur Econ Assoc 6:657–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Emmenegger, P. (Eds.). (2012). The age of dualization: the changing face of inequality in deindustrializing societies. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  38. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. (eds.) (1996). Welfare states in transition : national adaptations in global economies. London ; thousand oaks. California: SageGoogle Scholar
  39. Esping-Andersen G (ed) (1999) Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Esping-Andersen G (ed) (2002) Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Ferrera M (2005) Welfare States and Social Nets in Southern Europe: An Introduction. In Maurizio (ed.) 2005. Welfare state reform in southern Europe: fighting poverty and social exclusion in Italy. Spain. Portugal and Greece. Routledge, London and New York, pp 1–32Google Scholar
  42. Fournier J, Fall F (2015) Limits to government debt sustainability. OECD economics department working papers, no. 1229. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  43. Ganghof S (2006) Tax mixes and the size of the welfare state: causal mechanisms and policy implications. J Eur Soc Policy 16:360–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ghosh A, Kim J, Mendoza E, Ostry JD, Mahvash S (2011) Fiscal fatigue, fiscal space and debt sustainability in advanced economies. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 16782Google Scholar
  45. Greiner A (2007) An endogenous growth model with public capital and sustainable government debt. Japanese Economic Review 58:345–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Greiner A, Fincke B (2009) Public debt and economic growth. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hakio CS, Rush M (1991) Is the budget deficit “too large?”. Econ Inq 29(3):429–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hallerberg, M. Strauch, R. & von Hagen J., (2004). The design of Fiscal Rules and Forms of Governance in European Union Countries. European Central Bank Working Papers No. 419Google Scholar
  49. Hallerberg M, Strauch R, von Hagen J (2007) The design of fiscal rules and forms of governance in European Union countries. Eur J Polit Econ 23(2):338–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hamilton JD, Flavin MA (1986) On the limitations of government borrowings: a framework for testing. Am Econ Rev 76:808–819Google Scholar
  51. Harris E (2013) Financing social protection floors: considerations of fiscal space. Int Soc Secur Rev 66:111–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hatemi-J A (2002) Fiscal policy in Sweden: effects of EMU criteria convergence. Econ Model 19:121–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hauner D, Kumar M (2005) Financial globalization and fiscal performance in emerging markets. IMF Working Paper 05(212):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Heller PS (2005) Understanding fiscal space (IMF policy discussion paper, no, 05/04). International Monerary Fund, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  55. Hicks AM (1994) The social democratic corporatist model of economic performance in the short-and medium-run perspective. In: Janoski T, Hicks A (eds) The comparative political economy of the welfare state. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 189–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Horne, J,(1991). Indicators of Fiscal Sustainability. IMF working paperGoogle Scholar
  57. Illera RM, Mulas-Granados C (2008) What makes fiscal consolidations last? A survival analysis of budget cuts in Europe (1960-2004). Public Choice 134:147–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Jones RS, Fukawa K (2015) Achieving Fiscal Consolidation while Promoting Social Cohesion in Japan. OECD economics department working papers. No. 1262. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  59. Ko H (2014) Empirical analysis of fiscal soundness and public social expenditure: a lesson for the future direction of the Korean welfare state. Asian Soc Work Policy Rev 8(1):16–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kontopoulos Y, Perotti R (1997) Fragmented fiscal policy. Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  61. Kontopoulos Y, Perotti R (1999) Government fragmentation and fiscal policy outcomes: evidence from the OECD countries. In: Poterba J, von Hagan J (eds) Fiscal rules and fiscal performance. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  62. Korpi W (1997) Is utility related to employment status? Employment, unemployment, labor market policies and subjective well-being among Swedish youth. Labour economics 4(2):125–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lindbeck, A. (2006). The Welfare State – Background, Achievements, Problems. IFN working paper no. 662Google Scholar
  64. Marcel M (2014) Budgeting for fiscal space and government performance beyond the great recession. OECD J Budg 13(2):9–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mendoza EG, Ostry JD (2008) International evidence on fiscal solvency: is fiscal policy “responsible”? J Monet Econ 55(6):1081–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Miriam, A., G. & Lucio, P. (2008). Pork-Barrel Politics in Postwar Italy, 1953–94. American Journal of Political Science, 52(2), 268–289Google Scholar
  67. Obinger H, Wagsshal U (2010) Social Expenditure and Revenues. In the Oxford handbook of the welfare state. (eds). Castles, F. G., Leibfried, S., Obinger, H. Pierson, C, pp 333–352Google Scholar
  68. OECD (2012). Restoring public finances 2012. OECD PublishingGoogle Scholar
  69. Olekalns N (2000) Sustainability and stability? Australian fiscal policy in the twentieth century. Aust Econ Pap 39(2):138–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ortiz, I., Chai, J. & Cummins, M. (2011). Identifying fiscal space - options for social and economic development for children and poor households in 184 countries. UNICEF social and economic policy working paperGoogle Scholar
  71. Ortiz I, Cummins M, Karunanethy K (2015) Fiscal Space for Social Protection and the SDGs: Options to Expand Social Investments in 187 Countries. In: Fiscal space for social protection options to expand social investments in 187 countries. International Labour OfficeGoogle Scholar
  72. Ostry JD, Ghosh AR, Kim J, Mahvash S (2010) Fiscal Space. IMF Staff position Note 10/11, SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  73. Ostry JD, Ghosh AR, Espinoza R (2015) When Should Public Debt Be Reduced? In: When should public debt be reduced?. IMF Staff Discussion Note. 15/10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Perotti R, Kontopolos Y (2002) Fragmented fiscal policy. J Public Econ 86:191–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Polito, V. & Wickens, M. (2005). Measuring Fiscal Sustainability, CEPR discussion paper, no. 5312Google Scholar
  76. Polito V, Wickens M (2011) Assessing the fiscal stance in the European Union and the United States, 1970-2011. Econ Policy 68:601–629Google Scholar
  77. Polito V, Wickens M (2012) A model-based indicator of the fiscal stance. Eur Econ Rev 56(3):526–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Reed WR, Ye H (2011) Which panel data estimator should I use? Appl Econ 43:985–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ricciuti R (2004) Political fragmentation and fiscal outcomes. Public Choice 118(3–4):365–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Richter C, Paparas D (2012) In: International Network for Economic Research Working Paper (ed) How reliable are budget sustainability tests? A Case study for GreeceGoogle Scholar
  81. Sakuragawa M, Hosono K (2011) Fiscal sustainability in Japan. Japanese Economic Review 61(4):517–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schick A (2009) Budgeting for fiscal space. OECD J Budg 9(2):1–18Google Scholar
  83. Schneider F, Buhen A, Montenegro C (2010) Shadow Economies All over the World - New Estimates for 162 Countries from 1999 to 2007. World Bank development research group and Europe and Central Asia region human development economic unit. Policy Research Working Paper 5356Google Scholar
  84. Seok J (2014) Towards a sustainable welfare state: an evaluation and typology of OECD countries through the fuzzy-set ideal types analysis. Health and Social Welfare Review 34(4):005–035 (in Korean)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sims CA (1999) The precarious fiscal foundations of EMU. DNB Staff Reports 1999:34Google Scholar
  86. Song JH (2012) Sustainability of Public Debt and Expenditure: The case of Korea. in Sustainability and efficiency in managing public expenditures. Richard hemming, jay-Hyung Kim, sang-Hyop lee. (eds). 9–38. KDI, Seoul, Korea, pp 9–38Google Scholar
  87. Sotiropoulos DA (2004) Southern Europe public bureaucracies comparative perspective. West Eur Polit 27(3):405–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Steinmo S (1993) Taxation and democracy: Swedish, British and American approaches to financing the modern state. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  89. Stoian A (2012) Fiscal sustainability of the European welfare state: evidence from cumulative excess of the primary balance. Documentos de Tranaho Working Papers 27Google Scholar
  90. Stubelj I, Dolenc P (2010) Fiscal sustainability of EU member states in the context of current financial crisis. Ekonomska Istrazivanja-Economic Research 23:37–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Trehan B, Walsh CE (1988) Common trends, the Government’s budget constraint., and revenue smoothing. J Econ Dyn Control 12(2–3):425–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Trehan B, Walsh CE (1991) Testing intertemporal budget constraints: theory and applications to U.S. Federal Budget and current account deficits. J Money Credit Bank 23(2):206–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Trifiletti R (1999) Southern European welfare regimes and the worsening position of women. J Eur Soc Policy 9(1):49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Ullah UMW, Ahmed SP (2014) A review of European sovereign debt crisis: causes and consequences. International Journal of Business and Economics Research 3(2):66–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Volkerink B, Hann J (2001) Fragmented government effects on fiscal policy, new evidence. Public Choice 109:221–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wilcox D (1989) The sustainability of government deficits: implications of the present value borrowing constraint. J Money Credit Bank 21(3):291–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Korea Institute for Health and Social AffairsSejong-siRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations