European Journal of Wildlife Research

, Volume 54, Issue 1, pp 27–35

Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) avoidance of a highway as revealed by lichen measurements

Original Paper

Abstract

Reindeer and caribou Rangifer tarandus are reported to avoid human infrastructure such as roads, high-voltage power lines, pipelines, and tourist resorts. Lichens are important forage for reindeer during winter, and their relatively slow growth rates make them vulnerable to overgrazing. Height and volume of lichens are often used as an indicator of grazing pressure by reindeer and, thus, as an indirect measure of Rangifer avoidance of human infrastructure. We sampled lichen height in Cetraria nivalis-dominated communities along 4 and 3 parallel transects located on two parallel mountain ridges in Hardangervidda, south central Norway. The lichen measurements were analyzed in relation to altitude and the distance from four tourist cabins in the area and a highway (Rv7) running perpendicular to the 7 transects. The mountain ridge with 4 transects is part of a much used migratory corridor for wild reindeer R. tarandus tarandus. Along the nonmigratory ridge, lichen height decreased 35% over an 8-km distance from Rv7 and a tourist cabin, indicating reindeer aversion toward Rv7 and/or a tourist cabin. No similar relationship was found for the migration ridge in relation to distance from Rv7 or the tourist cabins. Our results suggest that avoidance of human infrastructure by wild reindeer might be limited where reindeer use of winter pastures is influenced by herd traditions and/or motivation to follow established migration corridors. This has important implications for addressing the use of similar pasture measurements when testing for Rangifer aversion toward human disturbances.

Keywords

Grazing pressure Infrastructure Migration corridor 

References

  1. Beale CM, Monaghan P (2004) Human disturbance: people as predation-free predators? J Appl Ecol 41:335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bevanger K, Jordhøy P (2004) Reindeer—the mountain nomad. Naturforlaget, OsloGoogle Scholar
  3. Bevanger K, Falldorf T, Strand O (2005) Rv7 tunneller på Hardangervidda. NINA Rapport 106, pp 1–40Google Scholar
  4. Burson SL, Belant JL, Fortier KA, Tomkiewicz WC (2000) The effect of vehicle traffic on wildlife in Denali National Park. Arctic 53:146–151Google Scholar
  5. Cameron RD, Reed DJ, Dau JR, Smith WT (1992) Redistribution of calving caribou in response to oil-field development on the arctic slope of Alaska. Arctic 45:338–342Google Scholar
  6. Cameron RD, Smith WT, White RG, Griffith B (2005) Central Arctic Caribou and petroleum development: distributional, nutritional, and reproductive implications. Arctic 58:1–9Google Scholar
  7. Cooper EJ, Wookey PA (2001) Field measurements of the growth rates of forage lichens, and the implications of grazing by Svalbard reindeer. Symbiosis 31:173–186Google Scholar
  8. Cronin MA, Ballard WB, Bryan JD, Pierson BJ, McKendrick JD (1998) Northern Alaska oil fields and caribou: a commentary. Biol Conserv 83:195–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Jong C, Collins D, Ranzi R (2005) Climate and hydrology in mountain areas. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  10. den Herder M, Kytoviita MM, Niemela P (2003) Growth of reindeer lichens and effects of reindeer grazing on ground cover vegetation in a Scots pine forest and a subarctic heathland in Finnish Lapland. Ecography 26:3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dyer SJ, O’Neill JP, Wasel SM, Boutin S (2001) Avoidance of industrial development by woodland caribou. J Wildl Manage 65:531–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Forman RTT, Alexander LE (1998) Roads and their major ecological effects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frid A, Dill L (2002) Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Conserv Ecol 6(1):11Google Scholar
  14. Gaare E (1968) A preliminary report on winter nutrition of wild reindeer in the Southern Scandes, Norway. Symp Zool Soc Lond 21:109–115Google Scholar
  15. Gaare E (1997) A hypothesis to explain lichen–Rangifer dynamic relationships. Rangifer 17:3–7Google Scholar
  16. Gaare E, Skogland T (1975) Wild reindeer food habits and range use in Hardangervidda. In: Wielgolaski FE (ed) Fennoscandian tundra ecosystems. Part 2, animal and system analyses. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 195–205Google Scholar
  17. Gaare E, Skogland T (1980) Lichen–reindeer interaction studied in a simple case model. In: Reimers E, Gaare E, Skjenneberg S (eds) Proc 2nd Int Reindeer/Caribou Symp, Røros, DVF, Trondheim, pp 47–56Google Scholar
  18. Helle T, Sarkela M (1993) The effects of outdoor recreation on range use by semi domesticated reindeer. Scand J For Res 8:123–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klein DR (1968) The introduction, increase, and crash of reindeer on St. Matthew Island. J Wildl Manage 32:350–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kumpula J (2001) Winter grazing of reindeer in woodland lichen pasture: effect of lichen availability on the condition of reindeer. Small Rumin Res 39:121–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Larter NC, Nagy JA (2001) Variation between snow conditions at Peary caribou and muskox feeding sites and elsewhere in foraging habitats on Banks Island in the Canadian High Arctic. Arct Antarct Alp Res 33:123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lund SE (2001) Hardangervidda villreinområde. Minimumstelling av rein 2. mars, 18. mars og 23. mars 2001. VillreinenGoogle Scholar
  23. Lund SE (2002) Hardangervidda villreinområde. Minimumstelling av villrein 15. mars 2002. VillreinenGoogle Scholar
  24. Mathiesen SD, Haga OE, Kaino T, Tyler NJC (2000) Diet composition, rumen papillation and maintenance of carcass mass in female Norwegian reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) in winter. J Zool 251:129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nellemann C, Cameron RD (1996) Effects of petroleum development on terrain preferences of calving caribou. Arctic 49:23–28Google Scholar
  26. Nellemann C, Cameron RD (1998) Cumulative impacts of an evolving oil-field complex on the distribution of calving caribou. Can J Zool 76:1425–1430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nellemann C, Jordhoy P, Stoen O-G, Strand O (2000) Cumulative impacts of tourist resort on wild reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) during winter. Arctic 53:9–17Google Scholar
  28. Nellemann C, Vistnes I, Jordhoy P, Strand O (2001) Winter distribution of wild reindeer in relation to power lines, roads and resorts. Biol Conserv 101:351–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nellemann C, Vistnes I, Jordhøy P, Strand O (2002) Rapport fra REIN-prosjektet: Regionale effekter av kraftledningerGoogle Scholar
  30. Nellemann C, Vistnes I, Jordhoy P, Strand O, Newton A (2003) Progressive impact of piecemeal infrastructure development on wild reindeer. Biol Conserv 113:307–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Noel LE, Pollard RH, Ballard WB, Cronin MA (1998) Activity and use of active gravel pads and tundra by caribou, Rangifer tarandus granti, within the Prudhoe Bay oil field, Alaska. Can Field Nat 112:400–409Google Scholar
  32. Noel LE, Parker KR, Cronin AA (2004) Caribou distribution near an oilfield road on Alaska’s North Slope, 1978–2001. Wildl Soc Bull 32:757–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Østbye E, Ber A, Blehr O, Espeland M, Gaare E, Hagen A, Hesjedal O, Hågvar S, Kjelvik S, Lien L, Mysterud I, Sandhaug A, Skar HJ, Skartveit A, Skre O, Skogland T, Solhøy T, Stenseth NC, Wielgolaski FE (1975) Hardangervidda, Norway, vol 20, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  34. Pintado A, Sancho LG, Valladares F (2001) The influence of microclimate on the composition of lichen communities along an altitudinal gradient in the maritime Antarctic. Symbiosis 31:69–84Google Scholar
  35. Reimers E, Colman JE (2006) Reindeer and caribou (Rangifer) response to human activity. Rangifer 26:55–71Google Scholar
  36. Reimers E, Dahle B, Eftestøl S, Colman JE, Gaare E (2007) Effects of a power line on migration and range use of wild reindeer. Biol Conserv 134:484–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rønning OI (1985) Vegetasjonslære. 2nd edn. Universitetsforlaget, OsloGoogle Scholar
  38. Skogland T (1980) Comparative summer feeding strategies of arctic and alpine Rangifer. J Anim Ecol 49:81–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Skogland T (1990) Density dependence in a fluctuating wild reindeer herd; maternal vs. offspring effects. Oecologia 84:442–450Google Scholar
  40. Skogland T (1993) Villreinens bruk av Hardangervidda. NINA Oppdragsmelding 245:1–23Google Scholar
  41. Skogland T, Mølmen Ø (1980) Prehistoric and present habitat distribution of wild reindeer at Dovrefjell. In: Reimers E, Gaare E, Skjenneberg S (eds) Proc 2nd Int Reindeer/Caribou Symp, Røros, DVF, Trondheim, pp 130–141Google Scholar
  42. Strand O, Jordhøy P, Solberg EJ (2001) Villreinen og effekter av Rv7 over hardangervidda. NINA Oppdragsmelding 666:1–24Google Scholar
  43. Strand O, Gaare E, Solberg EJ, Wilman B (2004) Faggrunnlag for forvaltningen av villreinstammen på Hardangervidda. NINA Oppdragsmelding 838:1–28Google Scholar
  44. Strand O, Bevanger K, Falldorf T (2006) Reinens bruk av Hardangervidda, Sluttrapport fra Rv7-prosjektet. NINA Rapport 131:1–67Google Scholar
  45. Thomson BR (1977) The behaviour of wild reindeer in Norway. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  46. Trombulak SC, Frissell CA (2000) Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conserv Biol 14:18–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vistnes I, Nellemann C (2001) Avoidance of cabins, roads, and power lines by reindeer during calving. J Wildl Manage 65:915–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vistnes I, Nellemann C, Jordhoy P, Strand O (2001) Wild reindeer: impacts of progressive infrastructure development on distribution and range use. Polar Biol 24:531–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vistnes I, Nellemann C, Jordhoy P, Strand O (2004) Effects of infrastructure on migration and range use of wild reindeer J Wildl Manage 68:101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Warenberg K, Danell Ö, Gaare E, Nieminen M (1997) Flora i reinbeiteland. Nordisk Organ for Reinforskning/Landbruksforlaget, OsloGoogle Scholar
  51. Wilegolaski FE (2001) Field and bottom layer vegetation mat transplantation: a method to simulate effects of climate change? Skoræktarritid 1:167–170Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bjørn Dahle
    • 1
  • Eigil Reimers
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jonathan E. Colman
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Prog. for Exp. Beh. and Pop. Ecol. Res. (EBE)University of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.The Norwegian School of Veterinary ScienceOsloNorway
  3. 3.Department of Ecology and Natural Resource ManagementThe Norwegian University of Life SciencesÅsNorway

Personalised recommendations