Advertisement

European Journal of Forest Research

, Volume 133, Issue 5, pp 879–894 | Cite as

Hydrology-oriented (adaptive) silviculture in a semiarid pine plantation: How much can be modified the water cycle through forest management?

  • Antonio D. del Campo
  • Tarcísio J. G. Fernandes
  • Antonio J. Molina
Original Paper

Abstract

Hydrology-oriented silviculture might adapt Mediterranean forests to climatic changes, although its implementation demands a better understanding and quantification on the water fluxes. The influence of thinning intensity (high, medium, low and a control) and its effect on the mid-term (thinned plots in 1998 and 2008) on the water cycle (transpiration, soil water and interception) and growth [basal area increment (BAI)] were investigated in 55-year-old Aleppo pine trees. Thinning enhanced a lower dependence of growth on climate fluctuations. The high-intensity treatment showed significant increases in the mean annual BAI (from 4.1 to 17.3 cm2) that was maintained in the mid-term. Thinning intensity progressively increased the sap flow velocity (v s) in all cases with respect to the control. In the mid-term, an increased functionality of the inner sapwood was also observed. Mean daily tree water use ranged from 5 (control) to 18 (high intensity) l tree−1. However, when expressed on an area basis, daily transpiration ranged from 0.18 (medium) to 0.30 mm (control), meaning that in spite of the higher transpiration rates in the remaining trees, stand transpiration was reduced with thinning. Deep infiltration of water was also enhanced with thinning (about 30 % of rainfall) and did not compete with transpiration, as both presented opposite seasonal patterns. The changes in the stand water relationships after 10 years were well explained by the forest cover metric. The blue to green water ratio changed from 0.15 in the control to 0.72 in the high-intensity treatment, with the remaining treatments in the 0.34–0.48 range.

Keywords

Blue–green water Dendrochronology Forest hydrology Pinus halepensis Transpiration 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study is a component of two research projects: “CGL2011-28776-C02-02, Hydrological characterisation of forest structures at plot scale for an adaptive management, HYDROSIL”, funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and FEDER funds, and “Determination of hydrological and forest recovery factors in Mediterranean forests and their social perception”, led by Dr. E. Rojas and supported by the Ministry of Environment, Rural and Marine Affairs. The authors are grateful to the Valencia Regional Government (CMAAUV, Generalitat Valenciana) and the VAERSA staff for their support in allowing the use of the La Hunde experimental forest and for their assistance in carrying out the fieldwork. The second author thanks the Mundus 17 Program, coordinated by the University of Porto—Portugal.

Supplementary material

10342_2014_805_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (36 kb)
Supplementary material Fig. 1 Mean and standard deviation values of tree stemflow (l) and rainfall (mm) in the different spells studied for this variable. (PDF 35 kb)
10342_2014_805_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (85 kb)
Supplementary material Fig. 2 Mean daily values of sap flow velocity (cm h-1) as a function of the mean daily values of VPD (KPa) for each treatment (PDF 85 kb)
10342_2014_805_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (38 kb)
Supplementary material Fig. 3 Relationship between the blue to green water ratio (B/G) and forest cover (proportion). N= 5. The model was statistically significant at p-value<0.01. (PDF 37 kb)

References

  1. Andréassian V (2004) Waters and forests: from historical controversy to scientific debate. J Hydrol 291:1–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aussenac G (2000) Interactions between forest stands and microclimate: ecophysiological aspects and consequences for silviculture. Ann For Sci 57:287–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aussenac G, Granier A (1988) Effects of thinning on water stress and growth in Douglas-fir. Can J For Res 18:100–105. doi: 10.1139/x88-015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belmonte Serrato F (1997) Interceptación en bosque y matorral mediterráneo semiárido: Balance hídrico y distribución espacial de la lluvia neta. Doctoral Thesis, Universidad de MurciaGoogle Scholar
  5. Birot Y, Gracia C (2011) The hydrologic cycle at a glance: blue and green water. In: Birot Y, Gracia C, Palahi M (eds) Water for forests and people in the mediterranean region: a challenging balance. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, pp 17–21Google Scholar
  6. Bunn AG (2008) A dendrochronology program library in R (dplR). Dendrochronologia 26:115–124. doi: 10.1016/j.dendro.2008.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burgess SSO, Adams MA, Turner NC, Beverly CR, Ong CK, Khan AAH, Bleby TM (2001) An improved heat pulse method to measure low and reverse rates of sap flow in woody plants. Tree Physiol 21:589–598. doi: 10.1093/treephys/21.9.589 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen Y, Cohen S, Cantuarias-Aviles T, Schiller G (2008) Variations in the radial gradient of sap velocity in trunks of forest and fruit trees. Plant Soil 305:49–59. doi: 10.1007/s11104-007-9351-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Condés S, Sterba H (2008) Comparing an individual tree growth model for Pinus halepensis Mill. in the Spanish region of Murcia with yield tables gained from the same area. Eur J For Res 127:253–261. doi: 10.1007/s10342-007-0201-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cook ER, Briffa KR (1990) A comparison of some tree-ring standardization methods. In: Cook ER, Kairiukstis LA (eds) Methods of dendrochronology: applications in the environmental science. Springer, Kluwer, pp 104–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Core Team R (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  12. De Luis M, Novak K, Čufar K, Raventós J (2009) Size mediated climate–growth relationships in Pinus halepensis and Pinus pinea. Trees 23:1065–1073. doi: 10.1007/s00468-009-0349-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Del Campo AD (2013) Research resource review: revisiting experimental catchment studies in forest hydrology: proceedings of a workshop held during the XXV IUGG General Assembly in Melbourne, Australia. Prog Phys Geogr 37:147–149. doi: 10.1177/0309133312465252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Delzon S, Loustau D (2005) Age-related decline in stand water use: sap flow and transpiration in a pine forest chronosequence. Agric For Meteorol 129:105–119. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Delzon S, Sartore M, Granier A, Loustau D (2004) Radial profiles of sap flow with increasing tree size in maritime pine. Tree Physiol 24:1285–1293. doi: 10.1093/treephys/24.11.1285 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Devitt DA, Smith SD (2002) Root channel macropores enhance downward movement of water in a Mojave Desert ecosystem. J Arid Environ 50:99–108. doi: 10.1006/jare.2001.0853 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Falkenmark M (2003) Freshwater as shared between society and ecosystems: from divided approaches to integrated challenges. Philos Trans R Soc B 358:2037–2049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. FAO (2010) Global forest resources assessment 2010: main report. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  19. Fitzgerald J, Jacobsen JB, Blennow K, Thorsen BJ, Lindner M (2013) Climate change in European forests: how to adapt. European Forest Institute, JoensuuGoogle Scholar
  20. Fritts H (1976) Tree rings and climate. Elsevier Science, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Ganatsios HP, Tsioras PA, Pavlidis T (2010) Water yield changes as a result of silvicultural treatments in an oak ecosystem. For Ecol Manag 260:1367–1374. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Giuggiola A, Bugmann H, Zingg A, Dobbertin M, Rigling A (2013) Reduction of stand density increases drought resistance in xeric Scots pine forests. For Ecol Manag 310:827–835. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.09.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Granier A (1987) Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas-fir stand by means of sap flow measurements. Tree Physiol 3:309–320. doi: 10.1093/treephys/3.4.309 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hatton TJ, Catchpole EA, Vertessy RA (1990) Integration of sapflow velocity to estimate plant water use. Tree Physiol 6:201–209. doi: 10.1093/treephys/6.2.201 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hernandez-Santana V, Asbjornsen H, Sauer T, Isenhart T, Schilling K, Schultz R (2011) Enhanced transpiration by riparian buffer trees in response to advection in a humid temperature agricultural landscape. For Ecol Manag 261:1415–1427. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.01.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holmes RL (1983) Computer-assisted quality control in tree-ring dating and measurement. Tree Ring Bull 43:51–67Google Scholar
  27. Klein T, Shpringer I, Fikler B, Elbaz G, Cohen S, Yakir D (2013) Relationships between stomatal regulation, water-use, and water-use efficiency of two coexisting key Mediterranean tree species. For Ecol Manag 302:34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.03.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Linares JC, Delgado-Huertas A, Carreira JA (2011) Climatic trends and different drought adaptive capacity and vulnerability in a mixed Abies pinsapoPinus halepensis forest. Clim Change 105:67–90. doi: 10.1007/s10584-010-9878-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lindner M, Maroschek M, Netherer S, Kremer A, Barbati A, Garcia-Gonzalo J, Seidi R, Delzon S, Corona P, Kolström M, Lexer MJ, Marchetti M (2010) Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems. For Ecol Manag 259:698–709. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maestre F, Cortina J (2004) Are Pinus halepensis plantations useful as a restoration tool in semiarid Mediterranean areas? For Ecol Manag 198:303–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Major J (1951) A functional, factorial approach to plant ecology. Ecology 32:392–412. doi: 10.2307/1931718 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martínez-Vilalta J, Piñol J, Beven K (2002) A hydraulic model to predict drought-induced mortality in woody plants: an application to climate change in the Mediterranean. Ecol Model 155:127–147. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00025-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Medhurst JL, Battaglia M, Beadle CL (2002) Measured and predicted changes in tree and stand water use following high-intensity thinning of an 8-year-old Eucalyptus nitens plantation. Tree Physiol 22:775–784. doi: 10.1093/treephys/22.11.775 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meko D, Stockton CW, Boggess WR (1995) The tree-ring record of severe sustained drought. J Am Water Resour Assoc 31:789–801. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1995.tb03401.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mérian P, Pierrat J-C, Lebourgeois F (2013) Effect of sampling effort on the regional chronology statistics and climate–growth relationships estimation. Dendrochronologia 31:58–67. doi: 10.1016/j.dendro.2012.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Molina AJ, del Campo AD (2012) The effects of experimental thinning on throughfall and stemflow: a contribution towards hydrology-oriented silviculture in Aleppo pine plantations. For Ecol Manag 269:206–213. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.12.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Montero G, Cañellas I, Ruíz-Peinado R (2001) Growth and yield models for Pinus halepensis Mill. Rev Investig Agrar Sist Recur For 10:179–201Google Scholar
  38. Morikawa Y, Hattori S, Kiyono Y (1986) Transpiration of a 31-year-old Chamaecyparis obtusa Endl. stand before and after thinning. Tree Physiol 2:105–114. doi: 10.1093/treephys/2.1-2-3.105 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. O’Grady AP, Eamus D, Hutley LB (1999) Transpiration increases during the dry season: patterns of tree water use in eucalypt open-forests of northern Australia. Tree Physiol 19:591–597. doi: 10.1093/treephys/19.9.591 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pereira FL, Gash JHC, David JS, Valente F (2009) Evaporation of intercepted rainfall from isolated evergreen oak trees: do the crowns behave as wet bulbs? Agric For Meteorol 149:667–679. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.10.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Persson HA (2012) The high input of soil organic matter from dead tree fine roots into the forest soil. Int J For Res 2012:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2012/217402 Google Scholar
  42. Planchon O, Dubreuil V, Bernard V, Blain S (2008) Contribution of tree-ring analysis to the study of droughts in northwestern France (XIX–XXth century). Clim Past Discuss 4:249–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Raventós J, De Luís M, Gras MJ, Cufar K, Gonzalez-Hidalgo JC, Bonet A, Sanchez JR (2001) Growth of Pinus pinea and Pinus halepensis as affected by dryness, marine spray and land use changes in a Mediterranean semiarid ecosystem. Dendrochronologia 19:211–220Google Scholar
  44. Rutter AJ (1963) Studies in the water relations of Pinus Sylvestris in plantation conditions I. Measurements of rainfall and interception. J Ecol 51:191–203. doi: 10.2307/2257513 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sánchez-Salguero R, Navarro RM, Camarero JJ, Fernández-Cancio Á (2010) Drought-induced growth decline of Aleppo and maritime pine forests in south-eastern Spain. For Syst 19:458–470Google Scholar
  46. Sarris D, Christodoulakis D, Körner C (2007) Recent decline in precipitation and tree growth in the eastern Mediterranean. Glob Change Biol 13:1187–1200. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01348.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sarris D, Christodoulakis D, Körner C (2011) Impact of recent climatic change on growth of low elevation eastern Mediterranean forest trees. Clim Change 106:203–223. doi: 10.1007/s10584-010-9901-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schiller G, Cohen Y (1998) Water balance of Pinus halepensis Mill. afforestation in an arid region. For Ecol Manag 105:121–128. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00283-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shelburne VB, Hedden RL (1996) Effect of stem height, dominance class, and site quality on sapwood permeability in loblolly pine, (Pinus taeda L.). For Ecol Manag 83:163–169. doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(96)03727-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1989) Bioestadística: principios y procedimientos. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Ungar ED, Rotenberg E, Raz-Yaseef N, Cohen S, Yakir D, Schiller G (2013) Transpiration and annual water balance of Aleppo pine in a semiarid region: implications for forest management. For Ecol Manag 298:39–51. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Webb AA, Bonell M, Bre L, Lane PNJ, McGuire D, Neary DG, Nettles J, Scott DF, Stednick JD, Wang Y (eds) (2012) Revisiting experimental catchment studies in forest hydrology. Proceedings of a workshop held during the XXV IUGG General Assembly in Melbourne, Australia, June-July 2011, vol 353. IAHS Publication, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  53. White D, Beadle C, Worledge D, Honeysett J, Cherry M (1998) The influence of drought on the relationship between leaf and conducting sapwood area in Eucalyptus globulus and Eucalyptus nitens. Trees 12:406–414. doi: 10.1007/PL00009724 Google Scholar
  54. Williams DG, Cable W, Hultine K, Hoedjes JCB, Yepez EA, Simonneaux V, Er-Raki S, Boulet G, Bruin HAR, Chehbouni A, Hartogensis OK, Timouk F (2004) Evapotranspiration components determined by stable isotopes, sap flow and eddy covariance techniques. Agric For Meteorol 125:241–258. doi: 10.1016/j.agroformet.2004.04.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio D. del Campo
    • 1
  • Tarcísio J. G. Fernandes
    • 1
    • 2
  • Antonio J. Molina
    • 3
  1. 1.Research Group in Forest Science and Technology (Re-ForeST)Universitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain
  2. 2.Center of Science Biology and NatureFederal University of AcreRio BrancoBrazil
  3. 3.Research and Technology Food and Agriculture (IRTA)Caldes de MontbuiSpain

Personalised recommendations