European Journal of Wildlife Research

, Volume 57, Issue 1, pp 149–156 | Cite as

Problems with studying wolf predation on small prey in summer via global positioning system collars

  • Vicente Palacios
  • L. David Mech
Original Paper


We attempted to study predation on various-sized prey by a male and female wolf (Canis lupus) with global positioning system (GPS) collars programmed to acquire locations every 10 min in the Superior National Forest of Minnesota. During May to August 2007, we investigated 147 clusters of locations (31% of the total) and found evidence of predation on a white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) fawn and yearling, a beaver (Castor canadensis), ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus), and fisher (Martes pennanti) and scavenging on a road-killed deer and other carrion. However, we missed finding many prey items and discuss the problems associated with trying to conduct such a study.


Canis lupus Global positioning system (GPS) collars Predation Telemetry White-tailed deer Wolf 



This study was supported by the Biological Resources Division, United States Geological Survey, and the United Sates Department of Agriculture NorthCentral Research Station. We thank M.E. Nelson, D. Thompson, and A. Bennett for field assistance, and especially M. Clark for special devotion to this project, and D.J. Demma and S.M. Barber-Meyer for reviewing the manuscript and offering helpful suggestions for improvement.


  1. Ballard WB, Whitman JS, Gardner CL (1987) Ecology of an exploited wolf population in south-central Alaska. Wildl Monogr 98Google Scholar
  2. Barja I (2009) Prey and prey-age preference by the Iberian wolf Canis lupus signatus in a multiple-prey ecosystem. Wildl Biol 15:147–154. doi: 10.2981/07-096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Capitani C, Bertelli I, Varuzza P, Scandura M, Apollonio M (2004) A comparative analysis of wolf (Canis lupus) diet in three different Italian ecosystems. Mamm Biol 69(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Demma DJ, Mech LD (2008) Wolf use of summer territory in northeastern Minnesota. J Wildl Manage 73:380–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Demma DJ, Barber-Meyer SM, Mech LD (2007) Testing global positioning system telemetry to study wolf predation on deer fawns. J Wildl Manage 71:2767–2775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dussault C, Courtois R, Ouellet JP, Huot J (2001) Influence of satellite geometry and differential correction on GPS location accuracy. Wildl Soc Bull 29:171–179Google Scholar
  7. Franke A, Caelli T, Kuzyk G, Hudson RJ (2006) Prediction of wolf (Canis lupus) kill-sites using hidden Markov models. Ecol Model 197:237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gipson PS, Ballard WB, Nowak RM, Mech LD (2000) Accuracy and precision of estimating age of gray wolves by tooth wear. J Wildl Manage 64:752–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hayes RD, Baer AM, Larsen DG (1991) Population dynamics and prey relationships of an exploited and recovering wolf population in the southern Yukon. Yukon Territory Fish and Wildlife Branch, Final Report TR-91-1. Whitehorse, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  10. Hooge PN, Eichenlaub B (1997) Animal movement extension to Arcview. ver. 1.1. Alaska Science Center—Biological Science Office, U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, Alaska, USAGoogle Scholar
  11. Jethva BD, Jhala YV (2004) Foraging ecology, economics and conservation of Indian wolves in the Bhal region of Gujarat, Western India. Biol Conserv 116:351–357. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00218-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kunkel KE, Mech LD (1994) Wolf and bear predation on white-tailed deer fawns in northeastern Minnesota. Can J Zool 72:1557–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mackay P, Smith DA, Long R, Parker M (2008) Scat detection dogs. In: Long R, Mackay P, Ray J, Zielinski W (eds) Noninvasive survey methods for carnivores. Island Press, pp 183–222Google Scholar
  14. Mech LD (1974) Current techniques in the study of elusive wilderness carnivores. Proc of the 11th International Congress of Game Biologists, pp 315–322Google Scholar
  15. Mech LD (2009) Long-term research on wolves in the Superior National Forest. In: Wydeven AP, Heske EJ, Van Deelen TR (eds) Recovery of Gray Wolves in the Great Lakes Region of the United States: an endangered species success story. Springer, New York, pp 15–34Google Scholar
  16. Messier F, Crete M (1985) Moose (Alces alces) and wolf (Canis lupus) dynamics and the natural regulation of moose populations. Oecologia 65:503–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moen R, Pastor J, Cohen Y (1997) Accuracy of GPS telemetry collar locations with differential correction. J Wildl Manage 61:530–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nelson ME, Mech LD (1986) Mortality of white-tailed deer in northeastern Minnesota. J Wildl Manage 50:691–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Packard JM (2003) Wolf behavior: reproductive, social, and intelligent. In: Mech LD, Boitani L (eds) Wolves: behavior, ecology, and conservation. The University of Chicago, Chicago, pp 35–65Google Scholar
  20. Peterson RO, Ciucci P (2003) The wolf as a carnivore. In: Mech LD, Boitani L (eds) Wolves: behavior, ecology, and conservation. The University of Chicago, Chicago, pp 104–130Google Scholar
  21. Peterson RO, Woolington JD, Bailey TN (1984) Wolves of the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska. Wildl Monogr 88Google Scholar
  22. Sand H, Zimmermann B, Wabakken P, Andrèn H, Pedersen HC (2005) Using GPS technology and GIS cluster analyses to estimate kill rates in wolf-ungulate ecosystems. Wildl Soc Bull 33:914–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sand H, Wabakken P, Zimmermann B, Johansson Ö, Pedersen HC, Liberg O (2008) Summer kill rates and predation pattern in a wolf-moose system: can we rely on winter estimates? Oecologia 156:53–64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Van Ballenberghe V, Erickson AW, Byman B (1975) Ecology of the timber wolf in northeastern Minnesota. Wildl Monogr 43Google Scholar
  25. Webb NF, Hebblewhite M, Merrill EH (2008) Statistical methods for identifying wolf kill sites using global positioning system locations. J Wildl Manage 72:798–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zimmermann B, Wabakken P, Sand H, Pedersen HC, Liberg O (2007) Wolf movement patterns: a key to estimation of kill rate? J Wildl Manage 71:1177–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© US Government 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto Cavanilles de Biodiversidad y Biología EvolutivaUniversidad de ValenciaValenciaSpain
  2. 2.US Geological Survey, Northern Prairie Wildlife Research CenterJamestownUSA
  3. 3.The Raptor Center, 1920 Fitch AvenueUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations