Skip to main content
Log in

Robotic Colorectal Surgery: First 50 Cases Experience

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Purpose

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is believed to be technically and oncologically feasible. However, some limitation of traditional laparoscopic surgery may cause difficulties. Robotic-assisted surgery may overcome these pitfalls.

Methods

From December 2005 to July 2007, 50 patients were selected for robotic-assisted colorectal resection mainly for cancer.

Results

Of the 50 patients enrolled, 32 (64 percent) were men and 18 (36 percent) were women. Their mean age was 66.7 (range, 37–92) years. The American Society of Anesthesiologists’ (ASA) class distribution was 13 (26 percent) ASA I, 24 (48 percent) ASA II, 12 (24 percent) ASA III, and 1 (2 percent) ASA IV. Forty-four patients suffered from cancer and six patients from benign disease. Amongst the cancer patients, 3 percent were at UICC (International Union Against Cancer) Stage 0, 36 percent at UICC Stage I, 24 percent at Stage II, 28 percent at Stage III, and 9 percent at Stage IV. The global conversion rate was 4 percent. The mean operative time was 338.8 minutes. It decreased as the experience increased (419 minutes in the first 20 cases vs. 346 minutes in the last 30 cases; P = 0.036). As a gross comparison, the results of a coeval standard laparoscopy group of patients were shown.

Conclusions

Robotic laparoscopic colon surgery is feasible and safe. A longer operating time is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, Sargent D, Schroeder G. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 2002;287:321–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2050–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Germay O, et al. Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 2001;25:1467–77.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, et al. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 2003;138:777–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Abbou C, Hoznek A, Salomon L, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot. J Urol 2001;165:1964–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mikhail AA, Orvieto MA, Billatos ES, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: first 100 patients with one year of follow-up. Urology 2006;68:1275–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mohr F, Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, et al. Computer-enhanced "robotic" cardiac surgery: experience in 148 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121:842–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nezhat C, Saberi NS, Shahmohamady B, Nezhat F. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgery. JSLS 2006;10:317–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne GH. Telerobotic assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1689–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Woeste G, Bechstein WO, Wullstein C. Does telerobotic assistance improve laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Int J Colorectal Dis 2005;20:253–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Munz Y, Moorthy K, Kudchadkar R, et al. Robotic assisted rectopexy. Am J Surg 2004;187:88–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:2162–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rockall TA, Darzi A. Robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83:1463–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marecick SJ, Chaudhry V, Jan A, et al. A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and hand-sewn intestinal anastomoses performed by residents. Am J Surg 2007;193:349–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Baik SH, Kang CM, Kim NK, et al. Robotic total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. J Robotic Surg 2007;1:99–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Berlinger NT. Robotic surgery: squeezing into tight places. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2099–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Spinoglio M.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Spinoglio, G., Summa, M., Priora, F. et al. Robotic Colorectal Surgery: First 50 Cases Experience. Dis Colon Rectum 51, 1627–1632 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9334-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9334-0

KEY WORDS

Navigation