European Journal of Wildlife Research

, Volume 57, Issue 2, pp 355–362 | Cite as

Estimation of the Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) population in the Doñana area, SW Spain, using capture–recapture analysis of camera-trapping data

  • German Garrote
  • Ramon Perez de Ayala
  • Pablo Pereira
  • Francisco Robles
  • Nicolas Guzman
  • Francisco J. García
  • Maria C. Iglesias
  • Jaime Hervás
  • Iñigo Fajardo
  • Manuel Simón
  • Jose L. Barroso
Original Paper

Abstract

The Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) has a highly restricted geographic distribution, limited even within the Iberian Peninsula. The last national survey reported less than 200 remaining individuals, distributed in two isolated areas—Andújar-Cardeña and Doñana—and in consequence, the Iberian lynx was listed by the International Union for Conservation of Nature as “Critically Endangered”. In this study, we estimate the Iberian lynx population size in the Doñana area using capture–recapture analysis of camera-trapping data. A model with different capture probability for each individual (Mh) yielded an estimate of 26 Iberian lynxes (SE = 5.26) more than 1 year old. It is considered that a small slant in the estimation of the number of individuals could exist due to the presence of dispersers inside the study area that were not detected. Our study shows: (1) a reduction in number since the 1980s (45 individuals), and falling below the theoretical threshold of genetic viability, (2) changes in the species’ spatial distribution in this area, and (3) as for other carnivore species, photographic capture–recapture methods are applicable for estimating the size of Iberian lynx populations

Keywords

Lynx pardinus Iberian lynx Camera trapping Capture–recapture Population estimates Doñana 

References

  1. Anon (1989) Plan Nacional de Coordinación de Doñana y su entorno. Consejería de obras Públicas y Transporte. Junta de Andalucía, SevillaGoogle Scholar
  2. Burnham KP, Overton WS (1979) Robust estimation of population size when capture probabilities vary among animals. Ecology 60:927–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cabrera A (1914) Fauna ibérica. Mamíferos. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, MadridGoogle Scholar
  4. Curtis PD, Boldgiv B, Mattison PM, Boulanger JR (2009) Estimating deer abundance in suburban areas with infrared-triggered cameras. Hum Wildl Conf 3:116–128Google Scholar
  5. Cutler TL, Swann DE (1999) Using remote photography in wildlife ecology: a review. Wildl Soc Bul 27:571–581Google Scholar
  6. Efford MG, Warburton B, Coleman MC, Barker RJ (2005) A field test of two methods for density estimation. Wildl Soc Bul 33:731–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferreras P (2001) Landscape structure and asymmetrical inter-patch connectivity in a metapopulation of the endangered Iberian lynx. Biol Conserv 100:125–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferreras P, Aldama J, Beltrán JF, Delibes M (1997) Spatial organization and land tenure system of the endangered Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus), Temminck, 1824). J Zool 243:163–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Franklin IR (1980) Evolutionary change in small populations. In: Soule ME, Wilcox BA (eds) Conservation biology, an evolutionary-ecological perspective. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 135–149Google Scholar
  10. Garrote G, García FJ, Guzmán JN, Perez de Ayala C, Iglesias C, Pereira P, Robles F (2001) Aplicación de técnicas de autofotografía en trabajos de conservación de especies amenazadas. El caso del lince ibérico (Lynx pardinus). VI jornadas de la Sociedad Española de Conservación y Estudio de Mamíferos. Vitoria-GasteizGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibbs JP (2000) Monitoring populations. In: Boitani L, Fuller TK (eds) Research techniques in animal ecology. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 213–252Google Scholar
  12. Graells MP (1897) Fauna mastozoologica ibérica. Mem Rea Aca Ciencias XVII. MadridGoogle Scholar
  13. Guzmán JN, García FJ, Garrote G, Pérez de Ayala R, Iglesias C (2004) El lince ibérico (Lynx pardinus) en España y Portugal. Censo diagnóstico de sus poblaciones. Dirección General para la Biodiversidad. MadridGoogle Scholar
  14. Heilbrun RD, Silvy NJ, Peterson MJ, Tewes ME (2006) Estimating bobcat abundance using automatically triggered cameras. Wildl Soc Bul 34:69–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hemker TP, Lindzey FG, Ackerman BB (1984) Population characteristics and movenments patterns of cougars in southern Utah. J Wildl Manag 48:1275–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Henschel P, Ray J (2003) Leopards in African rainforests: survey and monitoring techniques. WCS Global Carnivore Program. Wildlife Conservation SocietyGoogle Scholar
  17. IUCN (2002) 2002 IUCN red list of threatened animals. IUCN, Gland and CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. IUCN (2007) 2007 IUCN red list of threatened animals. IUCN, Gland and CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Jackson RM, Roe JD, Wangchuk R, Hunter DO (2006) Estimating snow leopard population abundance using photography and capture–recapture techniques. Wildl Soc Bul 34:772–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jacobson HA, Kroll JC, Browning RW, Koerth BH, Conway MH (1997) Infrared-triggered cameras for censusing white-tailed deer. Wildl Soc Bul 25:547–556Google Scholar
  21. Jiménez MA, Sánchez B, Pérez Alenza MD, García P, López JV, Rodriguez A, Munóz A, Martínez F, Vargas A, Peña L (2008) Membranous glomerulonephritis in the Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus). Vet Immunol Immunopathol 121:34–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Karanth KU, Nichols JD (1998) Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79:2852–2862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karanth KU, Nichols JD (eds) (2002) Monitoring tigers and their prey: a manual for researchers, managers and conservationists in tropical Asia. Centre for Wildlife Studies, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  24. Kelly MJ, Noss AJ, Arispe L, Di Bitetti M, De Angelo CD, Paviolo A, Di Blanco YE, Maffei L (2008) Estimating puma densities from remote cameras across three study sites: Bolivia, Argentina, and Belize. J Mammal 89:408–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lancia RA, Nichols JD, Pollock KH (1994) Estimating the number of animals in wildlife populations. In: Bookhout TA (ed) Research and management techniques for wildlife and habitats. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, pp 215–253Google Scholar
  26. Lebreton JD, Brunham KP, Clobert J, Anderson DR (1992) Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecol Monogr 62:67–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lopez-Bao JV, Rodrıguez A, Palomares F (2008) Behavioural response of a trophic specialist, the Iberian lynx, to supplementary food: patterns of food use and implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 141:1857–1867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mitchell-Jones AJ, Amori G, Bogdanowicz W, Krystufek B, Reijnders PJH, Spitzenberger F, Stubbe J, Thissen JBM, Vohralik V, Zima J (1999) The atlas of European mammals. T. and A. D. Poyser Ltd./Societas Europaea Mammalogica, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Murray DL, Fuller MR (2000) A critical review of the effects of marking on the biology of vertebrates. In: Boitani L, Fuller TK (eds) Research techniques in animal ecology. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 15–64Google Scholar
  30. Otis DL, Burnham G, White C, Anderson DR (1978) Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildl Monogr 62:1–135Google Scholar
  31. Palomares F, Rodriguez A, Laffite R, Delibes M (1991) The status and distribution of the Iberian Lynx Felis pardina (Temminck) in Coto de Doñana, SW Spain. Biol Conserv 57:159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Palomares F, Ferreras P, Fedriani JM, Delibes M (1996) Spatial relationships between Iberian lynx and other carnivores in an area of south-western Spain. J App Ecol 33:5–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Palomares F, Delibes M, Ferreras P, Fedriani JM, Calzada J, Revilla E (2000) Iberian lynx in a fragmented landscape: predispersal, dispersal, and postdispersal habitats. Cons Biol Vol 14(3):809–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Palomares F, Delibes M, Revilla E, Calzada J, Fedriani JM (2001) Spatial ecology of Iberian lynx and abundance of European rabbits in southwester Spain. Wildl Monogr 148:1–35Google Scholar
  35. Peña L, García P, Jiménez MA, Benito A, Pérez Alenza MD, Sánchez B (2006) Histopathological and immunohistochemical findings in lymphoid tissues of the endangered Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus). Comp Immunol Microbial Infect Dis 29:114–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peterson MN, Lopez RR, Frank PA, Peterson MJ, Silvy NJ (2003) Evaluating capture methods for urban white-tailed deer. Wildl Soc Bul 31:1176–1187Google Scholar
  37. Pollock KH, Nichols JD, Brownie C, Hines JE (1990) Statistical inference for capture–recapture experiments. Wildl Monogr 107:1–97Google Scholar
  38. Rau JR, Beltrán JF, Delibes M (1985) Can the increase of fox density explain the decrease in lynx numbers at Doñana? Rev Ecol (Terre vie) 40:145–150Google Scholar
  39. Rexstad E, Burnham KP (1991) User’s guide for interactive program CAPTURE. Abundance estimation of closed populations. Colorado State University, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  40. Rivas-Martínez S (1987) Memoria del Mapa de Series de Vegetación de España. 1: 400000. ICONA, MadridGoogle Scholar
  41. Rodríguez A, Delibes M (1992) Current range and status of the Iberian lynx Felis pardina Temminck, 1824 in Spain. Biol Conserv 61:189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rodríguez A, Delibes M (2003) Population fragmentation and extinction in the Iberian lynx. Biol Conserv 109:321–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Seber GAF (1982) The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters, 2nd edn. MacMillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Shaffer ML, Samson FB (1985) Population size and extintion: a note on determining critical population sizes. Amer Nat 125:144–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Silver SC, Ostr LET, Marsh LK, Maffei L, Noss AJ, Kelly MJ, Wallace RB, Gomez H, Ayala G (2004) The use of camera traps for estimating jaguar Panthera onca abundance and density using capture/recapture analysis. Oryx 38:148–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Simón MA (2008) Currente status of Iberian lynx in Andalusia. Proceedings of the III Iberian lynx International Seminar. Andalusia Government, IUCN/SC Cats Specialist GroupGoogle Scholar
  47. Soisalo MS, Cavalcanti SMC (2006) Estimating the density of a jaguar population in the Brazilian Pantanal using camera-traps and capture-recapture sampling in combination with GPS radio-telemetry. Biol Conserv 129:487–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Soulé ME (1980) Thresholds for survival: maintaining fitness and evolutionary potential. In: Soulé ME, Wilcox BA (eds) Conservation biology: an evolutionary–ecological perspective. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 151–169Google Scholar
  49. Trolle M, Kéry M (2003) Estimation of ocelot density in the pantanal using capture–recapture analysis of camera-trapping data. J Mamm 84:607–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Valverde JA (1963) Información sobre el lince en España. Min Agric Bol Tec, Ser Cinegética, 1Google Scholar
  51. Villafuerte R, Calvete C, Gortázar C, Moreno S (1994) First epizooty of rabbit haemorragic disease on free living populations at Doñana National Park (SW Spain). J Wildl Dis 30:176–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46:120–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zielinski WJ, Kucera TE (1995) American Marten, Fisher, Lynx, and Wolverine: survey methods for their detection. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW GTR-157Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • German Garrote
    • 1
    • 5
  • Ramon Perez de Ayala
    • 1
  • Pablo Pereira
    • 2
  • Francisco Robles
    • 2
  • Nicolas Guzman
    • 1
  • Francisco J. García
    • 1
  • Maria C. Iglesias
    • 1
  • Jaime Hervás
    • 1
  • Iñigo Fajardo
    • 3
  • Manuel Simón
    • 4
  • Jose L. Barroso
    • 4
  1. 1.Dirección General para la BiodiversidadMinisterio de Medio AmbienteMadridSpain
  2. 2.Parque Nacional de DoñanaOrganismo Autónomo de Parques Nacionales, MIMAMAndalusiaSpain
  3. 3.Delegación Provincial de HuelvaConsejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de AndalucíaHuelvaSpain
  4. 4.Parque Natural de DoñanaConsejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de AndalucíaAndalusiaSpain
  5. 5.Vertebrate Biology and Conservation UCM Research Group, Faculty of BiologyComplutense University of MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations