International Economics and Economic Policy

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 159–183 | Cite as

On imperfect competition and market distortions: the causes of corporate under-investment in energy and material efficiency

  • Jun RentschlerEmail author
  • Raimund Bleischwitz
  • Florian Flachenecker
Original Paper


In practice firms are faced by a range of market frictions and barriers, which can prevent them from undertaking investments in efficiency and low-carbon technologies. Thus, even when environmental taxes are imposed, firms may be unable (or unwilling) to adjust their behaviour and technology in response to price signals. With a focus on energy and material efficiency investments, this paper systematically investigates how the theoretical assumptions of perfectly competitive and efficient markets are violated in practice, and how this results in complex and interlinked investment barriers. It classifies five categories of investment barriers: information, capacity, and financial constraints, as well as uncompetitive market structures and fiscal mismanagement; and presents evidence on each of these. It concludes by proposing a range of measures for mitigating investment barriers, and addressing their structural causes. Overall, the evidence presented in this paper aims to help increase the effectiveness of environmental taxes and regulation, by identifying market imperfections that environmental taxes alone cannot address.


Investment barriers Efficiency Firms Environmental taxes 

JEL codes

H23 H32 L22 



This paper is partly based on a research partnership between the Institute for Sustainable Resources at University College London (UCL ISR) and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), and the associated policy report by Flachenecker and Rentschler (2015). It benefited from extensive comments from and discussions with Craig Davies, Paul Ekins, Nigel Jollands, and Gianpiero Nacci. Comments by seminar participants at the EBRD in December 2014, and by anonymous referees are gratefully acknowledged. The conceptual framework of this paper is inspired by Chapter 2 of the World Bank’s World Development Report 2014 (Typology of obstacles to risk management) by Stéphane Hallegatte.


  1. Acemoglu D, Robinson J (2010) The role of institutions in growth and development. In: Brady D, Spence M (eds) Leadership and growth. The World Bank, Washington DC, pp 135–164Google Scholar
  2. Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Bursztyn L, Hemous D (2012) The environment and directed technical change. Am Econ Rev 102:131–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ADB (2013) Same energy, more power: accelerating energy efficiency in Asia. Asian Development Bank, ManilaGoogle Scholar
  4. Aghion P, Bloom N, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P (2002). Competition and Innovation: an inverted U relationship. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 9269Google Scholar
  5. Aldy JE, Krupnick AJ, Newell RG, Parry IW, Pizer WA (2010) Designing climate mitigation policy. J Econ Lit 48(4):903–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Allwood JM, Ashby MF, Gutowski TG, Worrell E (2011) Material efficiency: a white paper. Resour Conserv Recycl 55(3):362–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anderson S, Newell R (2004) Information programs for technology adoption. Resour Energy Econ 26:27–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Avner P, Rentschler J, Hallegatte S (2014). Carbon price efficiency lock-in and path dependence in urban forms and transport infrastructure. World Bank Policy Research Working Papers, 6941Google Scholar
  9. Baron D (1985) Regulation of prices and pollution under incomplete information. J Public Econ 28:211–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bastein T, Koers W, Dittrich K, Becker J, Lopez F (2014) Business barriers to the uptake of resource efficiency measures. POLFREE Deliverable 1.5. Policy Options For a Resource Efficient Economy (POLFREE)Google Scholar
  11. Blaug M (2007) The fundamental theorems of modern welfare economics, historically contemplated. Hist Polit Econ 39(2):185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bleischwitz R (2010) International economics of resource productivity—relevance, measurement, empirical trends, innovation, resource policies. IEEP 7(2–3):227–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bleischwitz R (2012) Towards a resource policy - unleashing productivity dynamics and balancing international distortions. Miner Econ 24(2):135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bleischwitz R, Hennicke P (eds) (2004). Eco-efficiency, regulation, and sustainable business: towards a governance structure for sustainable development. Edward Elgar PublishingGoogle Scholar
  15. Bloom N, van Reenen J (2007) Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Q J Econ 122(4):1351–1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bontems P, Bourgeon JM (2005) Optimal environmental taxation and enforcement policy. Eur Econ Rev 49(2):409–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bovenberg AL (1999) Green tax reforms and the double dividend: an updated reader’s guide. Int Tax Public Financ 6(3):421–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bovenberg L, Goulder LH (1996) Optimal environmental taxation in the presence of other taxes: general-equilibrium analyses. Am Econ Rev 86(4):985–1000Google Scholar
  19. Brunner S, Flachsland C, Marschinski R (2012) Credible commitment in carbon policy. Clim Pol 12(2):255–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cagno E, Worrell E, Trianni A, Pugliese G (2013) A novel approach for barriers to industrial energy efficiency. Renew Sust Energ Rev 19:290–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Castagneto-Gissey G (2014) How competitive are EU electricity markets? An assessment of ETS Phase II. Energy Pol 73:278–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Commander S, Nikolski Z, Vagliasindi (2015). Estimating the size of external effects of energy subsidies in transport and agriculture. World Bank Policy Research Working Papers, 7227Google Scholar
  23. D’Amato A, Dijkstra BR (2015) Technology choice and environmental regulation under asymmetric information. Resour Energy Econ 41:224–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. DeCanio S (1993). Barriers within firms to energy-efficient investments. Energy Policy: 906–914Google Scholar
  25. DeCanio S, Watkins W (1998) Investment in energy efficiency: do the characteristics of firms matter? Rev Econ Stat 80(1):95–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. DeCanio S, Dibble C, Keyvan A-A (2000) The importance of organizational structure for the adoption of innovations. Manag Sci 46(10):1285–1299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dijk M, Kemp R (2016) Understanding the web of constraints on resource efficiency in Europe. Policy brief March 2016. Policy options for a resource efficient economy (POLFREE)Google Scholar
  28. Domenech T, Bleischwitz R, Ekins P, O’Keeffe M, Drummond P (2014) Lessons from the EU policy experiences, POLFREE Deliverable 1.2. Policy Options For a Resource Efficient Economy (POLFREE)Google Scholar
  29. Durbin S (2004) Workplace skills, technology adoption and firm productivity: a review. New Zealand Treasury Working Paper. 04/16. September 2004Google Scholar
  30. Ebrahim Z, Inderwildi OR, King D a (2014) Macroeconomic impacts of oil price volatility: mitigation and resilience. Front Energy 8(1):9–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. EBRD (2010) EBRD Management, Organisation, and Innovation (MOI) Survey. From European Bank for Reconstruction and Development:
  32. European Commission (1999) Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the Landfill of Waste. Brussels: European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  33. European Commission (2008) Directive 2008/98/EC of the European parliament and the council of 19 November 2008 on waste. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  34. European Commission (2011). Roadmap to a resource efficient Europe. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the RegionsGoogle Scholar
  35. European Commission (2012) Directive 2012/27/EU of the European parliament and the council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  36. European Commission (2013) Eurobarometer: SMEs, resource efficiency and green markets. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  37. Fankhauser S, Hepburn C, Park J (2010) Combining multiple climate policy instruments: how not to do. Clim Chang Econ 1(3):209–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Farzin YH, Kort PM (2000) Pollution abatement investment when environmental regulation is uncertain. J Public Econ Theory 2(2):183–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fay M, Hallegatte S, Vogt-Schilb A, Rozenberg J, Narloch U, Kerr T (2015) Decarbonizing development: three steps to a zero-carbon future. The World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  40. Fischer C (2008) Emissions pricing, spillovers, and public investment in environmentally friendly technologies. Energy Econ 30(2):487–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fischer C, Greaker M, Rosendahl KE (2015) Strategic subsidies for renewable energy. Conference Paper. Green Growth Knowledge Platform (GGKP) Third Annual Conference. 29–30 January, 2015Google Scholar
  42. Flachenecker F, Rentschler J (2015) A report commissioned by the European bank for reconstruction and development (EBRD). University College London (UCL), London, Investments in Resource Efficiency—Costs and Benefits, Investment Barriers, and Intervention MeasuresGoogle Scholar
  43. Frishammar J, Hörte S (2005) Managing external information in manufacturing firms: the impact on innovation performance. J Prod Innov Manag 22(3):251–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gillingham K, Newell RG, Palmer K (2009) Energy efficiency economics and policy. Ann Rev Resour Econ 1(1):597–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gollier C (2002) Discounting an uncertain future. J Publ Econ:149–166Google Scholar
  46. Goulder L (2013) Climate change policy’s interactions with the tax system. Energy Econ 40(2013):S3–S11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Grubb M, Ulph D (2002) Energy, the environment, and innovation. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 18(1):92–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hallegatte S, Fay M, Vogt-Schilb A (2013). Green industrial policies—when and how. World Bank Policy Research Working Papers, 6677Google Scholar
  49. Howarth R, Andersson B (1993) Market barriers to energy efficiency. Energ Econ: 262–272Google Scholar
  50. Hyytinen A, Toivanen O (2005) Do financial constraints hold back innovation and growth? Evidence on the role of public policy. Res Policy 34(9):1385–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. IFC (2011) Resource efficiency in the ferrous foundry industry in Russia. International Finance Corporation, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  52. IMF (2013) Energy subsidy reform: lessons and implications. International Monetray Fund, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  53. Jordan ND, Lemken T, Liedtke C (2014) Barriers to resource efficiency innovations and opportunities for smart regulations—the case of Germany. Environ Policy Gov 24(5):307–323. doi: 10.1002/eet.1632 Google Scholar
  54. Kammerlander M (2014). Individual Behavioural Barriers to Resource Efficiency (2014), Deliverable 1.6 of POLFREE project, SERI, MU-ICIS and UCL Del_1.6_FINAL_20VERSION_clean_20lay-out_20-2.pdf
  55. KfW (2013) BMU-Umweltinnovationsprogramm: Neuer Förderschwerpunkt „Materialeffizienz in der Produktion“., From Kreditanstalt für WiederaufbauGoogle Scholar
  56. Kostka G, Moslener U, Andreas J (2013) Barriers to increasing energy efficiency: evidence from small-and medium-sized enterprises in China. J Clean Prod 57:59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Krishna P, Mitra D (1998) Trade liberalization, market discipline and productivity growth: new evidence from India. J Dev Econ 56(2):447–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Krysiak FC (2008) Prices vs. quantities: The effects on technology choice. J Public Econ 92(5–6):1275–1287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Laffont JJ (1994) Regulation of pollution with asymmetric information. Issues and Analysis, Nonpoint Source Pollution Regulation, p 39Google Scholar
  60. Lecuyer O, Quirion P (2013) Can uncertainty justify overlapping policy instruments to mitigate emissions? Ecol Econ 93:177–191Google Scholar
  61. Legeida N (2002) The Economic implications of government support for the steel industry: The Case of Ukraine. Association for Studies in Public Economics—The Fifth International Conference on “Public Sector Transition”Google Scholar
  62. Lipsey R, Lancaster K (1956) The general theory of second best. The Review of Economic Studies Vol. 24, No. 1 (1956–1957), pp. 11–32Google Scholar
  63. Montero JP (2002) Permits, standards, and technology innovation. J Environ Econ Manag 44(1):23–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Morris MG, Venkatesh V (2000) Age differences in technology adoption decisions: implications for a changing work force. Pers Psychol 53:375–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Morrisa J, Phillips P, Read A (1998) The UK Landfill Tax: an analysis of its contribution to sustainable waste management. Resour Conserv Recycl 23(4):259–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. OECD (2004) Principles of corporate governance. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  67. OECD (2015) OECD inventory of support measures for fossil fuels 2015. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  68. Onischka M, Liedtke C, Jordan N (2012) How to sensitize the financial industry to resource efficiency considerations and climate change related risks. J Env Assess Pol Assess 14 (3)Google Scholar
  69. Pamukcu T (2003) Trade liberalization and innovation decisions of firms: lessons from post-1980 Turkey. World Dev 31(8):1443–1458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Parry IWH, Williams RC III, Goulder LH (1999) When can carbon abatement policies increase welfare? The fundamental role of distorted factor markets. J Environ Econ Manag 37(1):52–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Parry I, Evans D, Oates WE (2014) Are energy efficiency standards justified? J Environ Econ Manag 67(2):104–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pigou AC (1920) The economics of welfare. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  73. Pindyck R (1990) Irreversibility, uncertainty, and investment. NBER Working Paper No. 3307Google Scholar
  74. Pindyck R (2006) Uncertainty in environmental economics., NBER Working Paper, No. 12725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Pindyck R (2013) Climate change policy: what do the models tell us? J Econ Lit 51:860–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Popp D (2006) R&D subsidies and climate policy: is there a “free lunch”? Clim Chang 77(3):311–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Reddy S, Assenza GB, Assenza D, Hasselmann F (2013) Barriers and drivers to energy efficiency—a new taxonomical approach. Energy Convers Manag 74:403–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Requate T (1998) Incentives to innovate under emission taxes and tradeable permits. Eur J Polit Econ 14(1):139–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Requate T (2005) Timing and commitment of environmental policy, adoption of New technology, and repercussions on R&D. Environ Resource Econ 31(2):175–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Requate T (2006) Environmental policy under imperfect competition. Int Yearb Environ Resour Econ 2007:120–207Google Scholar
  81. Requate T, Unold W (2003) Environmental policy incentives to adopt advanced abatement technology: will the true ranking please stand up? Eur Econ Rev 47(1):125–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rodrik D (1988) Closing the technology gap: does trade liberalization really help? NBER Working Paper Series, No. 2654Google Scholar
  83. Rohdin P, Tholander P, Solding P (2007) Barriers to and drivers for energy efficiency in the Swedish foundry industry. Energy Policy 35(1):672–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rozenberg J, Vogt-Schilb A, Hallegatte S (2014) Transition to clean capital, irreversible investment and stranded assets. World Bank Policy Research Working Papers, 6859Google Scholar
  85. Salehi-Isfahani D, Stucki BW, Deutschmann J (2014) The reform of energy subsidies in Iran : the role of cash transfersGoogle Scholar
  86. Schleifer A (1998) State versus private ownership., NBER Working Paper Series, No. 6665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sorrell S, Sijm J (2003) Carbon trading in the policy mix. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 19(3):420–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sutherland R (1991) Market barriers to energy-efficiency investments. Energy J 12(3):15–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Trianni A, Cagno E, Thollander P, Backlund S (2013) Barriers to industrial energy efficiency in foundries: a European comparison. J Clean Prod 40:161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. US Dept. of Commerce (2001) Report to the president. Structural Problems. International Trade Administration, Global Steel TradeGoogle Scholar
  91. Vogt-Schilb A, Hallegatte S (2014) Marginal abatement cost curves and the optimal timing of mitigation measures. Energy Policy 66:645–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Whitley S (2013) At cross-purposes subsidies and climate compatible investment. Overseas Development Institute (ODI), LondonGoogle Scholar
  93. World Bank (2004a) Corporate governance country assessment: Moldova. World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  94. World Bank (2004b) Corporate governance country assessment: Romania. World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  95. World Bank (2006) Corporate governance country assessment—Ukraine 2006. The World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  96. World Bank (2013) World development report 2014—risk and opportunity: managing risk for development. The World Bank, Washington DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. World Bank (2014) Diversified development—making the most of natural resources in Eurasia. The World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  98. Yeo M, Partner, Steptoe, Johnson (2010). Natural resource subsidies. Geneva: World Trade OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  99. Zhao J (2003) Irreversible abatement investment under cost uncertainties: tradable emission permits and emissions charges. J Public Econ 87(12):2765–2789CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University College London, Institute for Sustainable ResourcesLondonUK
  2. 2.Oxford Institute for Energy StudiesOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations