European Journal of Wildlife Research

, Volume 56, Issue 5, pp 693–702

Noninvasive genetic studies of brown bears using power poles

  • Alexandros A. Karamanlidis
  • Elena Drosopoulou
  • Miguel de Gabriel Hernando
  • Lazaros Georgiadis
  • Lambros Krambokoukis
  • Stavri Pllaha
  • Andreas Zedrosser
  • Zacharias Scouras
Original Paper

Abstract

One difficulty in the conservation of endangered wildlife is the lack of reliable information on its status. This lack of knowledge can often be attributed to financial and logistic constraints as well as the lack of trained personnel to collect data. We test a simple method to study bears in the southern Balkans by inspecting power poles, which are used by bears for marking and rubbing purposes. We created a network of barbed-wire fitted poles for the collection of hair samples, evenly distributed throughout six study areas. During 87 sampling sessions in the main study area, we collected 191 samples and identified six microsatellite loci that were variable enough for individual bear identification. The most and best-quality hair samples were collected during the mating period, and DNA was most successfully extracted from samples remaining <4 weeks in the field. In the six study areas, we identified 47 bears. An advantage of using power poles for hair sampling is their availability and accessibility; no bait is required, and the network can be easily set up. A drawback may be an unequal capture probability of sex and age classes of bears. Despite this limitation, using power poles proved to be a simple and cheap method for the noninvasive genetic study of bears that did not require any prior knowledge on habitat use and activity patterns. The method is suitable for large-scale surveys to estimate distribution and relative densities of bears and could also be applied for studying other species.

Keywords

Conservation DNA Endangered species Greece Management Methodology Southern Balkans Ursus arctos 

References

  1. Belant JL (2003) A hair snare for forest carnivores. Wildl Soc Bull 31:482–485Google Scholar
  2. Bellemain E, Ali Nawaz M, Valentini A, Swenson JE, Taberlet P (2007) Genetic tracking of the brown bear in northern Pakistan and implications for conservation. Biol Conserv I34:537–547Google Scholar
  3. Boitani L (2000) Action plan for the conservation of wolves in Europe. Nature and environment. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, p 113Google Scholar
  4. Boulanger J, Kendall KC, Stetz JB, Roon DA, Waits LP, Paetkau D (2008) Multiple data sources improve DNA-based mark-recapture population estimates of grizzly bears. Ecol Appl 18:577–589Google Scholar
  5. Breitenmoser U, Breitenmoser-Würsten C, Okarma H, Kaphegyi T, Kaphegyi-Wallmann U, Müller UM (2000) Action plan for the conservation of the Eurasian lynx in Europe. Nature and environment. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, p 112Google Scholar
  6. Burst TL, Pelton MR (1983) Black bear mark trees in the Smoky Mountains. International Conference on Bear Research and Management 5:45–53Google Scholar
  7. Castro-Arellano I, Madrid-Luna C, Lacher TEJ, León-Paniagua L (2008) Hair-trap efficacy for detecting mammalian carnivores in the tropics. J Wildl Manage 72:1405–1412Google Scholar
  8. Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR (2002) Mammal population losses and the extinction crisis. Science 296:904–907Google Scholar
  9. Ennis S, Gallagher T (1994) PCR based sex determination assay in cattle based on bovine Amelogenin locus. Anim Genet 25:425–427Google Scholar
  10. Fernandez-Gil A, Naves J, Delibes M (2006) Courtship of brown bears Ursus arctos in northern Spain: phenology, weather, habitat and durable mating areas. Wildl Biol 12:367–373Google Scholar
  11. Gervasi V, Ciucci P, Boulanger J, Posillico M, Sulli C, Focardi S, Randi E, Boitani L (2008) A preliminary estimate of the Apennine brown bear population size based on hair-snag sampling and multiple data source mark–recapture Huggins models. Ursus 19:105–121Google Scholar
  12. Green GI, Mattson DJ (2003) Tree rubbing by Yellowstone grizzly bears Ursus arctos. Wildl Biol 9:1–9Google Scholar
  13. Huber D, Roth HU (1992) Denning of brown bears in Croatia. International Conference on Bear Research and Management 9:271–281Google Scholar
  14. Kanellopoulos N, Mertzanis G, Korakis G, Panagiotopoulou M (2006) Selective habitat use by brown bear (Ursus arctos L.) in northern Pindos, Greece. J Biol Res 5:23–33Google Scholar
  15. Karamanlidis AA (2008) Development of an innovative method for studying genetic, demographic and behavioural aspects of the brown bear (Ursus arctos). Ph.D. Thesis, Aristotle University of ThessalonikiGoogle Scholar
  16. Karamanlidis AA, Georgiadis L (2009) Brown bear habitat fragmentation in Greece: monitoring effects of the construction of the “E65” highway. Int Bear News 18:16Google Scholar
  17. Karamanlidis AA, Mertzanis G (2003) Paving a new way for brown bears in Greece. Int Bear News 12:8–9Google Scholar
  18. Karamanlidis AA, Youlatos D, Sgardelis S, Scouras Z (2007) Using sign at power poles to document presence of bears in Greece. Ursus 18:54–61Google Scholar
  19. Karamanlidis AA, Georgiadis L, Zedrosser A (2009) The “Southwestern Balkans Bear Register”: a tool in the conservation of brown bears in the southwestern Balkans. Int Bear News 18:13–14Google Scholar
  20. Karanth KU, Chellam R (2009) Carnivore conservation at the crossroads. Oryx 43:1–2Google Scholar
  21. Kendall KC, McKelvey KS (2008) Hair collection. In: Long RA et al (eds) Noninvasive survey methods for North American carnivores. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 135–176Google Scholar
  22. Kendall KC, Stetz JB, Roon DA, Waits LP, Boulanger J, Paetkau D (2008) Grizzly bear density in Glacier National Park, Montana. J Wildl Manage 72:1693–1705Google Scholar
  23. Kendall KC, Stetz JB, Boulanger J, Macleod AC, Paetkau D, White GC (2009) Demography and genetic structure of a recovering Grizzly bear population. J Wildl Manage 73:1–17Google Scholar
  24. Long RA, Donovan TM, MacKay P, Zielinski WJ, Buzas JS (2007) Comparing scat detection dogs, cameras, and hair snares for surveying carnivores. J Wildl Manage 71:2018–2025Google Scholar
  25. Long RA, MacKay P, Ray J, Zielinski W (2008) Non invasive survey methods for carnivores. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  26. Mertzanis G (1994) Brown bear in Greece: distribution, present status—ecology of a northern Pindus subpopulation. International Conference on Bear Research and Management 9:187–197Google Scholar
  27. Mertzanis Y, Isaak I, Mavridis A, Nikolaou O, Tragos A (2005) Movements, activity patterns and home range of a female brown bear (Ursus Arctos, L.) in the Rodopi Mountain Range, Greece. Belg J Zool 135:217–221Google Scholar
  28. Mertzanis G, Kallimanis AS, Kanellopoulos N, Sgardelis SP, Tragos A, Aravidis I (2008) Brown bear (Ursus arctos L.) habitat use patterns in two regions of northern Pindos, Greece—management implications. J Nat Hist 42:301–315Google Scholar
  29. Murphy MA, Waits LP, Kendall KC (2000) Quantitative evaluation of fecal drying methods for brown bear DNA analysis. Wildl Soc Bull 28:951–957Google Scholar
  30. Murphy MA, Waits LP, Kendall KC (2003) The influence of diet on faecal DNA amplification and sex identification in brown bears (Ursus arctos). Molec Ecol 12:2261–2265Google Scholar
  31. Paetkau D (2003) An empirical exploration of data quality in DNA-based population inventories. Molec Ecol 12:1375–1387Google Scholar
  32. Paetkau D, Calvert W, Stirling I, Strobeck C (1995) Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Molec Ecol 4:347–354Google Scholar
  33. Paetkau D, Shields GF, Strobeck C (1998) Gene flow between insular, coastal and interior populations of brown bears in Alaska. Molec Ecol 7:1283–1292Google Scholar
  34. Piggott MP (2004) Effect of sample age and season of collection on the reliability of microsatellite genotyping of faecal DNA. Wild Res 31:485–493Google Scholar
  35. Rogers LL (1987) Effects of food supply and kinship on social behavior, movements and population growth of black bears in northeastern Minnesota. Wildl Monogr 97:1–72Google Scholar
  36. Roon DA, Waits LP, Kendall KC (2003) A quantitative evaluation of two methods for preserving hair samples. Molec Ecol Notes 3:163–166Google Scholar
  37. Roon DA, Waits LP, Kendall KC (2005) A simulation test of the effectiveness of several methods for error-checking non-invasive genetic data. Anim Conserv 8:203–215Google Scholar
  38. Sadlier LMJ, Webbon CC, Baker PJ, Harris S (2004) Methods of monitoring red foxes Vulpes vulpes and badgers Meles meles: are field signs the answer? Mammal Rev 34:75–98Google Scholar
  39. Schipper J, Chanson JS, Chiozza F, Cox NA, Hoffmann M, Katariya V, Lamoreux J, Rodrigues ASL, Stuart SN, Temple HJ, Baillie J, Boitani L, Lacher TE (2008) The status of the world's land and marine mammals: diversity, threat and knowledge. Science 322:225–230Google Scholar
  40. Schmidt K, Kowalczyk R (2006) Using scent-marking stations to collect hair samples to monitor Eurasian lynx populations. Wildl Soc Bull 34:462–466Google Scholar
  41. Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Waples RS (2006) Genetic monitoring as a promising tool for conservation and management. Trends Ecol Evol 22:25–33Google Scholar
  42. Servheen C, Herrero S, Peyton B (1999) Bears. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan, Gland, Switzerland and IUCN, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  43. Swenson JE, Sandegren F (2000) Conservation of European brown bear populations: experiences from Scandinavia. In: Layna JF et al (eds) La conservacion del oso pardo en Europa: un reto de cara al siglo XXI. Fundación Biodiversida, Madrid, pp 111–116Google Scholar
  44. Swenson JE, Gerstl N, Dahle B, Zedrosser A (2000) Action plan for the conservation of the brown bear (Ursus arctos) in Europe Nature and environment. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, p 114Google Scholar
  45. Swenson JE, Adamic M, Huber D, Stokke S (2007) Brown bear body mass and growth in northern and southern Europe. Oecologia 153:37–47Google Scholar
  46. Taberlet P, Camarra J-J, Griffin S, Uhres E, Hanotte O, Waits LP, Dubois-Paganon C, Burke T, Bouvet J (1997) Noninvasive genetic tracking of the endangered Pyrenean brown bear population. Molec Ecol 6:869–876Google Scholar
  47. Vlachos CG, Bakaloudis DE, Dimitriou M, Kritikou K, Chouvardas D (2000) Seasonal food habits of the European brown bear (Ursus arctos) in the Pindos Mountains, Western Greece. Folia Zool 49:19–25Google Scholar
  48. Waits LP, Paetkau D (2005) Noninvasive genetic sampling tools for wildlife biologists: a review of applications and recommendations for accurate data collection. J Wildl Manage 69:1419–1433Google Scholar
  49. Zedrosser A, Dahle B, Swenson JE, Gerstl N (2001) Status and management of the brown bear in Europe. Ursus 12:9–20Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandros A. Karamanlidis
    • 1
    • 4
  • Elena Drosopoulou
    • 2
  • Miguel de Gabriel Hernando
    • 1
  • Lazaros Georgiadis
    • 1
  • Lambros Krambokoukis
    • 1
  • Stavri Pllaha
    • 3
  • Andreas Zedrosser
    • 4
    • 5
  • Zacharias Scouras
    • 2
  1. 1.ARCTUROS, Civil Society for the Protection and Management of Wildlife and the Natural EnvironmentThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Department of Genetics, Development and Molecular Biology, School of Biology, Faculty of SciencesAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  3. 3.Transborder Wildlife AssociationKorçëAlbania
  4. 4.Department of Ecology and Natural Resource ManagementNorwegian University of Life SciencesÅsNorway
  5. 5.Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research, Institute of Wildlife Biology and Game ManagementUniversity of Natural Resources and Applied Life SciencesViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations