Advertisement

Landslides

pp 1–19 | Cite as

Characterizing the catastrophic 2017 Mud Creek landslide, California, using repeat structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry

  • Jonathan A. WarrickEmail author
  • Andrew C. Ritchie
  • Kevin M. Schmidt
  • Mark E. Reid
  • Joshua Logan
Technical Note

Abstract

Along the rugged coast of Big Sur, California, the Mud Creek landslide failed catastrophically on May 20, 2017, and destroyed over 400 m of scenic California State Highway 1. We collected structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry data using airborne platforms that, when combined with existing airborne lidar data, revealed that the area exhibited significant topographic change and displacement before, during, and after the catastrophic failure. Before the catastrophic failure, we document two areas of elevated change in the zone of depletion, which aligned with the double-peaked head scarp produced by the catastrophic failure. The catastrophic failure extended from 337-m elevation to at least 8 m below sea level, was 490 m wide, displaced ~ 3 million m3 of earth and rock, and deposited landslide debris at least 175 m seaward of the original shoreline. The failure was not a complete slope-clearing event, however, and several upslope and lateral regions that did not slip into the ocean exhibited significant displacement and topographic change during the days and months after the catastrophic failure. Additionally, we use the post-slide data to quantify several other processes, including the time-varying rates of talus accumulation and coastal erosion of the landslide toe. We conclude that repeat SfM surveys from aerial imagery can provide valuable information about landslide evolution and the potential for deep-seated landslide hazards—especially in the lead up to catastrophic failure—if photos are collected and processed regularly.

Keywords

Landslide Big Sur California Structure-from-motion photogrammetry 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for review comments by Jeffrey Coe, Cees van Westen, and an anonymous reviewer that improved the paper markedly. Bob Van Wagenen of EcoScan Resource Data flew all small airplane flights and operated a camera system designed and built by Tim Elfers, Peter Harkins and Gerry Hatcher of the USGS. Elizabeth Haddon (USGS) led efforts to provide survey-grade positions on prominent boulders in the study area for ground control. Support for these efforts comes from both the Coastal and Marine Geology Program and the Landslides Hazards Program under the USGS Natural Hazards Mission Area.

Supplementary material

10346_2019_1160_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (76 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 75 kb)
10346_2019_1160_MOESM2_ESM.gif (7.9 mb)
ESM 2 (GIF 8081 kb)
10346_2019_1160_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (9.9 mb)
ESM 3 (PDF 10117 kb)
10346_2019_1160_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (171.5 mb)
ESM 4 (PDF 175586 kb)
10346_2019_1160_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (15.1 mb)
ESM 5 (PDF 15463 kb)
10346_2019_1160_MOESM6_ESM.pdf (63.1 mb)
ESM 6 (PDF 64659 kb)
10346_2019_1160_MOESM7_ESM.pdf (92.5 mb)
ESM 7 (PDF 94721 kb)
10346_2019_1160_MOESM8_ESM.pdf (15 mb)
ESM 8 (PDF 15410 kb)

References

  1. Adams PN, Anderson RS, Revenaugh J (2002) Microseismic measurement of wave-energy delivery to a rocky coast. Geology 30(10):895–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey EH, Irwin WP, Jones DL (1964) Franciscan and related rocks and their significance in the geology of western California. Calif Div Min Geol Bull:183 177 pGoogle Scholar
  3. Bromhead EN, Ibsen ML (2006) A review of landsliding and coastal erosion damage to historic fortifications in South East England. Landslides 3(4):341–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caltrans (California Department of Transportation) (2017) Massive landslide on highway 1 at Mud Creek is latest in storm damage. Caltrans News Release, June 29, 2017. [http://www.dot.ca.gov/paffairs/pr/2017/prs/17pr064.html; accessed 21 Apr 2018]Google Scholar
  5. Caltrans (California Department of Transportation) (2018) State route 1/Mud Creek will open tomorrow, Wednesday July 18 by 10 AM. Caltrans News Release, July 17, 2018. [http://www.dot.ca.gov/dist05/paffairs/misc_pr/traffic_advisory_mud_creek_roadway_reopens_wednesday_7.18.18.pdf; accessed 1 Feb 2019]
  6. Collins BD, Sitar N (2008) Processes of coastal bluff erosion in weakly lithified sands, Pacifica, California, USA. Geomorphology 97(3–4):483–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cook KL (2017) An evaluation of the effectiveness of low-cost UAVs and structure from motion for geomorphic change detection. Geomorphology 278:195–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corominas J (1996) The angle of reach as a mobility index for small and large landslides. Can Geotech J 33(2):260–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dawson RJ, Dickson ME, Nicholls RJ, Hall JW, Walkden MJ, Stansby PK, Mokrech M, Richards J, Zhou J, Milligan J, Jordan A, Pearson S, Rees J, Bates PD, Koukoulas S, Watkinson AR (2009) Integrated analysis of risks of coastal flooding and cliff erosion under scenarios of long term change. Clim Chang 95(1–2):249–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dickson ME, Walkden MJ, Hall JW (2007) Systemic impacts of climate change on an eroding coastal region over the twenty-first century. Clim Chang 84(2):141–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emery KO, Kuhn GG (1982) Sea cliffs: their processes, profiles, and classification. Geol Soc Am Bull 93(7):644–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hall CA, Jr. (1991) Geology of the point Sur-Lopez point region, coast ranges, California—a part of the Southern California allochthon: Geological Society of America Special Paper 266, 40 pGoogle Scholar
  13. Hampton MA, Griggs GB (2004) Formation, evolution, and stability of coastal cliffs–status and trends. US Geol Surv Prof Paper 1693:123Google Scholar
  14. Hapke CJ, Green KR (2004) Map showing coastal cliff retreat rates along the Big Sur coast, Monterey and San Luis Obispo Counties. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map, California, p 2853Google Scholar
  15. Hapke CJ, Green KR (2006) Coastal landslide material loss rates associated with severe climatic events. Geology 34(12):1077–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hapke CJ, Reid D (2007) National assessment of shoreline change part 4: historical coastal cliff retreat along the California coast. U. S. Geol Surv Open-File Rep 2007-1133, 51 pGoogle Scholar
  17. Harp EL, Jibson RW (1996) Landslides triggered by the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(1B):S319–S332Google Scholar
  18. Hovius N, Stark CP, Allen PA (1997) Sediment flux from a mountain belt derived by landslide mapping. Geology 25(3):231–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Iverson RM (2000) Landslide triggering by rain infiltration. Water Resour Res 36(7):1897–1910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson SY, Watt JT, Hartwell SR, Kluesner JW (2018) Neotectonics of the Big Sur Bend, San Gregorio-Hosgri fault system, central California. Tectonics 37:1930–1954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. JRPHCS (JRP Historical Consulting Services) (2001) A history of road closures along Highway 1, Big Sur, Monterey and San Luis Obispo Counties, California. Prepared for California Department of Transportation District 5, 50 pGoogle Scholar
  22. Keefer DK, Johnson AM (1983) Earth flows: morphology, mobilization and movement: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1264. 56 pGoogle Scholar
  23. Keefer DK, Larsen MC (2007) Assessing landslide hazards. Science 316:1136–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lague D, Brodu N, Leroux J (2013) Accurate 3D comparison of complex topography with terrestrial laser scanner: application to the Rangitikei canyon (NZ). ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 82:10–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Larsen IJ, Montgomery DR, Korup O (2010) Landslide erosion controlled by hillslope material. Nat Geosci 3(4):247–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Limber PW, Barnard PL, Vitousek S, Erikson LH (2018) A model ensemble for projecting multidecadal coastal cliff retreat during the 21st century. J Geophys Res Earth Surf.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JF004401
  27. Lucieer A, Jong SMD, Turner D (2014) Mapping landslide displacements using structure from motion (SfM) and image correlation of multi-temporal UAV photography. Prog Phys Geogr 38(1):97–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Malamud BD, Turcotte DL, Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P (2004) Landslides, earthquakes, and erosion. Earth Planet Sci Lett 229(1–2):45–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moore LJ, Griggs GB (2002) Long-term cliff retreat and erosion hotspots along the central shores of the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary. Mar Geol 181(1–3):265–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. NOAA OCM (Office for Coast ManagCoastal Management), California state coastal conservancy ocean protection council, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, joint airborne lidar bathymetry technical center of expertise (2012) 2009–2011 California Coastal Conservancy Coastal Lidar Project Data, online at https://coast.noaa.gov/htdata/lidar1_z/geoid12a/data/1124/
  31. Nouwakpo SK, Weltz MA, McGwire K (2016) Assessing the performance of structure-from-motion photogrammetry and terrestrial LiDAR for reconstructing soil surface microtopography of naturally vegetated plots. Earth Surf Process Landf 41(3):308–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Petley D (2012) Global patterns of loss of life from landslides. Geology 40(10):927–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reid ME, Nielsen HP, Dreiss SJ (1988) Hydrologic factors triggering a shallow hillslope failure. Bull Assoc Eng Geol 25(3):349–361Google Scholar
  34. Ritchie AC, Warrick JA Logan J (2019) Topographic point clouds for the Mud Creek landslide, Big Sur, California from structure-from-motion photogrammetry from aerial photographs. U.S. Geological Survey data release,  https://doi.org/10.5066/P973FQ3M
  35. Rosser NJ, Petley DN, Lim M, Dunning SA, Allison RJ (2005) Terrestrial laser scanning for monitoring the process of hard rock coastal cliff erosion. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 38(4):363–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schmidt KM, Reid ME (2007) Rock strength, geology, and landsliding along the Big Sur coast, CA: First North American Landslide Conference, Vail, Colorado, USA, June 3–8, 2007, Association of Environmental & Engineering Geologists, pp. 1717–1727Google Scholar
  37. Sherwood CR, Warrick JA, Hill AD, Ritchie AC, Andrews BD, Plant NG (2018) Rapid, remote assessment of Hurricane Matthew impacts using 4D structure-from-motion photogrammetry. J Coast Res.  https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-18-00016R1
  38. Sidle RC, Furuichi T, Kono Y (2011) Unprecedented rates of landslide and surface erosion along a newly constructed road in Yunnan, China. Nat Hazards 57(2):313–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sithole G, Vosselman G (2004) Experimental comparison of filter algorithms for bare-earth extraction from airborne laser scanning point clouds. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 59(1–2):85–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spaete LP, Glenn NF, Derryberry DR, Sankey TT, Mitchell JJ, Hardegree SP (2011) Vegetation and slope effects on accuracy of a LiDAR-derived DEM in the sagebrush steppe. Remote Sens Lett 2(4):317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sturdivant EJ, Lentz EE, Thieler ER, Farris AS, Weber KM, Remsen DP, Miner S, Henderson RE (2017) UAS-SfM for coastal research: geomorphic feature extraction and land cover classification from high-resolution elevation and optical imagery. Remote Sens 9(10):1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. USGS (U.S. Geological Survey) (2017) Lidar point cloud - USGS National Map 3DEP downloadable data collection: U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  43. Varnes DJ (1978) Slope movement types and processes. In: Schuster RL, Krizek RJ (eds) Landslides, analysis and control, special report 176: transportation research board. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., pp 11–33Google Scholar
  44. Varnes DJ (1984) Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice. UNESCO, Paris 63 pGoogle Scholar
  45. Wallace L, Lucieer A, Malenovský Z, Turner D, Vopěnka P (2016) Assessment of forest structure using two UAV techniques: a comparison of airborne laser scanning and Structure from Motion (SfM) point clouds. Forests 7:62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Warrick JA, Ritchie AC, Adelman G, Adelman K, Limber PW (2017) New techniques to measure cliff change from historical oblique aerial photographs and structure-from-motion photogrammetry. J Coast Res 33(1):39–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilkinson MW, Jones RR, Woods CE, Gilment SR, McCaffrey KJW, Kokkalas S, Long JJ (2016) A comparison of terrestrial laser scanning and structure-from-motion photogrammetry as methods for digital outcrop acquisition. Geosphere 12(6):1865–1880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wills CJ, Manson MW, Brown KD, Davenport CW, Domrose CJ (2001) Landslides in the highway 1 corridor: geology and slope stability along the Big Sur coastal between Point Lobos and San Carpoforo Creek, Monterey and San Luis Obispo counties, California. California Geological Survey Special Report 185. 42 pGoogle Scholar
  49. Young AP (2015) Recent deep-seated coastal landsliding at San Onofre State Beach, California. Geomorphology 228:200–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Young AP, Ashford SA (2006) Application of airborne LIDAR for seacliff volumetric change and beach-sediment budget contributions. J Coast Res 22(2):307–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Young AP, Guza RT, Flick RE, O'Reilly WC, Gutierrez R (2009) Rain, waves, and short-term evolution of composite seacliffs in southern California. Mar Geol 267(1–2):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Young AP, Adams PN, O'Reilly WC, Flick RE, Guza RT (2011) Coastal cliff ground motions from local ocean swell and infragravity waves in southern California. J Geophys Res 116:C09007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Young AP, Flick RE, O'Reilly WC, Chadwick DB, Crampton WC, Helly JJ (2014) Estimating cliff retreat in southern California considering sea level rise using a sand balance approach. Mar Geol 348:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveySanta CruzUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Geological SurveyMenlo ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations