Advertisement

European Journal of Forest Research

, Volume 133, Issue 2, pp 247–260 | Cite as

Different reactions of central and marginal provenances of Fagus sylvatica to experimental drought

  • Daniel ThielEmail author
  • Juergen Kreyling
  • Sabrina Backhaus
  • Carl Beierkuhnlein
  • Constanze Buhk
  • Kolja Egen
  • Gerhard Huber
  • Monika Konnert
  • Laura Nagy
  • Anke Jentsch
Original Paper

Abstract

Climate extremes are expected to increase in frequency and magnitude as a consequence of global warming, threatening the functioning, services and goods of forest ecosystems. Across Europe, the ecologically and economically important tree species Fagus sylvatica is expected to suffer particularly under such conditions. The regional introduction of provenances from drier and warmer climates is one option to adapt beech forest ecosystems to these adverse effects of climate change. Marginal populations from the drought-prone southern and north-eastern edges of the species’ distribution come into focus in search of suitable candidates for Central European deciduous forests. Here, we test three marginal provenances (Spain, Bulgaria and Poland) and three provenances from the centre of the distribution range (Germany) for their response to drought in two different soil types (sand, loam) in a full factorial common garden experiment in Landau, Germany. Drought impacted all growth parameters negatively (leaf damage +22 % (percentage points), height −40 % and diameter increment −41 %), and the sandy substrate exacerbated this effect. However, provenances differed in their response to drought and soil type. Evidence for a local adaptation to summer drought was detected, especially in terms of mortality rates. The Bulgarian and Spanish provenance showed a stable performance under drought conditions (BG −27 % in diameter increment; ES −32 %), compared to the Polish (−48 %) or the most sensitive German provenances (−57 %), yet for Bulgaria on a low level of total increment. This may indicate a trade-off between drought tolerance and growth. Therefore, a sole focus on drought-resistant marginal provenances seems to not be conducive, as they might be less adapted to other climatic factors, e.g. frost, as well. However, intermixed with local Central European provenances, these may act as functional insurance in future drought-prone forest stands.

Keywords

Extreme events Local adaptation Phenotypic plasticity Plant–climate interactions Provenance trial Within-species diversity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the “Bavarian Climate Programme 2020” in the joint research centre “FORKAST” and the Bavarian State Ministry of the Environment and Public Health (ZKL01Abt7_18456) together with the University of Koblenz/Landau. We thank the Julius-Kühn—Institute in Siebeldingen for the provision of the site and infrastructure for the experiment. Furthermore, we thank Dr. Dorota Dobrowolska, Forest Research Institute, Poland, for providing the seed material for the Polish provenance.

References

  1. Allen CD, Macalady AK, Chenchouni H et al (2010) A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For Ecol Manag 259:660–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beierkuhnlein C, Thiel D, Jentsch A et al (2011) Ecotypes of European grass species respond differently to warming and extreme drought. J Ecol 99:703–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertrand R, Lenoir J, Piedallu C et al (2011) Changes in plant community composition lag behind climate warming in lowland forests. Nature 479:517–520Google Scholar
  4. Betsch P, Bonal D, Breda N et al (2011) Drought effects on water relations in beech: the contribution of exchangeable water reservoirs. Agric For Meteorol 151:531–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolte A, Czajkowski T, Kompa T (2007) The north-eastern distribution range of European beech—a review. Forestry 80:413–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolte A, Ammer C, Lof M et al (2009) Adaptive forest management in central Europe: climate change impacts, strategies and integrative concept. Scand J For Res 24:473–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolte A, Hilbrig L, Grundmann B et al (2010) Climate change impacts on stand structure and competitive interactions in a southern Swedish spruce-beech forest. Eur J For Res 129:261–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonn S (2000) Competition dynamics in mixed beech-oak stands and its modifications expected due to climate changes. Allg For Jgdztg 171:81–88Google Scholar
  9. Brus R (2010) Growing evidence for the existence of glacial refugia of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in the south-eastern Alps and north-western Dinaric Alps. Period Biol 112:239–246Google Scholar
  10. Charru M, Seynave I, Morneau F et al (2010) Recent changes in forest productivity: an analysis of national forest inventory data for common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in north-eastern France. For Ecol Manag 260:864–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen I-C, Hill JK, Ohlemueller R et al (2011) Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333:1024–1026PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark JS, Bell DM, Hersh MH et al (2011) Climate change vulnerability of forest biodiversity: climate and competition tracking of demographic rates. Global Change Biol 17:1834–1849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Comps B, Thiebaut B, Paule L et al (1990) Allozymic variability in beechwoods (Fagus sylvatica L.) over Central-Europe—spatial differentiation among and within populations. Heredity 65:407–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Czajkowski T, Bolte A (2006) Different reaction of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) provenances from Germany and Poland to drought. Allg For Jgdztg 177:30–40Google Scholar
  15. Czajkowski T, Kuhling M, Bolte A (2005) Impact of the 2003 summer drought on growth of beech sapling natural regeneration (Fagus sylvatica L.) in north-eastern Central Europe. Allg For Jgdztg 176:133–143Google Scholar
  16. Czucz B, Galhidy L, Matyas C (2011) Present and forecasted xeric climatic limits of beech and sessile oak distribution at low altitudes in Central Europe. Ann For Sci 68:99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellenberg H, Leuschner C (2010) Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer, dynamischer und historischer Sicht, 6th edn. Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  18. Fotelli MN, Gessler A, Peuke AD et al (2001) Drought affects the competitive interactions between Fagus sylvatica seedlings and an early successional species, Rubus fruticosus: responses of growth, water status and delta C-13 composition. New Phytol 151:427–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fotelli MN, Nahm M, Radoglou K et al (2009) Seasonal and interannual ecophysiological responses of beech (Fagus sylvatica) at its south-eastern distribution limit in Europe. For Ecol Manag 257:1157–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Friedrichs DA, Trouet V, Buentgen U et al (2009) Species-specific climate sensitivity of tree growth in Central-West Germany. Trees Struct Funct 23:729–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaertner S, Reif A, Xystrakis F et al (2008) The drought tolerance limit of Fagus sylvatica forest on limestone in southwestern Germany. J Veg Sci 19:757–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gessler A, Keitel C, Kreuzwieser J et al (2007) Potential risks for European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in a changing climate. Trees 21:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Giannini R, von Wühlisch G (2009) Workshop COST E52 “Evaluation of beech genetic resources for sustainable forestry”. iForest Biogeosci For 3:104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Herbette S, Wortemann R, Awad H et al (2010) Insights into xylem vulnerability to cavitation in Fagus sylvatica L.: phenotypic and environmental sources of variability. Tree Physiol 30:1448–1455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Clim 25:1965–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hlasny T, Barcza Z, Fabrika M et al (2011) Climate change impacts on growth and carbon balance of forests in Central Europe. Clim Res 47:219–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hunt R (1975) Further observations on root–shoot equilibria in perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Ann Bot 39:745–755Google Scholar
  28. IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. In: Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Quin D, Dokken DJ, Ebi KL, Mastrandrea M, Mach K, Plattner G-K, Allen S, Tignor M, Midgley P (eds) A special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  29. Jezik M, Blazenec M, Strelcova K et al (2011) The impact of the 2003–2008 weather variability on intra-annual stem diameter changes of beech trees at a submontane site in central Slovakia. Dendrochronologia 29:227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jump AS, Hunt JM, Penuelas J (2006) Rapid climate change-related growth decline at the southern range edge of Fagus sylvatica. Global Change Biol 12:2163–2174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jung T (2009) Beech decline in Central Europe driven by the interaction between Phytophthora infections and climatic extremes. For Pathol 39:73–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kawecki TJ (2008) Adaptation to marginal habitats. Annl Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:321–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kölling C (2007) Klimahüllen für 27 Waldbaumarten. AFZ Der Wald 23:1242–1245Google Scholar
  34. Kondoh S, Yahata H, Nakashizuka T, Kondoh M (2006) Interspecific variation in vessel size, growth and drought tolerance of broad-leaved trees in semi-arid regions of Kenya. Tree Physiol 26:899–904PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Konnert M (1995) Investigations on the genetic variation of beech (Fagus sylvatica L) in Bavaria. Silvae Genet 44:346–351Google Scholar
  36. Kreuzwieser J, Gessler A (2010) Global climate change and tree nutrition: influence of water availability. Tree Physiol 30:1221–1234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kreyling J, Bittner T, Jaeschke A et al (2011) Assisted colonization: a question of focal units and recipient localities. Restor Ecol 19:433–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kreyling J, Thiel D, Nagy L et al (2012) Late frost sensitivity of juvenile Fagus sylvatica L. differs between southern Germany and Bulgaria and depends on preceding air temperature. Eur J For Res 131:717–725Google Scholar
  39. Lebourgeois F, Breda N, Ulrich E et al (2005) Climate-tree-growth relationships of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in the French Permanent Plot Network (RENECOFOR). Trees Struct Funct 19:385–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Leuzinger S, Zotz G, Asshoff R et al (2005) Responses of deciduous forest trees to severe drought in Central Europe. Tree Physiol 25:641–650PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lindner M, Maroschek M, Netherer S et al (2010) Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems. For Ecol Manag 259:698–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lof M, Bolte A, Welander NT (2005) Interacting effects of irradiance and water stress on dry weight and biomass partitioning in Fagus sylvatica seedlings. Scand J For Res 20:322–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Magri D (2008) Patterns of post-glacial spread and the extent of glacial refugia of European beech (Fagus sylvatica). J Biogeogr 35:450–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Magri D, Vendramin GG, Comps B et al (2006) A new scenario for the Quaternary history of European beech populations: palaeobotanical evidence and genetic consequences. New Phytol 171:199–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Matyas C, Bozic G, Goemoery D et al (2009) Juvenile growth response of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) to sudden change of climatic environment in SE European trials. iForest 2:213–220Google Scholar
  46. Messaoud Y, Chen HY (2011) The influence of recent climate change on tree height growth differs with species and spatial environment. PLoS ONE 6:e14691Google Scholar
  47. Nielsen CN, Jorgensen FV (2003) Phenology and diameter increment in seedlings of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) as affected by different soil water contents: variation between and within provenances. For Ecol Manag 174:233–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ohlemuller R, Gritti ES, Sykes MT et al (2006) Quantifying components of risk for European woody species under climate change. Global Change Biol 12:1788–1799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Penuelas J, Hunt JM, Ogaya R et al (2008) Twentieth century changes of tree-ring delta(13)C at the southern range-edge of Fagus sylvatica: increasing water-use efficiency does not avoid the growth decline induced by warming at low altitudes. Global Change Biol 14:1076–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Petritan AM, von Luepke B, Petritan IC (2007) Effects of shade on growth and mortality of maple (Acer pseudoplatanus), ash (Fraxinus excelsior) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) saplings. Forestry 80:397–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Peuke AD, Gessler A, Rennenberg H (2006) The effect of drought on C and N stable isotopes in different fractions of leaves, stems and roots of sensitive and tolerant beech ecotypes. Plant Cell Environ 29:823–835PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Piovesan G, Biondi F, Di Filippo A et al (2008) Drought-driven growth reduction in old beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forests of the central Apennines, Italy. Global Change Biol 14:1265–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pollastrini M, Desotgiu R, Cascio C et al (2010) Growth and physiological responses to ozone and mild drought stress of tree species with different ecological requirements. Trees Struct Funct 24:695–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Polley H, Hennig P, Kroiher F (2009) Eine Kohlenstoffinventur auf Bundeswaldinventur-Basis: baumarten, Altersstruktur und Totholz in Deutschland. AFZ-DerWald 64:1074–1075Google Scholar
  55. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, R version 2.11.1. R foundation for statistical computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org, Vienna, Austria
  56. Rennenberg H, Seiler W, Matyssek R et al (2004) European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)—a forest tree without future in the south of Central Europe? Allg For Jagdztg 175:210–224Google Scholar
  57. Rennenberg H, Dannenmann M, Gessler A et al (2009) Nitrogen balance in forest soils: nutritional limitation of plants under climate change stresses. Plant Biol 11:4–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Richter S, Kipfer T, Wohlgemuth T et al (2012) Phenotypic plasticity facilitates resistance to climate change in a highly variable environment. Oecologia 169:269–279Google Scholar
  59. Rose L, Leuschner C, Koeckemann B et al (2009) Are marginal beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) provenances a source for drought tolerant ecotypes? Eur J For Res 128:335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schaberg PG, DeHayes DH, Hawley GJ et al (2008) Anthropogenic alterations of genetic diversity within tree populations: implications for forest ecosystem resilience. For Ecol Manag 256:855–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schall P, Lödige C, Beck M et al (2012) Biomass allocation to roots and shoots is more sensitive to shade and drought in European beech than in Norway spruce seedlings. For Ecol Manag 266:246–253Google Scholar
  62. Scharnweber T, Manthey M, Criegee C et al (2011) Drought matters—declining precipitation influences growth of Fagus sylvatica L. and Quercus robur L. in north-eastern Germany. For Ecol Manag 262:947–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Scherrer D, Bader MK, Koerner C (2011) Drought-sensitivity ranking of deciduous tree species based on thermal imaging of forest canopies. Agric For Meteorol 151:1632–1640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schraml C, Rennenberg H (2000) Sensitivity of different ecotypes of beech trees (Fagus sylvatica L.) to drought stress. Forstw Cbl 119:51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shipley B, Meziane D (2002) The balanced-growth hypothesis and the allometry of leaf and root biomass allocation. Funct Ecol 16:326–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Varelides C, Brofas G, Varelides Y (2001) Provenance variation in Pinus nigra at three sites in Northern Greece. Ann For Sci 58:893–900Google Scholar
  67. von Wuehlisch G, Krusche D, Muhs HJ (1995) Variation in temperature sum requirement for flushing of beech provenances. Silvae Genet 44:343–346Google Scholar
  68. Vornam B, Decarli N, Gailing O (2004) Spatial distribution of genetic variation in a natural beech stand (Fagus sylvatica L.) based on microsatellite markers. Conserv Genet 5:561–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wang T, Hamann A, Spittlehouse DL et al (2006) Development of scale-free climate data for Western Canada for use in resource management. Int J Climat 26:383–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Weitner A, Dupouey JL, Lefevre Y et al (2007) Roles of soil chemistry and water availability in site-related delta C-13 variations in French beech forests. Tree Physiol 27:1043–1051PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wortemann R, Herbette S, Barigah TS et al (2011) Genotypic variability and phenotypic plasticity of cavitation resistance in Fagus sylvatica L. across Europe. Tree Physiol 31:1175–1182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Thiel
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  • Juergen Kreyling
    • 1
  • Sabrina Backhaus
    • 2
  • Carl Beierkuhnlein
    • 1
  • Constanze Buhk
    • 3
  • Kolja Egen
    • 3
  • Gerhard Huber
    • 4
  • Monika Konnert
    • 4
  • Laura Nagy
    • 2
  • Anke Jentsch
    • 2
  1. 1.Biogeography, BayCEERUniversity of BayreuthBayreuthGermany
  2. 2.Disturbance Ecology, BayCEERUniversity of BayreuthBayreuthGermany
  3. 3.Geoecology/Physical GeographyUniversity of Koblenz/LandauLandauGermany
  4. 4.Bavarian Office for Forest Seeding and PlantingTeisendorfGermany

Personalised recommendations