Endoparasites in the endangered Fennoscandian population of arctic foxes (Vulpes lagopus)
- 608 Downloads
The Fennoscandian arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) population is endangered due to overharvest and competition with the larger red fox (Vulpes vulpes). In this study, we have screened the population in Sweden for endoparasites by analysis of non-invasively faecal samples collected at reproductive dens during two summers, one with low food abundance (2008) and the other with high food abundance (2010). Eggs, larvae and oocysts of a total of 14 different endoparasites were identified with a species richness per inhabited den of 3.2 (CI95% ± 0.48) in 2008 and 2.7 (CI95% ± 0.72) in 2010. Capillariidae-like eggs was identified at 59% of the dens in 2008 and 57% in 2010 and Toxocara canis with 7% (2008) and 30% (2010); Toxascaris leonina with 93% (2008) and 65% (2010); Uncinaria stenocephala 65% (2008) and 39% (2010); Crenosoma vulpis 3% (2008) and 4% (2010); Trichuris sp. 7% (2008) and 4% (2010); Cystoisospora canis-like oocysts 28% (2008) and 26% (2010); Cystoisospora ohiensis-like oocysts 38% (2008) and 4% (2010); Eimeria sp. 7% (2008) and 9% (2010); Sarcocystis sp. 3% (2008) and 9% (2010); Taenia sp. 10% (2008) and 4% (2010); Mesocestoides sp. 3% (2008) and 0% (2010); Balantidium sp. 0% (2008) and 9% (2010) and Spiruroidea-like eggs 0% (2008) and 4% (2010). To our knowledge, Balantidium sp., Sarcocystis sp. and Trichuris sp. has never been described before in wild arctic foxes.
KeywordsAlopex lagopus Parasites Conservation Wildlife disease Sweden
The County board administration in Jämtland with L. Liljemark, H. Berglund and L. Back. This study was financed by Swedish environmental protection agency, EU LIFE (SEFALO+), WWF Sweden, Fjällräven AB, International Polar Year and with logistical support from Swedish Polar Research Secretary and the Swedish research council.
- Angerbjörn A, Tannerfeldt M, Bjärvall A, Ericson M, From J, Noren E (1995) Dynamics of the arctic fox population in Sweden. Ann Zool Fenn 32:55–68Google Scholar
- Angerbjörn A, Henttonen H, Eide NE, Landa A, Norén K, Meijer T (2008) SEFALO+. Final report LIFE03 NAT/S/000073 Saving the Endangered Fennoscandian Alopex lagopus.Google Scholar
- Martinez-Carrasco C, de Ybanez MRR, Sagarminaga JL, Garijo MM, Moreno F, Acosta I, Hernandez S, Alonso FD (2007) Parasites of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes Linnaeus, 1758) in Murcia, Southeast Spain. Rev Med Vet 158:331–335Google Scholar
- Martínez-Carrasco C, Berriatua M, Garijo E, Martínez J, Alonso FD, Ruiz de Ybáñez R (2007b) Epidemiological study of non-systematic parasitism in dogs in southeast mediterranean Spain assessed by Coprological and Post-mortem Examination. Zoonoses Public Hlth., 54Google Scholar
- Pellérdy L (1974) Coccidia and coccidiosis, 2nd edn. Verlag paul Parey, Berlin, p 959Google Scholar
- Persson L, Christensson D (1971) Endoparasiter hos rödräv i Sverige. Zoologisk Vilt Revy 1–2:17–28Google Scholar
- Rodriguez A, Carbonell E (1998) Gastrointestinal parasites of the Iberian lynx and other wild carnivores from Central Spain. Acta Parasitol 43:128–136Google Scholar
- Taylor MK, Coop RL, Wall RL (2007) Veterinary parasitology. Blackwell Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Thienpont D, Rochette F, Vanparjis OFJ (1986) Diagnosing helminthiasis by coprological examination, 2nd edn. Jansen Research Foundation, Beerse, p 205Google Scholar
- Wilson K, Bjornstad ON, Dobson AP, Arneberg P, Begon M, Cattadori IM, Greenman JV, Heesterbeek H, Hudson PJ, Newborn D, Pugliese A, Rizzoli A, Rosà R, Rosso F (2003) In: Hudson Pj, Rizzoli A, Grenfell BT, Heesterbeek H, Dobson AP (eds) Heterogeneities in macroparasite infections; patterns and processes. The ecology of wildlife diseases. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 6–44Google Scholar