European Journal of Wildlife Research

, Volume 53, Issue 4, pp 287–297

Reproductive parameters of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in three different parts of Germany

  • Friederike Gethöffer
  • Gunter Sodeikat
  • Klaus Pohlmeyer
Original Paper


Recent increases in wild boar populations in central Europe necessitated an evaluation of the current reproductive performance of this species. During a 2-year study, samples of ovaries and uteri were taken from wild boars from areas in the (northern) state of Lower Saxony and the (more southern) Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, in which wild boar have been vaccinated against classical swine fever (CSF) after several outbreaks of the disease. Serum samples were also analyzed to determine the prevalence of diseases that may influence pig reproduction and fertility. While there was a striking seasonality of reproductive performance, especially among older animals, mating was delayed in up to 15% of piglets and yearlings, leading to a second peak of farrowing from June to August. Depending on the area, between 60 and 70% of the piglets were most likely to become pregnant during the main period of reproduction, while another two thirds of the remaining individuals farrowed by the summer, which was the case in the mountainous areas. The arithmetic mean number of fetuses were 6.29 per piglet, 6.67 per yearling, and 7.64 per adult for wild boar in Eastern Lower Saxony; 4.58 per piglet and 4.63 per yearling and 6.56 per adult for wild boar in the Western Eifel and 4.77 per yearling and 6.50 per adult in the Palatine Forest, as the number of pregnant piglets has been too low to calculate an arithmetic mean in this area. The numbers of Lower Saxony wild boar fetuses per individual exceed previously known values. The results indicate that exogenous factors have a strong impact on both reproductive seasonality and the percentage of reproducing individuals in an age group. Ovulation rates, numbers of fetuses, and prevalence of pregnancies were found to be high among all age groups, while early onset of puberty and high pregnancy rates were typical of young animals (yearlings). The influence of some important reproductive diseases like Aujeszky’s disease, Brucellosis, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome, porcine parvovirosis, and CSF on wild boar reproduction and fertility was tested and found to be at least of minor interest for the reproductive outcome of the species.


Fertility Pig Classical swine fever 


  1. Abaigar T (1992) Paramètres de la reproduction chez le sanglier (Sus scrofa) dans le sud-est de la péninsule ibérique. Mammalia 56(2):245–250Google Scholar
  2. Ahrens M (1984) Untersuchungen zur Reproduktion beim Schwarzwild. Beitr Jagd Wildforsch 13:231–243Google Scholar
  3. Appelius M (1995) Einflüsse auf die Populationsdynamik von weiblichen Schwarzwild-Frischlingen aus dem nördlichen Regierungsbezirk Braunschweig und dem Forstamt Saupark. Hannover, Tierärztliche Hochschule, DissertationGoogle Scholar
  4. Artois M, Delahay R, Guberti V, Cheeseman C (2001) Control of infectious diseases of wildlife in Europe. Vet J 162:141–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Artois M, Depner KR, Guberti V, Hars J, Rossi S, Rutili D (2002) Classical swine fever (hog cholera) in wild boar in Europe. Rev Sci Tech 21(2):287–303PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Aumaitre A, Moran C, Quere JP, Peiniau J, Vallet G (1982) Productivité potentielle et reproduction hivernale chez la laie (Sus scrofa scrofa) en milieu sauvage. J Rech Porcines en France 14:109–124Google Scholar
  7. Aumaitre A, Quere JP, Peiniau J (1984) Influence du milieu sur la reproduction hivernale et la prolificité de la laie. In: Spitz F, Pepin D (eds) Symposium inernational sur le sanglier. INRA Publ, Toulouse, France, pp 69–78Google Scholar
  8. Boitani L, Trapanese P, Mattei L (1995) Demographic patterns of a wild boar population in Tuscany, Italy. J Mountain Ecol 3:197–201Google Scholar
  9. Briedermann L (1971) Zur Reproduktion des Schwarzwildes in der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik. Tag Ber Dt Akad Landwirtsch Wiss Berlin 113:169–186Google Scholar
  10. Briedermann L (1990) Schwarzwild. VEB Deutscher Landwirtschaftsverlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  11. Cannon RM, Roe RT (1982) Livestock disease surveys: a field manual for veterinarians. In: AID (1990) (ed) Krankheitsüberwachung in TierbeständenGoogle Scholar
  12. Capua I, Fico R, Banks M, Tamba M, Calzetta G (1997) Isolation and characterisation of an Aujeszky’s disease virus naturally infecting a wild boar (Sus scrofa). Vet Microbiol 55(1–4):141–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cutler RS, Molitor TW, Lemam AD, Sauber TE (1982) Effect of porcine parvovirus serostatus on the reproductive performance of mated gilts in an infected herd. Am J Vet Res 43(6):935–937PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dahle J, Patzelt T, Schagemann G, Liess B (1993) Antibody prevalence of hog cholera, bovine viral diarrhoea and Aujeszky’s disease virus in wild boars in northern Germany. Dtsch Tierärztl Wochenschr 100(8):330–333PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Delfs J (1999) Schweinemast im Wald. Mastnutzung in den Ämtern Gifhorn, Knesebeck, Isenhagen und Bodenteich. Schriftenreihe des Landkreises GifhornGoogle Scholar
  16. Ehlers MJ, Mabry JW, Bertrand JK, Stalder KJ (2005) Variance components and heritabilities for sow productivity traits estimated from purebred versus crossbred sows. J Anim Breed Genet 122(5):318–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernández-Llario P, Carranza J (2000) Reproductive performance of the wild boar in a Mediterranean ecosystem under drought conditions. Ethol Ecol Evol 12:335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gaillard JM, Jullien JM (1993) Body weight effect on reproduction of young wild boar (Sus scrofa) females: a comparative analysis. Folia Zool 42(3):204–212Google Scholar
  19. Gethoeffer F (2005) Reproduktionsparameter und Saisonalität der Fortpflanzung des Wildschweins (Sus scrofa) in drei Untersuchungsgebieten Deutschlands. Hannover, Tierärztliche Hochschule, DissertationGoogle Scholar
  20. Gortazar C, Vicente J, Fierro Y, Leon L, Cubero MJ, Gonzalez M (2002) Natural Aujeszky’s disease in a Spanish wild boar population. Ann N Y Acad Sci 969:210–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Habermehl KH (1985) Altersbestimmung bei Wild- und Pelztieren, 2nd edn. Paul Parey, Hamburg and BerlinGoogle Scholar
  22. Heinritzi K, Aigner K, Erber M, Kersjes C, von Wangenheim B (1999) Brucellose und Aujeszky-Krankheit in einem Wildschweingatter-Fallbeschreibung. Tierärztl Prax 27(G):41–46Google Scholar
  23. Henry VG (1968) Fetal development in European wild hogs. J Wildl Manage 32(4):967–970Google Scholar
  24. Hirao Y, Nagai T, Kubo M, Miyano T, Miyake M, Kato S (1994) In vitro growth and maturation of pig oocytes. J Reprod Fertil 100(2):333–339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Iff U (1983) Altersbestimmung beim Schwarzwild. Wild Hund 11:26–30Google Scholar
  26. Kaden V, Lange E, Fischer U, Strebelow G (2000) Oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever: evaluation of the first field study in Germany. Vet Microbiol 73(2–3):239–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaden V, Heyne H, Kiupel H, Letz W, Kern B, Lemmer U, Gossger K, Rothe A, Bohme H (2002) Oral immunisation of wild boar against classical swine fever: concluding analysis of the recent field trials in Germany. Berl Münch Tierärztl Wochenschr 115(5–6):179–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Laddomada A (2000) Incidence and control of CSF in wild boar in Europe. Vet Microbiol 73(2–3):121–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lucas X, Martinez EA, Roca J, Vazquez JM, Gil MA, Pastpr LM, Alabart JL (2002) Relationship between antral follicle size, oocyte diameters and nuclear maturation of immature oocytes in pigs. Theriogenology 58(5):871–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lutz W, Wurm R (1996) Serologische Untersuchungen zum Nachweis von Antikörpern gegen Viren des Seuchenhaften Spätaborts, der Aujeszkyschen Krankheit, der Europäischen Schweinepest und Porzine Parvoviren beim Wildschwein (Sus scrofa L., 1758) in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Zeitschr Jagdwiss 42:123–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Maillard D, Fournier P (2004) Timing and synchrony of births in the wild boar (Sus scrofa Linnaeus, 1758) in a Mediterranean habitat: the effect of food availability. Galemys 16:67–74Google Scholar
  32. Marchal R, Vigneron C, Perreau C, Bali-Papp A, Mermillod P (2002) Effect of follicular size on meiotic and developmental competence of porcine oocytes. Theriogenology 57(5):1523–1532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marrable AW (1971) The embryonic pig—a chronological account. Wheaton & Co, ExeterGoogle Scholar
  34. Marrable AW, Ashdown RR (1967) Quantitative observations on pig embryos of known ages. J Agric Sci 69:443–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Matschke GH (1967) Aging European wild hogs by dentition. J Wildl Manage 31:109–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mauget R (1982) Seasonality of reproduction in the wild boar. In: Foxcroft GR, Cole DJA (eds) Conrol of pig reproduction. Butterworths, London, pp 509–526Google Scholar
  37. Mengeling WL, Paul PS, Brown TT (1980) Transplacental infection and embryonic death following maternal exposure to porcine parvovirus near the time of conception. Arch Virol 65(1):55–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Miyano T (2003) Bringing up small oocytes to eggs in pigs and cows. Theriogenology 59(1):61–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moretti M (1995) Birth distribution, structure and dynamics of a hunted mountain population of wild boar, Ticino, Switzerland. J Mountain Ecol 3:192–196Google Scholar
  40. Motlik J, Crozet N, Fulka J (1984) Meiotic competence in vitro of pig oocytes isolated from early antral follicles. J Reprod Fertil 77:323–328Google Scholar
  41. Müller T, Klupp B, Zellmer R, Teuffert J, Ziedler K, Possardt C, Mewes L, Dresenkamp B, Conraths FJ, Mettenleiter TC (1998a) Characterisation of pseudorabies virus isolated from wild boar (Sus scrofa). Vet Rec 143(12):337–340PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Müller T, Teuffert J, Ziedler K, Possardt C, Kramer M, Staubach C, Conraths FJ (1998b) Pseudorabies in the European wild boar from eastern Germany. J Wildl Dis 34(2):251–258PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Nahlik A, Sandor G (2003) Birth rate and offspring survival in a free-ranging wild boar Sus scrofa population. Wildl Biol 9(Suppl 1):37–42Google Scholar
  44. Patten BM (1948) Embryology of the pig, 3rd edn. Blakiston Company, NYGoogle Scholar
  45. Rosell C (1998) Biologia I ecologia del senglar (Sus scrofa L., 1758) a dues poblacions del nordest ibèric. Aplicació a la gestió. Barcelona, Univers., Facultat de Biologia, Tesi DoctoralGoogle Scholar
  46. Rüsse I, Sinowatz F (1991) Lehrbuch der Embrylogie der Haustiere. Paul Parey, Berlin and HamburgGoogle Scholar
  47. Sodeikat G, Pohlmeyer K (2003) Escape movements of family groups of wild boar Sus scrofa influenced by drive hunts in Lower Saxony, Germany. Wildlife Biol 9(Suppl 1):43–49Google Scholar
  48. Sodeikat G, Papendieck J, Richter O, Söndgerath D, Pohlmeyer K (2005) Modelling population dynamics of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Lower Saxony, Germany In: Pohlmeyer K (ed) Extended abstracts of the XXVIIth congress of the International union of game biologists, Hannover 2005. DSV Verlag, Hamburg, pp 488–489Google Scholar
  49. Steinheuer R (2001) Schätzung von Varianzkomponenten und Kandidatengeneffekten für die paternale und maternale Komponente von Fruchtbarkeitsmerkmalen beim Schwein. Hannover, Tierärztliche Hochschule, DissertationGoogle Scholar
  50. Stubbe C (1977) Wechsel und Wachstum der Zähne beim Schwarzwild. Beitr Jagd Wildforsch 18:59–66Google Scholar
  51. Stubbe C (2001) Vom Frischling zum Hauptschwein. Wildbiologische Erkenntnisse. In: DLV Deutscher Landwirtschaftsverlag Berlin (ed) Unsere Jagd Spezial: SchwarzwildGoogle Scholar
  52. Stubbe W, Stubbe M (1977) Vergleichende Beiträge zur Geburts- und Reproduktionsbiologie von Wild- und Hausschwein-Sus scrofa L., 1758. Beitr Jagd Wildforsch 10:153–179Google Scholar
  53. Torres RA, Torres RA, Lopes PS, Pereira CS, Euclydes RF, Araujo CV, Silva MA, Breda FC (2005) Genetic parameters estimates for reproductive traits in swine. Arq Bras Med Vet Zoo 57(5):684–689Google Scholar
  54. Warwick BL (1928) Prenatal growth of swine. J Morph 46:59–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Friederike Gethöffer
    • 1
  • Gunter Sodeikat
    • 1
  • Klaus Pohlmeyer
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Wildlife Research at the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, FoundationMeinersenGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Wildlife Research at the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, FoundationHannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations