European Journal of Wildlife Research

, Volume 58, Issue 4, pp 661–668 | Cite as

Temporal pattern of wild ungulate-related traffic accidents in northwest Spain

Original Paper

Abstract

Wildlife-related accidents are a serious problem in different countries and describing their temporal pattern allows for the development of measures to mitigate them. We described the temporal pattern of wild ungulate-related accidents occurring between January 2006 and December 2010 in the Autonomous Region of Galicia, northwest of Spain. We examined the temporal distribution of the accidents according to months, phenological and hunting seasons, days of the week and time of the day. From the 6,255 wild ungulate-related traffic accidents analysed, 36.5% were related to roe deer Capreolus capreolus and 62.8% were related to wild boar Sus scrofa. The monthly distribution of accidents was not random but follows a characteristic pattern for each species. Roe deer-related accidents have their maximum in April and May, coinciding with the breeding season, followed by July, coinciding with the rut. Wild boar-related accidents have their maximum between October and January, coinciding with the hunting season but also with months with the longest nights. Both roe deer- and wild boar-related accidents showed an increase at weekends, specially on Sundays. During the hunting season, the wild boar-related accidents showed a marked peak on the same day. This weekly pattern was explained by drivers’ behaviour and by hunting. For roe deer, peaks of accidents occurred between 19:00 and 22:00 (about dusk) and between 05:00 and 08:00 (about dawn). For wild boar, 69% of accidents occurred between 18:00 and 23:00, coinciding with dusk and night. This daily pattern of accidents was explained by the behaviour of the species.

Keywords

Capreolus capreolus Galicia Road ecology Road mortality Sus scrofa 

References

  1. Acevedo P, Escudero MA, Muñoz R, Gortázar C (2006) Factors affecting wild boar abundance across an environmental gradient in Spain. Acta Theriol 51:327–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aragón S, Braza F, San José C (1995) Socioeconomic, physiognomic, and climatic factors determining the distribution pattern of roe deer Capreolus capreolus in Spain. Acta Theriol 40:37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banister D, Stead D, Steen P, Akerman J, Dreborg K, Nijkamp P, Schleicher-Tappeser R (2000) European transport policy and sustainable mobility. E & FN Spon, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Bárcena F, Hermida R (2003) Mamíferos de Galicia. In: Otero Pedrayo R (ed) Enciclopedia galega. Editorial Novos Vieiros, A Coruña, pp 432–579Google Scholar
  5. Boitani L, Mattei L, Nonis D, Corsi F (1994) Spatial and activity patterns of wild boars in Tuscany, Italy. J Mammal 75:600–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crooks KR (2002) Relative sensitivities of mammalian carnivores to habitat fragmentation. Conserv Biol 16:488–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Danilkin A, Hewison AJ (1996) Behavioural ecology of European and Siberian roe deer. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Dussault C, Poulin M, Courtois R, Ouellet JP (2006) Temporal and spatial distribution of moose–vehicle accidents in the Laurentides Wildlife Reserve, Quebec, Canada. Wildl Biol 12:415–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dytham C (2003) Choosing and using statistics. A biologist’s guide. Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  10. Eloff P, van Niekerk A (2008) Temporal patterns of animal-related traffic accidents in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. S Afr J Wildl Res 38:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. European Union Road Federation (2009) European road statistics 2009. Available at: http://www.irfnet.eu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=262%3Aeuropean-road-statistics-2009&catid=17&Itemid=61. Accessed 25 May 2011
  12. Fahrig L, Merriam G (1994) Conservation of fragmented populations. Conserv Biol 8:50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fernández-Llario P, Mateos-Qusesada P, Silvério A, Santos P (2003) Habitat effects and shooting techniques on two wild boar (Sus scrofa) populations in Spain and Portugal. Z Jagdwiss 49:120–129Google Scholar
  14. Ferreras P, Aldama JJ, Beltran JF, Delibes M (1992) Rates and causes of mortality in a fragmented population of iberian lynx Felis pardina Temminck, 1824. Biol Conserv 61:197–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Finder RA, Roseberry JL, Woolf A (1999) Site and landscape conditions at white-tailed deer vehicle collision locations in Illinois. Landsc Urban Plan 44:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fuller DO, Williamson R, Jeffe M, James D (2003) Multi-criteria evaluation of safety and risks along transportation corridors on the Hopi Reservation. Appl Geogr 23:177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garrett LC, Conway GA (1999) Characteristics of moose–vehicle collisions in Anchorage, Alaska, 1991-1995. J Saf Res 30:219–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Groot Bruinderink WTAG, Hazebroek E (1996) Ungulate traffic collisions in Europe. Conserv Biol:1059–1067Google Scholar
  19. Haikonen H, Summala H (2001) Deer–vehicle crashes—extensive peak at 1 hour after sunset. Am J Prev Med 21:209–213Google Scholar
  20. Hartwig D (1991) Erfassung der Verkehrsunfälle mit Wild im Jahre 1989 in Nordrhein-Westfalen im Bereich der Polizeibehörden. Z Jagdwiss 37:55–62Google Scholar
  21. Hartwig D (1993) Auswertung der durch Wild verursachten Verkehrsunfälle nach der Statistik für Nordrhein-Westfalen. Zeitschrift für Jagdwissenschaft 39:22–33Google Scholar
  22. Hubbard M, Danielson B, Schmitz R (2000) Factors influencing the location of deer–vehicle accidents in Iowa. J Wildl Manage 64:707–713Google Scholar
  23. Huijser MP, Duffield JW, Clevenger AP, Ament RJ, McGowen PT (2009) Cost–benefit analyses of mitigation measures aimed at reducing collisions with large ungulates in the United States and Canada: a decision support tool. Ecol Soc14: 15 [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art15/
  24. IGE (2009) Densidade da rede de Estradas. Available at: http://www.ige.eu/igebdt/selector.jsp?COD=473&paxina=001&c=0101001. Accesed 14 June 2011
  25. IGE (2010) Territorio. Available at: http://www.ige.eu/web/mostrar_actividade_estatistica.jsp?idioma=gl&codigo=0101001. Accessed 23 May 2011
  26. Joyce T, Mahoney S (2001) Spatial and temporal distributions of moose–vehicle collisions in Newfoundland. Wildl Soc Bull 29:281-291Google Scholar
  27. Langbein J (2007) National deer–vehicle collisions project: England 2003–2005. Final report to the Highways Agency. The Deer Initiative, Wrexham, UKGoogle Scholar
  28. Langbein J, Putman RJ (2006) Deer–vehicle collisions project; Scotland, 2003–2005. Report to the Scottish Executive, June 2006Google Scholar
  29. Langbein J, Putman R, Pokorny B (2011) Traffic collisions involving deer and other ungulates in Europe and available measures for mitigation. In: Putman R, Apollonio M, Andersen R (eds) Ungulate management in Europe: problems and practices. Cambridge University Press, pp 215–259Google Scholar
  30. Liberg O, Johansson A, Andersen R, Linnell JDC (1998) Mating system, mating tactics and the function of male territoriality in roe deer. In: Andersen R, Duncan P, Linnell JDC (eds) The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo, pp 221–256Google Scholar
  31. Linnell JDC, Wahlström K, Gaillard J-M (1998) From birth to independence: birth, growth, neonatal mortality, hiding behaviour and dispersal. In: Andersen R, Duncan P, Linnell JDC (eds) The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo, pp 257–283Google Scholar
  32. Madsen AB, Strandgaard H, Prang A (2002) Factors causing traffic killings of roe deer Capreolus capreolus in Denmark. Wildl Biol 8:55–61Google Scholar
  33. Maillard D, Fournier P (1995) Effects of shooting with hounds on size of resting range of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) groups in Mediterranean habitat. Ibex J Mt Ecol 3:102–107Google Scholar
  34. Martínez Cortizas A, Pérez Alberti A (2000) Atlas Climático de Galicia. Xunta de Galicia, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Santiago de CompostelaGoogle Scholar
  35. Mateos Quesada P (2002) Biología y comportamiento del Corzo Ibérico. Universidad de Extremadura, CáceresGoogle Scholar
  36. Mateos-Quesada P (2005) Corzo - Capreolus capreolus. Enciclopedia Virtual de los Vertebrados Españoles. Museo Nacional deCiencias Naturales, Madrid. http://www.vertebradosibericos.org/
  37. Mysterud A (2004) Temporal variation in the number of car-killed red deer Cervus elaphus in Norway. Wildl Biol 10:203–211Google Scholar
  38. Ng JW, Nielsen C, St C, Clair C (2008) Landscape and traffic factors influencing deer–vehicle collisions in an urban enviroment. Hum Wildl Confl 2:34–47Google Scholar
  39. Pallant JM (2005) SPSS survival manual. A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS version 12. Open University Press, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  40. Pokorny B (2006) Roe deer–vehicle collisions in Slovenia: situation, mitigation strategy and countermeasures. Vet Arhiv (Suppl) 76:177–187Google Scholar
  41. Putman RJ (1997) Deer and road traffic accidents: options for management. J Environ Manage 51:43–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ramp D, Caldwell J, Edwards KA, Warton D, Croft DB (2005) Modelling of wildlife fatality hotspots along the snowy mountain highway in New South Wales, Australia. Biol Conserv 126:474–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Romin L, Bissonette J (1996) Temporal and spatial distribution of highway mortality of mule deer on newly constructed roads at Jordanelle Reservoir, Utah. Great Basin Nat 56:1–11Google Scholar
  44. Rosell C, Fernández-Llario P, Herrero J (2001) El jabalí (Sus scrofa Linnaeus, 1758). Galemys 13:1–25Google Scholar
  45. Rosell C, Álvarez G, Cahill C, Campeny C, Rodríguez A, Séiler A (2002) COST 34. La fragmentación del hábitat en relación con las infraestructuras de transporte en España. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente. Informe inédito, MadridGoogle Scholar
  46. Russo L, Massei G, Genov PV (1997) Daily home range and activity of wild boar in a Mediterranean area free from hunting. Ethol Ecol Evol 9:287–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sáez-Royuela C, Tellería JL (1986) The increased population of the wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) in Europe. Mamm Rev 16:97–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Scillitani L, Monaco A, Toso S (2010) Do intensive drive hunts affect wild boar (Sus scrofa) spatial behaviour in Italy? Some evidences and management implications. Eur J Wildl Res 56:307–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Seiler A (2004) Trends and spatial patterns in ungulate–vehicle collisons in Sweden. Wildl Biol 10:301–313Google Scholar
  50. Sempéré AJ, Sokolov VE, Danilkin AA (1996) Capreolus capreolus. Mamm Species 538:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Silva-Pando FJ, Rozados Lorenzo MJ, González Hernández MP (2002) Grasslands and scrublands in the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula: silvopastoral systems and nature conservation. In: Redecker B, Finck P, Härdtle W, Riecken U, Schröder E (eds) Pasture landscapes and nature conservation. Springer, Berlin, pp 271–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sodeikat G, Pohlmeyer K (2003) Escape movements of family groups of wild boar Sus scrofa influenced by drive hunts in Lower Saxony, Germany. Wildl Biol 9:43–49Google Scholar
  53. Sodeikat G, Pohlmeyer K (2007) Impact of drive hunts on daytime resting site areas of wild boar family groups (Sus scrofa L.). Wildl Biol Pract 3:28–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Underhill JE, Angold PG (2000) Effects of roads on wildlife in an intensively modified landscape. Environ Rev 8:21–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Xunta de Galicia (2010) Memoria de Tráfico da Rede Autonómica de Estradas de Galicia 2010. Available at: http://cmati.xunta.es/portal/webdav/site/cptopv/shared/es/pdfs/dxop/Memoria10.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2011

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Ingeniería de los Recursos Naturales y Medio Ambiente, Escuela de Ingeniería ForestalUniversidad de VigoPontevedraSpain

Personalised recommendations