Advertisement

Structural determinants of potential output growth in Europe and the role of fiscal policy

  • Roberta De SantisEmail author
  • Piero Esposito
  • Elena Masi
Original Paper
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

GDP growth in the Eurozone during the last twenty years continuously decreased. In addition, the global financial crisis and subsequent events seem to have, on average, shifted the trajectory of the Eurozone’s potential output downward. A key question is whether this trend is a permanent result of “secular stagnation” or if economic policies might improve the situation. In this paper, we test the impact of several structural determinants of potential output growth using a dynamic panel data methodology for 11 main EMU members for the period 1996–2014. We also take into account the role of fiscal policy stance and debt dynamics to assess whether European fiscal rules, especially in the aftermath of the financial and sovereign debt crises, contributed to the slowdown of potential growth. Estimated results suggest that population, tertiary education, research and development expenditure, trade and financial openness, and institutional quality contributed significantly to potential output growth in the EMU during the period under examination. We further find that debt accumulation affects positively and significantly potential growth for debt values up to 90% of GDP.

Keywords

Determinants of growth Potential output growth Reforms Institutional quality Fiscal rules Secular stagnation 

JEL classification

O29 O41 O43 O47 

Notes

References

  1. Acemoglu, D (2009) Endogenous technological change. Introduction to modern economic growth. Princeton University press. pp. 411–533. ISBN 978-0-691-13292-1Google Scholar
  2. Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J (2005) Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In Aghion P and Durlaff S, eds. Handbook of economic growth Vol. IA. Elsevier B.VGoogle Scholar
  3. Aghion P, Howitt P (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60(2):323–351Google Scholar
  4. Aghion P, Boustan L, Hoxby C, Vandenbussche J (2009). 2The causal impact of education on economic growth: Evidence from U.S”. mimeo Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
  5. Alesina A, Spolaore E, Wacziarg G (2005) Trade, growth and the size of countries. In P. Aghion and S. Durlaff, eds. Handbook of economic growth Vol. IA. Elsevier B.VGoogle Scholar
  6. Arestis P, Demetriades P, Luintel K (2001, 33) Financial development and economic growth: the role of stock markets. J Money, Credit, Bank (1):16–41Google Scholar
  7. Astorga P, Berges AR, Fitzgerald, V (2005) The standard of living in latin america during the twentieth century. Econ Hist Rev 58(4):765–796Google Scholar
  8. Auerbach J, Gorodnichenko Y (2012) Measuring the output responses to fiscal policy. AEJ:EP 4(2):1–27Google Scholar
  9. Bils M, Klenow PJ (2001) Quantifying quality growth. Am Econ Rev 91(4):1006–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blanchard O, Leigh D (2013) Growth forecast errors and fiscal multipliers. Available: IMF wp n 1301Google Scholar
  11. Briotti MG (2005) Economic reactions to public finance consolidation: a survey of the literature. ECB occasional paper no. 38. European Central BankGoogle Scholar
  12. Calderon C (2003) The direction of causality between financial development and economic growth. J Dev Econ 72(1):321–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cardarelli R, Lusinyan L (2015) U.S. Total factor productivity slowdown: evidence from the U.S. States, IMF WP n116Google Scholar
  14. Carvalho C, Ferrero A, Nechio F (2016) Demographics and real interest rates: inspecting the mechanism. EER 88(C):208–226Google Scholar
  15. Cesaroni T, De Santis R (2016) Current account “core periphery dualism” in the EMU. World Econ 39(10):1514–1538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cesaroni T, De Santis R (2018) Dynamics of net foreign asset components in the EMU. Int Econ 156(C):268–283Google Scholar
  17. Checherita-Westphal C, Rother P (2010) The impact of high and growing government debt on economic growth: an empirical investigation for the euro area. Working Paper Series 1237, European Central Bank Google Scholar
  18. Chinn M, Ito H (2008) What matters for financial development? Capital controls, institutions, and interactions. J Dev Econ 81(1):163–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ciucci M, Zoppè A (2017) Potential output estimates and their role in the EU fiscal policy surveillance. European Parliament Briefing, 16th January 2017Google Scholar
  20. Corsetti G, Kuester K, Meier A, Müller G (2012) Sovereign risk, fiscal policy and macroeconomic stability. IMF Working paper 12/33Google Scholar
  21. Cournède B, Goujard A, Pina A (2014) Reconciling fiscal consolidation with growth and equity. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, Vol. 2013/1Google Scholar
  22. Darvas Z, Simon A (2015) Filling the gap: open economy considerations for more reliable potential output estimates. Bruegel Working Paper 1172015Google Scholar
  23. Esposito P (2017) Trade creation, trade diversion and imbalances in the EMU. Econ Model 60:462–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Everaert G, Heylen G, Schoonackers R (2015) Fiscal policy and TFP in the OECD: measuring direct and indirect effects. Empir Econ 49:605–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hale G, Obstfield M (2014) The Euro and the geography of international debt flows, CEPR discussion paper n.9937Google Scholar
  26. Hauk WR Jr (2017) Endogeneity Bias and growth regressions. J Macroecon 51(March 2017):143–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Havik K, Mc Morrow K, Orlandi F, Planas C, Raciborski R, Roeger W, Rossi A, Thum-Thysen A, Vandermeulen V (2014) The production function methodology for calculating potential growth rates & output gaps. Eur Econ. Economic Papers 535Google Scholar
  28. Hoeting JA, Madigan D, Raftery AE, Volinsky CT (1999) Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial. Stat Sci 14:382–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115(1):53–74Google Scholar
  30. Jimeno F, Smets, Yiangou J (2014) Secular stagnation: A view from the Eurozone http://voxeu.org/article/secular-stagnation-view-eurozone. Accessed 1 June 2018
  31. Kapetanios G, Pesaran MH, Yamagata T (2011) Panels with non-stationary multifactor error structures. J Econ 160(2):326–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M (2010) The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. WB policy research WP no. 5430. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  33. Koenig J (2015) European integration and the effects of country size on growth. J Econ Integr 30(3):501–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Krugman (2014), Four observations on secular stagnation, Vox-EU, 15th August 2015. https://voxeu.org/article/four-observations-secular-stagnation. Accessed 1 June 2018
  35. Lanzafame M, Felipe J, Sotocinal N RC, Bayudan-Dacuycuy C (2016) The pillars of potential growth and the role of policy: a panel data approach, asian development bank, WP n.482Google Scholar
  36. Leon-Gonzales R, Vinagayathasan T (2013). Robust determinants of growth in Asian developing economies: a bayesian panel data model averaging approach. GRIPS discussion paper 12–12. TokyoGoogle Scholar
  37. Levchenko, Logan TL, Tesar LL (2010) The collapse of international trade during the 2008–2009 crisis: in search of the smoking gun, NBER working papers 16006, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
  38. Moral-Benito E (2012) Determinants of economic growth: a Bayesian panel data approach. Rev Econ Stat 94(2):566–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Müller (2014) Fiscal austerity and the multiplier in times of crisis. Ger Econ Rev 15(2):243–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Neil T (2015) Estimating heterogeneous coefficients in panel data models with endogenous regressors and common factors. Ph.D Conference Working Paper, University of QueenslandGoogle Scholar
  41. OECD (2016) Using the fiscal levers to escape the low-growth trap. OECD economic outlook, volume 2016 issue 2, chapter 3Google Scholar
  42. Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge WP in economics 0435, Faculty of Economics, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  43. Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Econ 22(2):265–312Google Scholar
  44. Pritchett L (2001) Where has all the education gone? World Bank Econ Rev 15(3):367–391Google Scholar
  45. Reinhart C, Rogoff K (2010) Growth in a time of debt. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 100(May 2010):573–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Riera-Crichton D, Vegh CA, Vuletin G (2014) Fiscal multipliers in recessions and expansions does it matter whether government spending is increasing or decreasing? Policy research working paper 6994, World bankGoogle Scholar
  47. Rodriguez F, Rodrik D (2001) Trade policy and economic growth: a skeptic's guide to the cross-national evidence. NBER Macroecon Annu 2000(15):261–338Google Scholar
  48. Romer PM (1994) The origins of endogenous growth. J Econ Perspect 8(1):3–22Google Scholar
  49. Roodman D (2009) How to do xtabond2 an introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata J 9(1):86–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sachs J, Warner A (1995) Economic reform and the process of global integration. Brook Pap Econ Act 1:1–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sala-i-Martin X, Doppelhofer G, Miller RI (2004) Determinants of long term growth: a Bayesian averaging of classical estimates (BACE) approach. Am Econ Rev 94(4):813–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Solow RM (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q J Econ. Oxford Journals 70(1): 65–94Google Scholar
  53. Swan TW (1956) Economic growth and capital accumulation. Econ Rec Wiley 32(2):334–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberta De Santis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Piero Esposito
    • 2
  • Elena Masi
    • 3
  1. 1.Italian National Statistical Institute (ISTAT) and LUISS Guido CarliRomeItaly
  2. 2.School of European Political EconomyLUISS Guido CarliRomeItaly
  3. 3.Ministry of Economy and Finance, Treasury DepartmentRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations