Short-term movements and strong dependence on figs of binturongs (Arctictis binturong) in Bornean rainforests

  • Miyabi NakabayashiEmail author
  • Abdul Hamid Ahmad
Short Communication


We evaluated short-term movements of three radio-collared binturongs in relation to food distribution in Bornean rainforests, in addition to the basic ecological information on their home-range size and diet. Mean 95% fixed kernel and 95% MCP home-range size were 4.24 ± 0.79 km2 and 1.54 ± 0.89 km2, respectively (mean ± SD). We recorded 13 fig Ficus species and four non-fig species as their foods. Fig trees accounted for 87.5% of the feeding sites of the three collared binturongs, and 87.9% including uncollared individuals. Our results suggested that binturongs’ short-term movements were strongly affected by food distribution, especially figs. They feed on various fig species and may remember the location and fruiting periods of fig trees. They may use the biggest fig species, F. punctata, as a fallback food when other foods are scarce. Although this is the first systematic study to describe movement and feeding habits of binturongs, further studies are needed to understand their ecology so that proper measures can be designed for their conservation.


Binturong Diet Ficus Radio-telemetry Home-range size 



We thank the Sabah Biodiversity Centre, Danum Valley Management Committee, and Maliau Basin Management Committee for their permission to conduct this research. We are grateful to field assistants, Azz, Kenneth, Albert, Farizal and Taufiq for their assistance in the field, and Q. Phillipps, Postar, Jemson, Jeisin and Joel for their assistance in the identification of plant species.

Funding information

This research was supported by JSPS Core-to-Core Program, A. Advanced Research Networks, Grants-in-Aid for JSPS Research Fellow to MN (no.25597, no. 201608680), the Shikata Memorial Trust for Nature Conservation and the Inui Tasuke Scientific Foundation.


  1. Chutipong W, Steinmetz R, Savini T, Gale GA (2015) Sleeping site selection in two Asian viverrids: effects of predation risk, resource access and habitat characteristics. Raffles Bull Zool 63:516–528Google Scholar
  2. Colon CP (1999) Ecology of the Malay civet (Viverra tangalunga) in a logged and an unlogged forest in Sabah, East Malaysia. Biological Sciences. New York, Fordham University. PhD thesisGoogle Scholar
  3. Crapo C, Moresco A, Hurley S, Hanner T, Kadzere C (2002) Anatomical measurements of the digestive tract and nutrient digestibility in the Asian bear cat (Arctictis binturong). J Dairy Sci 85:251Google Scholar
  4. Grassman LI Jr, Tewes ME, Silvy NJ (2005) Ranging, habitat use and activity patterns of binturong Arctictis binturong and yellow-throated marten Martes flavigula in north-Central Thailand. Wildl Biol 11:49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harrison RD, Hamid AA, Kenta T, Lafrankie J, Lee H, Nagamasu H, Nakashizuka T, Palmiotto P (2003) The diversity of hemi-epiphytic figs (Ficus; Moraceae) in a Bornean lowland rain forest. Biol J Linn Soc 78:439–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Houle A, Chapman CA, Vickery WL (2004) Tree climbing strategies for primate ecological studies. Int J Primatol 25:237–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lam WY, Hedges L, Clements GR (2014) First record of a clouded leopard predating on a binturong. Cat News 60:16–16Google Scholar
  8. McNab BK (1995) Energy expenditure and conservation in frugivorous and mixed-diet carnivorans. J Mammal 76:206–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nakabayashi M, Ahmad AH, Kohshima S (2016) Fruit selection of a binturong (Arctictis binturong) by focal animal sampling in Sabah. Malaysian Borneo Mammalia 81:107–110Google Scholar
  10. Pyke GH (1984) Optimal foraging theory: a critical review. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 15:523–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. R Development Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna Google Scholar
  12. Reynolds G, Payne J, Sinun W, Mosigil G, Rory Walsh PDR (2011) Changes in forest land use and management in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo, 1990–2010, with a focus on the Danum Valley region. Phil Trans R Soc B 366:3168–3176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shanahan M, So S, Compton SG, Corlett R (2001) Fig-eating by vertebrate frugivores: a global review. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 76:529–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sikes RS, Animal Care and Use Committee of The American Society of Mammalogists (2016) Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and education. J Mammal 97:663–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Strier KB (2011) Primate behavioral ecology, fourth ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  16. Willcox DHA, Chutipong W, Gray TNE, Cheyne S, Semiadi G, Rahman H, Coudrat CNZ, Jennings A, Ghimirey Y, Ross J, Fredriksson G, Tilker A (2016) Arctictis binturong. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T41690A45217088. Downloaded on 10 September 2018

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ScienceUniversity of the RyukyusOkinawaJapan
  2. 2.Institute for Tropical Biology and ConservationUniversiti Malaysia SabahKota KinabaluMalaysia

Personalised recommendations