Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 49, Issue 4, pp 517–518 | Cite as

Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancers

  • Jin-Tung LiangEmail author
  • Horng-Shiee Lai
  • Po-Huang Lee
Multimedia Article


More and more colorectal surgeons believe that total mesorectal excision can achieve favorable oncologic results for the treatment of rectal cancers. The present study is a feasibility study aiming to evaluate if total mesorectal excision can be safely performed by laparoscopic approach with beneficial functional recovery.


A total of 44 patients (from January 2004 to February 2005) with middle rectal cancer (the average distance from anal verge was 7.8 cm, ranging from 5.0 to 10.0 cm) without preoperative chemoradiation therapy were selected to undergo laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Before the study entry, all patients underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging or multislice spiral computed tomography to evaluate the circumferential resection margin of rectal cancer. Only patients whose circumferential resection margin was not involved by rectal cancer were considered as potentially curable by total mesorectal excision procedures and were enrolled for this study. The operation procedures were conducted according to the guidelines advocated by Heald et al.1 and were shown in the video. Posteriorly, the dissection was along the ‘holy plane’ downward to the level of levator ani muscle. Anteriorly, the dissection plane was at the anterior part of Denonvilliers fascia. Laterally, the lateral ligaments were sharply cauterized at the medial part. The resected bowel was reconstructed with stapled end-to-end anastomosis. The surgical outcomes of this procedure were prospectively evaluated.


The laparoscopic total mesorectal excision was performed with acceptable operation time (234.4±44.4 minutes, mean±standard deviation) and little blood loss (80.0±24.0 ml) through a small wound (5.0±0.5 cm). Histopathology showed that all patients were able to get adequate distal section margins (mean: 2.8 cm; range: 1.6–5.4 cm) and negative circumferential resection margins (mean: 8.4mm; range: 2–14 mm). The number of dissected lymph nodes was 16.0±4.0. The pathologic tumor–node–metastasis stages were as follows: Stage I: n= 4; Stage II: n = 22; Stage III: n = 18. Two patients (4.5 percent) were diverted by protective ileostomy. There was no mortality within 30 days after operation. However, anastomotic leakage occurred in 3 patients. The patients have quick functional recovery, as evaluated by the length of postoperative ileus (48.0±12.0 hours), hospitalization (9.0±1.0 days) and degree of postoperative pain (3.5±0.5, visual analog scale). Besides the expenses covered by the National Bureau of Health Insurance in Taiwan, the patient had to pay an extra expense of NT$ 65000.08000.0 (1.0US dollars = 32.0 NT$). During the follow-up periods (median: 14 months, range. 2 to 27 months), three patients of Stage III and 1 patient of Stage II developed a recurrent disease (lung metastasis: n = 2; liver metastasis: n = 1, and pelvic recurrence, n = 1).


By laparoscopic approach, the total mesorectal excision for rectal cancers can be safely performed with good functional recovery. However, with only a median follow-up of 14 months in this case series, the long-term oncologic outcomes for these patients remain a question. Further randomized prospective study is thus mandatory to provide solid evidence of this approach.

Key words

Laparoscopic surgery Rectal cancer Total mesorectal excision 

Supplementary material

(MPG 52.3 MB)


  1. 1.
    Heald, RJ, Husband, EM, Ryall, RD 1982The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery-the clue to pelvic recurrence?Br J Surg69613616PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leroy, J, Jamali, F, Forbes, L,  et al. 2004Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgerySurg Endosc18281289PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pikarsky, AJ, Rosenthal, R, Weiss, EG, Wexner, SD 2002Laparoscopic total mesorectal excisionSurg Endosc16558562PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liang, JT, Shieh, MJ, Chen, CN,  et al. 2002Prospective evaluation of laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus laparotomy with resection in the management of complex polyps of the sigmoid colonWorld J Surg26377383PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liang, JT, Lai, HS, Huang, KC,  et al. 2003Comparison of medial-to-lateral versus traditional lateral-to-medial dissection sequences for the resection of rectosigmoid cancers—A randomized controlled clinical trialWorld J Surg27190196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liang, JT 2003Comparison of medial-to-lateral versus traditional lateral-to-medial dissection sequences for the resection of rectosigmoid cancers [letter]World J Surg2713371338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Milsom, JW, Böhm, B 1996Laparoscopic Colorectal SurgerySpringer-VerlagNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Milsom, JW, Böhm, B, Hammerhofer, KA,  et al. 1998A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary reportJ Am Coll Surg1874657CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beets-Tan, RG 2003MRI in rectal cancer: the T stage and circumferential resection marginColorectal Disease5392395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum1994General Rules for Clinical and Pathological Studies on Cancer of the Colon, Rectum, and AnusKaneharaTokyoGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sjoerdsma, W, Meijer, DW, Jansen, A,  et al. 2000Comparison of efficiencies of three techniques for colon surgeryJ Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Technique104753Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bärlehner, E, Benhidjeb, T, Anders, S, Schicke, B 2005Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: Outcomes in 194 patients and review of the literatureSurg Endosc19757766CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of SurgeryNational Taiwan University Hospital and College of MedicineTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations