European Journal of Wildlife Research

, Volume 52, Issue 3, pp 164–170 | Cite as

The diurnal habitat used by red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in the Haute Ardenne

Original Paper

Abstract

We describe diurnal habitat used by red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in two representative forests of Haute Ardenne. We captured 17 calves and 13 adults and fitted them with VHF transmitters (ear tags or collars). Each animal was radio-tracked at least once per week during the daylight hours and relocated by triangulation. To determine habitat use, we used compositional analysis. We defined use for each animal as the proportion of relocations in each vegetation association. Each relocation was weighed according to its accuracy (i.e., based on the confidence ellipse computation). We defined availability as the proportion in the area of each vegetation association within its home range (i.e., minimum convex polygon). Red deer calves preferred edges in open areas (e.g., clear-cuts) during their first 3 months of life. Adults used open coniferous [e.g., natural regeneration of spruce (Picea abies)] stands and edges between coniferous stands and other vegetation associations. Closed coniferous stands were preferred during winter and deer usually used the edges of habitat patches rather than the core areas, except in winter for coniferous stands. The deciduous stands [e.g., old growth stands of beech (Fagus sylvatica)] were usually avoided, except in winter when the edges of deciduous stands were used. The availability of coniferous stands and edges partly determined the size of the diurnal home ranges.

Keywords

Bedding site Belgium Confidence ellipse Habitat selection Home range Radio-tracking 

References

  1. Aebischer NJ, Robertson PA, Kenward RE (1993) Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74:1313–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birtles T, Goldspink CR, Gibson S, Holland RK (1998) Calf site selection by red deer (Cervus elaphus) from three contrasting habitats in Nort-West England: implications for welfare and management. Anim Welf 7:427–443Google Scholar
  3. Boyle SA, Samson FB (1985) Effects of non-consumptive recreation on wildlife: a review. Wildl Soc Bull 13:110–116Google Scholar
  4. Georgii B (1980) Home range patterns of female red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in the Alps. Oecologia 47:278–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hamann JL, Klein F, Saint-Andrieux C (1997) Domaine vital diurne et déplacements de biches (Cervus elaphus) sur le secteur de La Petite Pierre (Bas-Rhin). Game Wildl Sci 14:1–17Google Scholar
  6. Hooge PN, Eichenlaub B (1997) Animal movement extension to ArcView. ver. 1.1. Alaska Science Center–Biological Science Office, U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, AK, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. Jeppesen JL (1987) Impact of human disturbance on home range, movements and activity of red deer in a Danish environment. Dan Rev Game Biol 13:1–33Google Scholar
  8. Johnson DH (1980) The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61:65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Leban FA (1999) Performance of five resource selection methods under different sampling designs: a case study with elk radio-telemetry data. Ph.D. thesis, University of IdahoGoogle Scholar
  10. Lenth RV (1981) Robust measures of location for directional data. Technometrics 23:77–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Licoppe AM, Prevot C, Verheyden H (2005) Measuring the impact of human disturbance on free ranging red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) by telemetry. In: Pohlmeyer K (ed) Extended abstracts of the XXVIIth Congress of the International Union of Game Biologists, Hannover 2005. DSV-Verl., Hamburg, p 393Google Scholar
  12. Mysterud A, Ostbye E (1999) Cover as a habitat element for temperate ungulates: effects on habitat selection and demography. Wildl Soc Bull 27:385–394Google Scholar
  13. Richard A, Picars A (1996) Mise au point d’une technique de capture de faons de cerf élaphe. Bull Mens Off Natl Chasse 209:2–9Google Scholar
  14. Staines BW (1974) A review of factors affecting deer dispersion and their relevance to management. Mamm Rev 4:79–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Szemethy L, Heltai M, Matrai K, Peto Z (1998) Home ranges and habitat selection of red deer (Cervus elaphus) on a lowland area. In: Havet P et al (eds) Proceedings of the XXIIIrd Congress of the International Union of Game Biologists (IUGB), Lyon, France, 1–6 September 1997. Gibier Faune Sauvage 15:607–615Google Scholar
  16. White GC, Garrott RA (1990) Analysis of wildlife radiotracking data. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre de Recherche de la Naturedes Forêts et du BoisGemblouxBelgium

Personalised recommendations