Advertisement

The effect of biochar amendment on the growth, morphology and physiology of Quercus castaneifolia seedlings under water-deficit stress

  • Zohreh Zoghi
  • Seyed Mohsen HosseiniEmail author
  • Masoud Tabari Kouchaksaraei
  • Yahya Kooch
  • Lucia Guidi
Original Paper

Abstract

Water stress is one of the most important environmental stresses which can adversely affect soil fertility and plant growth in arid and semiarid regions. In this study, biochar was used as a type of soil amendment to improve the physiology of Chestnut-leaved oak (Quercus castaneifolia C.A.M.) seedlings and soil quality in water-deficit conditions. A randomized complete block design was conducted using three water regime treatments [100, 70 and 40% field capacity (FC)] and four application rates of produced biochar from hornbeam wood chips (control without biochar, B1, B2 and B3 with 10, 20 and 30 g kg−1 soil, respectively) in potted seedlings. The soil water-holding capacity in the 30 g kg−1 biochar was found to be higher than that in the non-biochar treatment under 100 and 40% FC. Water supply reduction to 40% FC decreased the soil total N, the available P and K, CEC, SOC and microbial respiration, as compared to the non-biochar soil used as the control; however, an increase in the B3 treatment was detected in the soil P and K at 100% FC. Severe water deficit (40% FC) induced a significant decrease in photosynthesis, transpiration, stomatal conductance and xylem water potential seedlings; even, in this case, the addition of the highest dose of biochar under the lowest water supply increased photosynthesis and stomatal conductance by 38% and 39%, respectively. Leaf nutrient concentration was also influenced by the treatment. The highest diameter and height growth and dry weight of the seedlings were observed in 100 and 40% FC under the B3 treatment. Plant biomass of the seedlings treated by B3 was increased by 55, 70 and 73%, in comparison with those attained by the control under 100, 70 and 40% FC irrigation, respectively. Generally, the use of the 30 g kg−1 biochar in the soil could alleviate the negative effects of water deficit and improve the growth of Q. castaneifolia seedling and soil quality with increasing the soil water-holding capacity, organic carbon and nutrient.

Keywords

Biomass Chestnut-leaved oak Water deficit Photosynthesis Xylem water potential 

Notes

References

  1. Abel S, Peters A, Trinks S, Schonsky H, Facklam M, Wessolek G (2013) Impact of biochar and hydrochar addition on water retention and water repellency of sandy soil. Geoderma 202:183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agegnehu G, Srivastava A, Bird MI (2017) The role of biochar and biochar-compost in improving soil quality and crop performance: a review. Appl Soil Ecol 119:156–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alef K (1995) Soil Respiration. In: Alef K, Nannipieri P (eds) Methods in soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 214–215Google Scholar
  4. Allison LE (1975) Organic carbon. In: Black CA (ed) Methods of soil analysis: part 2. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 1367–1378Google Scholar
  5. Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24:1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. ASTM (2010) Laboratory determination of water (moisture) content of soil and rock by mass. In: D 2216—10. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  7. Atkinson CJ, Fitzgerald JD, Hipps NA (2010) Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant Soil 337:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Banon S, Ochoa J, Franco J, Alarcon J, Sánchez-Blanco MJ (2006) Hardening of oleander seedlings by deficit irrigation and low air humidity. Environ Exp Bot 56(1):36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baronti S, Vaccari F, Miglietta F, Calzolari C, Lugato E, Orlandini S, Pini R, Zulian C, Genesio L (2014) Impact of biochar application on plant water relations in Vitis vinifera (L.). Eur J Agron 53:38–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Basso AS, Miguez FE, Laird DA, Horton R, Westgate M (2013) Assessing potential of biochar for increasing water holding capacity of sandy soils. GCB Bioenergy 5(2):132–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bates L, Waldren R, Teare I (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39:205–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Batool A, Taj S, Rashid A, Khalid A, Qadeer S, Saleem AR, Ghufran MA (2015) Potential of soil amendments (biochar and gypsum) in increasing water use efficiency of Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench. Front Plant Sci 6:733CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Blackwell P, Riethmuller G, Collins M (2009) Biochar application to soil. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology, 2nd edn. Earthscan, London, pp 207–226Google Scholar
  14. Bower CA, Reitemeier RF, Fireman M (1952) Exchangeable cation analysis of saline and alkali soils. Soil Sci 73:251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS (1982) Nitrogen—total. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney RR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, part 2, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 595–624Google Scholar
  16. Changxun G, Zhiyong P, Shu’ang P (2016) Effect of biochar on the growth of Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf. seedlings in Gannan acidic red soil. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 62(2):194–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chapman HD, Pratt PF (1962) Methods of analysis for soils, plants and waters. Soil Sci 93(1):68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chatzopoulos F, Fugit JF, Ouillous L (2000) Etu deocation function do different parameters dolabsption et alla desorption do sodium retitule. Eur Polym J 36:51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cheng C-H, Lehmann J, Engelhard MH (2008) Natural oxidation of black carbon in soils: changes in molecular form and surface charge along a climosequence. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 72(6):1598–1610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chu TM, Aspinall D, Paleg L (1974) Stress metabolism. VI. Temperature stress and the accumulation of proline in barley and radish. Funct Plant Biol 1(1):87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clough T, Condron L, Kammann C, Müller C (2013) A review of biochar and soil nitrogen dynamics. Agron J 3:275–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cotrozzi L, Remorini D, Pellegrini E, Landi M, Massai R, Nali C, Guidi L, Lorenzini G (2016) Variations in physiological and biochemical traits of oak seedlings grown under drought and ozone stress. Physiol Plant 157(1):69–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Danish S, Ameer A, Qureshi TI, Younis U, Manzoor H, Shakeel A, Ehsanullah M (2014) Influence of biochar on growth and photosynthetic attributes of Triticum aestivum L. under half and full irrigation. Int J Biosci 5(7):101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Davis JG, Whiting D (2013) Gardening services, Colorado State University, US Department of Agriculture and Colorado Countries Cooperating. Fact sheet number 7: 235Google Scholar
  25. de Melo Carvalho M, de Holanda Nunes A, Madari B, Bastiaans L, Van Oort P, Heinemann A, Soler da Silva M, Petter F, Marimon B Jr, Meinke H (2014) Biochar increases plant-available water in a sandy loam soil under an aerobic rice crop system. Solid Earth 5(2):939–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. de Souza CR, Maroco JP, dos Santos TP, Rodrigues ML, Lopes C, Pereira JS, Chaves MM (2005) Control of stomatal aperture and carbon uptake by deficit irrigation in two grapevine cultivars. Agric Ecosyst Environ 106(2–3):261–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Deligöz A, Bayar E (2018) Drought stress responses of seedlings of two oak species (Quercus cerris and Quercus robur). Turk J Agric For 42(2):114–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Deligoz A, Gur M (2015) Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses to drought stress of Stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) seedlings. Acta Physiol Plant 37:243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dempster DN, Jones DL, Murphy DV (2012) Clay and biochar amendments decreased inorganic bout not dissolved organic nitrogen leaching in soil. Soil Res 50:216–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Din J, Khan S, Ali I, Gurmani A (2011) Physiological and agronomic response of canola varieties to drought stress. J Anim Plant Sci 21(1):78–82Google Scholar
  31. Ding Y, Liu Y, Liu S, Li Z, Tan X, Huang X, Zeng G, Zhou L, Zheng B (2016) Biochar to improve soil fertility. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 36(2):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Elfeel AA, Al-Namo ML (2011) Effect of imposed drought on seedlings growth, water use efficiency and survival of three arid zone species (Acacia tortilis subsp raddiana, Salvadora persica and Leptadenia pyrotechnica). Agric Biol J N Am 2(3):493–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Evans JR (1989) Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants. Oecologia 78(1):9–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Fallahi H-R, Taherpour R, Kalantari R, Aghhavani Shajar M, Soltanzadeh MG (2015) Effect of super absorbent polymer and irrigation deficit on water use efficiency, growth and yield of cotton. Not Sci Biol 7(3):338–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ferreira WN, CF de Lacerda, RC da Costa SM Filho (2015) Effect of water stress on seedling growth in two species with different abundances: the importance of Stress Resistance Syndrome in seasonally dry tropical forest. Acta Bot Bras 29(3):375–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Flexas J, Barón M, Bota J, Ducruet JM, Gallé A, Galmés J, Jiménez M, Pou A, Ribas-Carbó M, Sajnani C, Tomàs M, Medrano H (2009) Photosynthesis limitations during water stress acclimation and recovery in the drought-adapted Vitis hybrid Richter-110 (V. berlandieri × V. rupestris). J Exp Bot 60(8):2361–2377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Garau AM, Lemcoff JH, Ghersa CM, Beadle CL (2008) Water stress tolerance in Eucalyptus globulus Labill. subsp. Maidenii (F. Muell.) saplings induced by water restrictions imposed by weeds. For Ecol Manag 255:2811–2819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gardner CMK, Laryea KB, Unger PW (1999) Soil physical constraints to plant growth and crop production. FAO AGL/MISC/ 24/99. Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  39. Gebhardt M, Fehmi JS, Rasmussen C, Gallery RE (2017) Soil amendments alter plant biomass and soil microbial activity in a semi-desert grassland. Plant Soil 419(1–2):53–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ghanbary E, Tabari Kouchaksaraei M, Mirabolfathy M, Modarres Sanavi SAM, Rahaei M (2017) Growth and physiological responses of Quercus brantii seedlings inoculated with Biscogniauxia mediterranea and Obolarina persica under drought stress. For Pathol 47(5):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ghanbary E, Kouchaksaraei MT, Guidi L, Mirabolfathy M, Etemad V, Sanavi SAMM, Struve D (2018) Change in biochemical parameters of Persian oak (Quercus brantii Lindl.) seedlings inoculated by pathogens of charcoal disease under water deficit conditions. Trees 32(6):1595–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ghosh S (2012) An introduction to biochar and its potential as soil amendment. CUGE research technical note, urban greenery series RTN:01-2012Google Scholar
  43. Grant RF, Rochette P (1994) Soil microbial respiration at different temperatures and water potentials: theory and mathematical modelling. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:1681–1690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hafeez Y, Iqbal S, Jabeen K, Shahzad S, Jahan S, Rasul F (2017) Effect of biochar application on seed germination and seedling growth of Glycine max (L.) merr. under drought stress. Pak J Bot 49:7–13Google Scholar
  45. Haider G, Koyro HW, Azam F, Steffens D, Müller C, Kammann C (2015) Biochar but not humic acid product amendment affected maize yields via improving plant-soil moisture relations. Plant Soil 395:141–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hung SH, Yu CW, Lin CH (2005) Hydrogen peroxide functions as a stress signal in plants. Bot Bull Acad Sin 46:1–10Google Scholar
  47. Ibrahim HM, Al-Wabel MI, Usman AR, Al-Omran A (2013) Effect of Conocarpus biochar application on the hydraulic properties of a sandy loam soil. Soil Sci 178(4):165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. IPCC (2007) Intergovernmental panel on climate change: contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate changeGoogle Scholar
  49. Jafarnia S, Akbarinia M, Hosseinpour B, Modarres Sanavi SAM, Salami SA (2018) Effect of drought stress on some growth, morphological, physiological, and biochemical parameters of two different populations of Quercus brantii. I Forest 11:212–220Google Scholar
  50. Jassa RS, Black TA, Novak MD, Gaumont-Guay D, Nesic Z (2008) Effect of soil water stress on soil respiration and its temperature sensitivity in an 18-year-old temperate Douglas-fir stand. Glob Change Biol 14:1–14Google Scholar
  51. Jeffery S, Verheijen FG, van der Velde M, Bastos AC (2011) A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 144(1):175–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jones DL, Rousk J, Edwards JG, Deluca TH, Murphy DV (2012) Biochar-mediated changes in soil quality and plant growth in a three year field trial. Soil Biol Biochem 45:113–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kammann CI, Linsel S, Gößling JW, Koyro HW (2011) Influence of biochar on drought tolerance of Chenopodium quinoa Willd and on soil–plant relations. Plant Soil 345:195–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kannan V, Srinivasan G, Babu R, Thiyageshwari S, Sivakumar T (2017) Effect of biochar, mulch and PPFM spray on leaf relative water content, leaf proline, chlorophyll stability index and yield of cotton under moisture stress condition. Curr Microbiol 6(6):604–611Google Scholar
  55. Kanthle AK, Lenka NK, Lenka S, Tedia K (2016) Biochar impact on nitrate leaching as influenced by native soil organic carbon in an Inceptisol of central India. Soil Tillage Res 157:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Laird DA (2008) The charcoal vision: a win-win-win scenario for simultaneously producing bioenergy, permanently sequestering carbon, while improving soil and water quality. Agron J 100:178–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Laird DA, Fleming P, Wang B, Horton R, Karlen D (2010) Biochar impact on nutrient leaching from a midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158(3–4):436–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lawrinenko M (2014) Anion exchange capacity of biochar. Dissertations. University of Lowa State (USA)Google Scholar
  59. Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  60. Lehmann J, da Silva JP, Jr C, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zech W, Glaser B (2003) Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant Soil 249:343–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M (2006) Biochar sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems: a review. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 11:395–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota: a review. Soil Biol Biochem 43(9):1812–1836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Liang B, Lehmann J, Solomon D, Kinyangi J, Grossman J, O’neill B, Skjemstad J, Thies J, Luizao F, Petersen J (2006) Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70(5):1719–1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Licht J, Smith N (2017) The influence of lignocellulose and hemicellulose biochar on photosynthesis and water use efficiency in seedlings from a Northeastern U.S. pine-oak ecosystem. J Sustain For 37(1):25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lyu S, Du G, Liu Z, Zhao L, Lyu D (2016) Effects of biochar on photosystem function and activities of protective enzymes in Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim. under drought stress. Acta Physiol Plant 38:220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Major J, Rondon M, Molina D, Riha SJ, Lehmann J (2010) Maize yield and nutrition during 4 years after biochar application to a Colombian savanna oxisol. Plant Soil 333(1–2):117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mannan MA, Halder E, Karim MA, Ahmed JU (2016) Alleviation of adverse effect of drought stress on soybean (Glycine max. L.) by using poultry biochar. Bangladesh Agron 19(2):61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mao JD, Johnson RL, Lehmann J, Olk DC, Neves EG, Thompson ML, Schmidt-Rohr K (2012) Abundant and stable chat residues in soils: implications for soil fertility and carbon sequestration. Environ Sci Technol 46:9571–9576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Mensah AK, Frimpong KA (2018) Biochar and/or compost applications improve soil properties, growth, and yield of maize grown in acidic rainforest and coastal savannah soils in Ghana. Int J Environ Agric Res 2018:1–8Google Scholar
  70. Moles AT, Westoby M (2004) What do seedlings die from and what are the implications for evolution of seed size? Oikos 106:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Nazari H, Zardashti MR, Darvishzadeh R, Najafi S (2010) The effect of water stress and polymer on water use efficiency, yield and several morphological traits on sunflower. Not Sci Biol 2:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Niinemets U, Tenhunen JD (1997) A model separating leaf structural and physiological effects on carbon gain along light gradients for the shade-tolerant species Acer saccharum. Plant Cell Environ 20:845–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Niinemets U, Ellsworth DS, Lukjanova A, Tobias M (2001) Site fertility and the morphological and photosynthetic acclimation of Pinus sylvestris needles to light. Tree Physiol 21:1231–1244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Noman A, Ali S, Naheed F, Ali Q, Farid M, Rizwan M, Irshad MK (2015) Foliar application of ascorbate enhances the physiological and biochemical attributes of maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars under drought stress. Arch Agron Soil Sci 61:1659–1672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Novak JM, Busscher WJ, Laird DL, Ahmedna M, Watts DW, Niandou MA (2009) Impact of biochar amendment on fertility of a southeastern coastal plain soil. Soil Sci 174(2):105–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Oguchi R, Hikosaka K, Hirose T (2005) Leaf anatomy as a constraint for photosynthetic acclimation: differential responses in leaf anatomy to increasing growth irradiance among three deciduous trees. Plant Cell Environ 28:916–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ohashi M, Kume T, Yoshifuji N, Kho LK, Nakagawa M, Nakashizuka T (2014) The effects of an induced short-term drought period on the spatial variations in soil respiration measured around emergent trees in a typical Bornean tropical forest, Malaysia. Plant Soil 387:337–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ohsowski BM, Klironomos JN, Dunfield KE, Hart MM (2012) The potential of soil amendments for restoring severely disturbed grasslands. Appl Soil Ecol 60:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Olsen SR, Sommers LE (1982) Phosphorus. In: Al P, Miller RH, Keaney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 403–430Google Scholar
  80. Orchard VA, Cook FJ (1983) Relationship between soil respiration and soil moisture. Soil Biol Biochem 15:447–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Pandian K, Subramaniayan P, Gnasekaran P, Chitraputhirapillai S (2016) Effect of biochar amendment on soil physical, chemical and biological properties and groundnut yield in rainfed Alfisol of semi-arid tropics. Arch Agron Soil Sci 62(9):1293–1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pandit NR, Mulder J, Hale SE, Martinsen V, Schmidt HP, Cornelissen G (2018) Biochar improves maize growth by alleviation of nutrient stress in a moderately acidic low-input Nepalese soil. Sci Total Environ 625:1380–1389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Paneque M, José M, Franco-Navarro JD, Colmenero-Flores JM, Knicker H (2016) Effect of biochar amendment on morphology, productivity and water relations of sunflower plants under non-irrigation conditions. CATENA 147:280–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Parad GA, Zarafshar M, Striker GG, Sattarian A (2013) Some physiological and morphological responses of Pyrus boissieriana to flooding. Trees Struct Funct 27(5):1387–1393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Parad GA, Tabari Kouchaksaraei M, Striker GG, Sadati SE, Nourmohammadi K (2015) Growth, morphology and gas exchange responses of two-year-old Quercus Castaneifolia seedlings to flooding stress. Scand J For Res 31(5):458–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Pereira RG, Heinemann AB, Madari BE, Carvalho MTM, Kliemann HJ, dos Santos AP (2012) Transpiration response of upland rice to water deficit changed by different levels of eucalyptus biochar. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 47:716–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Plaster EJ (1985) Soil science and management. Delmar, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  88. Polat EM, Demir KH, Onus NA (2004) Use of natural zeolite (clinoptilolite) in agriculture. J Fruit Ornam Plant Res 12:183–189Google Scholar
  89. Rajapaksha AU, Chen SS, Tsang DC, Zhang M, Vithanage M, Mandal S, Gao B, Bolan NS, Ok YS (2016) Engineered/designer biochar for contaminant removal/immobilization from soil and water: potential and implication of biochar modification. Chemosphere 148:276–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Rath KM, Rousk J (2015) Salt effects on the soil microbial decomposer community and their role in organic carbon cycling: a review. Soil Biol Biochem 8:108–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rezaei Rashti M, Esfandbod M, Phillips IR, Chen C (2019) Biochar amendment and water stress alter rhizosphere carbon and nitrogen budgets in bauxite-processing residue sand under rehabilitation. J Environ Manag 230:446–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Sagheb Talebi K, Sajedi T, Pourhashemi M (2014) Forests of Iran. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Seehausen ML, Gale NV, Dranga S, Hudson V, Liu N, Michener J, Thurston E, Williams C, Smith SM, Thomas SC (2017) Is there a positive synergistic effect of biochar and compost soil amendments on plant growth and physiological performance? Agron J 7(13):1–15Google Scholar
  94. Shao HB, Liang ZS, Shao MA (2005) Investigation on dynamic changes of photosynthetic characteristics of 10 wheat (Triticum aestivum) genotypes during two vegetative-growth stages at water deficit. Colloids Surf B 43(3–4):221–227Google Scholar
  95. Siddiqui MH, Al-Khaishany MY, Al-Qutami MA, Al-Whaibi MH, Grover A, Ali HM, Al-Wahibi MS, Bukhari NA (2015) Response of different genotypes of faba bean plant to drought stress. Int J Mol Sci 16:10214–10227CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  96. Silberbush M, Adar E, De Malach Y (1993) Use of a hydrophilic polymer to improve water storage and availability to crops grown in sand dunes. I. Corn irrigated by trickling. Agric Water Manag 23:303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Slavich PG, Sinclair K, Morris SG, Kimber SWL, Downie A, Van Zwieten L (2013) Contrasting effects of manure and green waste biochars on the properties of an acidic ferralsol and productivity of a subtropical pasture. Plant Soil 366(1–2):213–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Sohi SP, Krull E, Lopez-Capel E, Bol R (2010) A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. Adv Agron J 105:47–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Suliman W, Harsh JB, Abu-Lail NI, Fortun AM, Dallmeyer I, Garcia-Pérez M (2017) The role of biochar porosity and surface functionality in augmenting hydrologic properties of a sandy soil. Sci Total Environ 574:139–147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Szabados L, Savoure A (2010) Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Sci 15:89–97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Tahir S, Gul S, Aslam Ghori S, Sohail M, Batool S, Jamil N, Naeem Shahwani M, Rehman Butt M (2018) Biochar influences growth performance and heavy metal accumulation in spinach under wastewater irrigation. Soil Crop Sci 4:1–12Google Scholar
  102. Talbi S, Romero-Puertas MC, Hernandez A, Terron L, Ferchichi A, Sandalio LM (2015) Drought tolerance in a Saharian plant Oudneya africana: role of antioxidant defences. Environ Exp Bot 111:114–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Tayyab M, Islam W, Khalil F, Ziqin P, Caifang Z, Arafat Y, Hui L, Rizwan M, Ahmad K, Waheed S (2018) Biochar: an efficient way to manage low water availability in plants. Appl Ecol Environ Res 16:2565–2583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Thies JE, Rillig M (2009) Characteristics of biochar: biological properties. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 85–105Google Scholar
  105. Thomas SC, Frye S, Gale N, Garmon M, Launchbury R, Machado N, Melamed S, Murray J, Petroff A, Winsborough C (2013) Biochar mitigates negative effects of salt additions on two herbaceous plant species. J Environ Econ Manag 129:62–68Google Scholar
  106. Tian X, Li C, Zhang M, Wan Y, Xie Z, Chen B, Li W (2018) Biochar derived from corn straw affected availability and distribution of soil nutrients and cotton yield. PLoS ONE 13(1):e0189924CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  107. Tom-Dery D, Abdul-Rafiq M, Asante WJ, Issifu H, Ochire-Boadu K (2015) Effect of Albizia lebbeck pods used as soil amendment on growth of Solanum Aethiopicum (Garden eggs). UDSIJD 2(1):12–19Google Scholar
  108. Uzoma K, Inoue M, Andry H, Zahoor A, Nishihara E (2011) Influence of biochar application on sandy soil hydraulic properties and nutrient retention. JFAE 9(3–4):1137–1143Google Scholar
  109. Vassilev N, Martos E, Mendes G, Martos V, Vassileva M (2013) Biochar of animal origin: a sustainable solution to the global problem of high-grade rock phosphate scarcity? J Sci Food Agric 93:1799–1804CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Velikova V, Yordanov I, Edreva A (2000) Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants: protective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Sci 151(1):59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Ventura M, Zhang C, Baldi E, Fornasier F, Sorrenti G, Panzacchi P, Tonon G (2014) Effect of biochar addition on soil respiration partitioning and root dynamics in an apple orchard. Eur J Soil Sci 65(1):186–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Walinga I, Van der Lee JJ, Houba VJG, Van Vark W, Novozamsky I (1995) Soil and plant analysis. Wageningen Agriculture University, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  113. Walter R, Rao BKR (2015) Biochars influence sweet-potato yield and nutrient uptake in tropical Papua New Guinea. J Plant Nut Soil Sci 178(3):393–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Wang T, Camps-Arbestain M, Hedley M, Bishop P (2012) Predicting phosphorus bioavailability from high-ash biochars. Plant Soil 357:173–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Wang L, Sun X, Li S, Zhang T, Zhang W, Zhai P (2014) Application of organic amendments to a coastal saline soil in north China: effects on soil physical and chemical properties and tree growth. PLoS ONE 9(2):e89185CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  116. Wu M, Zhang W, Ma C, Zhou J (2013) Changes in morphological, physiological, and biochemical responses to different levels of drought stress in Chinese cork oak (Quercus variabilis Bl.) seedlings. Russ J Plant Physiol 60(5):681–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Xu C-Y, Hosseini-Bai S, Hao Y, Rachaputi RC, Wang H, Xu Z, Wallace H (2015) Effect of biochar amendment on yield and photosynthesis of peanut on two types of soils. Environ Sci Pollut R 22(8):6112–6125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Yao Y, Gao B, Zhang M, Inyang M, Zimmerman AR (2012) Effect of biochar amendment on sorption and leaching of nitrate, ammonium, and phosphate in a sandy soil. Chemosphere 89:1467–1471CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Zarehaghi D, Neyshabouri MR, Sadeghzadeh Reyhan ME, Hassanpour R (2015) Effect of pumice on water holding capacity in soil, growth and yield of spring Safflower in dry land conditions. EJSMS 5(3):192–204Google Scholar
  120. Zarik L, Meddich A, Hijri M, Hafidi M, Ouhammou A, Ouahmane L, Duponnois R, Boumezzough A (2016) Use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to improve the drought tolerance of Cupressus atlantica G. C R Biol 339:185–196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Zhu QH, Peng X-H, Huang T, Xie ZB, Holden NM (2014) Effect of biochar addition on maize growth and nitrogen use efficiency in acidic red soils. Pedosphere 24(6):699–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Natural Resources and Marine SciencesTarbiat Modares UniversityNoorIran
  2. 2.Department of Agriculture, Food and EnvironmentUniversity of PisaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations