European Journal of Wildlife Research

, Volume 58, Issue 3, pp 589–596 | Cite as

Induced orphaning reveals post-weaning maternal care in reindeer

  • Øystein Holand
  • Robert B. Weladji
  • Atle Mysterud
  • Knut Røed
  • Eigil Reimers
  • Mauri Nieminen
Original Paper

Abstract

A common by-product of human harvesting is orphaning of calves in autumn. Despite this, there are few studies in northern and temperate ungulates evaluating the fate of orphaned calves and the potential benefits to offspring and costs to mothers of post-weaning maternal care. We manipulated orphaning and forage distribution during winter for two herds of reindeer (Rangifer tarandus): one nonfed and the other supplementally fed to increase level of interference competition. Both herds consisted of females with and without calves at heel and orphaned calves. We measured survival and somatic losses during winter and distances between mother–calves and adult females–orphans within the herds. All females survived the winter, and there was no evidence of post-weaning maternal cost in terms of female’s mass loss. The winter mortality among calves was negligible and did not differ between orphans as compared to nonorphans. However, nonorphaned calves lost less mass and stayed closer to their mothers than orphans to adult females, suggesting that increased mortality might occur in harsher winters. This tended to be more marked in the fed group where interference competition was more likely due to feed being concentrated both in space and time. Reduced mass loss in nonorphans is therefore most likely due to mothers sharing and defending feeding resources and protecting their offspring from harassment by other herd members during their first winter. We conclude that hunting practise of northern and temperate ungulates where females having calf/calves at heel are intentionally or non-intentionally harvested, may have demographic side effects at least in harsh winters.

Keywords

Feeding regime Management induced orphaning Post-weaning maternal care Post-weaning maternal cost Reindeer Rangifer tarandus 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the Finnish Reindeer Herders’ Association and especially Mika Tervonen and his crew at the Kutuharju Experimental Reindeer Station for carrying out the experiment, and the Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute, at the Reindeer Research Station in Kaamanen, for logistic support. The study complied with the Finnish National Advisory Board on Research Ethics requirements.

References

  1. Bårdsen BJ, Fauchald P, Tveraa T, Langeland K, Yoccoz NG, Ims RA (2008) Experimental evidence of a risk-sensitive reproductive allocation in a long-ived mammal. Ecology 89:829–837PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrette C, Vandal D (1986) Social rank, dominance, antler size and access to food in snow-bound wild woodland caribou. Behaviour 97:118–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berger J, Cunningham C (1988) Size-related effects on search times in north American grassland female ungulates. Ecology 69:177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brookshier JS, Fairbanks WS (2003) The nature and consequences of mother–daughter associations in naturally and forcibly weaned bison. Can J Zool 81:414–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  6. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1981) Parental investment in male and female offspring in polygynous mammals. Nature 289:487–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1983) The costs of reproduction to red deer hinds. J Anim Ecol 52:367–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1989) Fitness costs of gestation and lactation in wild mammals. Nature 337:260–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Espmark Y (1964) Studies in dominance-subordination relationship in a group of semi-domestic reindeer (rangifer tarandus L.). Anim Behav 12:420–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Etter DR, Nixon CM, Sullivan JB, Thomas JA (1995) Emigration and survival of orphaned female deer in Illinois. Can J Zool 73:440–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fancy SG, White RG (1985) Energy expenditures by caribou while cratering in snow. J Wildl Manage 49:987–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Festa-Bianchet M (1991) The social system of bighorn sheep: grouping patterns, kinship and female dominance rank. Anim Behav 42:71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT, Wuhart WD (1994) Early weaning in bighorn sheep, Ovis canadensis affects growth of males but not of females. Behav Ecol 5:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gates CC, Adamczewski J, Mulders R (1986) Population dynamics, winter ecology and social organization of Coats Island caribou. Arctic 39:216–222Google Scholar
  15. Geist V (1999) Deer of the world. Their evolution, behaviour and ecology. San-Hill Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Giovengo SL, Waring GH (1991) Social development of the American bison calf (Bison bison). Appl Anim Behav Sci 29:505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giuliano WM, Demarais S, Zaiglin RE, Sumner ML (1999) Survival and movements of orphaned white-tailed deer fawns in Texas. J Wildl Manage 63:570–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Godfray HCJ (1995) Evolutionary theory of parent–offspring conflict. Nature 376:133–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Green WCH, Griswold JG, Rothstein A (1989) Post-weaning associations among bison mothers and daughters. Anim Behav 38:847–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guinness FE, Hall MJ, Cockerill RA (1979) Mother–offspring association in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) on Rhum. Anim Behav 27:536–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hogg JT, Hass CC, Jenni DA (1992) Sex-biased maternal expenditure in Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holand Ø, Mysterud A, Røed KH, Coulson T, Gjøstein H, Weladji RB, Nieminen M (2006) Adaptive adjustment of offspring sex ratio and maternal reproductive effort in an iteroparous mammal. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 273:293–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hölzenbein S, Marchinton RL (1992) Spatial integration of maturing-male white-tailed deer into the adult popluation. J Mammal 73:326–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hudson RJ, Christopherson RJ (1985) Maintenance metabolism. In: Hudson RJ, White RG (eds) Bioenergetic of wild herbivores. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 143–159Google Scholar
  25. Jolicoeur H, Crête M (1988) Winter survival and habitat use of orphaned and non-orphaned moose calves in southern Quebec. Can J Zool 66:919–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Joly K (2000) Orphan caribou, Rangifer tarandus, calves: a re-evaluation of overwinter survival data. Can Fld-Nat 114:322–323Google Scholar
  27. Jönsson KI (1997) Capital and income breeding as alternative tactics of resource use in reproduction. Oikos 78:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klein DR (1996) Arctic ungulates at the northern edge of terrestrial life. Rangifer 16:51–56Google Scholar
  29. Kojola I (1989) Mother's dominance status and differential investment in reindeer calves. Anim Behav 38:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kojola I (1993) Early maternal investment and growth of reindeer. Can J Zool 71:753–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Langvatn R, Mysterud A, Stenseth NC, Yoccoz NG (2004) Timing and synchrony of ovulation in red deer constrained by short northern summers. Am Nat 163:763–772PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lent PC (1974) Mother–infant relationships in ungulates. In: Geist V, Walther F (eds) The behaviour of ungulates and its relation to management. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Morges, pp 14–55Google Scholar
  33. Loison A, Langvatn R, Solberg EJ (1999) Body mass and winter mortality in red deer calves: disentangling sex and climate effects. Ecography 22:20–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Markgren G (1975) Winter studies on orphaned moose calves in Sweden. Swed Wildl Res 9:193–219Google Scholar
  35. Milner JM, Bonenfant C, Mysterud A, Gaillard J-M, Csányi S, Stenseth NC (2006) Temporal and spatial development of red deer harvesting in Europe — biological and cultural factors. J Appl Ecol 43:721–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mysterud A, Røed KH, Holand Ø, Yoccoz NG, Nieminen M (2009) Age-related gestation length adjustment in a large iteroparous mammal at northern latitude. J Anim Ecol 78:1002–1006PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oftedal OT (1984) Milk composition, milk yield and energy output at peak lactation: a comparative review. Symp Zool Soc London 51:33–85Google Scholar
  38. Post E (2003) Large-scale climate synchronizes the timing of flowering by multiple species. Ecology 84:277–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Putman RJ, Staines BW (2004) Supplementary winter feeding of wild red deer Cervus elaphus in Europe and North America: justifications, feeding practice and effectiveness. Mammal Rev 34:285–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reimers E, Klein DR, Sørumgaard R (1983) Calving time, growth rate, and body size of Norwegian reindeer on different ranges. Arctic Alp Res 15:107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Røed KH, Holand Ø, Mysterud A, Tverdal A, Kumpula J, Nieminen M (2007) Male phenotypic quality influences offspring sex ratio in a polygynous ungulate. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 274:727–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schaefer JA, Mahoney SP (2001) Antlers on female caribou: biogeography of the bones of contention. Ecology 82:3556–3560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Skogland T (1989) Comparative social organization of wild reindeer in relation to food, mates and predator avoidance. Adv Ethol 29:1–74Google Scholar
  44. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  45. Trivers RL (1974) Parent-offspring conflict. Am Zool 14:249–264Google Scholar
  46. Underwood R (1982) Vigilance behavior in grazing African antelopes. Behaviour 79:79–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Veiberg V, Loe LE, Mysterud A, Langvatn R, Stenseth NC (2004) Social rank, feeding and winter weight loss in red deer: any evidence of interference competition? Oecologia 138:135–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. White RG, Luick JR (1984) Plasticity and constraints in the lactational strategy of reindeer and caribou. Symp Zool Soc London 51:215–232Google Scholar
  49. Woodson DLE, Reed ET, Downing RL, McGinnes BS (1980) Effect of fall orphaning on white-tailed deer fawns and yearlings. J Wildl Manage 44:249–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Øystein Holand
    • 1
  • Robert B. Weladji
    • 2
  • Atle Mysterud
    • 3
  • Knut Røed
    • 4
  • Eigil Reimers
    • 5
  • Mauri Nieminen
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Animal and Aquacultural SciencesNorwegian University of Life SciencesÅsNorway
  2. 2.Department of BiologyConcordia UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of BiologyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  4. 4.Department of Morphology, Genetics and Aquatic BiologyNorwegian School of Veterinary MedicineOsloNorway
  5. 5.Department of BiologyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  6. 6.Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute, Reindeer Research StationKaamanenFinland

Personalised recommendations