Advertisement

European Journal of Forest Research

, Volume 137, Issue 2, pp 223–235 | Cite as

Effects of foliage and traffic intensity on runoff and sediment in skid trails after trafficking in a deciduous forest

  • Meghdad Jourgholami
  • Kiomars Fathi
  • Eric R. Labelle
Original Paper

Abstract

After ground-based skidding operations, soil particles are rearranged closer together resulting in increased bulk density, reduced total porosity, and decreased infiltration capacity. The aim of the present study was to assess and quantify runoff and sediment in both leafed and leafless periods (foliage) over a 1-year duration following three levels of skidder traffic intensity (low, medium, high) performed in the Hyrcanian forests, Iran. By increasing traffic frequency, soil bulk density increased significantly, whereas total porosity decreased as compared to undisturbed (control) plots. After trafficking, runoff and sediment yield were significantly affected by foliage and traffic frequency. Regardless of foliage, mean total runoff and sediment increased with increasing traffic frequency performed on the skid trail. Mean runoff in the low, medium, and high traffic plots in the leafless period were 95.5, 54.2, and 21.7% higher than the values of runoff in the leafed period, respectively. Mean sediment yield in the low, medium, and high traffic plots in the leafless period was 7.1, 5.1, and 3.3 times higher than the values of sediment in the leafed period, respectively. Based on regression analysis, the runoff and sediment response to rainfall for the control plots and three traffic intensity classes were linear and statistically significant for both leafless and leafed periods. The total runoff in the high traffic intensity plot was 239.8 mm (62%) during the leafless period, and 38% of total runoff (148 mm) occurred during the leafed period. The sediment response to runoff over both leafless and leafed periods at all the traffic intensity classes and control plots were significantly linear. Restricting ground-based skidding operations to trail segments where the machine traffic is less than 4 (low)—9 (medium) traffic cycles can be effective to reduce runoff and sediment over compacted soil after machine-induced traffic.

Keywords

Machine traffic Forest soils Runoff plot Leafless period Leafed period Mixed forest 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the assistance of Mr. Jaafar Fathi, Forest Engineer, Kheyrud Forest Research Station, Nowshahr, and the field crew from the Kheyrud Forest Research Station, Mr. Asghar Ghomi. We thank two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments to improve the manuscript. Funding was provided by University College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Tehran (Grant No. 28514).

References

  1. Ampoorter E, Goris R, Cornelis WM, Verheyen K (2007) Impact of mechanized logging on compaction status of sandy forest soils. For Ecol Manage 241:162–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ampoorter E, Schrijver A, Nevel L, Hermy M, Verheyen K (2012) Impact of mechanized harvesting on compaction of sandy and clayey forest soils: results of a meta-analysis. Ann For Sci 69:533–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ares A, Terry TA, Miller RE, Anderson HW, Flaming BL (2005) Ground-based forest harvesting effects on soil physical properties and douglas-fir growth. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1822–1832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown AE, Zhang L, McMahon TA, Western AW, Vertessy RA (2005) A review of paired catchment studies for determining changes in water yield resulting from alterations in vegetation. J Hydrol 310:28–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cambi M, Certini G, Neri F, Marchi E (2015) The impact of heavy traffic on forest soils: a review. For Ecol Manage 338:124–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cambi M, Paffetti D, Vettori C, Picchio R, Venanzi R, Marchi E (2017) Assessment of the impact of forest harvesting operations on the physical parameters and microbiological components on a Mediterranean sandy soil in an Italian stone pine stand. Eur J For Res 136:205–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cristan R, Aust WM, Bolding MC, Barrett SM, Munsell JF, Schilling E (2016) Effectiveness of forestry best management practices in the United States: literature review. For Ecol Manage 360:133–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dung BX, Gomi T, Miyata S, Sidle RC, Kosugi K, Onda Y (2012) Runoff responses to forest thinning at plot and catchment scales in a headwater catchment draining Japanese cypress forest. J Hydrol 444–445:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ebeling C, Lang F, Gaertig T (2016) Structural recovery in three selected forest soils after compaction by forest machines in Lower Saxony, Germany. For Ecol Manage 359:74–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eliasson L (2005) Effects of forwarder tire pressure on rut formation and soil compaction. Silva Fenn 39:549–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Etehadi Abari M, Majnounian B, Malekian A, Jourgholami M (2017) Effects of forest harvesting on runoff and sediment characteristics in the Hyrcanian forests, northern Iran. Eur J Forest Res 136:375–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fernandez C, Vega JA (2016) Effects of mulching and post-fire salvage logging on soil erosion and vegetative regrowth in NW Spain. For Ecol Manage 375:46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fernandez C, Vega JA, Gras JM, Fonturbel T, Cuiñas P, Dambrine E, Alonso M (2004) Soil erosion after Eucalyptus globulus clear cutting: differences between logging slash disposal treatments. For Ecol Manage 195:85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle-size analysis. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis, Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 383–411Google Scholar
  15. Gökbulak F, Şengönül K, Serengil Y, Özhan S, Yurtseven I, Uygur B, Özçelik MS (2016) Effect of forest thinning on water yield in a sub-humid Mediterranean oak-beech mixed forested watershed. Water Resour Manage 30:5039–5049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grace JM, Skaggs RW, Cassel DK (2006) Soil physical changes associated with forest harvesting operations on an organic. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:503–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grushecky ST, Spong BD, McGill DW, Edwards JW (2009) Reducing sediments from skid roads in West Virginia using fiber mats. North J Appl For 26(3):118–121Google Scholar
  18. Hartanto H, Prabhu R, Widayat SE, Asdak C (2003) Factors affecting runoff and soil erosion: plot-level soil loss monitoring for assessing sustainability of forest management. For Ecol Manage 180:361–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holz DJ, Williard KWJ, Edwards PJ, Schoonover JE (2015) Soil erosion in humid regions: a review. J Contemp Water Res Educ 154:48–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Horn R, Vossbrink J, Becker S (2004) Modern forestry vehicles and their impacts on soil physical properties. Soil Till Res 79:207–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ide J, Finér L, Laurén A, Piirainen S, Launiainen S (2013) Effects of clear-cutting on annual and seasonal runoff from a boreal forest catchment in eastern Finland. For Ecol Manage 304:482–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jourgholami M, Etehadi Abari M (2017) Effectiveness of sawdust and straw mulching on postharvest runoff and soil erosion of a skid trail in a mixed forest. Eco Eng 109:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jourgholami M, Majnounian B, Etehadi Abari M (2014a) Effects of tree-length timber skidding on soil compaction in the skid trail in Hyrcanian forests. For Syst 23:288–293Google Scholar
  24. Jourgholami M, Soltanpour S, Etehadi Abari M, Zenner EK (2014b) Influence of slope on physical soil disturbance due to farm tractor forwarding in a Hyrcanian forest of northern Iran. iForest 7:342–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kolkaa RK, Smidt MF (2004) Effects of forest road amelioration techniques on soil bulk density, surface runoff, sediment transport, soil moisture and seedling growth. For Ecol Manage 202:313–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kozlowski TT (1999) Soil compaction and growth of woody plants. Scand J For Res 14:596–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Labelle ER, Jaeger D (2011) Soil compaction caused by cut-to-length forest operations and possible short-term natural rehabilitation of soil density. Soil Sci Soc Am J 75:2314–2329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Labelle ER, Jaeger D (2012) Quantifying the use of brush mats in reducing forwarder peak loads and surface contact pressures. Croat J For Eng 33(2):249–274Google Scholar
  29. Malvar MC, Silva FC, Prats SA, Vieira DCS, Coelho COA, Keizer JJ (2017) Short-term effects of post-fire salvage logging on runoff and soil erosion. For Ecol Manage 400:555–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McIver JD, McNeil R (2006) Soil disturbance and hill-slope sediment transport after logging of a severely burned site in northeastern Oregon. West J Appl For 21:123–133Google Scholar
  31. Moore RD, Wondzell SM (2005) Physical hydrology and the effects of forest harvesting in the Pacific Northwest: a review. J Am Water Resour Assoc 41(4):763–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Prats SA, Wagenbrenner J, Malvar MC, Martins MAS, Keizer JJ (2016a) Mid-term and scaling effects of forest residue mulching on post-fire runoff and soil erosion. Sci Total Environ 573:1242–1254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Prats SA, Wagenbrenner J, Martins MAS, Malvar MC, Keizer JJ (2016b) Hydrologic implications of post-fire mulching across different spatial scales. Land Degrad Dev 27:1440–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Prosser IP, Williams L (1998) The effect of wildfire on runoff and erosion in native Eucalyptus forest. Hydrol Process 12:251–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rab MA (2004) Recovery of soil physical properties from compaction and soil profile disturbance caused by logging of native forest in Victorian central highlands, Australia. For Ecol Manage 191:329–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rab MA, Bradshaw FJ, Campbell RG, Murphy S (2005) Review of factors affecting disturbance, compaction and trafficability of soils with particular reference to timber harvesting in the forests of south-west Western Australia, Consultants Report to Department of Conservation and Land Management, Western Australia, Sustainable Forest Management Series, SFM Technical Report No. 2, p 146Google Scholar
  37. Robichaud PR, Waldrop TA (1994) A comparison of surface runoff and sediment yields from low-and high- severity site preparation burns. J Am Water Resour Assoc 30:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. St Louis VL, Rudd JW, Kelly CA, Hall BD, Rolfhus KR, Scott KJ, Lindberg SE, Dong W (2001) Importance of the forest canopy to fluxes of methyl mercury and total mercury to boreal ecosystems. Environ Sci Technol 35:3089–3098CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Stednick JD (2008) Hydrological and biological responses to forest practices: the Alsea Watershed Study. Springer, New York, p 316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stuart GW, Edwards PJ (2006) Concepts about forests and water. North J Appl For 23:11–19Google Scholar
  41. Wade CR, Bolding MC, Aust WM, Lakel WA (2012) Comparison of five erosion control techniques for bladed skid trails in Virginia. South J Appl For 36:191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wagenbrenner JW, Robichaud PR (2014) Post-fire bedload sediment delivery across spatial scales in the interior western US. Earth Surf Proc Land 39:865–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wagenbrenner JW, MacDonald LH, Coats RN, Robichaud PR, Brown RE (2015) Effects of post-fire salvage logging and a skid trail treatment on ground cover, soils, and sediment production in the interior western United States. For Ecol Manage 335:176–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wagenbrenner JW, Robichaud PR, Brown RE (2016) Rill erosion in burned and salvage logged western montane forests: effects of logging equipment type, traffic level, and slash treatment. J Hydrol 541:889–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Webb AA, Dragovich D, Jamshidi R (2012) Temporary increases in suspended sediment yields following selective eucalypt forest harvesting. For Ecol Manage 283:96–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forestry and Forest Economics, Faculty of Natural ResourcesUniversity of TehranKarajIran
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Ecosystem ManagementTechnische Universität MünchenFreisingGermany

Personalised recommendations