Advertisement

Landslides

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 173–180 | Cite as

Reliability of water content estimation by profile probe and its effect on slope stability

  • Lucio Di MatteoEmail author
  • Cristina Pauselli
  • Daniela Valigi
  • Maurizio Ercoli
  • Mauro Rossi
  • Giacomo Guerra
  • Costanza Cambi
  • Remo Ricco
  • Giuseppe Vinti
Technical Note

Abstract

Shallow landslide failures are distributed worldwide and cause economic losses and fatalities. A proper evaluation of the possible occurrence of shallow landslides requires reliable characterization of water content. Volumetric water content (θ) is commonly estimated using dielectric sensors, which use manufacturers’ calibration curves developed for specific soil types. In this study, we present the experimental results achieved during a laboratory calibration of a capacitance probe (PR2/6 probe), tested on two sandy soils widely outcropping in Central Italy. The proposed equations demonstrate a more reliable estimation of θ with respect to the generalized soil equation provided by the manufacturer, which overestimates θ by up to 10 percentage points. Such overestimation could affect the evaluation of suction stress in partially saturated shallow soils affecting the slope stability analysis. Although the use of θ from correct calibration equations provides less precautionary factor of safety values, a reliable evaluation of the soil moisture condition is fundamental when mapping and predicting the spatial and temporal occurrence of shallow landslides. The use of the PR2/6 probe with the appropriate soil calibration equations in early warning monitoring systems will provide a more reliable forecast, minimizing the number of false alarms.

Keywords

Landslides Water content PR2/6 probe Sandy soils Suction stress 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The geotechnical analyses were performed in the Laboratorio di Geologia Applicata of the University of Perugia funded in the framework of the “Ricerca di base 2014 Project–DIMBASE14.” The authors are grateful for the technical support provided by Laboratorio Preparazione Rocce e Sezioni Sottili of the University of Perugia. The authors thank also anonymous Reviewers for the constructive feedbacks on the manuscript.

References

  1. Alvioli M, Guzzetti F, Rossi M (2014) Scaling properties of rainfall induced landslides predicted by a physically based model. Geomorphology 213:38–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.12.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ang AHS, Tang WH (1984) Probability concepts in engineering planning and design. Volume II - decision, risk and reliability. Wiley, New York 562 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Babu GLS, Murthy DSN (2005) Reliability analysis of unsaturated soil slopes. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131:1423–1428.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:11(1423)#sthash.VhJP7Gcy.dpuf CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baecher GB, Christian JT (2003) Reliability and statistics in geotechnical engineering. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumardth RL, Lascano LJ, Evett SR (2000) Soil material, temperature and salinity effects on calibration of multysensor capacitance probes. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:1940–1946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bogena HR, Huisman JA, Oberdörster C, Vereecken H (2007) Evaluation of a low-cost soil water content sensor for wireless network applications. J Hydrol 344:32–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.06.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brocca L, Hasenauer S, Lacava T, Melone F, Moramarco T, Wagner W, Dorigo W, Matgen P, Martínez-Fernández J, Llorens P, Latron J, Martin C, Bittelli M (2011) Soil moisture estimation through ASCAT and AMSR-E sensors: an intercomparison and validation study across Europe. Remote Sens Environ 115(12):3390–3408.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooper DD (2001) Soil water measurement: a practical handbook. Wiley Blackwell, Chichester, pp 368Google Scholar
  9. Cullen CA, Al-Suhili R, Khanbilvardi R (2016) Guidance index for shallow landslide hazard analysis. Remote Sens 8:866–883.  https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8100866 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Campos TMP, Andrade MHN, Vargas EA Jr (1991) Unsaturated colluvium over rock slide in a forested site in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. In: Proc. 6th Int. Symp. On landslides, Christchurch New Zealand. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1357–1364Google Scholar
  11. Delta-T Devices Ltd (2016). User Manual for the Profile Probe, typePR2. 48 pp. Available at https://www.delta-t.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/PR2_user_manual_version_5.0.pdf. Last accessed, July 31th, 2017
  12. Di Matteo L, Valigi D, Ricco R (2013) Laboratory shear strength parameters of cohesive soils: variability and potential effects on slope stability. Bull Eng Geol Environ 72(1):101–106.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0459-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doglioni A, Galeandro A, Simeone V (2013) Lateral strength and critical depth in infinite slope stability analysis. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 38:1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2190 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Evett SR, Tolk JA, Howell TA (2006) Soil profile water content determination: sensor accuracy, axial response, calibration, temperature dependence, and precision. Vadose Zone J 5:894–907.  https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2005.0149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glade T, Crozier MJ, Smith P (2000) Applying probability determination to refine landslide-triggering rainfall thresholds using an empirical “antecedent daily rainfall model”. Pure Appl Geophys 157(6/8):1059–1079.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s000240050017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Godt JW, Baum RL, McKenna JP (2007) Vadose-zone response to rainfall leading to shallow landslide initiation on the Puget Sound bluffs, Washington. Geol Soc Am Abstr Programs 36(6):362Google Scholar
  17. Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Galli M (2006) Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models. Geomorphology 81(1):166–184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.04.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoek E, Bray J (1981) Rock slope engineering, Revised 3rd edn. the institution of mining and metallurgy, London, pp 341–351Google Scholar
  19. Huang Q, Akinremi OO, Sri Rajan R, Bullock P (2004) Laboratory and field evaluation of five soil water sensors. Can J Soil Sci 84:431–438.  https://doi.org/10.4141/S03-097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Irmak S, Irmak A (2005) Performance of frequency-domain reflectometer, capacitance, and psuedo-transit time-based soil water content probes in four coarse-textured soil. Appl Eng Agric 21(6):999–1008.  10.13031/trans.58.10761 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jiang S, Li D, Cao Z, Zhou C, Phoon K (2015) Efficient system reliability analysis of slope stability in spatially variable soils using Monte Carlo simulation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 141(2):04014096.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim M-I, Chae B-G, Nishigaki M (2008) Evaluation of geotechnical properties of saturated soil using dielectric responses. Geosci J 12(1):83–93.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-008-0010-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kizito F, Campbell CS, Campbell GS, Cobos DR, Teare BL, Carter B, Hopmans JW (2008) Frequency, electrical conductivity and temperature analysis of a low-cost capacitance soil moisture sensor. J Hydrol 352:367–378.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.01.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lu N, Godt JW (2008) Infinite slope stability under steady unsaturated seepage conditions. Water Resour Res 44:W11404.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006976 Google Scholar
  25. Lu N, Likos WJ (2004) Unsaturated soil mechanics. John Wiley, Hoboken 556 ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Lu N, Likos WJ (2006) Suction stress characteristic curve for unsaturated soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(2):131–142.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:2(131) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mazahrih NT, Katbeh-Bader N, Evett SR, Ayars JE, Trout TJ (2008) Field calibration accuracy and utility of four down-hole water content sensors. Vadose Zone J 7(3):992–1000.  https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2008.0001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morbidelli R, Corradini C, Saltalippi C, Brocca L (2012) Initial soil water content as input to field-scale infiltration and surface runoff models. Water Resour Manag 26:1793–1807.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-9986-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Muñoz-Carpena R, Shukla S, Morgan K (2005) Field devices for monitoring soil water content. Univ. of Florida, bulletin 343, 24 pp. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download? https://doi.org/10.1.1.514.6862&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Last accessed, July 31th, 2017Google Scholar
  30. Paltineanu IC, Starr JL (1997) Real-time soil water dynamics using multi-sensor capacitance probes: laboratory calibration. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:1576–1585.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100060006x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Polyakov V, Fares A, Ryder MH (2005) Calibration of a capacitance system for measuring water content of tropical soil. Vadose Zone J 4:1004–1010.  https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2005.0028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Raia S, Alvioli M, Rossi M, Baum RL, Godt JW, Guzzetti F (2014) Improving predictive power of physically based rainfall-induced shallow landslide models: a probabilistic approach. Geosci Model Dev 7:495–514.  https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-495-2014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reid ME, Baum RL, LaHusen RG, Ellis WL (2008) Capturing landslide dynamics and hydrologic triggers using near-real-time monitoring. In: Chen et al (eds) landslides and engineered slopes. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 179–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rhoades JD, Chanduvi F, Lesch S. (1999). Soil salinity assessment: methods and interpretation of electrical conductivity measurements. Food & Agriculture org. 57, 165 Pp. available at http://www.Fao.Org/docrep/019/x2002e/x2002e.Pdf. Last accessed, July 31th, 2017
  35. Robinson DA, Gardner CMK, Cooper JD (1999) Measurement of relative permittivity in sandy soils using TDR, capacitance and theta probes: comparison, including the effects of bulk soil electrical conductivity. J Hydrol 223:198–211.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00121-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Robinson DA, Campbell CS, Hopmans JW, Hornbuckle BK, Jones SB, Knight R, Ogden F, Selker J, Wendroth O (2008) Soil moisture measurement for ecological and hydrological watershed-scale observatories: A review. Vadose Zone J 7(1):358–389.  https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2007.0143.
  37. Rossi M, Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Mondini AC, Peruccacci S (2010) Optimal landslide susceptibility zonation based on multiple forecasts. Geomorphology 114(3):129–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.06.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rossi M, Reichenbach P (2016) LAND-SE: a software for statistically based landslide susceptibility zonation, version 1.0. Geosci Model Dev 9(10):3533.  https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3533-2016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rossi M, Luciani S, Valigi D, Kirschbaum D, Brunetti MT, Peruccacci S, Guzzetti F (2017) Statistical approaches for the definition of landslide rainfall thresholds and their uncertainty using rain gauge and satellite data. Geomorphology 285:16–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rüdiger C, Western AW, Walker JP, Smith AB, Kalma JD, Willgoose GR (2010) Towards a general equation for frequency domain reflectometers. J Hydrol 383(3):319–329.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.12.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rudnick DR, Djaman K, Irmak S (2015) Performance analysis of capacitance and electrical resistance-type soil moisture sensors in a silt loam soil. Trans ASABE 58(3):649–665 https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.58.10761 Google Scholar
  42. Sahis MK, Bhattacharya G, Chowdhury R (2014) Reliability analysis of rainfall induced slope instability of unsaturated soil slopes. In: Khalili N, Russell A, Khoshghalb A (eds) Unsaturated soils: Research & Applications. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 1287–1293Google Scholar
  43. Saxton KE, Rawls WJ (2006) Soil water characteristic estimates by texture and organic matter for hydrologic solutions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1569–1578.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Saxton KE, Rawls WJ, Romberger JS, Papendick RI (1986) Estimating generalized soil water characteristics from texture. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 50:1031–1035Google Scholar
  45. Scudiero E, Berti A, Teatini P, Morari F (2012) Simultaneous monitoring of soil water content and salinity with a low-cost capacitance-resistance probe. Sensors 12(12):17588–17607.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s121217588 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sevostianova E, Deb S, Serena M, VanLeeuwen D, Leinauer B (2015) Accuracy of two electromagnetic soil water content sensors in saline soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 79(6):1752–1759.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2015.07.0271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Topp GC, Davis JL, Annan AP (1980) Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: measurement in coaxial transmission lines. Water Resour Res 16(3):579–582.  https://doi.org/10.1029/WR016i003p00574 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Bavel M, Nichols, C (2002) Theta and profiler soil moisture probes - Accurate impedance measurement devices - New applications. Available at http://dynamax.com/images/uploads/papers/95_Theta_and_profiler_soil_moisture_probes.pdf. Last accessed, October 19th, 2016
  49. Walker JP, Willgoose GR, Kalma JD (2004) In situ measurement of soil moisture: a comparison of techniques. J Hydrol 293(1):85–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wolle CM, Hachich W (1989) Rain-induced landslides in southeastern Brazil in, Proc. of the 12th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp. 1639–1644, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang LL, Zhang LM, Zhang J, Tang WH (2011) Stability analysis of rainfall induced slope failure: A review. P I Civil Eng-Geotec 164(Issue GE5):299–316.  https://doi.org/10.1680/geng.2011.164.5.299 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics and GeologyUniversity of PerugiaPerugiaItaly
  2. 2.CNR IRPIPerugiaItaly
  3. 3.Istituto Sperimentale per l’Edilizia (ISTEDIL)PerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations