, 65:22 | Cite as

Close encounters in the substrate: when macroborers meet microborers

  • Christine H. L. SchönbergEmail author
  • Frank H. Gleason
  • Neele Meyer
  • Max Wisshak
Original Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Bioerosion: An interdisciplinary approach


Coral cores taken from Great Barrier Reef massive Porites sp. were assessed for bioerosion by the brown demosponge Cliona orientalis Thiele, 1900, but also yielded evidence for microbial bioerosion that was partly simultaneously active with the sponge bioerosion. The most common microborer traces throughout were Ichnoreticulina elegans (Radtke, 1991) produced by the chlorophyte alga Ostreobium quekettii Bornet and Flahault, 1889 and Scolecia serrata Radtke, 1991, likely a bacterial trace. Additional, less common traces belonging to the ichnogenera Saccomorpha and Orthogonum were attributed to fungal tracemakers. Especially I. elegans was found partly colonizing the so-called sponge scars, new surfaces formed by the bioeroding sponge, indicating that the alga was still actively bioeroding after infestation by the sponge. In addition, a very small but abundant trace was discovered directly associated with the sponge’s etching scars. It is a yet-undescribed trace apparently of either fungal or bacterial origin. We found evidence that this and some other microbial euendoliths can at least temporarily co-exist with the clionaid sponge, both eroding simultaneously, and potentially even being engaged in a yet-unspecified symbiotic relationship. Observations on such endolithic borer relationships across different taxa are very rare. Further studies are needed to elucidate the roles of different bioeroders as well as their potential interactions.


Coral bioerosion Bioeroder interaction Cliona orientalis Euendoliths Ostreobium quekettii Fungal and bacterial microbioerosion 



MW’s and CS’s experimental work was conducted at the Orpheus Island Research Station and strongly relied on the support of the station staff. R. and D. Wisdom, N. Lee and C. Ansell assisted during field and experimental work. The experimental phase was financially supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Grant Fr 1134/19) and co-funded by the Australian Institute of Marine Science. S. Harii (Tropical Biosphere Research Center University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa) provided Fig. 1b.


  1. Bentis CJ, Kaufman L, Golubic S (2000) Endolithic fungi in reef-building corals (Order: Scleractinia) are common, cosmopolitan, and potentially pathogenic. Biol Bull 198:254–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bornet ME, Flahault C (1889) Sur quelques plantes vivant dans le test calcaire des mollusques. Bull Soc Bot France 36:CXLVII–LXXVI. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Del Campo J, Pombert JF, Šlapeta J, Larkum A, Keeling PJ (2017) The “other” coral symbiont: Ostreobium diversity and distribution. ISME J 11:296–299. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fang JKH, Schönberg CHL (2015) Carbonate budgets of coral reefs: recent developments in excavating sponge research. Reef Encount 30:43–46Google Scholar
  5. Glaub I (1994) Mikrobohrspuren in ausgewählten Ablagerungsräumen des europäischen Jura und der Unterkreide (Klassifikation und Palökologie). Cour Forsch Inst Senckenberg 174:1–324Google Scholar
  6. Glynn PW (1997) Bioerosion and coral reef growth: a dynamic balance. In: Birkeland C (ed) Life and death of coral reefs. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 69–98Google Scholar
  7. Golubic S, Brent G, Le Campion T (1970) Scanning electron microscopy of endolithic algae and fungi using a multipurpose casting-embedding technique. Lethaia 3:203–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Golubic S, Radtke G, Le Campion-Alsumard T (2005) Endolithic fungi in marine ecosystems. Trends Microbiol 13:229–235. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gutner-Hoch E, Fine M (2011) Genotypic diversity and distribution of Ostreobium quekettii within scleractinian corals. Coral Reefs 30:643–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heindel K, Wisshak M, Westphal H (2009) Microbioerosion in Tahitian reefs: a record of environmental change during the last deglacial sea-level rise (IODP 310). Lethaia 42:322–340. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ICZN [International Commission for Zoological Nomenclature] (1999) International code of zoological nomenclature, adopted by the International Union of Biological Sciences, 4th edn. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Ivarsson M, Bengtson S, Belivanova V, Stampanoni M, Marone F, Tehler A (2012) Fossilized fungi in subseafloor Eocene basalts. Geology 40:163–166. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kendrick B, Risk MJ, Michaelides J, Bergman K (1982) Amphibious microborers: bioeroding fungi isolated from live corals. Bull Mar Sci 32:862–867Google Scholar
  14. Königshof P, Glaub I (2004) Traces of microboring organisms in Palaeozoic conodont elements. Geobios 37:416–424. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Le Campion-Alsumard T, Golubic S, Priess K (1995a) Fungi in corals: symbiosis or disease? Interaction between polyps and fungi causes pearl-like skeleton biomineralization. Mar Ecol Prog Series 117:137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Le Campion-Alsumard T, Golubic S, Hutchings P (1995b) Microbial endoliths in skeletons of live and dead corals: Porites lobata (Moorea, French Polynesia). Mar Ecol Prog Series 117:149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. López-Victoria M, Zea S (2005) Current trends of space occupation by encrusting excavating sponges on Colombian coral reefs. Mar Ecol 26:33–41. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Massé A, Domart-Coulon I, Golubic S, Duché D, Tribollet A (2018) Early skeletal colonization of the coral holobiont by the microboring Ulvophyceae Ostreobium sp. Sci Rep 8:2293. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meyer N, Wisshak M, Schönberg CHL (in press) Sponge bioerosion versus aqueous CO2: morphometric assessment of chips and etching fissures. FaciesGoogle Scholar
  20. Neumann AC (1966) Observations on coastal erosion in Bermuda and measurements of the boring rate of the sponge, Cliona lampa. Limnol Oceanogr 11:92–108. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pita L, Rix L, Slaby BM, Franke A, Hentschel U (2018) The sponge holobiont in a changing ocean: from microbes to ecosystems. Microbiome 6:46. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Priess K, Le Campion-Alsumard T, Golubic S, Gadel F, Thomassin BA (2000) Fungi in corals: black bands and density-banding of Porites lutea and P. lobata skeleton. Mar Biol 136:19–27. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Radtke G (1991) Die mikroendolithischen Spurenfossilien im Alt-Tertiär West-Europas und ihre palökologische Bedeutung. Cour Forsch Inst Senckenberg 138:1–185Google Scholar
  24. Risk MJ, Pagani SE, Elias RJ (1987) Another internal clock: preliminary estimates of growth rates based on cycles of algal boring activity. Palaios 2:323–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schneider J (1976) Biological and inorganic factors in the destruction of limestone coasts. Contr Sedimentol 62:1–11Google Scholar
  26. Schneider J, Torunski H (1983) Biokarst on limestone coasts, morphogenesis and sediment production. PSZNI Mar Ecol 4:45–63. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schönberg CHL (2000) Bioeroding sponges common to the central Australian Great Barrier Reef: descriptions of three new species, two new records, and additions to two previously described species. Senckenb Marit 30:161–221. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schönberg CHL (2001) Small-scale distribution of Great Barrier Reef bioeroding sponges in shallow water. Ophelia 55:39–54. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schönberg CHL (2002) Substrate effects on the bioeroding demosponge Cliona orientalis. 1. Bioerosion rates. Mar Ecol 23:313–326. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schönberg CHL (2008) A history of sponge erosion: from past myths and hypotheses to recent approaches. In: Wisshak M, Tapanila L (eds) Current developments in bioerosion. Springer, Berlin, pp 165–202. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schönberg CHL (2017) Culture, demography and biogeography of sponge science: from past conferences to strategic research? Mar Ecol 38:e12416. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schönberg CHL, Wilkinson CR (2001) Induced colonization of corals by a clionid bioeroding sponge. Coral Reefs 20:69–76. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schönberg CHL, Fang JKH, Carballo JL (2017a) Bioeroding sponges and the future of coral reefs. In: Carballo JL, Bell JJ (eds) Climate change, ocean acidification and sponges. Springer, Cham, pp 179–372. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schönberg CHL, Fang JKH, Carreiro-Silva M, Tribollet A, Wisshak M (2017b) Bioerosion: the other ocean acidification problem. ICES J Mar Sci 74:895–925. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Titlyanov EA, Kiyashko SI, Titlyanova TV, Yakovleva IM (2009) δ13C and δ15N in tissues of reef building corals and the endolithic alga Ostreobium quekettii under their symbiotic and separate existence. Galaxea 11:169–175. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tribollet A (2008) The boring microfauna in modern coral reef ecosystems: a review of its roles. In: Wisshak M, Tapanila L (eds) Current developments in bioerosion. Springer, Berlin, pp 67–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Verbruggen H, Marcelino VR, Guiry MD, Cremen MC, Jackson CJ (2017) Phylogenetic position of the coral symbiont Ostreobium (Ulvophyceae) inferred from chloroplast genome data. J Phycol 53:790–803. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wisshak M (2006) High-latitude bioerosion. The Kosterfjord experiment. Lect Notes Earth Sci 109:1–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wisshak M (2012) Microbioerosion. In: Knaust D, Bromley RG (eds) Developments in sedimentology 64. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 213–243Google Scholar
  40. Wisshak M, Schönberg CHL, Form A, Freiwald A (2013) Effects of ocean acidification and global warming on bioerosion—lessons from a clionaid sponge. Aquat Biol 19:111–127. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wisshak M, Schönberg CHL, Form A, Freiwald A (2014) Sponge bioerosion accelerated by ocean acidification across species and latitudes? Helgol Mar Res 68:253–263. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zebrowski G (1936) New genera of Cladochytriaceae. Ann Missouri Bot Garden 23:553–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zu Castell W, Fleischmann F, Heger T, Matyssek R (2016) Shaping theoretic foundations of holobiont-like systems. In: Lüttge U, Cánovas F, Matyssek R (eds) Progress in botany, vol 77. Springer, Cham, pp 219–244. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oceans Graduate School and Oceans InstituteThe University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  2. 2.School of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Marine Research DepartmentSenckenberg am MeerWilhelmshavenGermany

Personalised recommendations