Advertisement

Landslides

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 839–855 | Cite as

An efficient method of monitoring slow-moving landslides with long-range terrestrial laser scanning: a case study of the Dashu landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China

  • Ronggang Huang
  • Liming JiangEmail author
  • Xiang Shen
  • Zhen Dong
  • Qiaoli Zhou
  • Bisheng Yang
  • Hansheng Wang
Technical Note
  • 313 Downloads

Abstract

Accurate measurement of the small pre-failure deformation plays a crucial role in landslide early warning systems. Recently, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) has been applied to detect the small pre-failure deformation, while the processing of TLS point clouds is still a non-trivial issue, especially for long-range TLS. Therefore, we propose an efficient method to detect the small pre-failure deformation of slow-moving landslides by the use of long-range TLS. To precisely align the point clouds of different epochs, a hybrid-weighted iterative closest point (HWICP) algorithm is proposed after the coarse registration, where the influences of several factors (i.e., deformed areas, point density variations, and observation errors) on the inconsistency of the point correspondence are quantitatively estimated. An adaptive local cloud-to-mesh method (ALC2M) is then proposed for the deformation calculation in the complex topography by defining a local reference frame and removing poor matches between ground points of the two epochs. To validate the performance of the proposed method, the Dashu landslide of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region was selected as a case study. The TLS-derived deformation showed that the landslide was stable in most areas over the study period, except for two abnormal deformation zones with maximum deformations of ~ 6 cm and ~ 3 cm, which agreed well with the ground-based synthetic aperture radar interferometry (GB-InSAR) measurements. A statistical analysis of the stable areas around the landslide illustrated a low uncertainty for the TLS-derived deformation of 6.3 mm. Therefore, the use of the long-range TLS was an efficient way to monitor slow-moving landslides. Moreover, extensive comparative experiments about the co-registration and deformation calculation were conducted, and the results showed that HWICP and ALC2M achieved superior performances.

Keywords

Long-range TLS Co-registration Deformation calculation Dashu landslide Three Gorges Reservoir Region 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. Special thanks to Lin Liu, Yafei Sun, Binbin Gao of Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics and Daqing Ge, Bin Liu of China Aero Geophysical Survey and Remote Sensing Center for Land and Resources, since their works in capturing the experiment datasets.

Funding information

This study was jointly supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Nos. 2018YFC1406102 and 2017YFA0603103); the China Postdoctoral Science Found (No. 2017M622553); the NSFC project (Nos. 41801398, 41590854, 41531177, 41701530); and the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS (Nos. QYZDB-SSW-DQC027, QYZDJ-SSW-DQC042).

References

  1. Abellán A, Jaboyedoff M, Oppikofer T, Vilaplana J (2009) Detection of millimetric deformation using a terrestrial laser scanner: experiment and application to a rockfall event. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:365–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiger D, Mitra NJ, Cohen-Or D (2008) 4-points congruent sets for robust pairwise surface registration. ACM Trans Graph 27:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Besl PJ, McKay ND (1992) A method for registration of 3-d shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 14:239–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brodu N, Lague D (2012) 3d terrestrial lidar data classification of complex natural scenes using a multi-scale dimensionality criterion: applications in geomorphology. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 68:121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caputo T, Marino E, Matano F, Somma R, Troise C, De Natale G (2018) Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) data for the analysis of coastal tuff cliff retreat: application to Coroglio cliff, Naples, Italy. Ann Geophys 61:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen Y, Medioni G (1992) Object modelling by registration of multiple range images. Image Vis Comput 10:145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen X, Yu K, Wu H (2018) Determination of minimum detectable deformation of terrestrial laser scanning based on error entropy model. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 56:105–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dong Z, Yang B, Liu Y, Liang F, Li B, Zang Y (2017) A novel binary shape context for 3d local surface description. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 130:431–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Du S, Liu J, Zhang C, Zhu J, Li K (2015) Probability iterative closest point algorithm for m-d point set registration with noise. Neurocomputing 157:187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Franz M, Carrea D, Abellán A, Derron M-H, Jaboyedoff M (2016) Use of targets to track 3d displacements in highly vegetated areas affected by landslides. Landslides 13:821–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ge X (2017) Automatic markerless registration of point clouds with semantic-keypoint-based 4-points congruent sets. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 130:344–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gressin A, Mallet C, Demantké J, David N (2013) Towards 3d lidar point cloud registration improvement using optimal neighborhood knowledge. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 79:240–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang D, Gu DM, Song YX, Cen DF, Zeng B (2018) Towards a complete understanding of the triggering mechanism of a large reactivated landslide in the three gorges reservoir. Eng Geol 238:36–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Intrieri E, Gigli G, Nocentini M, Lombardi L, Mugnai F, Fidolini F, Casagli N (2015) Sinkhole monitoring and early warning: an experimental and successful GB-InSar application. Geomorphology 241:304–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Intrieri E, Raspini F, Fumagalli A, Lu P, Del Conte S, Farina P, Allievi J, Ferretti A, Casagli N (2018) The Maoxian landslide as seen from space: detecting precursors of failure with sentinel-1 data. Landslides 15:123–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keefer DK, Wilson RC, Mark RK, Brabb EE, Brown WM, Ellen SD, Harp EL, Wieczorek GF, Alger CS, Zatkin RS (1987) Real-time landslide warning during heavy rainfall. Science 238:921–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kelbe D, Aardt JV, Romanczyk P, Leeuwen MV, Cawse-Nicholson K (2016) Marker-free registration of forest terrestrial laser scanner data pairs with embedded confidence metrics. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 54:4314–4330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kromer R, Abellán A, Hutchinson D, Lato M, Edwards T, Jaboyedoff M (2015) A 4d filtering and calibration technique for small-scale point cloud change detection with a terrestrial laser scanner. Remote Sens 7:13029–13052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kromer RA, Abellán A, Hutchinson DJ, Lato M, Chanut M-A, Dubois L, Jaboyedoff M (2017) Automated terrestrial laser scanning with near-real-time change detection – monitoring of the Séchilienne landslide. Earth Surf Dyn 5:293–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lague D, Brodu N, Leroux J (2013) Accurate 3d comparison of complex topography with terrestrial laser scanner: application to the Rangitikei canyon (n-z). ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 82:10–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu C, Liu Y, Wen M, Li T, Lian J, Qin S (2009) Geo-hazard initiation and assessment in the three gorges reservoir. In: Wang F, Li F (ed) Landslide disaster mitigation in Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Heidelberg, Germany, pp 3–40Google Scholar
  22. Lombardi L, Nocentini M, Frodella W, Nolesini T, Bardi F, Intrieri E, Carla T, Solari L, Dotta G, Ferrigno F, Casagli N (2017) The Calatabiano landslide (southern Italy): preliminary GB-InSar monitoring data and remote 3d mapping. Landslides 14:685–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lourakis MI (2005) A brief description of the levenberg-marquardt algorithm implemented by levmar. http://hackage.haskell.org/package/levmar. Accessed 31 Oct 2018
  24. Mayr A, Rutzinger M, Bremer M, Elberink SO, Stumpf F, Geitner C (2017) Object-based classification of terrestrial laser scanning point clouds for landslide monitoring. Photogramm Rec 32:377–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Monserrat O, Crosetto M (2008) Deformation measurement using terrestrial laser scanning data and least squares 3d surface matching. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 63:142–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Olsen MJ, Kuester F, Chang BJ, Hutchinson TC (2010) Terrestrial laser scanning-based structural damage assessment. J Comput Civ Eng 24:264–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schürch P, Densmore Alexander L, Rosser Nicholas J, Lim M, McArdell Brian W (2011) Detection of surface change in complex topography using terrestrial laser scanning: application to the Illgraben debris-flow channel. Earth Surf Process Landf 36:1847–1859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Segal A, Haehnel D, Thrun S (2009) Generalized-ICP. Robotics: Sci Syst 1–8Google Scholar
  29. Shi X, Liao M, Li M, Zhang L, Cunningham C (2016) Wide-area landslide deformation mapping with multi-path ALOS PALSAR data stacks: a case study of Three Gorges Area, China. Remote Sens 8:136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shi X, Zhang L, Zhou C, Li M, Liao M (2018) Retrieval of time series three-dimensional landslide surface displacements from multi-angular SAR observations. Landslides 15:1015–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Soudarissanane S, Lindenbergh R, Menenti M, Teunissen P (2011) Scanning geometry: influencing factor on the quality of terrestrial laser scanning points. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 66:389–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang F, Zhang Y, Huo Z, Peng X, Wang S, Yamasaki S (2008) Mechanism for the rapid motion of the Qianjiangping landslide during reactivation by the first impoundment of the Three Gorges Dam Reservoir, China. Landslides 5:379–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wujanz D, Krueger D, Neitzel F (2016) Identification of stable areas in unreferenced laser scans for deformation measurement. Photogramm Rec 31:261–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wujanz D, Avian M, Krueger D, Neitzel F (2017a) Identification of stable areas in unreferenced laser scans for automated geomorphometric monitoring. Earth Surf Dynam Discuss 2017:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wujanz D, Burger M, Mettenleiter M, Neitzel F (2017b) An intensity-based stochastic model for terrestrial laser scanners. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 125:146–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yang B, Zang Y (2014) Automated registration of dense terrestrial laser-scanning point clouds using curves. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 95:109–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yang B, Dong Z, Liang F, Liu Y (2016a) Automatic registration of large-scale urban scene point clouds based on semantic feature points. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 113:43–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yang B, Huang R, Dong Z, Zang Y, Li J (2016b) Two-step adaptive extraction method for ground points and breaklines from lidar point clouds. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 119:373–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yang B, Huang R, Li J, Tian M, Dai W, Zhong R (2017) Automated reconstruction of building lods from airborne lidar point clouds using an improved morphological scale space. Remote Sens 9:14CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronggang Huang
    • 1
  • Liming Jiang
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Xiang Shen
    • 1
  • Zhen Dong
    • 3
  • Qiaoli Zhou
    • 1
  • Bisheng Yang
    • 3
  • Hansheng Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth’s Dynamics, Institute of Geodesy and GeophysicsChinese Academy of SciencesWuhanChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote SensingWuhan UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations