, Volume 57, Issue 2, pp 215–221 | Cite as

Effect of the surgeonfish Ctenochaetus striatus (Acanthuridae) on the processes of sediment transport and deposition on a coral reef in the Red Sea

Original Article


Excessive sedimentation is a major threat to coral reefs. It can damage or kill reef-building corals and can prevent the successful settlement of their planktonic larvae. The surgeonfish Ctenochaetus striatus feeds on rocky surfaces by sweeping loose material into its mouth with its flexible, broom-like teeth. In addition, it grasps and removes hard substrates with the aid of its special palate structure. It then transports sediment matter off the reef by defecating the ingested material outside the rocky zone of the reef. We analyzed 150 feces samples of six individuals, differentiating between (1) ingested by sweeping and (2) ingested by scraping, and compared their content with inorganic land-derived and marine sediments trapped at the feeding area. Projections based on fish densities, defecation rates, and quantities as well as composition of sediments collected by traps on the same reef site suggest that C. striatus removes at least 18% of the inorganic sediment sinking onto the reef crest. The eroded share in the exported matter is about 13%. This finding points to a hitherto not verified role of C. striatus as a reef sweeper and reef scraper, whereby the first function is by far dominating.


Coral reefs Red Sea Sedimentation Feeding and defecation behavior Reef sweeper 

Supplementary material

SOM Supporting online material. Short summary: By feeding on loose particles accumulated on the top of coral reefs and defecating in a restricted place adjacent to its feeding area, the surgeon fish Ctenochaetus striatus transports loose particles from the reef, and hence functions as a “reef sweeper”. Movie comment: The tropical reef fish Ctenochaetus striatus (surgeonfish) visits specific places for defecation on sandy bottom beside the rocky reef. Ras Mohammed National Park, Sinai, Egypt, Red Sea. The fish stops its normal grazing activities on the reef rock and immediately starts to swim taking the shortest way over the edge of the reef where it stops about 20 cm above the adjacent sand-covered reef floor. The fish then assumes an oblique position with its head upwards and spreads its pectoral fins and deposits a fecal pellet. After this, it returns to the rocky zone to continue grazing. (MOV 6302 kb)


  1. Alwany MA, Thaler E, Stachowitsch M (2009) Parrotfish bioerosion on Egyptian Red Sea reefs. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 371:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babcock R, Davies P (1991) Effects of sedimentation on settlement of Acropora millepora. Coral Reefs 9:205–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bardach JE (1961) Transport of calcareous fragments by reef fishes. Sci 133:98–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bellwood DR (1995) Carbonate transport and within-reef patterns of bioerosion and sediment release by parrotfishes (family Scaridae) on the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 117:127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellwood DR, Hoey AS, Choat JH (2003) Limited functional redundancy in high diversity systems: resilience and ecosystem function on coral reefs. Ecol L 6:281–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bothner MH, Reynolds RL, Casso MA, Storlazzi CD, Field ME (2006) Quantity, composition, and source of sediment collected in sediment traps along the fringing coral reef off Molokai, Hawaii. Mar Poll Bull 52:1034–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chazottes V, Reijmer JJG, Cordier E (2008) Sediment characteristics in reef areas influenced by eutrophication-related alterations of benthic communities and bioerosion processes. Mar Geol 250:114–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choat JH (1991) The biology of herbivorous fishes on coral reefs. In: Sale PF (ed) The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 120–155Google Scholar
  9. Eisinger M (2005) Beiträge zu ökologischen Aspekten der Korallentransplantation auf elektrochemisch erzeugte Substrate als Methode zur Rehabilitation degradierter Korallenriffe. Dissertation, University of Duisburg-Essen, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  10. English S, Wilkinson C, Baker V (1997) Survey manual for tropical marine resources, 2nd edn. Australian Institute of Marine Science, TownsvilleGoogle Scholar
  11. Fabricius KE (2005) Effects of terrestrial runoff on the ecology of corals and coral reefs: review and synthesis. Mar Poll Bull 50:125–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fouda MM, El-Sayed AM (1994) Distribution and feeding habits of two surgeonfish Zebrasoma xanthurum and Ctenochaetus striatus in the Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea. J. KAU: Mar Sci 7 Spec Issue: Symp. on Red Sea Mar Environ, Jeddah, pp 233–244Google Scholar
  13. Gibbs MM (2001) Sedimentation, suspension, and resuspension in Tasman Bay and Beatrix Bay, New Zealand, two contrasting coastal environments which thermally stratify in summer. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 35:951–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilmour J (1999) Experimental investigation into the effects of suspended sediment on fertilisation, larval survival and settlement in a scleractinian coral. Mar Biol 135:451–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harrington L, Fabricius K, De’ath G, Negri A (2004) Recognition and selection of settlement substrata determine post-settlement survival in corals. Ecology 85:3428–3437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hodgson G (1990) Sediment and the settlement of larvae of the coral Pocillopora damicornis. Coral Reefs 9:41–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hubbard DK (1990) Production and cycling of calcium carbonate in a shelf-edge reef system (St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands): applications to the nature of reef systems in the fossil record. J Sediment Petrol 60:335–360Google Scholar
  18. Krone R, van Treeck P, Schuhmacher H, Nebel H, Epple M (2006) A special palate structure of Ctenochaetus striatus—a hidden tool for bioerosion. Coral Reefs 25:645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krone R, Bshary R, Paster M, Eisinger M, van Treeck P, Schuhmacher H (2008) Defecation behaviour of the lined bristletooth surgeonfish Ctenochaetus striatus (Acanthuridae). Coral Reefs 27:619–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Montgomery LW, Meyberg AA, Fishelson L (1989) Feeding ecology of surgeonfishes (Acanthuridae) in the northern Red Sea, with particular reference to Acanthurus nigrofuscus (Forsskål). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 13:179–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nelson SG, Wilkins SD (1988) Sediment processing by the surgeonfish Ctenochaetus striatus at Moorea, French Polynesia. J Fish Biol 32:817–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ogston AS, Storlazzi CD, Field ME, Presto MK (2004) Sediment resuspension and transport patterns on a fringing reef flat, Molokai, Hawaii. Coral Reefs 23:559–569Google Scholar
  23. Purcell SW, Bellwood DR (1993) A functional analysis of food procurement in two surgeonfish species Acanthurus nigrofuscus and Ctenochaetus striatus (Acanthuridae). Envir Biol Fis 37:139–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Randall JE, Clements KD (2001) Second revision of the surgeonfish genus Ctenochaetus (Perciformes: Acanthuridae), with description of two new species. Indo-Pacific Fishes 32. Bishop Museum, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
  25. Rogers CS (1990) Response of coral reefs and reef organisms to sedimentation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 62:185–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schuhmacher H, Krone R, van Treeck P (2008) Underestimated eroder among reef fishes—Experimental comparison between Ctenochaetus striatus and Acanthurus nigrofuscus (Acanthuridae). Proc. 11th Int Coral Reef Symp. Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, pp 337–340Google Scholar
  27. Steneck RS (1988) Herbivory on coral reefs: a synthesis. Proc. 6th Int Coral Reef Symp 1:37–49Google Scholar
  28. Wilson SK, Bellwood DR, Choat J, Furnas MJ (2003) Detritus in the epilithic algal matrix and its use by coral reef fishes. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 41:279–309Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Functional Ecology, Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine ResearchBremerhavenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Applied Zoology and HydrobiologyUniversity of Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany

Personalised recommendations