Advertisement

Landslides

, Volume 16, Issue 12, pp 2381–2393 | Cite as

Estimation of soil moisture using modified antecedent precipitation index with application in landslide predictions

  • Binru Zhao
  • Qiang DaiEmail author
  • Dawei Han
  • Huichao Dai
  • Jingqiao Mao
  • Lu Zhuo
  • Guiwen Rong
Original Paper
  • 142 Downloads

Abstract

Soil moisture plays a key role in land-atmosphere interaction systems. Although it can be estimated through in situ measurements, satellite remote sensing, and hydrological modelling, using indicators to index soil moisture conditions is another useful way. In this study, one of these indicators, the antecedent precipitation index (API), is explored. Modifications were proposed to the conventional version of API by introducing two parameters to make it more in line with the physical process. First, the recession coefficient is allowed to vary with the change of air temperature, which could take into account the variation of the evapotranspiration process. Second, the API value is restricted by the maximum value of API, accounting for the maximum water holding capacity of the soil. The modified API was then calibrated and validated by comparing with the in situ measured soil moisture. The better correlation between these two datasets demonstrates that the modified API could better indicate soil moisture conditions, compared with the conventional API. The capability of the modified API to index soil moisture conditions was further explored by applying it to landslide predictions in the Emilia-Romagna region, northern Italy. Here, the recent 3-day rainfall vs the antecedent soil wetness thresholds (RS thresholds) were constructed, in which the soil wetness is indexed by the modified API. The validation of RS thresholds was carried out with the use of the contingency matrix and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. By comparing the prediction performance between RS thresholds and rainfall thresholds, it is found that RS threshold could provide better prediction capabilities in terms of higher hit rate and lower false alarm rate. The positive results indicate that the modified API could provide superior performance of indexing soil moisture conditions, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed modifications.

Keywords

Antecedent precipitation index Soil moisture  Landslide prediction 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Dr. Matteo Berti for providing landslides data and Arpae Emilia-Romagna organization for providing the meteorological data. The first author would like to thank the China Scholarship Council for funding her study at the University of Bristol.

Funding information

This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41871299), Resilient Economy and Society by Integrated SysTems modelling (RESIST) (Newton Fund via Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (NE/N012143/1)) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (2016B42014).

References

  1. Bolten JD, Crow WT, Zhan X, Jackson TJ, Reynolds CA (2010) Evaluating the utility of remotely sensed soil moisture retrievals for operational agricultural drought monitoring. IEEE J Sel Topics Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens 3:57–66.  https://doi.org/10.1109/jstars.2009.2037163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brocca L, Morbidelli R, Melone F, Moramarco T (2007) Soil moisture spatial variability in experimental areas of Central Italy. J Hydrol 333:356–373.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brocca L, Melone F, Moramarco T, Wagner W, Naeimi V, Bartalis Z, Hasenauer S (2010) Improving runoff prediction through the assimilation of the ASCAT soil moisture product. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14:1881–1893.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1881-2010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brunetti M, Peruccacci S, Rossi M, Luciani S, Valigi D, Guzzetti F (2010) Rainfall thresholds for the possible occurrence of landslides in Italy. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:447–458.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-447-2010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castillo V, Gomezplaza A, Martinezmena M (2003) The role of antecedent soil water content in the runoff response of semiarid catchments: a simulation approach. J Hydrol 284:114–130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1694(03)00264-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chleborad AF, Baum RL, Godt JW, Powers PS (2008) A prototype system for forecasting landslides in the Seattle, Washington, area. Rev Eng Geol 20:103–120.  https://doi.org/10.1130/2008.4020(06) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crow W, Bindlish R and Jackson T (2005) The added value of spaceborne passive microwave soil moisture retrievals for forecasting rainfall-runoff partitioning. Geophys Res Lett 32: L18401.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023543 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crozier M and Eyles R (1980) Assessing the probability of rapid mass movement. In: Third Australia-New Zealand conference on Geomechanics: Wellington, May 12–16, 1980. Wellington, N.Z.: Institution of Professional Engineers New Zealand 6:247–251. https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=649149381088316;res=IELENG
  9. Draper CS, Walker JP, Steinle PJ, de Jeu RAM, Holmes TRH (2009) An evaluation of AMSR–E derived soil moisture over Australia. Remote Sens Environ 113:703–710.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Entekhabi D, Reichle RH, Koster RD, Crow WT (2010) Performance metrics for soil moisture retrievals and application requirements. J Hydrometeorol 11:832–840.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2010jhm1223.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fedora MA (1987) Simulation of storm runoff in the Oregon Coast Range. Master's MSc thesis, Department of Forest Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_dissertations/bg257h596?locale=en
  12. Gariano SL, Brunetti MT, Iovine G, Melillo M, Peruccacci S, Terranova O, Vennari C, Guzzetti F (2015) Calibration and validation of rainfall thresholds for shallow landslide forecasting in Sicily, southern Italy. Geomorphology 228:653–665.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.10.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glade T, Crozier M, Smith P (2000) Applying probability determination to refine landslide-triggering rainfall thresholds using an empirical “antecedent daily rainfall model”. Pure Appl Geophys 157:1059–1079.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s000240050017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gruhier C, Rosnay Pd, Hasenauer S, Holmes T, De Jeu R, Kerr Y, Mougin E, Njoku E, Timouk F and Wagner W (2010) Soil moisture active and passive microwave products: intercomparison and evaluation over a Sahelian site. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14:141–156.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-141-2010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ibsen M–L, Casagli N (2004) Rainfall patterns and related landslide incidence in the Porretta-Vergato region, Italy. Landslides 1:143–150.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-004-0018-0
  16. Jackson TJ, Cosh MH, Bindlish R, Starks PJ, Bosch DD, Seyfried M, Goodrich DC, Moran MS, Du J (2010) Validation of advanced microwave scanning radiometer soil moisture products. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 48:4256–4272.  https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2010.2051035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kerr YH, Waldteufel P, Wigneron J-P, Delwart S, Cabot F, Boutin J, Escorihuela M-J, Font J, Reul N, Gruhier C, Juglea SE, Drinkwater MR, Hahne A, Martín-Neira M, Mecklenburg S (2010) The SMOS mission: new tool for monitoring key elements of the global water cycle. Proc IEEE 98:666–687.  https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2010.2043032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koster RD, Dirmeyer PA, Guo Z, Bonan G, Chan E, Cox P, Gordon C, Kanae S, Kowalczyk E, Lawrence D (2004) Regions of strong coupling between soil moisture and precipitation. Science 305:1138–1140.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100217 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Koster RD, Guo Z, Yang R, Dirmeyer PA, Mitchell K, Puma MJ (2009) On the nature of soil moisture in land surface models. J Clim 22:4322–4335.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jcli2832.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koster RD, Mahanama SPP, Livneh B, Lettenmaier DP, Reichle RH (2010) Skill in streamflow forecasts derived from large-scale estimates of soil moisture and snow. Nat Geosci 3:613–616.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo944 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Linsley RK, Kohler MA, Paulhus JL (1949) Applied hydrology. The McGraw-Hill Book company, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Martelloni G, Segoni S, Fanti R, Catani F (2011) Rainfall thresholds for the forecasting of landslide occurrence at regional scale. Landslides 9:485–495.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-011-0308-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Melillo M, Brunetti MT, Peruccacci S, Gariano SL, Guzzetti F (2014) An algorithm for the objective reconstruction of rainfall events responsible for landslides. Landslides 12:311–320.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0471-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mirus BB, Becker RE, Baum RL, Smith JB (2018) Integrating real-time subsurface hydrologic monitoring with empirical rainfall thresholds to improve landslide early warning. Landslides 15:1909–1919.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-0995-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Posner AJ, Georgakakos KP (2015) Soil moisture and precipitation thresholds for real-time landslide prediction in El Salvador. Landslides 12:1179–1196.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0618-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rossi M, Witt A, Guzzetti F, Malamud BD, Peruccacci S (2010) Analysis of historical landslide time series in the Emilia-Romagna region, northern Italy. Earth Surf Process Landf 35:1123–1137.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1858 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Scheevel CR, Baum RL, Mirus BB, Smith JB (2017) Precipitation thresholds for landslide occurrence near Seattle, Mukilteo, and Everett, Washington. U.S. Geological Survey Open–File Report 2017–1039,  https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20171039, 2017.
  28. Staley DM, Kean JW, Cannon SH, Schmidt KM, Laber JL (2013) Objective definition of rainfall intensity–duration thresholds for the initiation of post–fire debris flows in Southern California. Landslides 10:547–562.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-012-0341-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Valenzuela P, Domínguez-Cuesta MJ, Mora García MA, Jiménez-Sánchez M (2017) Rainfall thresholds for the triggering of landslides considering previous soil moisture conditions (Asturias, NW Spain). Landslides 15:273–282.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0878-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wagner W, Naeimi V, Scipal K, de Jeu R, Martínez-Fernández J (2006) Soil moisture from operational meteorological satellites. Hydrogeol J 15:121–131.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-006-0104-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zêzere JL, Trigo RM, Trigo IF (2005) Shallow and deep landslides induced by rainfall in the Lisbon region (Portugal): assessment of relationships with the North Atlantic Oscillation. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5:331–344.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-5-331-2005, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zêzere J, Vaz T, Pereira S, Oliveira S, Marques R, Garcia R (2015) Rainfall thresholds for landslide activity in Portugal: a state of the art. Environ Earth Sci 73:2917–2936.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3672-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Binru Zhao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Qiang Dai
    • 3
    Email author
  • Dawei Han
    • 2
  • Huichao Dai
    • 1
  • Jingqiao Mao
    • 1
  • Lu Zhuo
    • 2
  • Guiwen Rong
    • 4
  1. 1.College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower EngineeringHohai UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of VGE of Ministry of EducationNanjing Normal UniversityNanjingChina
  4. 4.College of Earth and EnvironmentAnhui University of Science and TechnologyHuainanChina

Personalised recommendations