Advertisement

European Journal of Wildlife Research

, Volume 55, Issue 5, pp 531–533 | Cite as

No distinct difference in the excretion of large particles of varying size in a wild ruminant, the banteng (Bos javanicus)

  • Angela Schwarm
  • Sylvia Ortmann
  • Christian Wolf
  • Marcus ClaussEmail author
Short Communication

Abstract

The forestomach of ruminants and camelids does not only allow a differential excretion of fluids and small particles but also a differential excretion of small and large particles. The question whether larger particles of different size classes are also retained for different time periods, or whether simply a particle-size threshold exists above which all particles of a size higher than this threshold are retained in an undifferentiated manner, has not been addressed so far. We determined the mean retention time (MRT) of different-sized large particles (10 and 20 mm) in three banteng (Bos javanicus) on two forage only diets, grass and grass hay. We used cerium-mordanted fibre (10 mm) and lanthanum-mordanted fibre (20 mm) as particle markers, mixed in the food. Average total tract MRT for large and very large particles at the grass diet was 58 and 56 h and at the grass hay diet 66 and 64 h, respectively. Very large particles moved slightly faster than large particles through the gut of the banteng. Three interpretations are possible: Very large particles are resubmitted to rumination sooner than large particles; ingestive mastication of the particle markers could have reduced the difference in the size of the particle markers; alternatively, particle retention may be governed by a threshold, above which all particles of a size higher than this threshold are retained in an undifferentiated manner. In order to test these possibilities, experiments with fistulated animals would have to be performed.

Keywords

Ruminant Particle size Retention Ingestion Mastication 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the Freie Universität Berlin (NaFöG) to AS and the German Science Foundation (DFG) to SO (OR 86/1-1). We thank the staff of the Zoological Garden of Berlin, the IZW Berlin and the Landeslabor Brandenburg for their engaged support. This study complied with current German laws.

References

  1. Beaumont R, Deswysen AG (1991) Mélange et propulsion du contenu du réticulo-rumen. Reprod Nutr Dev 31:335–359. doi: 10.1051/rnd:19910401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cherney DJR, Mertens DR, Moore JE (1990) Intake and digestibility by wethers as influenced by forage morphology at three levels of forage offering. J Anim Sci 68:4387–4399PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Clauss M, Hummel J, Streich WJ (2006) The dissociation of the fluid and particle phase in the forestomach as a physiological characteristic of large grazing ruminants: an evaluation of available, comparable ruminant passage data. Eur J Wildl Res 52:88–98. doi: 10.1007/s10344-005-0024-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Faichney GJ (2006) Digesta flow. In: Dijkstra J, Forbes JM, France J (eds) Quantitative aspects of ruminant digestion and metabolism. CAB International, Wellingford, pp 49–86Google Scholar
  5. Heller R, Cercasov V, von Engelhardt W (1986) Retention of fluid and particles in the digestive tract of the llama (Lama guanacoe f. glama). Comp Biochem Physiol 83:687–691. doi: 10.1016/0300-9629(86)90710-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hristov AN, Ahvenjarvi S, McAllister TA, Huhtanen P (2003) Composition and digestive tract retention time of ruminal particles with functional specific gravity greater or less than 1.02. J Anim Sci 81:2639–2648PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kaske M, Hatiboglu S, von Engelhardt W (1992) The influence of density and size of particles on rumination and passage from the reticulo-rumen of sheep. Br J Nutr 67:235–244. doi: 10.1079/BJN19920027 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lechner-Doll M, Rutagwenda T, Schwartz HJ, Schultka W, von Engelhardt W (1990) Seasonal changes of ingesta mean retention time and forestomach fluid volume in indigenous camels, cattle, sheep and goats grazing in a thornbush savanna pasture in Kenya. J Agric Sci 115:409–420. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600075869 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lechner-Doll M, Kaske M, Engelhardt Wv (1991) Factors affecting the mean retention time of particles in the forestomach of ruminants and camelids. In: Tsuda T, Sasaki Y, Kawashima R (eds) Physiological aspects of digestion and metabolism in ruminants. Academic, San Diego, pp 455–482Google Scholar
  10. Lirette A, Milligan LP (1989) A quantitative model of reticulo-rumen particle degradation and passage. Br J Nutr 62:465–479. doi: 10.1079/BJN19890046 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McLeod MN, Minson DJ (1988) Large particle breakdown by cattle eating ryegrass and alfalfa. J Anim Sci 66:992–999PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Poppi DP, Ellic WC, Matis JH, Lascano CE (2001) Marker concentration patterns of labelled leaf and stem particles in the rumen of cattle grazing bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon) analysed by reference to a raft model. Br J Nutr 85:553–563. doi: 10.1079/BJN2001317 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schwarm A, Ortmann S, Wolf C, Streich WJ, Clauss M (2008) Excretion patterns of fluids and particle passage markers of different size in banteng (Bos javanicus) and pygmy hippopotamus (Hexaprotodon liberiensis): two functionally different foregut fermenters. Comp Biochem Physiol 150:32–39. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.02.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Thielemanns M-F, Francois E, Bodart C, Thewis A (1978) Mesure du transit gastrointestinal chez le porc à l’aide des radiolanthanides. Comparaison avec le mouton. Ann Biol Anim Biochim Biophys 18:237–247. doi: 10.1051/rnd:19780203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angela Schwarm
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Sylvia Ortmann
    • 1
  • Christian Wolf
    • 4
  • Marcus Clauss
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Freie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Research Institute for the Biology of Farm AnimalsDummerstorfGermany
  4. 4.Helmholtz Centre Berlin for Materials and EnergyBerlinGermany
  5. 5.Clinic for Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife, Vetsuisse FacultyUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations