Advertisement

International Economics and Economic Policy

, Volume 9, Issue 3–4, pp 297–322 | Cite as

Convergence crisis: economic crisis and convergence in the European Union

  • Péter Halmai
  • Viktória VásáryEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The success of the integration process of the new EU Member States is reflected by the convergence performance. Sustainable convergence assumes that potential growth rates of the less developed countries continuously exceed the dynamics of the potential output of the developed countries. However, the financial and economic crisis of 2008 has resulted in a fundamentally new situation as regards these issues. This paper considers real convergence, catch-up processes and in terms of these the main economic growth trends. The study focuses mainly on the potential growth trends. The recession has, however, affected the individual countries to different degrees. The study classified the Member States into four groups based on the initial circumstances and the vulnerability originating from them; these are ‘Developed’ countries and ‘Convergence’ countries, three groups of the latter are ‘Mediterranean’ countries, ‘Catch-up’ countries and ‘Vulnerable’ countries. Potential growth and the contribution of the individual growth factors might follow significantly different paths in these country groups. The convergence countries might face especially great challenges. Potential growth rate of the ‘Convergence’ countries—according to simulations—is expected to recover less in the mid-term, than that of the ‘Developed’ countries, i.e. convergence slows down, it might come to a halt or even divergence might occur in certain countries. It might result in a ‘Convergence Crisis’ particularly in certain ‘Mediterranean’ and ‘Vulnerable’ new Member States. Also, longer term simulations indicate that the European convergence processes might slow down and stop in certain countries. These trends may have significant effects on economic policies facilitating potential growth. We apply extensive quantitative analysis, production function and growth accounting approaches in the study.

Keywords

European Union Real convergence Convergence crisis Potential growth Catch-up 

JEL Classification

F43 F47 F15 E60 O11 O47 

References

  1. Barro RJ (1991) Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Q J EconGoogle Scholar
  2. Barro R, Sala-i-Martin X (1992) Convergence. J Polit Econ 100(2):223–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barro RJ, Sala-i-Martin X (1995) Economic growth. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Barro RJ, Sala-i-Martin X (2003) Economic growth, 2nd edn. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumol WJ (1986) Productivity growth, convergence and welfare: what the long-run data show. Am Econ RevGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlin W, Soskice D (2005) Macroeconomics: imperfections. Institutions and Policies, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Carone G, Denis C, Mc Morrow K, Mourre G, Röger W (2006) Long-term labour productivity and GDP projections for the EU25 Member States: a production function framework. European Commission, Economic Papers No. 253, European Commission, Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs. http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/economic_papers/economicpapers253_en.htm
  8. Cerra V, Saxena SC (2008) Growth dynamics: the myth of economic recovery. Am Econ Rev 98:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chalk N, Tanzi V (2002) Impact of large public debt on growth in the EU. In: Buti M, Von Hagen J, Martinez-Mongay C (eds) The behaviour of fiscal authorities, Basingstoke, Palgrave.Google Scholar
  10. Claessens S, Ayhan Kose M, Terrones E (2008) What happens during recessions, crunches and busts?, IMF Working Paper, WP/8/274, IMFGoogle Scholar
  11. Claessens SM, Kose MA, Terrones ME (2011). How do business and financial cycles interact. IMF Working Paper 11/88Google Scholar
  12. D’Auria F, Denis C, Havik K, Mc Morrow K, Planas C, Raciborski R, Röger W, Rossi A (2010) The production function methodology for calculating potential growth rates and output gaps. Economic Papers 420| July 2010Google Scholar
  13. Denis C, Mc Morrow K, Röger W (2002) Production function approach to calculating potential growth and output gaps—estimates for the EU Member States and the US. Economic Papers No. 176, European Commission, Directorate General for Economic and Financial AffairsGoogle Scholar
  14. Denis C, Grenouilleau D, Mc Morrow K, Röger W (2006) Calculating potential growth and output gaps – a revised production function approach. Economic Papers No. 247, European Commission, Directorate General for Economic and Financial AffairsGoogle Scholar
  15. EC (2008) EMU@10. Successes and challenges after 10 years of economic and monetary union. European Economy No. 2. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  16. EC (2009a) Impact of the current economic and financial crisis on potential output, European Economy. Occasional Papers. 49. June 2009. Economic and Financial Affairs DG, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  17. EC (2009b) The 2009 ageing report: economic and budgetary projections for the EU27 Member States (2008–2060) European Economy 2. DG ECFIN, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  18. EC (2009c) Five years of an enlarged EU Economic achievements and challenges. European Economy, No. 1/2009, Economic and Financial Affairs DGGoogle Scholar
  19. EC (2011a) The 2012 ageing report: underlying assumptions and projection methodologies. European Economy No. 4. DG ECFIN, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  20. EC (2011b) European economic forecast—Autumn 2011. Eur Econ 6Google Scholar
  21. Elekes A (2011) Cohesion and/or growth? In: Public finance quarterly 2011/1:pp. 107–123Google Scholar
  22. Furceri D, Mourougane A (2009) The effect of financial crises on potential output: new empirical evidence from OECD countries, ECO/WKP(2009)40Google Scholar
  23. Giannetti M (2002) The effects of integration of regional disparities: convergence, divergence or both? Eur Econ Rev 46:539–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gros D, Alcidi C (2010) The crisis and the real economy. Intereconomics 45(1):4–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Halmai P, Vásáry V (2010a). Real convergence in the new Member States of the European Union (Shorter and longer term prospects). In: Eur J Comp Econ (EJCE) 7(1):229–253. http://eaces.liuc.it/18242979201001/182429792010070110.pdf
  26. Halmai P, Vásáry V (2010b) Growth crisis in the EU.: challenges and prospects. Intereconomics 45(5):329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Halmai P, Vásáry V (2011) Crisis and economic growth in the EU, medium and long-tem trends In: Acta Oeconomica, Volume 61, Number 4/December 2011. doi: 10.1556/AOecon.61.2011.4.4, 465–485 pp., ISSN 0001-6373
  28. Haugh D, Ollivaud P, Turner D (2009) The macroeconomic consequences of banking crisis in OECD countries. OECD Working Paper No. 683Google Scholar
  29. Mankiw NG (1995) The growth of nations. Brook Pap Econ ActGoogle Scholar
  30. Mankiw G, Romer D, Weil D (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Q J EconGoogle Scholar
  31. Quah D (1995) Empirics for economic growth and convergence. CEP Discus Pap 235:27–59Google Scholar
  32. Quah D (1996) Regional convergence clusters across Europe. Eur Econ Rev 40(3–5):951–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ratto M, Roeger W, in’t Veld J (2008) QUEST III—an estimated DSGE model of the Euro Area with fiscal and monetary policy. European Economy Economic Paper No. 335Google Scholar
  34. Reinhart CM, Rogoff KS (2009a) The aftermath of financial crisis. NBER Working Paper No. 14656Google Scholar
  35. Reinhart CM, Rogoff KS (2009b) This time is different: eight centuries of financial folly. PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  36. Rodrik D (2011) Unconditional convergence, NBER Working Paper 17 546. MA Cambridge, USAGoogle Scholar
  37. Snowdon B, Vane HR (2005) Modern macroeconomics. It’s origins, development and current state. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  38. Tilford S, Whyte P (2010) The Lisbon scorecard X. The road to 2020. Centre for European Reform, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. UNU-MERIT(2011) Innovation union scoreboard 2010. The innovation union’s performance scoreboard for research and innovation. Maastricht, http://www.proinno-europe.eu/metrico
  40. van Ark B (2010) Productivity, sources of growth and potential output in Euro area and USA. Intereconomics 45(1):17–20Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Economics, Department of International EconomicsUniversity of PannoniaVeszprémHungary

Personalised recommendations