European Journal of Wildlife Research

, Volume 56, Issue 6, pp 829–837 | Cite as

Provision of artificial warrens as a means to enhance native wild rabbit populations: what type of warren and where should they be sited?

  • Mariana Fernández-Olalla
  • María Martínez-Jauregui
  • Francisco Guil
  • Alfonso San Miguel-Ayanz
Original Paper

Abstract

In Spain, wild rabbits are essential for some highly endangered species, and, therefore, many actions have been undertaken to increase their populations. In the present study, artificial warrens are provided as a means to increase shelter for native wild rabbit populations in a given area. We evaluate the use of three types of warrens by rabbits and the effect on that use of five habitat characteristics at two spatial scales (500 × 500-m grids and 25-m plots). To evaluate that use, we identified pre-established signs at the entrances to each warren, and based on this, we calculated occupancy rate and activity. Our results indicate that rabbit abundance within a grid is the only variable which simultaneously explains both the greater occupancy and the higher activity in the artificial warrens located in that grid. Some 73.2% of the grids showed signs of rabbit use at the time of the evaluation. However, the pre-existing rabbit populations within the grids were not quantified and, hence, we cannot state that the warrens contributed to an increase in the rabbit abundance. Regarding the habitat, our results reveal that warrens should be situated in grids with food coverage of less than 50%, while the use of each individual refuge is greater where food availability in the immediate surroundings is at least 20% and shelter at least 50%. The tube warrens showed significantly greater rabbit use than the other types while there was little difference between the stone and pallet warrens in terms of use.

Keywords

Habitat management Mediterranean ecosystems Oryctolagus cuniculus Risk of predation Shelter 

References

  1. Branco M, Monnerot M, Ferrand N, Templeton AR (2002) Postglacial dispersal of the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) on the Iberian Peninsula reconstructed from nested clade and mismatch analyses of mitochondrial DNA genetic variation. Evolution 56(4):792–803PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cabezas S, Moreno S (2007) An experimental study of translocation success and habitat improvement in wild rabbits. Anim Conserv 10:340–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Calvete C, Estrada R, Angulo E, Cabezas-Ruiz S (2004) Habitat factors related to wild rabbit conservation in an agricultural landscape. Landsc Ecol 19:531–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Catalán I, Rodríguez-Hidalgo P, Tortosa FS (2008) Is habitat management an effective tool for wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) population reinforcement? Eur J Wildl Res 54:449–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley and Sons, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Delibes-Mateos M, Delibes M, Ferreras P, Villafuerte R (2008a) Key role of European rabbits in the conservation of the western Mediterranean basin hotspot. Conserv Biol 22(5):1106–1117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Delibes-Mateos M, Ferreras P, Villafuerte R (2008b) Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) abundance and protected areas in central-southern Spain: why they do not match? Eur J Wildl Res 55(1):65–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delibes-Mateos M, Ferreras P, Villafuerte R (2008c) Rabbit populations and game management: the situation after 15 years of rabbit haemorrhagic disease in central-southern Spain. Biodivers Conserv 17:559–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Delibes-Mateos M, Ferreras P, Villafuerte R (2009) European rabbit population trends and associated factors: a review of the situation in the Iberian Peninsula. Mamm Rev 39(2):124–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fa JE, Sharples CM, Bell DJ (1999) Habitat correlates of European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) distribution after the spread of RVHD in Cadiz province, Spain. J Zool 249:83–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fletcher D, Mackenzie D, Villouta E (2005) Modelling skewed data with many zeros. A simple approach combining ordinary and logistic regression. Environ Ecol Stats 12:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gálvez-Bravo L, Belliure J, Rebollo S (2009) European rabbits as ecosystem engineers: warrens increase lizard density and diversity. Biodivers Conserv 18:869–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gea-Izquierdo G, Muñoz-Igualada J, San Miguel-Ayanz A (2005) Rabbit warren distribution in relation to pasture communities in Mediterranean habitats: consequences for management of rabbit populations. Wildl Res 32:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. González LM, San Miguel A (Coord.) (2004) Manual de buenas prácticas de gestión en fincas de monte mediterráneo de la red Natura 2000. DG Biodiversidad. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente. MadridGoogle Scholar
  15. Kolb HH (1985) The burrow structure of the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus L.). J Zool 206:253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lombardi L, Fernández N, Moreno S, Villafuerte R (2003) Habitat-related differences in rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) abundance, distribution and activity. J Mammal 84(1):26–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lombardi L, Fernández N, Moreno S (2007) Habitat use and spatial behaviour in the European rabbit in three Mediterranean environments. Basic Appl Ecol 8:453–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Muñoz J (2005) Fomento del conejo de monte (Oryctolagus cuniculus) en ecosistemas mediterráneos de suelos ácidos: ecología de madrigueras, selección y utilización de pastos y repoblaciones con conejos. PhD Thesis. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Madrid. SpainGoogle Scholar
  19. Palomares F (2001) Comparison of 3 methods to estimate rabbit abundance in a Mediterranean environment. Wildl Soc Bull 29:578–585Google Scholar
  20. Palomares F (2003) Warren building by European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in relation to cover availability in a sandy area. J Zool 259:63–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Palomares F, Calzada J, Revilla E (1996) El manejo del hábitat y la abundancia del conejo: diferencias entre dos hábitats potencialmente idénticas. Rev For 9:201–210Google Scholar
  22. Pech RP, Sinclair ARE, Newsome A, Catling PC (1992) Limits to predator regulation of rabbits in Australia: evidence from predator removal experiments. Oecologia 89:102–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. R Development Core Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing, reference index version 2.8.0. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org
  24. Rogers PM, Myers KJ (1979) Ecology of the European wild rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus in Mediterranean habitats. I. Distribution in the landscape of the Coto Doñana, S Spain. J Appl Ecol 16:691–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Virgós E, Cabezas-Díaz S, Lozano J (2007) Is the endemic wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) an endangered species in Spain? Sociological constraints in the conservation of species. Biodivers Conserv 16:3489–3504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Williams D, Acevedo P, Gortazar C, Escudero MA, Labarta JL, Marco J, Villafuerte R (2007) Hunting for answers: rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) population trends in northeastern Spain. Eur J Wildl Res 53:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mariana Fernández-Olalla
    • 1
  • María Martínez-Jauregui
    • 1
  • Francisco Guil
    • 2
  • Alfonso San Miguel-Ayanz
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Silvopascicultura, ETSI de MontesUniversidad Politécnica de MadridMadridSpain
  2. 2.Fundación CBD-HabitatMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations