Advertisement

European Journal of Wildlife Research

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 77–80 | Cite as

Incidence of embedded shotgun pellets and inferred hunting kill amongst Russian/Baltic barnacle geese Branta leucopsis

  • Thomas Eske Holm
  • Jesper Madsen
Original Paper

Abstract

X-rays of wild caught barnacle geese from the Russian/Baltic population were taken in Denmark in the springs of 2009 and 2011 to determine the incidence of embedded shotgun pellets and to estimate the annual hunting kill. On average, 13 % of adult geese (n = 212) and 6 % of first year geese (n = 35) examined contained pellets in their tissue. Assuming that these birds represented a random sample, extrapolation to the entire population of c. 770,000 individuals indicates that 96,000 barnacle geese carry embedded pellets. Based on the assumption that the ratio between the number of birds with embedded shot and the total number of birds harvested per season is similar to that found in pink-footed geese Anser brachyrhynchus (recorded as 3.6:1 during 1990–1996 and 1.7:1 during 2009–2011), the annual kill of barnacle geese was estimated at 26,300–58,300 birds. The Russian/Baltic barnacle geese are protected from hunting on their winter quarters (The Netherlands, Germany and Denmark), but are quarry in Russia and are shot under license to protect agricultural crops in Estonia, Germany, Sweden and Denmark (amounting to a total of c. 1,800–3,000 geese shots per year). Barnacle geese are known to be shot illegally (accidentally and deliberately) along the migration route, but in the absence of Russian bag statistics, the contribution of illegal hunting to the overall harvest cannot be substantiated. Although the population is currently increasing at an annual rate of 8 %, the indirectly estimated hunting pressure (3–7 %) is not insubstantial and should be taken into account in future population management models.

Keywords

Crippling Pink-footed geese Hunting bag Infliction rate Harvest rate X-ray 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Danish Nature Agency is thanked for granting access to catch geese at Vest Stadil Fjord. Peter Glazov, Konstantin Litvin, Aivar Leito, Karel Roht, Kjell Larsson and the Gotland County Administrative Board are thanked for providing unpublished information on shooting and Kees Koffijberg for providing unpublished productivity data.

References

  1. Andersen-Harild P, Clausen B, Elvestad K, Preuss NO (1982) Lead pellets in tissues of mute swans (Cygnus olor) from Denmark. Danish Rev Game Biol 12:1–12Google Scholar
  2. Boyd H (1961) The number of barnacle geese in Europe 1959-1960. Wildfowl Trust Annu Rep 12:116–124Google Scholar
  3. Elder WH (1950) Measurement of hunting pressure in waterfowl by means of X-ray. Transactions of the 15th North American Wildlife Conference, March 1950, San Francisco, pp. 490–504Google Scholar
  4. Elder WH (1955a) Fluoroscopic measurements of shooting pressure on pink-footed and greylag geese. Wildfowl Trust Annu Rep 7:123–126Google Scholar
  5. Elder WH (1955b) Fluoroscopic measures of hunting pressure in Europe and North America. Transactions of the 20th North American Wildlife Conference, March 1955, Montreal, pp. 298–321Google Scholar
  6. Elmeros M, Holm TE, Haugaard L, Madsen AB (2012) Prevalence of embedded shotgun pellets in protected and legally hunted medium-sized carnivores in Denmark. Eur J Wildl Res. doi: 10.1007/s10344-012-0621-7
  7. Fox AD, Madsen J (1999) Introdiction. In: Madsen J, Cracknell G, Fox AD (eds) Goose populations of the Western Palaearctic: a review of their status and distribution: Wetlands International, Wageningen, The Netherlands. National Environmental Research Institute, Aarhus, pp 8–18Google Scholar
  8. Fox AD, Ebbinge BS, Mitchell C, Heinicke T, Aarvak T, Colhoun K, Clausen P, Dereliev S, Farago S, Koffijberg K, Kruckenberg H, Loonen M, Madsen J, Mooij J, Musil P, Nilsson L, Pihl S, van der Jeugd H (2010) Current estimates of goose population sizes in the Western Palearctic, a gap analysis and assessment of trends. Ornis Svecica 20:115–127Google Scholar
  9. Ganter B, Larsson K, Syroechkovsky EV, Litvin KE, Leito A, Madsen J (1999) Barnacle goose Branta leucopsis: Russia/Baltic. In: Madsen J, Cracknell G, Fox AD (eds) Goose populations of the Western Palaearctic: a review of their status and distribution: Wetlands International, Wageningen, The Netherlands. National Environmental Research Institute, Aarhus, pp 270–283Google Scholar
  10. Grieb JR (1970) The shortgrass prairie Canada goose population. Wildlife Monogr 22:1–47Google Scholar
  11. Holm TE, Madsen J, Haugaard L, (2011) Anskydning af vildt. Nye undersøgelser 2008–2011. Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi, Aarhus Universitet. Teknisk rapport fra Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi nr. 1Google Scholar
  12. Jönsson B, Karlsson J, Svensson S (1985) Incidence of lead shot in tissues of the bean goose (Anser fabalis) wintering in South Sweden. Swedish Wildl Res 13:259–271Google Scholar
  13. MLURLS-H, (2008) Jagd und Artenschutz. Jahresbericht 2008. Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-HolsteinGoogle Scholar
  14. Newth JL, Brown MJ, Rees EC (2011) Incidence of embedded shotgun pellets in Bewick's swans Cygnus columbianus bewickii and whooper swans Cygnus cygnus wintering in the UK. Biol Cons 144:1630–1637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Noer H, Madsen J (1996) Shotgun pellet loads and infliction rates in pink-footed goose Anser brachyrhynchus. Wildl Biol 2:65–73Google Scholar
  16. Noer H, Madsen J, Hartmann P (2007) Reducing wounding of game by shotgun hunting: effects of a Danish action plan on pink-footed geese. J Appl Ecol 44:653–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Norman FI (1976) The incidence of lead shotgun pellets in waterfowl (Anatidae and Rallidae) examined in South-Eastern Australia between 1957 and 1973. Aust Wildl Res 3:61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sæther BE, Bakke Ø (2000) Avian life history variation and contribution of demographic traits to the population growth rate. Ecology 81:642–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BioscienceAarhus UniversityRoendeDenmark

Personalised recommendations