Advertisement

European Journal of Wildlife Research

, Volume 60, Issue 3, pp 511–517 | Cite as

A note on the effectiveness of incorporating management objectives with ecological variables when modeling red deer abundance

Original Paper

Abstract

Big game populations are being raised in areas characterized by different land uses and are being managed under a wide range of circumstances which might influence their population densities and structure. However, the consideration of explanatory variables related to management activities is not generally explicitly considered in game population models. This paper focuses on how estate owners’ management objectives and strategies influence red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) hunting yields. We study red deer harvest in 187 hunting estates in Andalusia (Spain) and use both ecological and management predictors to describe capture levels in each hunting estate. We have found that the main land use of the area where red deer are being raised, the type of hunting holder, and the long-term management strategies (such as fencing and the hunting practices implemented) significantly explain red deer hunting bag, which is often used as proxy of population abundance. Therefore, ecological variables alone are not always sufficient to determine big game harvests. We provide empirical support that reinforces the relevance of considering humans and their long-term decisions when trying to interpret wildlife harvests, populations, and trends. We urge scientists and technicians to incorporate human aims in the game species distribution models and resource user decision models, particularly when game populations are being intensively managed.

Keywords

Wildlife Red deer Hunting bags Hunting estate Fencing Hunting modalities Spatial modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study is framed within the RECAMAN Project, funded by the Junta de Andalucía. We would like to thank Pablo Campos, Ana Torres, Luis Guzmán, Isabel Martin, and Eva Pérez-Rodríguez for their collaboration.

References

  1. Acevedo P, Real R (2012) Favourability: concept, distinctive characteristics and potential usefulness. Naturwissenschaften 99:515–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acevedo P, Farfán MA, Márquez AL, Delibes-Mateos M, Real R, Vargas JM (2011a) Past, present and future of wild ungulates in relation to changes in land use. Landsc Ecol 26:19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Acevedo P, Real R, Gortazar C (2011b) Favorabilidad ecogeográfica para el corzo: distribución y abundancia Pirineos. Revista de Ecología de Montaña 166:9–27Google Scholar
  4. Acevedo P, Quirós-Fernández F, Casal J, Vicente J (2014) Spatial distribution of wild boar population abundance: basic information for spatial epidemiology and wildlife management. Ecol Indic 36:594–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Apollonio M, Andersen R, Putman R (2010) European ungulates and their management in the 21st century. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Arroyo B, Delibes-Mateos M, Diaz-Fernandez S, Viñuela J (2012) Hunting management in relation to profitability aims: red-legged partridge hunting in central Spain. Eur J Wildl Res 58:847–855Google Scholar
  7. Austin Z, Raffaelli DG, White PC (2013) Interactions between ecological and social drivers in determining and managing biodiversity impacts of deer. Biol Conserv 158:214–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bauer J, Giles J (2002) Recreational hunting: an international perspective. Wildlife Tourism Research Report Series: NO. 13. Cooperative Research Center for Sustainable Tourism, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  9. Bunnefeld N, Hoshino E, Milner-Gulland EJ (2011) Management strategy evaluation: a powerful tool for conservation? Trends Ecol Evol 26:441–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coltman DW, O’donoghue P, Jorgenson JT, Hogg JT, Strobeck C, Festa-Bianchet M (2003) Undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting. Nature 426:655–658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Côté SD, Rooney TP, Tremblay JP, Dussault C, Waller DM (2004) Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:113–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Delibes-Mateos M, Ferreras P, Villafuerte R (2008) Rabbit populations and game management: the situation after 15 years of rabbit haemorrhagic disease in central-southern Spain. Biodivers Conserv 17:559–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Delibes-Mateos M, Farfán MA, Olivero J, Márquez AL, Vargas JM (2009) Long-term changes in game species over a long period of transformation in the Iberian Mediterranean landscape. Environ Manag 43:1256–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Delibes-Mateos M, Farfán MA, Olivero J, Vargas J (2010) Land-use changes as a critical factor for long-term wild rabbit conservation in the Iberian Peninsula. Environ Conserv 37:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Dudík M, Ferrier S, Guisan A, Hijmans RJ, Huettmann F, Leathwick JR et al (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farfán MA, Guerrero JC, Real R, Barbosa AM, Vargas JM (2004) Caracterización del aprovechamiento cinegético de los mamíferos en Andalucía. Galemys 16:41–59Google Scholar
  18. Fulton EA, Smith ADM, Smith DC, Van Putten IE (2011) Human behavior: the key source of uncertainty in fisheries management. Fish Fish 12:2–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geisser H, Reyer HU (2004) Efficacy of hunting, feeding, and fencing to reduce crop damage by wild boars. J Wildl Manag 68:939–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gill RMA (1992) A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests: 1. Deer. Forestry 65:145–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gordon IJ, Hester AJ, Festa‐Bianchet M (2004) Review: the management of wild large herbivores to meet economic, conservation and environmental objectives. J Appl Ecol 41:1021–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gortázar C, Villafuerte R, Martín M (2000) Success of traditional restocking of red-legged partridge for hunting purposes in areas of low density of northeast Spain Aragón. Z Jagdwiss 46:23–30Google Scholar
  23. Gortázar C, Acevedo P, Ruiz-Fons F, Vicente J (2006) Disease risks and overabundance of game species. Eur J Wildl Res 52:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Herruzo AC, Martínez-Jauregui M (2013) Trends in hunters, hunting grounds and big game resources in Spain. For Syst 22:114–122Google Scholar
  25. Horne P, Petajisto L (2003) Preferences for alternative moose management regimes among Finnish landowners: a choice experiment approach. Land Econ 79:472–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Landete-Castillejos T, Gallego L, Estevez JA, García AJ, Fierro Y (2008) Fencing of game estates in Spain considered as management unit. In: Chapman NG, Hecker K (eds) Proceedings of the international symposium enclosures: a dead-end? CIC- International Council for Game Wildlife Conservation, Sopron, pp 68–79Google Scholar
  27. Landete-Castillejos T, Estevez JA, Ceacero F, Garcia AJ, Gallego L (2012) A review of factors affecting antler composition and mechanics. Front Biosci E 4:2328–2339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Landete-Castillejos T, Estevez JA, Ceacero F, Garcia AJ, Gallego L (2013) Effects of public vs. private management on deer antler composition, mechanical and structural variables. Eur J Wildl Res 59:519–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Langvatn R, Loison A (1999) Consequences of harvesting on age structure, sex ratio and population dynamics of red deer Cervus elaphus in central Norway. Wildl Biol 5:213–223Google Scholar
  30. MacMillan DC, Leitch K, Wightman A, Higgings P (2010) The management and role of highland sporting estates in the early 21st century: the owner’s view of a unique but contested form of land use. Scot Geogr J 126:24–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martínez JG, Carranza J, Fernández-García JL, Sánchez-Prieto CB (2004) Genetic variation of red deer populations under hunting exploitation in southwestern Spain. J Wildl Manag 66:1273–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martínez M, Rodríguez-Vigal C, Jones OR, Coulson T, San Miguel A (2005) Different hunting strategies select for different weights in red deer. Biol Lett 1:353–356PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Martínez-Jaúregui M, Arenas C, Herruzo AC (2011) Understanding long-term hunting statistics: the case of Spain (1972-2007). For Syst 20:139–150Google Scholar
  34. Mateo RG, Felicísimo AM, Muñoz J (2011) Modelos de distribución de especies: Una revisión sintética. Rev Chil Hist Nat 84:217–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Milner-Gulland EJ (2012) Interactions between human behaviour and ecological systems. Philos Trans R Soc B 367:270–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mysterud A (2010) Still walking on the wild side? Management actions as steps towards ‘semi-domestication’ of hunted ungulates. J Appl Ecol 47:920–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Olaussen JO, Mysterud A (2012) Red deer hunting—commercializing versus availability. Eur J Wildl Res 58:597–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Putman RJ, Staines BW (2004) Supplementary winter feeding of wild red deer Cervus elaphus in Europe and North America: justifications, feeding practice and effectiveness. Mammal Rev 34:285–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. R Development Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna) URL. http://www.R-project.org/
  40. Sáez-Royuela C, Tellería JL (1986) The increased population of the wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) in Europe. Mammal Rev 16:97–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sharp R, Wollscheid KU (2009) An overview of recreational hunting in North America, Europe and Australia. In: Dickson B, Hutton J, Adams B (eds) Recreational hunting, conservation and rural livelihoods: science and practice. Wiley-Blackwell, London, pp 25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sotherton N, Tapper S, Smith A (2009) Hen harriers and red grouse: economic aspects of red grouse shooting and the implications for moorland conservation. J Appl Ecol 46:955–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vargas JM, Guerrero JC, Farfán MA, Barbosa AM, Real R (2006) Land use and environmental factors affecting red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa) hunting yields in southern Spain. Eur J Wildl Res 52:188–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vargas JM, Farfán MA, Guerrero JC, Barbosa AM, Real R (2007) Geographical and environmental correlates of big and small game in Andalusia (southern Spain). Wildl Res 34:498–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zurell D, Jeltsch F, Dormann CF, Schröder B (2009) Static species distribution models in dynamically changing systems: how good can predictions really be? Ecography 32:733–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.INIA-CIFORMadridSpain
  2. 2.ETSI MontesUniversidad Politécnica de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations