Advertisement

Landslides

pp 1–19 | Cite as

Assessment of rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility at the regional scale using a physically based model and fuzzy-based Monte Carlo simulation

  • Hyuck Jin ParkEmail author
  • Jung Yoon Jang
  • Jung Hyun Lee
Original Paper
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

The occurrence of landslides is controlled by various interrelated spatial and climatic factors, some of which cannot be determined accurately in detail and others that can be determined only with large degrees of uncertainty. Therefore, uncertainties pervade the field of landslide susceptibility analysis, and so the recognition and assessment of uncertainties is of paramount importance in this analysis. In particular, in a physically based model that has been widely used in regional landslide susceptibility analysis, uncertainties are inevitably involved since reliable information required to estimate input parameters in physically based models is frequently limited in extent and has an imperfect quality. In addition, some uncertainties related to measured geotechnical parameters of slope materials may be nonstochastic, but rather cognitive, arising from incomplete information. Under such conditions of limited information, it is more appropriate to adopt the fuzzy set theory. Therefore, in this study, the fuzzy set theory, coupled with interval MC simulation and the vertex method, was adopted for physically based landslide susceptibility analysis to properly handle uncertainty propagation through a physical slope model. The proposed fuzzy-based approach was applied to the study area to evaluate landslide susceptibility for the regional area, and subsequently, to evaluate the performance of the proposed approach, the analysis results were compared with landslide inventory. In addition, a probabilistic and a deterministic analysis were also carried out to compare with the fuzzy-based analysis results. The fuzzy approach showed better performance than the probabilistic and deterministic analyses and was more robust against variation in input parameters than other approaches. Therefore, in a regional-scaled landslide susceptibility analysis using a physically based model, the fuzzy approach can control the uncertainties appropriately and is particularly advantageous when the amount of reliable input data is very limited.

Keywords

Landslide Fuzzy number Physically based model Monte Carlo simulations GIS 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by National Research Foundation (NRF) grant funded by Korean government (MSIP) (No. NRF-2016R1A2B4008963).

References

  1. AGS (2000) Landslide risk management concepts and guidelines—Australian Geomechanics Society Sub-Committee on Landslide Risk Management. International Union of Geological Sciences 51–93Google Scholar
  2. Ali A, Huang J, Lyamin AV, Sloan SW, Griffiths DV, Cassidy MJ, Li JH (2014) Simplified quantitative risk assessment of rainfall-induced landslides modelled by infinite slopes. Eng Geol 179:102–116Google Scholar
  3. Alvioli M, Baum RL (2016) Parallelization of the TRIGRS model for rainfall-induced landslides using the message passing interface. Environ Model Softw 81:122–135Google Scholar
  4. Alvioli M, Guzzetti F, Rossi M (2014) Scaling properties of rainfall induced landslides predicted by a physically based model. Geomorphology 213:38–47Google Scholar
  5. Apip TK, Yamashiki Y, Sassa K, Ibrahim AB, Fukuoka H (2010) A distributed hydrological-geotechnical model using satellite-derived rainfall estimates for shallow landslide prediction system at a catchment scale. Landslides 7(3):237–258Google Scholar
  6. Baecher GB, Christian JT (2003) Reliability and statistics in geotechnical engineering. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Baum RL, Savage WZ, Godt JW (2002) TRIGRS—a Fortran program for transient rainfall infiltration and grid-based regional slope-stability analysis. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-0424. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2002/ofr-02-424
  8. Baum RL, Savage WZ, Godt JW (2008) TRIGRS—a Fortran program for transient rainfall infiltration and grid-based regional slope-stability analysis, Version 2.0. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1159. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1159
  9. Baumann TV, Bonadonna C, Manzella I, Moscariello M, Cuomo S (2018) Slope stability models for rainfall induced lahars during long lasting eruption. J Volcanol Seismol 359:78–94Google Scholar
  10. Beer M, Zhang Y, Quek ST, Phoon KK (2013) Reliability analysis with scare information: comparing alternative approaches in a geotechnical engineering context. Struct Saf 41:1–10Google Scholar
  11. Begueria S (2006) Validation and evaluation of predictive models in hazard assessment and risk management. Nat Hazards 37(3):315–329Google Scholar
  12. Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol Sci Bull 24(1):43–69Google Scholar
  13. Borga M, Dalla Fontana G, Gregoretti C, Marchi L (2002) Assessment of shallow landsliding by using a physically based model of hillslope stability. Hydrol Process 16(14):2833–2851Google Scholar
  14. Burton A, Bathurst JC (1998) Physically based modeling of shallow landslide sediment yield at a catchment scale. Environ Geol 35(2–3):89–99Google Scholar
  15. Carrara A, Crosta GB, Frattini P (2008) Comparing models of debris-flow susceptibility in the alpine environment. Geomorphology 94(3–4):353–378Google Scholar
  16. Catani F, Segoni S, Falorni G (2010) An empirical geomorphology-based approach to the spatial prediction of soil thickness at catchment scale. Water Resour Res 46:W05508Google Scholar
  17. Cepeda J, Chavez JA, Martinez CC (2010) Procedure for the selection of runout model parameters from landslide back analyses: application to the metropolitan area of San Salvador, El Salvador. Landslides 7(2):105–116Google Scholar
  18. Chae BG, Park KB, Park HJ, Choi JH, Kim MI (2012) Analysis of slope stability considering the saturation depth ratio by rainfall infiltration in unsaturated soil. J Eng Geol 22(3):343–351Google Scholar
  19. Chae BG, Park HJ, Catani F, Simoni A, Berti M (2017) Landslide prediction, monitoring and early warning: a concise review of state-of-the-art. Geosci J 21:1033–1070.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-017-0049-x
  20. Chen CY, Chen TC, Yu FC, Lin SC (2005) Analysis of time-varying rainfall infiltration induced landslide. Environ Geol 48(4–5):466–479Google Scholar
  21. Chowdhury R, Flentje P, Bhattacharya G (2010) Geotechnical slope analysis. CRC, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Coduto DP, Yeung MR, Kitch WA (2010) Geotechnical engineering: principles and practices, 2nd edn. Pearson, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Corominas J, van Westen C, Frattini P, Cascini L, Malet JP, Fotopoulou S, Catani F, Van Den Eeckhau M, Mavrouli O, Agliardi F et al (2014) Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73(2):209–263Google Scholar
  24. Crosta GB, Frattini P (2003) Distribute modeling of shallow landslides triggered by intense rainfall. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 3(1/2):81–93Google Scholar
  25. Cuomo S, Iervolino A (2016) Investigating the role of strtigraphy in large area physically-based analysis of December 1999 Cervinara shallow landslides. J Mt Sci 13(1):104–115Google Scholar
  26. D’Amato Avanzi G, Falaschi F, Giannecchini R, Puccinelli A (2009) Soil slip susceptibility assessment using mechanical-hydrological approach and GIS techniques: an application in the Apuan Alps (Italy). Nat Hazards 50(3):591–603Google Scholar
  27. Davis TJ, Keller CP (1997) Modeling uncertainty in natural resource analysis using fuzzy sets and Monte Carlo simulation: slope stability prediction. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 11(5):409–434Google Scholar
  28. De Luca DL, Cepeda JM (2016) Procedure to obtain analytical solutions of one-dimensional Richards’ equation for infiltration in two-layered soils. J Hydrol Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001356
  29. Dietrich WE, Bellugi D, De Asua RR (2001) Validation of the shallow landslide model, SHALSTAB, for forest management. In: Wigmosta MS, Burges SJ (eds) Land use and watersheds: human influence on hydrology and geomorphology in urban and forest areas. American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp 195–227Google Scholar
  30. Dodagoudar GR, Venkatachalam G (2000) Reliability analysis of slope using fuzzy sets theory. Comput Geotech 27(2):101–115Google Scholar
  31. Dong WM, Wong FS (1987) Fuzzy weighted averages and implementation of the extension principle. Fuzzy Sets Syst 21(2):183–199Google Scholar
  32. Duncan J (2000) Factor of safety and reliability in geotechnical engineering. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126(4):307–316Google Scholar
  33. Elton DJ, Juang CH, Lin PS (2000) Vertical capacity of piles using fuzzy sets. Civ Eng Environ Syst 17(3):237–262Google Scholar
  34. Fawcett T (2006) An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recogn Lett 27(8):861–874Google Scholar
  35. Fell R, Corominas J, Bonnard C, Cascini L, Leroi E, Savage WZ (2008) Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning. Eng Geol 102(3–4):85–98Google Scholar
  36. Ferson S, Ginzburg L (1995) Hybrid arithmetic. In Uncertainty modeling and analysis, 1995, and Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society. Proceedings of ISUMA-NAFIPS’95. Third International Symposium on IEEE 619–623Google Scholar
  37. Formetta G, Capparelli G, Versace P (2016) Evaluating performance of simplified physically based models for shallow landslide susceptibility. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 20(11):4585Google Scholar
  38. Frattini P, Crosta GB, Fusi N, Dal Negro P (2004) Shallow landlsides in pyroclastic soils: a distributed modelling approach for hazard assessment. Eng Geol 73(3):277–295Google Scholar
  39. Giasi CI, Masi P, Cherubini C (2003) Probabilistic and fuzzy reliability analysis of a sample slope near Aliano. Eng Geol 67(3–4):391–402Google Scholar
  40. Godt JW, Baum RL, Savage WZ, Salciarini D, Schulz WH, Harp EL (2008) Transient deterministic shallow landslide modeling: requirements for susceptibility and hazard assessments in a GIS framework. Eng Geol 102(3):214–226Google Scholar
  41. Gong W, Wang L, Juang CH, Zhang J, Huang H (2014) Robust geotechnical design of shield-driven tunnels. Comput Geotech 56:191–201Google Scholar
  42. Gong W, Wang L, Khoshnevisan S, Juang CH, Huang H, Zhang J (2015) Robust geotechnical design of earth slope using fuzzy sets. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 141(1):0401484Google Scholar
  43. Griffiths DV, Huang JS, Fenton GA (2011) Probabilistic infinite slope analysis. Comput Geotech 38(4):577–584Google Scholar
  44. Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Galli M (2006) Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models. Geomorphology 81(1–2):166–184Google Scholar
  45. Haldar A, Mahadevan S (2000) Probability, reliability and statistical methods in engineering design. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Hanss M, Turrin S (2010) A fuzzy-based approach to comprehensive modeling and analysis of systems with epistemic uncertainties. Struct Saf 32(6):433–441Google Scholar
  47. Harr ME (1987) Reliability-based design in civil engineering. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Ho JY, Lee KT, Chang TC, Wang ZY, Liao YH (2012) Influences of spatial distribution of soil thickness on shallow landslide prediction. Eng Geol 124:38–46Google Scholar
  49. Hsu ML (1998) A grid based model for predicting shallow landslides: a case study in Linkou, Taipei. EOS Trans AGU 79(24):W25Google Scholar
  50. Huang JC, Kao SJ, Hsu ML, Lin JC (2006) Stochastic procedure to extract and to integrate landslide susceptibility maps: an example of mountainous watershed in Taiwan. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6(5):803–815Google Scholar
  51. Huang JC, Kao SJ, Hsu ML, Lin YA (2007) Influence of specific contributing area algorithms on slope failure prediction in landslide modeling. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 7(6):781–792Google Scholar
  52. Huang H, Gong W, Juang CH, Khoshnevisan S (2014) Robust geotechnical design of shield-driven tunnels using fuzzy sets. Tunneling and Underground Construction, pp 184–194Google Scholar
  53. Iverson RM (2000) Landslide triggering by rain infiltration. Water Resour Res 36(7):1897–1910Google Scholar
  54. Jahani E, Muhanna RL, Shayanfar MA, Barkhordari MA (2014) Reliability assessment with fuzzy random variables using interval Monte Carlo simulation. Comput Aided Civ Inf Eng 29(3):208–220Google Scholar
  55. Jang JY (2018) Landslide susceptibility analysis using a fuzzy Monte Carlo simulation and physically based model. MS thesis, Sejong University. in KoreanGoogle Scholar
  56. Juang CH, Elton DJ (1996) A practical approach to uncertainty modelling in geotechnical engineering. In: Uncertainty in the geologic environment: from theory to practice. ASCE, Reston, pp 1269–1283Google Scholar
  57. Juang CH, Lee DH (1992) Mapping slope failure potential using fuzzy sets. J Geotech Eng 118(3):475–494Google Scholar
  58. Juang CH, Wey JL, Elton DJ (1991) Model for capacity of single piles in sand using fuzzy sets. J Geotech Eng 117(12):1920–1931Google Scholar
  59. Juang CH, Jhi YY, Lee DH (1998) Stability analysis of existing slopes considering uncertainty. Eng Geol 49(2):111–122Google Scholar
  60. Kamai T (1991) Slope stability assessment by using GIS. Research report Science and Technology Agency of Japan, in JapaneseGoogle Scholar
  61. Kim WY, Chae BG (2009) Characteristics of rainfall, geology and failure geometry of the landslide areas on natural terrains, Korea. J Eng Geol 19(3):331–344Google Scholar
  62. Kim J, Lee K, Jeong S, Kim G (2014) GIS based prediction model of landslide susceptibility using a rainfall infiltration groundwater flow model. Eng Geol 182:63–78Google Scholar
  63. Lacasse S, Nadim F (1996) Uncertainties in characterizing soil properties. In: Uncertainty in the geologic environment: from theory to practice. ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication No. 58, Proceedings of Uncertainty' 96 held in Madison, Wisconsin, July 31 - August 3, 1996, pp 49–75Google Scholar
  64. Lee DH, Juang CH (1992) Evaluation of failure potential in mudstone slopes using fuzzy sets. In: Stability and performance of slopes and embankments II. ASCE, Reston, pp 1137–1151Google Scholar
  65. Lee JH, Park HJ (2016) Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using the transient infiltration flow model and GIS-based probabilistic approach. Landslides 13(5):885–903Google Scholar
  66. Li WX, Mei SH (2004) Fuzzy system method for the design of a jointed rock slope. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(3):569–574Google Scholar
  67. Liu CN, Wu CC (2008) Mapping susceptibility of rainfall-triggered shallow landslides using a probabilistic approach. Environ Geol 55(4):907–915Google Scholar
  68. Lu N, Godt JW (2013) Hillslope hydrology and stability. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  69. Luo Z, Atamturktur S, Juang CH, Huang H, Lin PS (2011) Probability of serviceability failure in a braced excavation in a spatially random field: fuzzy finite element approach. Comput Geotech 38(8):1031–1040Google Scholar
  70. Luzi I, Pergalani F (1996) Application of statistical and GIS techniques to slope instability zonation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 15(2):83–94Google Scholar
  71. Melchiorre C, Frattini P (2012) Modeling probability of rainfall-induced shallow landslides in a changing climate, Otta, Central Norway. Clim Chang 113(2):413–436Google Scholar
  72. Montgomery DR, Dietrich WE (1994) A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding. Water Resour Res 30(4):1153–1171Google Scholar
  73. Montrasio L, Valentino R, Losi GL (2011) Towards a real time susceptibility assessment of rainfall-induced shallow landslides on a regional scale. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:1927–1947Google Scholar
  74. Mostyn GR, Li KS (1993) Probabilistic slope analysis—state of play. Proceedings of the conference on probabilistic methods in geotechnical engineering, Canberra, Australia 89–109Google Scholar
  75. National Institute for Disaster Prevention (2000) Fundamental issues for landslide hazard avoidance or mitigation plans. National Institute for Disaster Prevention, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  76. Nilsen B (2000) New trend in rock slope stability analysis. Bull Eng Geol Environ 58:173–178Google Scholar
  77. O’Loughlin EM (1986) Prediction of surface saturation zones in natural catchments by topographic analysis. Water Resour Res 22(5):794–804Google Scholar
  78. Pack RT, Tarboton DG, Goodwin CN (1998) The SINMAP approach to terrain stability mapping. Proceedings of 8th Congress of the International Association of Engineering Geology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 1157–1165Google Scholar
  79. Pack TT, Tarboton DG, Goodwin CN (2001) Assessing terrain stability in a GIS using SINMAP, 15th annual GIS conference, GIS 2001, Vancouver, BCGoogle Scholar
  80. Park HJ, West TR, Woo I (2005) Probabilistic analysis of rock slope stability and random properties of discontinuity parameters, Interstate Highway 40, Western North Carolina, USA. Eng Geol 79(3):230–250Google Scholar
  81. Park HJ, Um JG, Woo I, Kim JW (2012) Application of fuzzy set theory to evaluate the probability of failure in rock slopes. Eng Geol 125:92–101Google Scholar
  82. Park HJ, Lee JH, Woo I (2013) Assessment of rainfall-induced shallow landslide susceptibility using a GIS-based probabilistic approach. Eng Geol 161:1–15Google Scholar
  83. Park HJ, Jang JY, Lee JH (2017) Physically based susceptibility assessment of rainfall-induced shallow landslides using a fuzzy point estimate method. Remote Sens 9:487Google Scholar
  84. Pathak S, Nilsen B (2004) Probabilistic rock slope stability analysis for Himalayan conditions. Bull Eng Geol Environ 63(1):25–32Google Scholar
  85. Phoon KK, Retief JV (2016) Reliability of geotechnical structures in ISO2394. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  86. Priest SD, Brown ET (1983) Probabilistic stability analysis of variable rock slopes. Tras Ins Min Metallurgy Lond 92:A1–A2Google Scholar
  87. Raia S, Alvioli M, Rossi M, Baum RM, Godt JW, Guzzetti F (2014) Improving predictive power of physically based rainfall-induced shallow landslide models: a probabilistic approach. Geosci Model Dev 7:495–514Google Scholar
  88. Regmi N, Giardino JR, Vitek JD (2010) Assessing susceptibility to landslides: using models to understand observed changes in slopes. Geomorphology 112(1–2):25–38Google Scholar
  89. Reid ME, Ellen SD, Brien DL, Fuente J, Fall JN, Hicks BG, Johnson EC (2007) Predicting debris slide locations in northwestern California, USDA Forest Service Gen Tech Rep. PSW-GTR-194. USDA Forest Service, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  90. Richard LA (1931) Capillary conduction of liquids in porous mediums. Physics 1:318–333Google Scholar
  91. Rossi G, Catani F, Leoni L, Segoni S, Tofani V (2013) HIRESSS: a physically based slope stability simulator for HPC applications. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13(1):151–166Google Scholar
  92. Rosso R, Rulli MC, Vannucchi G (2006) A physically based model for the hydrologic control on shallow landsliding. Water Resour Res 42(6):W06410.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004369 Google Scholar
  93. Salciarini D, Godt JW, Savage WZ, Conversini P, Baum RRL, Michael JA (2006) Modeling regional initiation of rainfall-induced shallow landslides in the eastern Umbria region of central Italy. Landslides 3(3):181–194Google Scholar
  94. Salciarini D, Tamagnini C, Conversini P, Rapinesi S (2012) Spatially distributed rainfall thresholds for the initiation of shallow landslides. Nat Hazards 61(1):229–245Google Scholar
  95. Salciarini D, Fanelli G, Tamagnini C (2017) A probabilistic model for rainfall-induced shallow landslide prediction at the regional scale. Landslides 14(5):1731–1746Google Scholar
  96. Santoso AM, Phoon KK, Quek ST (2011) Effects of soil spatial variability on rainfall-induced landslides. Comput Struct 89(11–12):893–900Google Scholar
  97. Saulnier GM, Beven KJ, Obled C (1997) Including spatially variable effective soil depths in TOPMODEL. J Hydrol 202(1–4):158–172Google Scholar
  98. Savage WZ, Godt JW, Baum RL (2004) Modeling time-dependent areal slope stability. Proceedings of 9th international symposium on landslides, Rio de Janeiro, n, pp 23–38Google Scholar
  99. Schiliro L, Monterasio L, Mugnozza GS (2016) Prediction of shallow landslide occurrence: validation of a physically based approach through a real case study. Sci Total Environ 569–570:134–144Google Scholar
  100. Silva F, Lambe TW, Marr WA (2008) Probability and risk of slope failure. J Geotech Geoenviron 134(12):1691–1699Google Scholar
  101. Sorbino G, Sica C, Cascini L (2010) Susceptibility analysis of shallow landslides source areas using physically based models. Nat Hazards 53(2):313–332Google Scholar
  102. Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 24(4857):1285–1293Google Scholar
  103. Terlien MTJ (1996) Modeling spatial and temporal variations in rainfall-triggered landslides. ITC publication 32, ITC, Enschede, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  104. Terlien MTJ, van Westen CJ, van Asch TW (1995) Deterministic modelling GIS-based landslide hazard assessment. In: Geographical information systems in assessing natural hazards. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 57–77Google Scholar
  105. Tsai TL, Tsai PY, Yang PJ (2015) Probabilistic modeling of rainfall-induced shallow landslide using a point estimate method. Environ Earth Sci 73(8):4109–4117Google Scholar
  106. van Westen CJ, van Asch TW, Soeters R (2006) Landslide hazard and risk zonation—why is it still so difficult? Bull Eng Geol Environ 65(2):167–184Google Scholar
  107. Vanmarcke EH (1977) Probabilistic modeling of soil profiles. J Geotech Eng Div 103(11):1227–1246Google Scholar
  108. Wang Y, Cao Z, Au SK (2010) Efficient Monte Carlo simulation of parameter sensitivity in probabilistic slope stability analysis. Comput Geotech 37(7):1015–1022Google Scholar
  109. Won CG, Kim KT (1969) Geological map of the Sangju sheet. Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  110. Wu W, Sidle RC (1995) A distributed slope stability model for steep forested basins. Water Resour Res 31(8):2097–2110Google Scholar
  111. Xie M, Easki T, Zhou G (2004) GIS based probabilistic mapping of landslide hazard using a three dimensional deterministic model. Nat Hazards 33(2):265–282Google Scholar
  112. Xu C, Wang L, Tien YM, Chen JM, Juang CH (2014) Robust design of rock slopes with multiple failure modes: modeling uncertainty of estimated parameters statistics with fuzzy number. Environ Earth Sci 72(8):2957–2969Google Scholar
  113. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353Google Scholar
  114. Zhou G, Esaki T, Mitani Y, Xie M, Mori J (2003) Spatial probabilistic modeling of slope failure using an integrated GIS Monte Carlo simulation approach. Eng Geol 68(3–4):373–386Google Scholar
  115. Zimmermann HJ (2001) Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Kluwer Academic, BostonGoogle Scholar
  116. Zolfaghari A, Heath AC (2008) A GIS application for assessing landslide hazard over a large area. Comput Geotech 35(2):278–285Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geoinformation EngineeringSejong UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations