How nutrient availability influences acclimation to shade of two (pioneer and late-successional) Mediterranean tree species?
- 261 Downloads
Examining ecological limits to shade acclimation at whole-plant level is determinant for evaluating the success of sapling establishment in low-light environments. We studied nutritional effects on whole-plant development in response to shade in two Mediterranean forest tree species with different successional status: the early-successional Pinus halepensis Mill. and the late-successional Quercus pubescens Wild. Through a nursery-based factorial experimental design approach, we measured height increment along 2 years and final leaf, stem and root biomass in both species saplings subjected to two lights and two soil nutrient availability treatments. The shade avoidance response was exclusive to P. halepensis, appeared as timely dependent, and persisted longer in saplings exposed to higher nutrient availability. Q. pubescens benefited from the higher nutrient availability by lowering the light-driven plastic response in aerial support investment and belowground carbon allocation, whereas P. halepensis heightened its light-driven plastic response. These contrasted responses are thus clearly related to the shade acclimation strategy of each species: the shade-intolerant P. halepensis enhances shade avoidance when non-nutrient-limited, whereas the shade-tolerant Q. pubescens assumes a conservative strategy by limiting phenotypic plasticity-induced costs. Maintaining greater shade avoidance in non-nutrient-limited soil conditions might be an adaptive advantage for P. halepensis seedlings growing in the understory, in response to gap formation in the overstory. In contrast, the more conservative and less costly shade responsiveness of Q. pubescens may confer it a better adaptive advantage in long-term light-limited environments.
KeywordsPinus halepensis Quercus pubescens Phenotypic plasticity Biomass partitioning Allocation Forest regeneration
We thank the staff of the Les Milles plant nursery (Bouches-du-Rhône Departmental Directorate of Agriculture and Forestry) for their technical assistance, and particularly Patrice Brahic for his valuable comments. We also thank Sylvie Dupouyet, Stéphane Greff, Caroline Lecareux, Céline Pernin, Willy Martin, Roland Estève, Aminata N’Dyaye, Christian Ripert, Diane Cattenoz, and Sylvain Bernard for their help with field and lab work. This study was funded by the CNRS under the Zone Atelier “Arrière-pays Méditerranéen” framework.
- Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
- Messier C, Nikinmaa E (2000) Effects of light availability and sapling size on the growth, biomass allocation, and crown morphology of understory sugar maple, yellow birch, and beech. Ecoscience 7:345–356Google Scholar
- Quézel P, Barbero M (1992) Le pin d’Alep et les espèces voisines: répartition et caractères écologiques généraux, sa dynamique récente en France méditerranéenne. Forêt méditerranéenne XIII:158–170Google Scholar
- Sumida A, Komiyama A (1997) Crown spread patterns for five deciduous broad-leaved woody species: ecological significance of the retention patterns of larger branches. Ann Bot 80:759–766Google Scholar