Landslides

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 191–201 | Cite as

Impact of seismic factors on landslide susceptibility zonation: a case study in part of Indian Himalayas

Technical Note

Abstract

Landslides are one of the most widespread natural hazards in high mountain terrains such as the Himalayas, which are one of the youngest tectonically and seismically active mountain ranges in the world. The crustal movements along the longitudinal thrusts and transverse faults give rise to earthquakes and in turn initiate landslides in the region. In fact, in addition to various static factors causing landslides, earthquakes are one of the major causes of landslides. It is thus imperative to incorporate seismic factor also while carrying out landslide susceptibility zonation map preparation in a seismically active areas like Garhwal Himalayas. In this paper, a study on the effect of earthquakes on landslide susceptibility zonation has been demonstrated by taking Chamoli earthquake as an example.

Keywords

Himalayas Chamoli earthquake Landslides Landslide susceptibility zonation 

References

  1. Anbalagan R (1992) Landslide hazard evaluation and zonation mapping in mountainous terrain. Eng Geol 32:269–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arora MK Das Gupta AS, Gupta RP (2004) An artificial neutral network for landslide hazard zonation in the Bhagirathi (Ganga) Valley, Himalayas. Int J Remote Sens 25(3):559–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Champati Ray PK, Pimri S, Lakhera RC, Sati S (2006) Landslide monitoring and fuzzy integration based method for hazard assessment in active seismic zone of Himalaya, International Journal onLandslides”, doi:10.1007/s10346-006-0068-6. Springer-Verlag GmbH
  4. Champati Ray PK, Dimri S, Lakhera RC, Sati S (2007) Fuzzy-based method for landslide hazard assessment in active seismic zone of Himalaya. Landslides 4(2):101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. GSI (2001) Chamoli earthquake of 29 March, 1999. GSI, Bulletin Series-B no. 53, p 163Google Scholar
  6. Gupta RP (2003) Remote sensing geology, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, p 655Google Scholar
  7. IS: 1893 (Part 1) (2002) Criteria for earthquake resistance design of structure, general provisions and buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards, p 36Google Scholar
  8. Lin ML, Tung CC (2003) A GIS based spatial data layers in favorability mapping for geological events. Trans Geosci Remote Sens IEEE 37:1194–1198Google Scholar
  9. Mathew J, Jha VK, Rawat GS (2007) Weights of evidence modelling for landslide hazard zonation mapping in part of Bhagirathi valley, Uttarakhand. Curr Sci 92(5):628–638Google Scholar
  10. Naithani AK (1999) The Himalayan landslides. Employ News 23(47):1–2Google Scholar
  11. Owen LA, Kamp U, Khattak GA, Harp EL, Keefer DK, Bauer MA (2008) Landslides triggered by the 8 October 2005 Kashmir earthquake. Geomorphology 94(1–2):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pachauri AK, Pant M (1992) Landslide hazard mapping based on geological attributes. Eng Geol 32(1–2):81–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pachauri AK, Gupta PV, Chander R (1998) Landslide zoning in a part of the Garhwal Himalayas. Environ Geol 36(3–4):325–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Prakash A, Fielding EJ, Gens R, Genderen JL, Evans DL (2001) Data fusion for investigating land subsidence and coalfire hazards in a coal mining area. Int J Remote Sens 22(6):921–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ravindran KV, Philip G (2002) Mapping of 29th March 1999 Chamoli earthquake induced landslides using IRS-IC-ID data. Himal Geol 23(1–2):69–76Google Scholar
  16. Sabins FF (1996) Remote sensing principles and interpretations. Freeman, New York, p 494Google Scholar
  17. Saha AK, Gupta RP, Arora MK (2002) GIS-based landslide hazard zonation in a part of the Himalayas. Int J Remote Sens 23(2):357–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Saha AK, Gupta RP, Sarkar I, Arora MK, Csaplovics E (2005) An approach for GIS-based statistical landslide susceptibility zonation—with a case study in the Himalayas. Landslides 2(1):61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sanjeevi S, Vani K, Lakshmi K (2001) Comparison of conventional and wavelet transform techniques for fusion of IRC-1c LISS-III and PAN images. In: Proceedings of Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, Singapore, 5–9 November 2001, pp 140–145Google Scholar
  20. Saraf AK (2000) IRS-1C-PAN depicts Chamoli earthquake induced landslides in Garhwal Himalayas, India. Int J Remote Sens 21(12):2345–2352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sarkar S, Kanungo DP, Mehrotra GS (1995) Landslide hazard zonation: a case study in Garhwal Himalaya, India. Mt Res Dev 15(4):301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sato HP, Hasegawa H, Fujiwara S, Tobita M, Koarai M, Une H, Iwahashi J (2007) Interpretation of landslide distribution triggered by the 2005 Northern Pakistan earthquake using SPOT 5 imagery. Landslides 4(2):113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shanmugam P, Sanjeevi S (2001) Analysis and evaluation of fusion techniques using IRS-1C LISS-3 and pan data for monitoring coastal wetlands of Vedaranniyam, Tamil Nadul. In: Proceedings of the Nationnal Symposium on advances in remote sensing technology with special emphasis on high resolution imagery & annual convention of Indian Society of Remote Sensing (ISRS), Ahmedabad, India, 11–13 December, 2001, pp 60–65Google Scholar
  24. Sharma PK, Chopra R, Verma VK, Thomas A (1996) Flood management using remote sensing technology: The Punjab (India) experience. Int J Remote Sens 17(17):3511–3521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sinha BN, Varma RS, Paul DK (1975) Landslides in Darjeeling district (West Bengal) and adjacent areas. Bull Geol Surv India 36(B):1–10Google Scholar
  26. Solonenko VP (1977) Landslides and collapses in seismic zones and their prediction. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 15:4–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Valdiya KS (1980) Geology of Kumaun lesser Himalaya. Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun, p 291Google Scholar
  28. van Westen CJ (1997) Statistical landslide hazard analysis. In: Application guide, ILWIS 2.1 for Windows, ITC, Enschede, The Netherlands, pp 73–84Google Scholar
  29. Welch R, Ehlers M (1987) Merging multiresolution SPOT HRV and Landsat TM data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 53(3):301–303Google Scholar
  30. Yalcin A (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations. Catena 72(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naveen Pareek
    • 1
  • Mukat L. Sharma
    • 2
  • Manoj K. Arora
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringThapar UniversityPatialaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Earthquake EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology RoorkeeRoorkeeIndia
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology RoorkeeRoorkeeIndia

Personalised recommendations