, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 3–13 | Cite as

Energy budget for a rock avalanche: fate of fracture-surface energy

  • Tim R. H. DaviesEmail author
  • Natalya V. Reznichenko
  • Mauri J. McSaveney
Original Paper


A detailed energy budget of a rock avalanche at Lake Coleridge, New Zealand, included fragments as small as 70 nm in diameter in the debris particle-size distribution, and used ultrasonic disaggregation of agglomerates formed during emplacement of the deposit to properly sample the fine fragments created during the rock avalanche. Using the maximum likely value of potential energy released during the debris fall and runout, and minimum values of energy lost to friction and of energy used in creating new rock surface area by fragmentation, the energy budget showed a substantial energy deficit; the available potential energy almost matched the energy lost to friction, leaving very little energy available for creating the new surface. This deficit was much less prominent if sub-micron fragments were ignored as in earlier energy budgets, because about 90% of total fragment surface area occurred on sub-micron fragments. Close examination of possible sources of error in the calculated budget leads to the conclusion, supported by published data, that only a small proportion of the energy used to create new rock surface transforms to surface energy, while a large proportion of it remains available in the form of elastic body-wave energy.


Lake Coleridge rock avalanche: ultra-fine debris Agglomerates Energy budget Energy lost to friction Fracture surface energy Surface free energy 



The first author was partly supported by the Hazards Toolbox (T6) Of Resilience to Nature’s Challenges, funded by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, New Zealand Grant Number RNC-011.


  1. Ball A, Payne BW (1976) The tensile fracture of quartz crystals. J Mater Sci 11:731–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baud P, Zhu W, Wong T-F (2000) Failure mode and weakening effect of water on sandstone. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 105:16371–16389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowman ET, Take WA, Rait KL, Hann C (2012) Physical models of rock avalanche spreading behaviour with dynamic fragmentation. Can Geotech J 49(4):460–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradley BA, Bae SE, Polak V, Lee RL, Thomson EM, Tarbali K (2017) Ground motion simulations of great earthquakes on the Alpine Fault: effect of hypocentre location and comparison with empirical modelling. N Z J Geol Geophys 60(3):188–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byerlee J (1978) Friction of rocks. Pure Appl Geophys 116(4–5):615–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carpinteri A, Lacidogna G, Manuello A, Niccolini G, Schiavi A, Agosto A (2012) Mechanical and electromagnetic emissions related to stress-induced cracks. ExpTech 36(3):53–64Google Scholar
  7. Chelidze T, Reuschle T, Gueguen Y (1994) A theoretical investigation of the fracture energy of heterogeneous brittle materials. J Phys Condens Matter 6:1957–1868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chester JS, Chester FM, Kronenberg AK (2005) Fracture surface energy of the Punchbowl fault, San Andreas system. Nature 437:133–136. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cook GK (2001) Rock mass structure and intact rock strength of New Zealand greywackes. MSc thesis. University of Canterbury, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  10. Crosta GB, Frattini P, Fusi N (2007) Fragmentation in the Val Pola rock avalanche, Italian Alps. J Geophys Res 112:F01006. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davies TRH (2018) Rock avalanches: processes, significance and hazards. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Natural Hazard Science, Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Davies TRH, McSaveney MJ (1999) Runout of dry granular avalanches. Can Geotech J 36(2):313–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davies TRH, McSaveney MJ (2009) The role of dynamic rock fragmentation in reducing frictional resistance to large landslides. Eng Geol 109:67–79. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davies TRH, McSaveney MJ, Hodgson KA (1999) A fragmentation-spreading model for long-runout rock avalanches. Can Geotech J 36(6):1096–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davies TRH, McSaveney MJ, Beetham RD (2006) Rapid block glides—slide-surface fragmentation in New Zealand’s Waikaremoana landslide. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 39:115–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davies TRH, McSaveney MJ, Kelfoun K (2010) Runout of the Socompa volcanic debris avalanche, Chile: a mechanical explanation for low basal shear resistance. Bull Volcanol 72:933–944. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Blasio FV, Crosta GB (2014) Simple physical model for the fragmentation of rock avalanches. Acta Mech 225(1):243–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dufresne A, Dunning SA (2017) Process dependence of grain size distributions in rock avalanche deposits. Landslides 14(5):1555–1563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dufresne A, Bösmeier A, Prager C (2016) Sedimentology of rock avalanche deposits—case study and review. Earth-Sci Rev 163:234–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunning SA (2006) Rock avalanches in high mountains. PhD Thesis, University of Luton, UK, 337pGoogle Scholar
  21. Friedman M (1972) Residual elastic strain in rocks. Tectonophys 15:297–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Friedman M (1975) Fracture in rock. Rev Geophys Space Phys 13(3):352–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Friedman M, Handin J, Alani G (1972) Fracture-surface energy of rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 9:757–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Griffith AA (1921) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Phil Trans R Soc London A221:163–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gudmunsson A (2011) Rock fractures in geological processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 570 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hewitt K (1999) Quaternary moraines vs catastrophic rock avalanches in the Karakoram Himalaya, northern Pakistan. Quat Res 51:220–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoagland RG, Hahn GT, Rosenfield AR (1973) Influence of microstructure on fracture propagation in rock. Rock Mech/Felsmech/Mech des Roches 5:77–106Google Scholar
  28. Hochella MF, Banfield JF (1995) In: White AF, Brantley SL (eds) Chemical weathering rates of silicate minerals. Mineral Soc Amer, Washington DC, pp 353–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hungr O (2006) Rock avalanche occurrence, process and modelling. In: Evans SG, Scarascia-Mugnozza G, Strom A, Hermanns R. (eds) Advanced research workshop: landslides from massive rock slope failure. NATO Science Series, IV Earth and Environmental Sciences vol 49. Celano, Italy, June 16–21, 2002, pp 243–266Google Scholar
  30. Hungr O, Morgenstern NR (1984) Experiments on the flow behaviour of granular materials at high velocity in an open channel. Géotechnique 34:405–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee JA (2005) Engineering geological investigation of the Lake Coleridge rock avalanche deposits, inland Canterbury. MSc(Eng Geol) thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand, 221pGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee JA, Davies TRH, Bell DH (2009) Successive Holocene rock avalanches at Lake Coleridge, Canterbury, New Zealand. Landslides 6:287–297. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Legros F (2002) The mobility of long-runout landslides. Engineering Geology 63:301–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Locat P, Couture R, Leroueil S, Locat J, Jaboyedoff M (2006) Fragmentation energy in rock avalanches. Can Geotech J 43:830–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McSaveney MJ, Davies TRH (2007) Rockslides and their motion. In: Sassa K, Fukuoka H, Wang F, Wang G (eds) Progress in landslide science. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 113–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ouchterlony F (1982) Review of fracture toughness testing of rock. SM Archives 7:131–211Google Scholar
  37. Persson P-A (1997) The relationship between strain energy, rock damage, fragmentation and throw in rock blasting. Fragblast 1:99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ren Z, Wang K, Yang K, Zhou ZH, Tang YJ, Tian L, Xu ZM (2018) The grain size distribution and composition of the Touzhai rock avalanche deposit in Yunnan, China. Eng Geol 234:97–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reznichenko NV, Davies TRH, Shulmeister J, Larsen SH (2012) A new technique for distinguishing rock-avalanche-sourced sediment in glacial moraines with some paleoclimatic implications. Geol 40:319–322. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schiavi A, Niccolini G, Tarizzo P, Carpinter A, Lacidogna G, Manuello A (2011) Acoustic emissions at high and low frequencies during compression tests in brittle materials. Strain 47(s2):105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shan J, Xu S, Liu Y, Zhou L, Wang P (2018) Dynamic breakage of glass sphere subjected to impact loading. Powder Technol 330:317–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Togo T, Shimamoto T (2012) Energy partitioning for grain crushing in quartz gouge during subseismic to seismic fault motion: an experimental study. J Struct Geol 38:139–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang Z, Ning J, Ren H (2018) Frequency characteristics of the released stress wave by propagating cracks in brittle materials. Theor Appl Fract Mech 96:72–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. White AF, Blum AE, Schulz MS, Bullen TD, Harden JW, Peterson ML (1996) Chemical weathering rates of a soil chronosequence on granitic alluvium: I. Quantification of mineralogical and surface area changes and calculation of primary silicate reaction rates. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 60:2533–2550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilson BT, Dewers T, Reches Z, Brune JS (2005) Particle size and energetics of gouge from earthquake rupture zones. Nature 434:749–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Xia Y et al (2012) Self-assembly of self-limiting monodisperse supraparticles from polydisperse nanoparticles. Nat Nanotechnol 6:580–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zgura I, Moldovan R, Negrila CC, Frunza S, Cotorobai VF, Frunza L (2013) Surface free energy of smooth and dehydroxylated fused quartz from contact angle measurements using some particular organics as probe liquids. J Optoelectron Adv Mater 15:627–634Google Scholar
  48. Zhang M, McSaveney MJ (2017) Rock avalanche deposits store quantitative evidence on internal shear during runout. Geophys Res Lett 44(17):8814–8821CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tim R. H. Davies
    • 1
    Email author
  • Natalya V. Reznichenko
    • 1
  • Mauri J. McSaveney
    • 2
  1. 1.University of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand
  2. 2.GNS ScienceLower HuttNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations