European Journal of Wildlife Research

, Volume 54, Issue 4, pp 549–555 | Cite as

Epidemiological risk factors of Aujeszky’s disease in wild boars (Sus scrofa) and domestic pigs in Spain

  • Francisco Ruiz-Fons
  • Dolo Vidal
  • Joaquín Vicente
  • Pelayo Acevedo
  • Isabel G. Fernández-de-Mera
  • Vidal Montoro
  • Christian Gortázar
Original Paper

Abstract

An Aujeszky’s disease (AD) control and eradication campaign started in Spain in 1995, and as a result, AD virus (ADV) seroprevalences have notably diminished in Spanish domestic pig herds, but eradication has not yet been achieved. Since the presence of ADV in Spanish wild boar populations can impede schemes to eradicate ADV in domestic pig, we conducted analyses of risk factors and investigated associations between the patterns of ADV seroprevalence at the municipal level in the wild boar and the domestic pig, respectively, in south-central Spain. There was a clear influence of individual factors on the risk of wild boar to test positive to ADV. Concerning the domestic pig, higher ADV seroprevalences were observed with increasing numbers of pigs per farm. Indoor pig farms showed higher seroprevalences than open-air farms. Our results show that, at least at the study scale, the level of ADV seroprevalence in domestic pig farms is not influenced by the level of ADV seroprevalence in the coexisting wild boar populations. Also, there was no influence of domestic pigs ADV seroprevalence on the risk of wild boars to test seropositive. Finally, there was no evidence for a statistical association between ADV seroprevalence levels in wild boar and domestic pig at the municipal level in the study region. These findings are of interest for both veterinary and public health authorities. Nevertheless, more effort is needed in order to elucidate the nature of particular ADV outbreaks in domestic pigs in the study region due to possible contacts with wild boars, which will probably require a molecular approach.

Keywords

Livestock Pseudorabies Risk assessment Seroprevalence Wildlife 

References

  1. Acevedo P, Escudero MA, Muñoz R, Gortázar C (2006) Factors affecting wild boar abundance across an environmental gradient in Spain. Acta Theriol 51:327–336Google Scholar
  2. Acevedo P, Vicente J, Höfle U, Cassinello J, Ruiz-Fons F, Gortázar C (2007) Estimation of European wild boar relative abundance and aggregation: a novel method in epidemiological risk assessment. Epidemiol Infect 135:519–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Aut Cont 19:716–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Artois M, Depner KR, Guberti V, Hars J, Rossi S, Rutili D (2002) Classical swine fever (hog cholera) in wild boar in Europe. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz 21:287–303Google Scholar
  5. Austin CC, Weigel RM (1992) Factors affecting the geographic distribution of Pseudorabies (Aujeszky’s disease) virus infection among swine herds in Illinois. Prev Vet Med 13:239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1992) Data-base selection of an appropriate biological model: the key to modern data analysis. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Fernández-de-Mera I, Gortázar C, Vicente J, Höfle U, Fierro Y (2003) Wild boar helminths: risks in animal translocations. Vet Parasitol 115:335–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fernández-Llario P, Mateos-Quesada P, Silverio A, Santos P (2003) Habitat effects and shooting techniques on two wild boar (Sus scrofa) populations in Spain and Portugal. Z Jagdwiss 49:120–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gortázar C, Herrero J, Villafuerte R, Marco J (2000) Historical examination of the status of large mammals in Aragon, Spain. Mammalia 64:411–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gortázar C, Vicente J, Fierro Y, León L, Cubero MJ, González M (2002) Natural Aujeszky’s disease in a Spanish wild boar population. Ann N Y Acad Sci 969:210–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gortázar C, Acevedo P, Ruiz-Fons F, Vicente J (2006) Disease risks and overabundance of game species. Eur J Wildl Res 52:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gortázar C, Ferroglio E, Höfle U, Frölich K, Vicente J (2007) Diseases shared between wildlife and livestock: a European perspective. Eur J Wildl Res 53:241–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hars J, Rossi S (2005) Actualites dans le domaine de la surveillance des maladies transmissibles en France (peste porcine classique, maladie d’Aujeszky, tuberculose, brucellose, leptospirose, trichinellose, influenza aviaire, virus West Nile). 23èmes Rencontres du GEEFSM, Val d’Ordino, AndorreGoogle Scholar
  14. Höfle U, Vicente J, Fernández-de-Mera IG, Villanúa D, Acevedo P, Ruiz-Fons F, Gortázar C (2004) Health risks in game production: the wild boar. Galemys 16:197–206Google Scholar
  15. Kluge JP, Beran GW, Hill HT, Platt KB (1999) Pseudorabies (Aujeszky’s disease). In: Straw BE, D’Allaire S, Mengeling WL, Taylor DJ (eds) Diseases of swine. Blackwell Science, Ames, pp 233–246Google Scholar
  16. Köppel C, Knopf L, Ryser MP, Miserez R, Thür B, Stärk KDC (2007) Serosurveillance for selected infectious disease agents in wild boars (Sus scrofa) and outdoor pigs in Switzerland. Eur J Wildl Res 53:212–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leontides L, Ewald C, Mortensen S, Willeberg P (1994) Factors associated with circulation of Aujeszky’s disease virus in fattening herds of an intensively vaccinated area of Northern Germany. Prev Vet Med 20:63–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lipowski A (2003) European wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) as a reservoir of infectious diseases for domestic pigs. Med Weterynar 59:861–863Google Scholar
  19. Lutz W, Junghans D, Schmitz D, Müller T (2003) A long-term survey of pseudorabies virus infections in European wild boar of western Germany. Z Jagdwiss 49:130–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marsh WE, Damrongwatanapokin T, Larntz K, Morrison RB (1991) The use of a geographic information system in an epidemiological study of Pseudorabies (Aujeszky’s disease) in Minnesota swine herds. Prev Vet Med 11:249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martin SW, Meek AH, Willeberg P (1987) Veterinary epidemiology. Iowa State University Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
  22. Moynagh J (1997) Aujeszky’s disease and the European Community. Vet Microbiol 55:159–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Müller T, Zellmer R, Klupp B, Teuffert J, Possardt C, Mewes L, Dresenkamp B, Conraths FJ, Mettenleiter TC (1998) Characterization of pseudorabies virus isolated from European wild boar in Germany. Vet Rec 143:337–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Müller TF, Teufflert J, Zellmer R, Conraths FJ (2001) Experimental infection of European wild boars and domestic pigs with pseudorabies viruses with differing virulence. Am J Vet Res 62:252–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parra A, Larrasa J, García A, Alonso JM, Hermoso de Mendoza J (2005) Molecular epidemiology of bovine tuberculosis in wild animals in Spain: a first approach to risk factor analysis. Vet Microbiol 110:293–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Quevedo M, Bañuelos MJ, Obeso JR (2006) The decline of the Cantabrian capercaillie: how much does habitat configuration matter? Biol Conserv 127:190–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosell C, Herrero J (2002) Jabalí. In: Palomo LJ, Gisbert J (eds) Atlas de los mamíferos terrestres de España, Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza-SECEM-SECEMU, Madrid, pp 285–290Google Scholar
  28. Ruiz-Fons F, Vicente J, Vidal D, Höfle U, Villanúa D, Gauss C, Segalés J, Almería S, Montoro V, Gortázar C (2006) Seroprevalence of six reproductive pathogens in European wild boar (Sus scrofa) from Spain: the effect on wild boar female reproductive performance. Therio 65:731–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ruiz-Fons F, Segalés J, Gortázar C (2008) A review of viral diseases of the European wild boar: effects of population dynamics and reservoir role. Vet J. DOI 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.02.017
  30. Ruiz-Fons F, Rodríguez O, Mateu E, Vidal D, Gortázar C (in press) Antibody response of wild boar piglets vaccinated against Aujeszky’s disease virus. Vet Rec, in pressGoogle Scholar
  31. Saenz de Buruaga M, Lucio AJ, Purroy J (1991) Reconocimiento de sexo y edad en especies cinegéticas. Diputación Foral de Álava, VitoriaGoogle Scholar
  32. Saez-Royuela C, Tellería JL (1986) The increased population of the wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) in Europe. Mammal Rev 16:97–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tamba M, Calabrese R, Finelli E, Cordioli P (2002) Risk factors for Aujeszky’s-disease seropositivity of swine herds of a region of northern Italy. Prev Vet Med 54:203–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vicente J, Segalés J, Höfle U, Balasch M, Plana-Durán JC, Domingo M, Gortázar C (2004) Epidemiological study on porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) infection in the European wild boar (Sus scrofa). Vet Res 35:243–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vicente J, Ruiz-Fons F, Vidal D, Hofle U, Acevedo P, Villanúa D, Fernández-de-Mera IG, Martin MP, Gortázar C (2005) Serosurvey of Aujeszky’s disease virus infection in European wild boar in Spain. Vet Rec 156:408–412PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Vicente J, Höfle U, Garrido JM, Fernández-de-Mera I, Acevedo P, Juste R, Barral M, Gortázar C (2007) Risk factors associated with the prevalence of tuberculosis-like lesions in fenced wild boar and red deer in South Central Spain. Vet Res 38:451–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francisco Ruiz-Fons
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dolo Vidal
    • 1
  • Joaquín Vicente
    • 1
  • Pelayo Acevedo
    • 1
    • 3
  • Isabel G. Fernández-de-Mera
    • 1
  • Vidal Montoro
    • 1
  • Christian Gortázar
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM)Ciudad RealSpain
  2. 2.The Macaulay Land Use Research InstituteAberdeenUK
  3. 3.Central Science LaboratoryYorkUK

Personalised recommendations