Advertisement

Laparoscopic Abdominoanal Pull-through Procedure for Male Patients With Lower Rectal Cancer After Chemoradiation Therapy

Introduction

Abdominoanal pull-through procedure is an alternative procedure for lower rectal cancer in which double-stapling technique is difficult to apply and/or the adequate distal safety margin (>2 cm) cannot be achieved in a very narrow male pelvis. The present study is to examine if the pull-through procedure can be effectively performed by laparoscopic approach for male lower rectal cancer downstaged by concurrent chemoradiation therapy.

Methods

A total of 14 male patients with advanced lower rectal cancer (Stage II: n = 6; Stage III: n = 8, by tumor, node, and metastasis staging system of International Union Against Cancer) and successfully downstaged by preoperative concurrent chemoradiation therapy were accrued for this study. All patients underwent three-staged operation including: transverse-colostomy creation before concurrent chemoradiation therapy, laparoscopic pull-through procedure and closure of colostomy. The details of laparoscopic pull-through procedure were shown in the video including: total mobilization for rectum in the fashion of total mesorectal excision, retrieval and transection of bowel through an incision over dentate line, and coloanal anastomosis. The surgical outcome of the patients were prospectively evaluated.

Results

Although the dissection plane is a little blurred by preoperative concurrent chemoradiation therapy, the laparoscopic pull-through procedure was preformed with acceptable operation time (274.6 ± 52.4 minutes, mean±standard deviation) and little blood loss (104.5 ± 32.0 ml) through 5 small wounds of abdominal ports. The number of dissected lymph node was 17.0 ± 3.0. The distal safety margin of all patients was more than 2 cm. The patients have quick functional recovery, as evaluated by the length of postoperative ileus (48.0 ± 8.0 hours), hospitalization (9.0 ± 1.0 days), and degree of postoperative pain (3.5 ± 0.5, visual analog scale). There were no major postoperative complications yet postoperative fever developed in one patient and wound infection in the other one. Besides the expenses covered by the National Bureau of Health Insurance in Taiwan, the patient had to pay extra expenses of NT$25000.0 ± 3500.0 (1.0 US dollars = 32.0 NT$). During the follow-up periods (median: 10 months, range, 4 to 16 months), one patient developed a recurrent lung metastasis.

Conclusion

In view of the good functional recovery and fine short-term oncologic results, laparoscopic pull-through procedure was thus a good choice for downstaged male lower rectal cancer in terms of sphincter-preservation and enough distal section margin of tumor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

References

  1. 1.

    GL Kratzer (1967) ArticleTitleThe pull-through operation Dis Colon Rectum 10 112–114 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CCiC38rmvVY%3D Occurrence Handle6021063

  2. 2.

    JT Liang SM Wang KJ Chang (1997) ArticleTitleModified surgical techniques for the superlow anterior resection Hepatogastroenterology 44 1331–1333 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FhvFKqtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9356849

  3. 3.

    Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery-the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69:613–6.

  4. 4.

    J Leroy F Jamali L Forbes et al. (2004) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery Surg Endosc 18 281–289 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7kvFeluw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle14691716 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-002-8877-8

  5. 5.

    JT Liang MJ Shieh CN Chen et al. (2002) ArticleTitleProspective evaluation of laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus laparotomy with resection in the management of complex polyps of the sigmoid colon World J Surg 26 377–383 Occurrence Handle11865378 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00268-001-0235-9

  6. 6.

    JT Liang HS Lai KC Huang et al. (2003) ArticleTitleComparison of medial-to-lateral versus traditional lateral-to-medial dissection sequences for the resection of rectosigmoid cancers — a randomized controlled clinical trial World J Surg 27 190–196 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00268-003-1029-z Occurrence Handle12616435

  7. 7.

    JT Liang (2003) ArticleTitleComparison of medial-to-lateral versus traditional lateral-to-medial dissection sequences for the resection of rectosigmoid cancers (Letter to the Editor with Reply) World J Surg 27 1337–1338 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00268-003-1029-z

  8. 8.

    JW Milsom B Böhm (1996) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery Springer-Verlag New York

  9. 9.

    JW Milsom B Böhm KA Hammerhofer et al. (1998) ArticleTitleA prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report J Am Coll Surg 187 46–57 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00132-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czitFClsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9660024

  10. 10.

    InstitutionalAuthorNameJapanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (1994) General rules for clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon, rectum, and anus Kanehara Tokyo

  11. 11.

    W Sjoerdsma DW Meijer A Jansen et al. (2000) ArticleTitleComparison of efficiencies of three techniques for colon surgery J Laparoendos Adv Surg Tech 10 47–53 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7mvVyhsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1089/lap.2000.10.47

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Jin-Tung Liang M.D., Ph.D..

Additional information

Grant support from 94S040, National Taiwan University Hospital.

Reprints are not available.

Electronic Supplementary Mater

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liang, J., Lai, H. & Lee, P. Laparoscopic Abdominoanal Pull-through Procedure for Male Patients With Lower Rectal Cancer After Chemoradiation Therapy. Dis Colon Rectum 49, 259–260 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0250-2

Download citation

Key words

  • laparoscopic surgery
  • rectal cancer
  • pull-through procedure