Advertisement

European Journal of Wildlife Research

, Volume 60, Issue 1, pp 77–84 | Cite as

Movement pattern of red deer during drive hunts in Sweden

Original Paper

Abstract

We investigated the movement pattern of GPS-collared red deer (Cervus elaphus) during drive hunts with loose dogs. In 46 flights of hinds (N = 9), the median flight distance was 2.5 km (range 0.4–15.0). In 28 % of the flights, the hind left its home range. Average time before returning to home range was 23 h (range 2–88). Hinds in a less forested site left their home ranges more often, fled longer distances, moved at higher speed, and returned later than hinds in a homogenous forest. Speed of movement increased with number of hunts in the less forested site. In eight flights of stags (N = 4), the median flight distance was 5.1 km (range 2.2–13.3). The start of hunting season seemed to trigger stags’ departure to their wintering areas. Knowledge of reactions to disturbance can aid game management to choose hunting methods and dogs that cause less disturbance but may also be used to deter deer from areas where they damage crops and forest plantations.

Keywords

Cervus elaphus Deer management Flight behavior Hunting disturbance Landscape structure Spatial use 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Ove Fransson, John Källström, Johan Palmgren, Bengt O. Röken, Håkan Svensson, and Bosse Söderberg for field work, assistance during marking and information about hunts. Johanna Månsson Wikland, Jenny Mattisson, and Henrike Hensel helped with the administration of GPS-collars. We also thank Jenny Mattisson, Henrik Andrén, Marco Festa-Bianchet, and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. The study was financed by The Swedish Association for Hunting and Wildlife Management, Holmen Skog AB, Ittur AB, Virå Bruk AB, Karl-Erik Önnesjös Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig forskning och Utveckling, Stiftelsen Oscar och Lili Lamms Minne, and Kolmårdens insamlingsstiftelse/Tåby Allmänning.

References

  1. Allen A (2012) How does the landscape structure shape the movement and feeding patterns of red deer (Cervus elaphus) in Sweden? Master thesis, Imperial College LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Apollonio M, Ciuti S, Luccarini S (2005) Long-term influence of human presence on spatial sexual segregation in fallow deer. J Mamm 86:937–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apollonio M, Andersen R, Putman R (2010) European ungulates and their management in the 21st century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. Bateson P, Bradshaw EL (1997) Physiological effects of hunting red deer (Cervus elaphus). Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1707–1714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benhaiem S, Delon M, Lourtet B, Cargnelutti B, Aulagnier S, Hewison M, Morellet N, Verheyden H (2008) Hunting increases vigilance levels in roe deer and modifies feeding site selection. Anim Behav. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.03.012 Google Scholar
  6. Borkowski J, Ukalski K (2012) Bark stripping by red deer in a post-disturbance area: the importance of security cover. For Ecol Manag 263:17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown JS, Laundre JW, Gurung M (1999) The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions. J Mamm 80:385–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and inference: a practical information–theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Conner M, White GC, Freddy DJ (2001) Elk movement in response to early season hunting in Northwest Colorado. J Wildl Manag 65:926–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cook SM, Khan ZR, Pickett JA (2007) The use of push–pull strategies in integrated pest management. Ann Rev Entom 52:375–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Drechsler H (1988) Altersentwicklung und Altersansprache beim Rotwild. Gestalten, Gesichter, Gehabe, Geweihe, Gebisse. Hamburg, Paul PareyGoogle Scholar
  12. Frid A, Dill L (2002) Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Ecol & Soc 6: article 11: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol6/iss1/art11/print.pdf
  13. Gill RMA (1992) A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests: 1. Deer Forestry 65:145–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grignolio S, Merli E, Bongi B, Ciuti S, Apollonio M (2011) Effects of hunting with hounds on a nontarget species living on the edge of a protected area. Biol Cons 144:641–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hartl GB, Zachos F, Nadlinger K (2003) Genetic diversity in European red deer (Cervus elaphus L.): anthropogenic influences on natural populations. C. R. Biol 326:37–42Google Scholar
  16. Hetschold W, Vorreyer F (1968) Das Ansprechen des Rotwildes. Hamburg, Paul PareyGoogle Scholar
  17. Hillve P (2012) Den svenska jakten – ett näringsperspektiv. Rapport. Svenska Yrkesjägareföreningen, 12 pp (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  18. Höglund J, Cortazar Chinarro M, Jarnemo A, Thulin CG (2013) Genetic variation and structure in Scandinavian red deer (Cervus elaphus): influence of ancestry, past hunting, and restoration management. Biol J Linn Soc 109:43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jarnemo A (2008) Seasonal migration of male red deer (Cervus elaphus) in southern Sweden and consequences for management. Eur J Wildl Res 54:327–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jayakody S, Sibbald AM, Gordon IJ, Lambin X (2008) Red deer Cervus elaphus vigilance behavior differs with habitat type and human disturbance. Wildl Biol 14:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jeppesen JL (1987) Impact of human disturbance on home range, movements, and activity of red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a Danish environment. Dan Rev Game Biol 13:1–38Google Scholar
  22. Johnson BK, Ager AA, Noyes JH, Cimon N (2004) Elk and mule deer responses to variation in hunting pressure. In: Transaction of the 69th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference. The Wildlife Institute, Spokane, WA, USA, pp 625–640Google Scholar
  23. Kilpatrick HK, Lima KK (1999) Effects of archery hunting on movement and activity of female white-tailed deer in an urban landscape. Wildl Soc Bull 27:433–440Google Scholar
  24. Krebs H (1969) Schießen oder schonen. München, MayerGoogle Scholar
  25. Liberg O, Bergström R, Kindberg J, von Essen H (2010). Ungulates and their management in Sweden. In: Apollonio M, Andersen R, Putman R (eds) European ungulates and their management in the 21st century. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p 37–70Google Scholar
  26. Lovari S, Herrero J, Conroy J, Maran T, Giannatos G, Stubbe M, Aulagnier S, Jdeidi T, Masseti M, Nader I, de Smet K, Cuzin F (2008) Cervus elaphus. In: IUCN 2008. 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Available from www.iucnredlist.org [accessed on 8 January 2013]
  27. Mattsson L, Boman M, Ericsson G (2008) Jakten i Sverige – Ekonomiska värden och attityder jaktåret 2005/06. Rapport från Adaptiv förvaltning av vilt och fisk. Rapport nr 1 (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  28. McCorquodale SM (2003) Sex-specific movements and habitat use by elk in the cascade range of Washington. J Wildl Manage 67:729–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller JR, Cowles RS (1990) Stimulo-deterrent diversion: a concept and its possible application to onion maggot control. J Chem Ecol 16:3197–3212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Millspaugh JJ, Brundige GC, Gitzen RA, Raedeke KJ (2000) Elk and hunter space-use sharing in South Dakota. J Wildl Manag 64:994–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Milner JM, Bonenfant C, Mysterud A, Gaillard J-M, Csanyi S, Stenseth NC (2006) Temporal and spatial development of red deer harvesting in Europe: biological and cultural factors. J Appl Ecol 43:721–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mohr CO (1947) Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals. Am Midl Nat 37:233–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mysterud A (2010) Still walking on the wild side? Management actions as steps towards “semi-domestication” of hunted ungulates. J Appl Ecol 47:920–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Månsson J, Jarnemo A (2012) Bark-stripping on Norway spruce by red deer in Sweden: level of damage and relation to tree characteristics. Scand J For Res DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2012.701323. Published online http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs
  35. Nelson ME, Mech LD (1991) White-tailed deer movements and wolf predation risk. Can J Zool 69:2696–2699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nolte D (1999) Behavioral approaches for limiting depredation by wild ungulates. In: Launchbaugh KL, Sanders KD, Mosley JC (eds). Grazing Behavior of Livestock and Wildlife. Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Exp. Sta. Bull. #70, Univ. of Idaho, Moscow, IDGoogle Scholar
  37. Okarma H (1995) The trophic ecology of wolves and their predatory role in ungulate communities of forest ecosystems in Europe. Acta Theriol 40:335–386Google Scholar
  38. Okarma H (1997) Der Wolf. Ökologie, Verhalten, Schutz. Parey Buchverlag, Berlin, in GermanGoogle Scholar
  39. Pan D, Teng L, Cui F, Zeng Z, Bravery BD, Zhang Q, Song Y (2011) Eld’s deer translocated to human inhabited areas become nocturnal. Ambio 40:60–67PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Phillips GE, Alldredge AW (2000) Reproductive success of elk following disturbance by humans during calving season. J Wildl Manag 64:521–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Putman R, Langbein J, Green P, Watson P (2011) Identifying threshold densities for wild deer in the UK above which negative impacts may occur. Mamm Rev 41:175–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pyke B, Rice M, Sabine B, Zalucki MP (1987) The push-pull strategy - behavioral control of Heliothis. Austral Cott Grow May-July:7–9Google Scholar
  43. Reimoser F, Putman RJ (2011) Impact of large ungulates on agriculture, forestry, and conservation habitats in Europe. In: Putman RJ, Apollonio M, Andersen R (eds) Ungulate Management in Europe: Problems and Practices. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 144–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Root BG, Fritzell EK, Giessman NF (1988) Effects of intensive hunting on white-tailed deer movement. Wildl Soc Bull 16:145–151Google Scholar
  45. Scillitani L, Monaco A, Toso S (2009) Do intensive drive hunts affect wild boar (Sus scrofa) spatial behavior in Italy? Some evidences and management implications. Eur J Wildl Res 56:307–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sibbald AM, Hooper RJ, McLeod JE, Gordon IJ (2011) Responses of red deer (Cervus elaphus) to regular disturbance by hill walkers. Eur J Wildl Res. doi: 10.1007/s10344-011-0493-2 Google Scholar
  47. Sunde P, Olesen CR, Madsen TL, Haugaard L (2009) Behavioral responses of GPS-collared female red deer Cervus elaphus to driven hunts. Wildl Biol 15:454–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Swenson JE (1982) Effects of hunting on habitat use by mule deer on mixed-grass prairie in Montana. Wildl Soc Bull 10:115–120Google Scholar
  49. Thurfjell H, Spong G, Ericsson G (2013) Effects of hunting on wild boar Sus scrofa behavior. Wildl Biol 19:87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vercauteren KC, Hygnstrom SE (1998) Effects of agricultural activities and hunting on home ranges of female white-tailed deer. J Wildl Manag 62:280–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Verdolin JL (2006) Meta-analysis of foraging and predation risk trade-offs in terrestrial systems. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:457–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Verheyden H, Ballon P, Bernard V, Saint-Andrieux C (2006) Variations in bark-stripping by red deer Cervus elaphus across Europe. Mamm Rev 36:217–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vieira ME, Conner MM, White GC, Freddy DJ (2003) Effects of archery hunter numbers and opening dates on elk movement. J Wildl Manag 67:717–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. von Raesfeld F, Vorreyer F (1974) Das Rotwild. Verlag Paul Parey, Hamburg (in German)Google Scholar
  55. Wagenknecht E (1986) Rotwild. Verlag J. Neumann-Neudamm, Berlin (in German)Google Scholar
  56. Wikenros C, Sand H, Wabakken P, Liberg O, Pedersen HC (2009) Wolf predation on moose and roe deer: chase distances and outcome of encounters. Acta Theriol 54:207–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Williams SC, DeNicola AJ, Ortega IM (2008) Behavioral response of white-tailed deer subjected to lethal management. Can J Zool 86:1358–1366Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of EcologySwedish University of Agricultural SciencesRiddarhyttanSweden

Personalised recommendations