Landslides

, Volume 14, Issue 5, pp 1827–1838 | Cite as

Landslides: a top international journal in geological engineering and engineering geology?

ICL/IPL Activities

Abstract

Scientific literature is becoming daily more and more abundant. Scientific and professional journals as primary information sources are competing to each other to attract readership. Their position (ranking, visibility, attractiveness, prestige) in scientific community can be measured by using different journal bibliometric and scientometric parameters, journal impact factor being only one of them. Springer Nature publishes the journal Landslides: Journal of the International Consortium on Landslides since 2004. Being examined in the past by different authors from bibliometric and editorial point of view, this review on the journal’s achievements confirmed the high ranking of this journal in the fields of geological and geotechnical engineering and engineering geology. Strong and weak points are discussed from the bibliometric point of view, stressing the need for higher internationality of co-authorship of published articles in order to be true international journal. Continuous publishing and the move to a monthly journal in 2018 will eventually increase journal’s h-index and cited half-life of citations, but further editorial efforts should be directed to attract excellent review papers and focused technical notes to increase cites per paper. Until now, the journal Landslides is the foremost journal in the field of landslide disaster risk reduction, and the top young international journal in the field of geological engineering and engineering geology.

Keywords

Landslides Impact Factor International collaboration Citations Journal metrics Journal rankings 

References

  1. Akgun A (2012) A comparison of landslide susceptibility maps produced by logistic regression, multi-criteria decision, and likelihood ratio methods: a case study at Izmir, Turkey. Landslides 9(1):93–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergstrom CT, West J (2017) Comparing Impact factor and Scopus CiteScore Available at: http://eigenfactor.org/projects/posts/citescore.php
  3. Bornmann L, Stefaner M, Anegon FD, Mutz R (2014) Ranking and mapping of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide based on highly-cited papers: a visualisation of results from multi-level models. Online Inf Rev 38(1):43–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bui DT, Tuan TA, Klempe H, Pradhan B, Revhaug I (2016) Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree. Landslides 13(2):361–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cerovšek T, Mikoš M (2014) A comparative study of cross-domain research output and citations: research impact cubes and binary citation frequencies. J Inform 8:147–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chorus C, Waltman L (2016) A large-scale analysis of impact factor biased journal self-citations. PLoS One 11(8):e0161021. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarivate Analytics (2017) Web of science. https://apps.webofknowledge.com/
  8. Dorn RI (2002) Analysis of geomorphology citations in the last quarter of the 20th century. Earth Surf Process Landf 27(6):667–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elsevier (2017). Scopus journal metrics https://journalmetrics.scopus.com/
  10. Garfield E (1955) Citation indexes to science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science 122(3159):108–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garfield E (2006) The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA 295(1):90–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Google (2017). Google Scholar Metrics – web page https://scholar.google.de/intl/en/scholar/metrics.html#metrics
  13. Guzzetti G, Peruccacci S, Rossi M (2008) The rainfall intensity-duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows: an update. Landslides 5(1):3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haque U, Blum P, da Silva PF, Andersen P, Pilz J, Chalov SR, Malet J-P, Jemec Auflič M, Andres N, Poyiadji E, Lamas PC, Zhang W, Peshevski I, Pétursson HG, Kurt T, Dobrev N, García-Davalillo JC, Halkia M, Ferri S, Gaprindashvili G, Engström J, Keellings D (2016) Fatal landslides in Europe. Landslides 13(6):1545–1554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harzing A-W, Alakangas S (2016) Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics 106: 787–804. Available at: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11192-015-1798-9.pdf
  16. Hungr O, Leroueil S, Picarelli L (2014) The Varnes classification of landslide types, an update. Landslides 11(2):167–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Krauss J (2007) Journal self-citation rates in ecological sciences. Scientometrics 73(1): 79-89. Avalaible at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-007-1727-7
  18. Lando T, Bertoli-Barsotti L (2014) A new bibliometric index based on the shape of the citation distribution. PLoS ONE 9(12):e115962. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115962 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee S, Pradhan B (2007) Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Landslides 4(1):33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li DQ, Xiao T, Cao ZJ, Zhou CB, Zhang LM (2016) Enhancement of random finite element method in reliability analysis and risk assessment of soil slopes using subset simulation. Landslides 13(2):293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mikoš M (2011) Landslides: a state-of-the art on the current position in the landslide research community. Landslides 8:541–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pradhan B, Lee S (2010) Regional landslide susceptibility analysis using back-propagation neural network model at Cameron Highland, Malaysia. Landslides 7(1):13–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rodriguez-Navarro A (2012) Counting highly cited papers for university research assessment: conceptual and technical issues. PLoS One 7(10):e47210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rousseau R (1999) Temporal differences in self-citation rates of scientific journals. Scientometrics 44:521–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sassa K, Tsuchiya S, Ugai K, Wakai A, Uchimura T (2009) Landslides: a review of achievements in the first 5 years (2004–2009). Landslides 6:275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sassa K, Tsuchiya S, Fukuoka H, Mikos M, Doan L (2015) Landslides: review of achievements in the second 5-year period (2009–2013). Landslides 12(2):213–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sassa K, Arbanas Ž (2017) Landslides: journal of the international consortium on landslides. In: Sassa K, Mikoš M, Yin Y (eds) Advancing culture of living with landslides. WLF 2017. Springer, Cham, 257–267. Avalaible at: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-59469-9_21
  28. Springer (2017) Landslides: Journal of the International Consortium on Landslides – home page http://www.springer.com/earth+sciences+and+geography/natural+hazards/journal/10346
  29. U-Multirank (2017) U-Multirank – home page www.umultirank.org/
  30. Van Noorden R (2016) Impact factor gets heavyweight rival—CiteScore uses larger database and gets different results. Nature 540:325–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xu C, Xu XW, Yao X, Dai FC (2014) Three (nearly) complete inventories of landslides triggered by the May 12, 2008 Wenchuan Mw 7.9 earthquake of China and their spatial distribution statistical analysis. Landslides 11(3):441–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yavari-Ramshe S, Ataie-Ashtiani B (2017) A rigorous finite volume model to simulate subaerial and submarine landslide-generated waves. Landslides 14(1):203–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yin YP, Wang FW, Sun P (2009) Landslide hazards triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, Sichuan, China. Landslides 6(2):139–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Walters WH (2017) Do subjective journal ratings represent whole journals or typical articles? Unweighted or weighted citation impact? J Inform 11:730–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Waltman L, Calero-Medina C, Kosten J, Noyons ECM, Tijssen RJW, Van Eck NJ, Van Leeuwen TN, Van Raan AFJ, Visser MS, Wouters P (2012) The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: data collection, indicators, and interpretation. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 63(12):2419–2432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wannous C, Velasquez G (2017) United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR)—UNISDR’s Contribution to Science and Technology for Disaster Risk Reduction and the Role of the International Consortium on Landslides (ICL). In: Sassa K, Mikoš M, Yin Y (eds) Advancing culture of living with landslides. WLF 2017. Springer, Cham, 99–115. Available at: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-59469-9_6

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Civil and Geodetic EngineeringUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations