Advertisement

Landslides

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 159–173 | Cite as

Global landslide and avalanche hotspots

  • Farrokh Nadim
  • Oddvar Kjekstad
  • Pascal Peduzzi
  • Christian Herold
  • Christian Jaedicke
Original Article

Abstract

Allocating resources for natural hazard risk management has high priority in development banks and international agencies working in developing countries. Global hazard and risk maps for landslides and avalanches were developed to identify the most exposed countries. Based on the global datasets of climate, lithology, earthquake activity, and topography, areas with the highest hazard, or “hotspots”, were identified. The applied model was based on classed values of all input data. The model output is a landslide and avalanche hazard index, which is globally scaled into nine levels. The model results were calibrated and validated in selected areas where good data on slide events exist. The results from the landslide and avalanche hazard model together with global population data were then used as input for the risk assessment. Regions with the highest risk can be found in Colombia, Tajikistan, India, and Nepal where the estimated number of people killed per year per 100 km2 was found to be greater than one. The model made a reasonable prediction of the landslide hazard in 240 of 249 countries. More and better input data could improve the model further. Future work will focus on selected areas to study the applicability of the model on national and regional scales.

Keywords

Landslides Avalanches Global analysis Hazard Risk assessment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is based on a study conducted under the ProVention Consortium initiative on Natural Disaster Hotspots. The overall study is published by the World Bank in two volumes. The first volume, Natural Disaster Risk Hotspots: A Global Risk Analysis (Dilley et al. 2005), presents the global findings. Volume 2, which presents a number of case studies (including this one on landslide risk) is forthcoming. The study was initiated by the World Bank's Hazard Management Unit (HMU), headed by Margaret Arnold, under the umbrella of the ProVention Consortium. The study was conducted as part of the ProVention activity on Natural Disaster Hotspots: A Global Risk Analysis. A major part of the funding was provided by the United Kingdom's Department for International Development (DFID) and The Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Margaret Arnold's support and encouragement throughout the work are gratefully appreciated. The support of Christopher Pusch of the World Bank for the landslide hazard study in Armenia is also gratefully acknowledged. The authors acknowledge close cooperation with Columbia University, especially Robert Chen and Max Dilley. A number of NGI personnel participated actively in the project, among them Ulrik Domaas, Ramez Rafat and Frode Sandersen. The authors are grateful to these individuals for their active participation and support.

References

  1. CGMW (2000) Geological map of the world. Commission for the Geological Map of the World. UNESCO PublishingGoogle Scholar
  2. Coburn AW, Spence RJS, Pomonis A (1991) Vulnerability and risk assessment. UNDP Disaster Management Training Program: 57Google Scholar
  3. Dao H, Peduzzi P (2004) Global evaluation of human risk and vulnerability to natural hazards. Enviro-info 2004, Sh@ring, Editions du Tricorne, Genève, ISBN 282930275-3 (1):435–446Google Scholar
  4. Deichmann U, Balk D, Yetman G (2001) Transforming population data for interdisciplinary usages: from census to grid. Available at http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/plue/gpw/GPWdocumentation.pdf
  5. Dilley M, Chen RS, Deichmann U, Lerner-Lam AL, Arnold M et al. (2005) Natural disaster hotspots – a global risk analysis. Report of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank and Columbia University: 132Google Scholar
  6. EM-DAT (2003) The OFDA/CRED International Disaster Database - www.em-dat.net - Université Catholique de Louvain - Brussels - BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  7. GEORISK (2004) Communications through The World Bank studyGoogle Scholar
  8. Giardini D, Grünthal G, Shedlock K, Zhang P (2003) The GSHAP Global Seismic Hazard Map. In: Lee W, Kanamori H, Jennings P (eds) International handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology. IASPEIGoogle Scholar
  9. Mora S, Vahrson W (1994) Macrozonation methodology for landslide hazard determination. Bull Assoc Eng Geol 31(1):49–58Google Scholar
  10. Nadim F, Kjekstad O, Gregoire AS, Rodriguez C, Peduzzi P (2004) First-order identification of global slide and avalanche hotspots. NGI report 20021613-1, 31 March 2004. Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  11. Peduzzi P, Dao H, Herold C, Mouton F (2002) Global risk and vulnerability index trends per year (GRAVITY), phase II: development, analysis and results. 56 http://www.grid.unep.ch/product/publication/download/ew_gravity2.pdf
  12. Pusch C (2004) A comprehensive risk management framework for Europe and Central Asia. Disaster Risk Management Working Paper Series No. 9. The World Bank, October 2004Google Scholar
  13. Rudolf B, Beck C, Grieser J, Schneider U (2005) Global precipitation analysis products, Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach a. M., GermanyGoogle Scholar
  14. UNDP (2004) Reducing disaster risk. United Nations Development Programme, Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  15. UNDRO (United Nations Disaster Relief Coordinator) (1979) Natural disasters and vulnerability analysis. Report of expert group meeting (9–12 July 1979). Geneva: UNDRO. 49 ppGoogle Scholar
  16. UNEP (1987) Global data sets for atmosphere, biosphere, and human related data. UNEP/GRID-GenevaGoogle Scholar
  17. Willmott CJ, Feddema JJ (1992) A more rational climatic moisture index. Prof Geogr 44(1):84–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. World Disaster Report (2004) International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, IFRC, Geneva; http://ifrc.org

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Farrokh Nadim
    • 1
  • Oddvar Kjekstad
    • 1
  • Pascal Peduzzi
    • 2
  • Christian Herold
    • 2
  • Christian Jaedicke
    • 1
  1. 1.Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, International Centre for GeohazardsOsloNorway
  2. 2.UNEP/DEWA/GRID-EuropeChâtelaineSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations